| tribaal | mruffell: as far as I can see it's currently undergoing testing, so it should be relatively soon (you can help by enabling -proposed and checking that it works for your use-case, too!) | 08:35 |
|---|---|---|
| === hjensas__ is now known as hjensas|lunch | ||
| Odd_Bloke | mruffell: Yep, tribaal is correct, we're currently performing validation; I would expect that would be complete this week, but blackboxsw would have a better perspective. | 12:25 |
| === hjensas|lunch is now known as hjensas | ||
| === MAbeeTT_ is now known as MAbeeTT | ||
| blackboxsw | correct, mruffell tribaal Odd_Bloke this SRU was a big one to verify as we hadn't SRU'd for 4 months, so lots to verify. We are tracking and adding logs to this process bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018 and need to knock out the rest of the TODOs. expectation is this week if we don't hit a significant regression in testing. | 15:12 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,In progress] | 15:12 |
| AnhVoMSFT | @blackboxsw it would be useful to keep a list of what can be automated during your manual verification and have a list of tasks to automate them. If there is anything we can help from the Azure side of things please let us know. | 15:15 |
| blackboxsw | AnhVoMSFT: agreed, this sru has been painful. In our retro I believe we will be trying to instrument a new approach to spread the wealth of some of this verification cost by potentially looking at requesting that new features have some integration test coverage under tests/cloud_tests. | 16:15 |
| blackboxsw | AnhVoMSFT: I was aware at one point you may have an internal CI running cloud-init's azure cloud_tests, is that still true? | 16:16 |
| blackboxsw | and if so, I think it would be excellent if there is an ability to kick off a CI run on Azure's side which added the (xenial|bionic|focal)-proposed pocket and run that test suite https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/debugging.html#manual-sru-verification-procedure. | 16:19 |
| blackboxsw | it would be effective to have a successful CI run from any cloud vendor running tox -e citest -- --ppa ppa:cloud-init-dev/proposed | 16:25 |
| blackboxsw | that would exercise the cloud-init version under current SRU verification and ensure no feature regression. | 16:26 |
| blackboxsw | rharper: do you think this week you'll have a chance for SRU verification tests for either https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/commit/?id=46cf23c2 or https://git.launchpad.net/cloud-init/commit/?id=723e2bc1 | 17:54 |
| blackboxsw | otherwise I think we'll probably grab them in a day or two | 17:54 |
| blackboxsw | I think we/I volunteered you for them last week when you thought there might be time, no pressure either way, we are just closing in on release verification | 17:55 |
| AnhVoMSFT | @blackboxsw I will look into it. If not I can look into integrating it | 18:17 |
| rharper | blackboxsw: yeah, I can get those done | 18:28 |
| blackboxsw | excellent rharper thank you sir | 18:29 |
| blackboxsw | AnhVoMSFT: also good to hear. I'll get a rtd update together on manual SRU testing too to suggest the tox -e citest -- --ppa ppa:cloud-init-dev/proposed run. for additional SRU verification tasks for a given c;loud | 18:29 |
| === akkad is now known as Ober | ||
| meena | oh nooo… github is dead, or at least it doesn't resolve anymore…. | 19:34 |
| blackboxsw | lucasmoura: responded on the azure sru verification results PR. thanks. https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/126 | 21:59 |
| blackboxsw | I think we need to improve this process before our next SRU (which I suppose is in about 2 weeks ;/) | 22:00 |
| blackboxsw | so we should be able to trim this verification process a bit so it doesn't sink our ship for 2.5 weeks | 22:00 |
| blackboxsw | and addressed comments on consolidated SRU verification scripts https://github.com/cloud-init/ubuntu-sru/pull/128 | 22:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!