[02:02] <timClicks> wallyworld: what is the timeline for juju scp support in k8s models?
[02:14] <wallyworld> timClicks: hopefully this cycle but it is a stretch goal as it got punted
[02:45] <timClicks> ok
[03:10] <wallyworld> hpidcock: if you have a moment at some point https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/juju-qa-jenkins/pull/470
[03:30] <hpidcock> wallyworld: sure thing
[03:44] <hpidcock> wallyworld: lgtm
[03:45] <wallyworld> ty
[04:52] <timClicks> 2 easy PRs https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11704 https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11712
[05:15] <thumper> wallyworld: re: bug 1872670, if it is working on eu/us region, surely it isn
[05:15] <mup> Bug #1872670: AWS m6g.* instances fail with latest juju <juju:Confirmed> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1872670>
[05:15] <thumper> isn't juju, but account issue?
[05:15] <thumper> clearly latest/edge won't work for them
[05:16] <thumper> but 2.8.0 stable should
[08:59] <flxfoo> hi there
[09:00] <flxfoo> interface for apache-solr uses deprecated reactive RelationBase, where can I find documentation to be able to define departed / joined like parts , please?
[10:47] <stickupkid> manadart, https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11715
[10:47] <stickupkid> manadart, might affect your changes you want to propose
[10:51] <manadart> stickupkid: I also notice that `idle_subordinate_condition` does not use the declared `app_index`.
[10:51] <stickupkid> ah good spot
[10:57] <achilleasa> manadart: stickupkid can you take a look (and QA) https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11716 and https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11714?
[10:58] <achilleasa> fun with virtual maas ;-)
[11:04] <stickupkid> I like how in the integration tests we have .log and .txt extensions
[11:04] <stickupkid> PICK ONE SIMON!
[11:04] <stickupkid> I'll fix that at some point
[11:09] <manadart> achilleasa: Yep.
[11:15] <stickupkid> manadart, updated https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11715, you where correct, just run the whole deploy suite and it worked fine
[11:16] <stickupkid> deploy suite is hefty
[11:18] <stickupkid> this annoys me https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tX7jdGff79/ we really should sort the image server nested containers manadart
[11:20] <stickupkid> also I've never seen the error/issue when trying to retrieve the environ
[11:22] <manadart> stickupkid: You now have a gap in the args indexes :)
[11:24] <manadart> stickupkid: Tell me what I am doing wrong here. I have this: https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/QZKBVhd57V/
[11:24] <manadart> And this query: `wait_for "network-health-xenial" "$(idle_subordinate_condition "network-health-xenial", "mongodb")"`
[11:26] <manadart> If I fill out the generated query manually, I get what I expect: https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/dYbxvTZMV8/
[11:27] <manadart> stickupkid: Gonna eat. Maybe you can school me in a few.
[11:41] <manadart> stickupkid: Got time for a quick HO?
[12:42] <manadart> Need a review: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11717
[12:53] <jam> hey manadart. I just came across something unexpected: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1883703
[12:53] <mup> Bug #1883703: Snap build not stripping the binary? <build> <juju:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1883703>
[12:53] <jam> basically, the 'juju' in our snap is 120MB instead of 89MB and it appears it is *not* stripped.
[12:53] <jam> I can't make it to standup, and I don't really know the priority for it, but I wanted to raise awareness
[12:56] <manadart> jam: Ack; we will discuss.
[12:57] <jam> manadart, it seems we use our own extension of snapcraft's go plugin
[12:57] <jam> and it has https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/develop/snap/plugins/juju_go.py#L107
[12:57] <jam> which isn't supplying '-ldflags "-s -w '
[13:48] <hml> stickupkid: I’ve gotten this 2 of 2 times on 11715: https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/bkPRmhPRWV/ can’t confirm if it’s timing related or not
[13:50] <achilleasa> back-port for the kvm fix: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11718 and https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11719
[13:50] <achilleasa> QA should be easy on this one ;-)
[13:53] <stickupkid> hml, i'll get to that after fixing the issue for manadart
[13:53] <hml> stickupkid: k
=== narindergupta is now known as narinderguptamac
=== sadin999_ is now known as sadin999
=== niemeyer_ is now known as niemeyer
=== nniehoff_ is now known as nniehoff
=== joedborg_ is now known as joedborg
[14:19] <stickupkid> why is it sometimes does juju status take 22 seconds on a local lxd setup
[14:19] <stickupkid> something very strange is going on
[14:54] <stickupkid> manadart, got a second
[15:19] <stickupkid> another case of a random lock up when querying juju status https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/yYSnzxJ2pN/
[15:19] <stickupkid> see timestamp between the two different status timestamps
[15:26] <stickupkid> should juju hang if a lxd container is down, i wonder if the controller is down?
[16:22] <stickupkid> hml, re-writing the container integration test, but can confirm it the new stuff works for lxd and aws...
[16:22] <stickupkid> hml, juju action wasn't working as I was targetting the wrong unit
[16:23] <hml> stickupkid: ack
[16:24] <hml> stickupkid: i think i have a test failure to deal with… doesn’t reproduce locally.
[16:24] <hml> stickupkid: [LOG] 0:01.949 INFO test unit "u/0" shutting down: preparing operation "install cs:quantal/wordpress-0": failed to download charm "cs:quantal/wordpress-0" from API server: download aborted
[16:24] <stickupkid> hml, isn't that the mock one?
[16:25] <hml> stickupkid: unfortunately not…  its in the uniter.loop code… and startup
[16:25] <hml> no easy way to mock without rewritting, afaik
[16:25] <hml> rewritting uniter stuff
[16:26] <stickupkid> "cs:quantal/wordpress-0" it's just that it using the testcharms though
[16:26] <hml> stickupkid: yeah, that’s what i don’t get… it should be using the local charm repro for test
[16:27] <stickupkid> that's why i was wondering if it was the mock store
[16:27] <stickupkid> hml, quick ho?
[16:28] <hml> stickupkid: sure
[20:08] <pmatulis> does the '--map-machines' option need to be used when deploying with both a bundle and an overlay? i'm thinking that the bundle will define the existing machines and then the overlay needs the option. or is an existing machine completely "pre-deploy"?
[20:33] <wpk> 2/wind 343
[20:38] <josephillips> hey
[20:38] <josephillips> im installing swift
[20:38] <josephillips> on different zones
[20:39] <josephillips> but when i perform teh relation betwen swift-storage-zonename swift-proxy
[20:39] <josephillips> keep on missing relation proxy
[20:44] <hml> hey wpk
[20:45] <hml> josephillips: and no errors with the add-relation?
[20:50] <hml> josephillips:  do you have a pastebin you can share?  i’m not seeing a relation “proxy” for either of those charm
[20:50] <hml> pastebin with the output you’re seeing
[20:51] <wpk> hml: o/
[20:58] <josephillips> sure hml im checking something else
[20:59] <josephillips> give me one sec
[21:00] <josephillips> my bad
[21:00] <josephillips> was a bad configuraiton as block device
[21:05] <hml> josephillips: rgr
[23:53] <wallyworld> hpidcock: kelvinliu: tlm: see comment on bug 1875481 ... another issue with running juju agent in the workload container. the base linux may not support our jujud
[23:53] <mup> Bug #1875481: Juju 2.8 error about unit not being the leader <k8s> <juju:Incomplete> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1875481>
[23:54] <hpidcock> wallyworld: I thought we were statically compiling jujud
[23:55] <hpidcock> oh maybe that was only in snaps
[23:55] <wallyworld> i thought we did too
[23:55] <wallyworld> hpidcock: ah forgot to mention, there's also an issue with our snap
[23:55] <wallyworld> bug 1883703
[23:55] <mup> Bug #1883703: Snap build not stripping the binary? <build> <juju:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1883703>
[23:56] <wallyworld> i haven't looked closely, theory is he go plugin doesn't supply the necessary flags
[23:56] <kelvinliu> I found all jujud images doesnot have jujuc added
[23:56] <wallyworld> something to fix for 2.8.1 release
[23:57] <hpidcock> kelvinliu: that shouldn't affect it, but yeah I noticed the same thing
[23:57] <wallyworld> kelvinliu: yeah, jujuc is a separate binary that we need to package if we haven't already
[23:58] <kelvinliu> https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/v9d3MRSXS5/
[23:58] <kelvinliu> it's weird if docker build didn't fail when jujuc was missing
[23:59] <kelvinliu> docker should complain about ADD failed because jujuc was not existing