[01:38] <mwhudson> hmhm the right fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-guide/+bug/1876151 in focal involves removing a package
[01:38] <mwhudson> i guess we should make installation-guide-i386 empty in focal-updates instead?
[01:38] <mwhudson> vorlon: ^
[06:36] <vorlon> mwhudson: yeah, I'm ok with making the package empty
[08:05] <mwhudson> now if only i could remember my trick for that
[08:05] <mwhudson> i think it was snapd on powerpc that i did it for before...
[08:23] <knocte> do gtk2 apps have the same theme as gtk3 apps in ubuntu 20.04? or is that a known issue?
[08:25] <guiverc> knocte, see https://manual.lubuntu.me/stable/3/3.2/3.2.2/appearance.html for setting GTK2 and GTK3 theme (they are different entities)
[10:38] <xnox> jibel:  could you please fill out the SRU template on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1880869 ?
[10:38] <xnox> also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1875045 ?
[11:12] <jibel> xnox, sure, will do
[11:37]  * guiverc says sorry, I thought my last reply was in room #lubuntu  (sorry knocte)
[12:03] <kswoboda> hello everyone :)  I've got a question regarding proposing a patch to a Ubuntu package. Would it be possible to somehow fork the repository and create a request to accept the patch? Are there any guidelines available or smth?
[12:44] <seb128> kswoboda, hey, depending of the package but if the package has a Vcs then you can do a merge request, otherwise a .patch or debdiff attached to a launchpad bug report works
[13:53] <kswoboda> seb128 thanks for the answer ;)  the package has a vcs - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/collectd, but it seems like only "Members of Ubuntu Server Dev import team can push to this repository."
[13:54] <seb128> kswoboda, https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Git could help
[13:55] <seb128> no nice UI to fork but you can checkout and push to your from the command line
[14:02] <kswoboda> ok, thank you
[14:02] <ahasenack> sil2100: hi, I uploaded a fix for the go package from yesterday (golang-go.uber-zap) which should unblock golang-testify
[14:02] <ahasenack> sil2100: now I'm looking at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#golang-yaml.v2 which should also unblock others when fixed
[14:02] <ahasenack> I'll update the wiki
[14:06] <sil2100> ahasenack: thanks!
[14:06] <sil2100> ahasenack: I'm still working on NBS stuff :)
[14:06] <sil2100> So baiscally https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html
[14:51] <sil2100> ahasenack: hey! I'll be looking at pytest that's in -proposed right now, as it's related to an NBS I'm seeing
[14:51] <ahasenack> ok
[14:51] <ahasenack> sil2100: I *may* look at dovecot later, found out by accident it's a sync done by my team and is an ftbfs at the moment
[18:24] <vorlon> mdeslaur, kees, stgraber: unless there's an indication we'll have quorum for TB today, I expect to be afk for the meeting
[19:07] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks for the wpa review (I had uploaded a newer revision to G so the version used would have worked but your tweaked one works as well)
[19:13] <bdmurray> seb128: it would have worked but then if there was another SRU it would have had to be ubuntu5.1 which would have looked weird to me.
[19:13] <seb128> bdmurray, fair enough :)