tribaalmruffell: as far as I can see it's currently undergoing testing, so it should be relatively soon (you can help by enabling -proposed and checking that it works for your use-case, too!)08:35
=== hjensas__ is now known as hjensas|lunch
Odd_Blokemruffell: Yep, tribaal is correct, we're currently performing validation; I would expect that would be complete this week, but blackboxsw would have a better perspective.12:25
=== hjensas|lunch is now known as hjensas
=== MAbeeTT_ is now known as MAbeeTT
blackboxswcorrect, mruffell tribaal Odd_Bloke this SRU was a big one to verify as we hadn't SRU'd for 4 months, so lots to verify. We are tracking and adding logs to this process bug  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018  and need to knock out the rest of the TODOs. expectation is this week if we don't hit a significant regression in testing.15:12
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,In progress]15:12
AnhVoMSFT@blackboxsw it would be useful to keep a list of what can be automated during your manual verification and have a list of tasks to automate them. If there is anything we can help from the Azure side of things please let us know.15:15
blackboxswAnhVoMSFT: agreed, this sru has been painful. In our retro I believe we will be trying to instrument a new approach to spread the wealth of some of this verification cost by potentially looking at requesting that new features have some integration test coverage under tests/cloud_tests.16:15
blackboxswAnhVoMSFT: I was aware at one point you may have an internal CI running cloud-init's azure cloud_tests, is that still true?16:16
blackboxswand if so, I think it would be excellent if there is an ability to kick off a CI run on Azure's side which added the (xenial|bionic|focal)-proposed pocket and run that test suite https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/debugging.html#manual-sru-verification-procedure.16:19
blackboxswit would be effective to have a successful CI run from any cloud vendor running tox -e citest -- --ppa ppa:cloud-init-dev/proposed16:25
blackboxswthat would exercise the cloud-init version under current SRU verification and ensure no feature regression.16:26
blackboxswrharper: do you think this week you'll have a chance for SRU verification tests for either https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/commit/?id=46cf23c2  or https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/commit/?id=723e2bc117:54
blackboxswotherwise I think we'll probably grab them in a day or two17:54
blackboxswI think we/I volunteered you for them last week when you thought there might be time, no pressure either way, we are just closing in on release verification17:55
AnhVoMSFT@blackboxsw I will look into it. If not I can look into integrating it18:17
rharperblackboxsw: yeah, I can get those done18:28
blackboxswexcellent rharper thank you sir18:29
blackboxswAnhVoMSFT: also good to hear. I'll get a rtd update together on manual SRU testing too to suggest the tox -e citest -- --ppa ppa:cloud-init-dev/proposed  run. for additional SRU verification tasks for a given c;loud18:29
=== akkad is now known as Ober
meenaoh nooo… github is dead, or at least it doesn't resolve anymore….19:34
blackboxswlucasmoura: responded on the azure sru verification results PR. thanks. https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/12621:59
blackboxswI think we need to improve this process before our next SRU (which I suppose is in about 2 weeks ;/)22:00
blackboxswso we should be able to trim this verification process a bit so it doesn't sink our ship for 2.5 weeks22:00
blackboxswand addressed comments on consolidated SRU verification scripts https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/12822:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!