| RAOF | Eickmeyer: There might be bad news with artyfx - it looks like a bunch of files there are GPL-2 (*not* GPL-2+) and then some files are GPL-3+, so the combination will be undistributable. | 03:23 |
|---|---|---|
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: Ok. Thanks. :) | 04:37 |
| RAOF | Sorry to be the one always with the copyright complaints! | 04:41 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | RAOF: It's OK. Just means the software itself is basically illegal and the upstream should be notified. | 04:46 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | RAOF: I filed an upstream issue: https://github.com/openAVproductions/openAV-ArtyFX/issues/44 | 04:55 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | RAOF: Interestingly enough, I do maintain ArtyFX in Fedora, albiet a much older version (I inherited it). https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lv2-artyfx-plugins | 05:00 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Might not have had that copyright issue with that version. | 05:01 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Er... licensing issue. | 05:01 |
| studiobot | <teward001> RAOF: i should have caught that, but let's chalk that up to being overworked and tired. But it sounds like this software can't be distributed and basically is illegal and in major license violations | 05:02 |
| studiobot | <teward001> Eickmeyer: if it can't be distributed then the fork you have on Git with the packaging is technically in violation - in THEORY I could potentially ask the LP admins to delete it, but... | 05:03 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | I can delete it. | 05:03 |
| RAOF | <studiobot "<teward001> Eickmeyer: if it can"> I don't think that's true? It's only when you're trying to distribute a binary that combines the two that the licenses come into conflict. | 05:04 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | I revised the upstream issue accordingly since that makes more sense. Redistributing the source files themselves is not a violation. | 05:09 |
| studiobot | <teward001> depending on how it's worded, perhaps. But yes this makes sense. | 05:09 |
| studiobot | <teward001> RAOF: (you can skip the studiobot bits, I'm in both places but IRCCloud is being a [CENSORED] rght now and won't load so... can only get here via the telegram bridge) | 05:10 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | @teward001 He's on Matrix, so he simply "replied" to it, made studiobot repeat it. | 05:12 |
| studiobot | <teward001> yeh | 05:13 |
| studiobot | <teward001> alls good | 05:13 |
| studiobot | <teward001> *goes to beat on his IRCCloud account with a pipe* | 05:13 |
| * Eickmeyer[m] goes to remove artyfx from Fedora with that discovery | 05:15 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Turns out it's the same version, just a somewhat older commit. | 05:16 |
| * OvenWerks thought gpl 2 was worded in such a way as to be 2+ | 07:35 | |
| OvenWerks | That line would have had to be removed I guess | 07:35 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: It all depends on what they put in the license header. If it's missing "or later version" It's not 2+, but 2. | 15:53 |
| OvenWerks | Yeah, I thought gpl 2 always included the "or later version" or it would not be gpl2, but I think I remember the kernel being gpl2 only as well. | 15:56 |
| OvenWerks | I think gpl3 has to have that though | 15:56 |
| OvenWerks | The author of that sw seems to be very busy with non-free time life these days :) | 15:57 |
| OvenWerks | (since about two years?) | 15:57 |
| OvenWerks | Eickmeyer: has firefox been acting up on you lately? In the past week or so it has been having rendering trouble off and on. | 15:59 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: I haven't noticed, I typically use Brave. | 16:10 |
| OvenWerks | how has that experience been? | 16:29 |
| Eickmeyer | Really good, actually. As long as you disable the binance, brave rewards, and sponsored images, it's pretty nice. | 16:35 |
| Eickmeyer | Built-in tracking protection and adblock. | 16:36 |
| OvenWerks | built on node so seems like a fork of chomium | 16:58 |
| Eickmeyer | It isn't a fork of Chromium, more like a base with the Google-specific stuff removed. | 16:58 |
| Eickmeyer | It's created by one of the creators of Firefox. | 16:59 |
| * OvenWerks can't figure out how to add that ppa | 17:20 | |
| OvenWerks | Eickmeyer: the instructions on this page: https://brave-browser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installing-brave.html#linux | 17:22 |
| OvenWerks | give me a Malformed entry 1 in list file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/... | 17:22 |
| Eickmeyer | That's weird. I've never had an issue. | 17:23 |
| Eickmeyer | It's not really a PPA per that definition but a private repo. | 17:23 |
| OvenWerks | it is the way it is displayed... | 17:23 |
| Eickmeyer | I'd just make sure /etc/apt/soruces.list.d/brave-browser-release.list is exactly deb [arch=amd64] https://brave-browser-apt-release.s3.brave.com/ stable main | 17:24 |
| OvenWerks | there is a / at the end of one line which seems to indicate the next word is part of the same text but there is a space in there | 17:24 |
| Eickmeyer | There's supposed to be a space between the / and stable. | 17:25 |
| OvenWerks | yeah I had ".com/stable" | 17:25 |
| Eickmeyer | Yep, that's the problem. | 17:25 |
| Eickmeyer | Best to just copy/paste those commands into the terminal. That way there's less room for error. | 17:25 |
| OvenWerks | well I did, but like I say it was three lines worth | 17:26 |
| Eickmeyer | Well, one-by-one. | 17:26 |
| OvenWerks | and the space (or not) was between lines | 17:26 |
| Eickmeyer | Each visual paragraph is a line and does not contain a CR character. | 17:27 |
| Eickmeyer | So that separate line between stable and main isn't actually there as far as it's concerned, so the terminal will treat it as one line. | 17:28 |
| OvenWerks | is the only way to have fast access to bookmarks by adding a whole toolbar? no single icon on the main toolbar? | 17:51 |
| Eickmeyer | I don't really use bookmarks unless I'm opening a new tab which gives me the bookmarks bar. | 18:19 |
| Eickmeyer | OvenWerks: This might be useful for you: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/bookmarks-menu/ffmdedmghpoipeldijkdlcckdpempkdi?hl=en-US | 18:25 |
| Eickmeyer | Gives you a bookmarks menu. | 18:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!