[09:36] <ricotz> ilasc, hi, are builds which "failed to upload" lost or is an admin able to recover them? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/19468809
[09:40] <ilasc> hi ricotz hopefully yes, we're looking into it as we speak
[09:40] <ricotz> ilasc, thanks
[09:41] <ricotz> ilasc, another ppc64el build failed but the build log says it was successful https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/firefox-next/+build/19468729
[10:04] <ilasc> ok ricotz , thanks for the headsup
[10:05] <ilasc> it should be building now
[10:05] <ricotz> ilasc, please let me known whether those builds need a retry
[10:07] <ilasc> ricotz: looking at the first one looks like it's currently building: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
[10:07] <ilasc> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+builds?build_state=building
[10:07] <ilasc> but not for Bionic
[10:07] <ilasc> hmmm
[10:08] <ricotz> ilasc, only look at the specific builds I mentioned :)
[10:10] <ricotz> I did not retry them yet to give you a chance to debug those
[10:11] <ilasc> ok, thanks
[10:11] <ilasc> looking now
[10:23] <ilasc> ricotz: those are gone, you can go ahead and retry them
[10:23] <ricotz> ilasc, thanks for checking, I assume the underlying issue is known
[15:06] <xnox> wgrant:  does https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1883271 look reasonable. And would it be possible to implement & deploy it before groovy ships?
[15:07] <xnox> it will reduce the size of archive metadata files quite a bit. and also speed up clients.
[15:07] <xnox> (cause apt validates all hashes that are present, even if they are weak)