=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [08:05] So anyone here ever had issues where you have nfs entry's that are not yet ready on startup, but say 20 seconds later, where cloud-init would just hang? Have this on rhel images only though, ubuntu works fine. Any idea on how to go about this? [08:14] which versions of those two OSes, Erikjan ? [08:17] well, my first thought is that something in the init scripts is blocking, but on second thought, i have no idea [08:19] latest rhel 7.7 up to 8.1 (have not tested 8.2) and ubuntu the latest LTS [08:19] on a cold boot in the cloud it takes some time before hte netapp is attached, it needs to wait, which it doesn't do correctly [13:33] smoser: Given that you were reviewing the previous iteration of it (thank you again!), do you also want to review https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/441? [16:05] If I could get a committer's +1 on https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/440 (paride has reviewed), that'd be much appreciated. [16:06] blackboxsw: ^ if you have a minute? [16:06] Odd_Bloke: reading [16:06] Thanks! [16:06] falcojr: Scott did approve that PR, so you're off the hook. ;) [16:06] heh, gtk [16:08] approved: Odd_Bloke awaiting CI [16:10] Thanks! [16:16] smoser: https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/444 <-- that's the fix for the `instance`-is-a-directory issue (which presumably you saw coming given the earlier PR ;) [16:17] what are cloud-initramfs-copymods and cloud-initramfs-dyn-netconf ? [16:17] just noticed them when I did a dpkg -l | grep cloud-init [16:17] are they related or just have an unfortunate similar name? [16:19] some kind of cloud specific initramfs thing or something? [16:39] falcojr: what's the "Source"? of those packages? apt show should tell you [16:44] https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/focal/cloud-initramfs-tools [16:58] OK, take two on that earlier PR: https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/445 [17:15] Odd_Bloke: if you get a chance today, I think https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/113 is ready [18:06] blackboxsw: I'll consider it if you send me the bug creation automation you promised earlier. ;) [18:06] hah a trade. I love to barter [18:06] good pt. getting that now [18:10] Odd_Bloke: here's what I did for the schema bugs so I think [18:10] s/so I think/ https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Dc3dbkDTSs/ [18:10] lp-create-bug is in uss-tableflip [18:11] I think something comparable would work for the net refactor [18:15] blackboxsw: Nice, thanks! [19:01] blackboxsw: Still one outstanding issue on that ubuntu-sru PR. :) [19:24] Odd_Bloke: thanks and pushed https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/113 [20:06] blackboxsw: I think we now have the opposite problem: the remaining _templates_ will no longer be rendered per-SRU. [20:09] Odd_Bloke: I'm hoping with the next PR to place all the remaining scripts under sru-scripts/manual. [20:09] at the moment only azure-sru.*.txt would be created [20:10] I have a followup to move all remaining scripts into sru-scripts and out of sru-templates [20:10] which will then remedy that gap [20:10] blackboxsw: OK, cool. [20:10] I'll post that PR next (and can also post the azure and openstack SRU verification results as well) [20:11] blackboxsw: +1, will leave you to merge. :) [20:11] thanks Odd_Bloke [20:11] thanks will merge, and the azure and openstack prs will move those two sru-templates/manual/* scripts under sru-scripts. [20:18] hi everyone, is there a way to manually test this outside a oracle instance ? https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/commit/?id=2bedc440 [20:19] Reading through the code it seems that only the oracle datasource use this to set network config, but I may be missing something [20:46] lucasmoura: https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/126/files for azure sru verification results review [20:46] I'll check that commit [20:46] blackboxsw, okay [20:53] lucasmoura: I think that commit is already tested as well as you can w/ the unit test that seeds the PROTO='none' @ https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/blob/master/tests/unittests/test_net.py#L84-L108 [20:53] which confirms that a 'none' value gets converted to 'static' [20:53] so I think we don't need integration test coverage of that [20:57] Okay, I will drop it from the list [21:02] Also, regarding this commit as well https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/commit/?id=d5dbbd1c, should we cover it too ? And if yes, does anyone have a good idea for an url we can use to test this more easily ? [21:22] openstack sru verification results and refactor up for review https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/127