| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| bryce | teward, https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/386231 | 06:46 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | seb128: LocutusOfBorg: what's up with the sane stuff? libsane1 needs promoting after all or? | 08:37 |
| seb128 | Laney, yes, LocutusOfBorg changed his mind, I will look at that after the meeting I'm currently in | 08:42 |
| Laney | right, I looked at the package and it seems that libsane is the one that should be demoted eventually | 08:43 |
| Laney | thanks! | 08:43 |
| seb128 | right, libsane1 is the one to promote now | 08:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, sorry for saying the exact opposite :/ | 08:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we transitioned that library back and forth around 3-4 times in the last 2 years, and no ABI changes at all | 08:55 |
| RAOF | Didn't I already promote that? | 08:55 |
| Laney | I think there was some confusion :P | 08:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this sucks a lot, because people kept syncing it over and over from experimental, debian changed its mind and reverted that change, but we had already transitioned | 08:55 |
| seb128 | RAOF, the binary is still in universe, if you want to try again please do, otherwise I've a look after that meeting | 08:59 |
| === ricab__ is now known as ricab | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | also RAOF please move src:libnma to main, the binaries are already in main :) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html | 09:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and I think we can also demote libsane to universe, but I'm not quite sure about that | 09:27 |
| Laney | wait for component-mismatches to say | 09:39 |
| seb128 | xnox, could you look at sponsoring the update on bug #1882185 ? Olivier is out this week but he said that's going to be needed for the new firefox that is due for next week | 10:12 |
| ubottu | bug 1882185 in nodejs (Ubuntu) "Firefox 78 requires nodejs >= 10.21" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1882185 | 10:12 |
| seb128 | hum, security updates bypass the autopkgtest infra? :( | 10:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, problem is that nodejs regressed a lot of stuff :/ | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but meh, I can also have a look if x nox is away | 10:18 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, how do you know if that version hasn't landed yet? | 10:18 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, also we are going to need to update firefox one way or another | 10:18 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, thanks | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://packages.qa.debian.org/nodejs | 10:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, the debian tracker shows them, and nodejs are pretty much packages in sync... | 10:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in any case, lets upload and see what happens | 10:22 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, thx | 10:23 |
| mwhudson | is ubuntuwire down? | 10:38 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, seems so, probably something to mention to IS? | 10:40 |
| mwhudson | i don't think we run it though | 10:40 |
| seb128 | wgrant might know | 10:41 |
| mwhudson | yeah he is on https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuwire-sysadmins/+members#active | 10:42 |
| seb128 | there is a #ubuntuwire also | 10:42 |
| wgrant | Looking | 10:42 |
| wgrant | seb128, mwhudson: Is back. | 10:46 |
| seb128 | wgrant, thx! | 10:46 |
| mwhudson | wgrant: thanks | 10:47 |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | wgrant, can you please help understanding this setarch failure? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/2.35.2-4ubuntu1/+build/19497777 | 12:18 |
| wgrant | LocutusOfBorg: It's not one I know about, but vorlon at least glanced at it a few weeks back., | 12:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I mean, wgrant this command setarch riscv64 -v --uname-2.6 seems to give segfault, but I don't know if qemu is to blame or not | 12:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | do you have a possibility to launch that command? | 12:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and also setarch from the old util-linux in release has the same segfault, just to be sure... the regression might be in something else, kernel maybe? | 12:26 |
| wgrant | LocutusOfBorg: Oh really, pretty sure that used to work | 12:33 |
| wgrant | Let me see | 12:33 |
| wgrant | I just put away my board because my cat was trying to bite the fan | 12:33 |
| wgrant | She'll just have to deal with it | 12:33 |
| wgrant | There was an issue with related code that assumed a glibc thing was static, but it become non-static and broke on like m68k and riscv64 | 12:34 |
| wgrant | I wonder if this is related. | 12:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the code of setarch didn't change at all, so something else is going under the hood, but trying to gdb it gives lots of uninplemented stuff | 12:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mmm interesting | 12:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | linux changed from 5.3 to 5.4, glibc from 2.31-0ubuntu7 to ubuntu10 | 12:37 |
| wgrant | LocutusOfBorg: Where did you see that the old one has the same segfault? | 12:38 |
| wgrant | Oh, building the old version in a PPA or something? | 12:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nope, ppa is sad | 12:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | pbuilder chroot local | 12:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | based on this build, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/2.35.1-5ubuntu2/+build/19330488 changes in toolchain are not that many | 12:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4114/+build/19498613 | 12:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is the focal version just no change rebuilt in bileto | 12:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | old one still builds with focal | 14:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lets try the new one with focal https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4114/+build/19499332 | 14:03 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, argyll/riscv seems not happy (ftbfs) | 14:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, nack, not a regression | 14:57 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, I didn't speak of regression | 14:57 |
| seb128 | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages just state | 14:57 |
| seb128 | colord | 14:57 |
| seb128 | Unsatisfiable depends: | 14:57 |
| seb128 | argyll: riscv64 | 14:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I wanted to no change rebuild just because the riscv64 was not retryable | 14:57 |
| seb128 | I see, the changelog was confusing | 14:57 |
| seb128 | I though you meant it would build now :) | 14:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, yes, but meh | 14:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I guess britney will consider it and let it migrate anyway | 14:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it is not installable on riscv64 but also on release pocket | 14:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | what is the workflow for a library that was in main, not in universe, and we want it in main again? | 15:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xxhash | 15:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (new rsync is trying to use it in proposed) | 15:01 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, read https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/06/23/%23ubuntu-meeting.html | 15:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ta | 15:10 |
| === grumble is now known as rawr | ||
| teward | bryce: thanks for the link. cpaelzer brings up some good points, but I think we need to check to see the difference between Debian and us, some things may need poked up there for them failing for things. | 16:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, looks like component is now saying it, thanks! libsanesane-backends | 16:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, ^^ :) | 16:25 |
| Odd_Bloke | slyon: bdmurray: Have you seen https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1884221 ? (It appears to be fixed in lp:apport.) | 17:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1884221 in apport (Ubuntu) "`ubuntu-bug` fails with "UnboundLocalError: local variable 'project' referenced before assignment"" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 17:07 |
| bdmurray | Odd_Bloke: I've seen it but haven't dug into it yet | 17:09 |
| Odd_Bloke | bdmurray: Want me to take a look? | 17:10 |
| bdmurray | Odd_Bloke: Sure if you are interested. | 17:12 |
| Odd_Bloke | bdmurray: What's the appropriate way to propose the change? | 17:13 |
| bdmurray | Odd_Bloke: an MP against the groovy branch - not upstream | 17:16 |
| Odd_Bloke | bdmurray: Including changelog entry? | 17:17 |
| bdmurray | Odd_Bloke: yes please | 17:18 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+git/autofs/+merge/386267 | 17:21 |
| rafaeldtinoco | if you have time for a quick +1 | 17:21 |
| rafaeldtinoco | its the same as the previous, without the & quoting as well | 17:21 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I'll keep the & for the SRUs since its not backed by an upstream change and we are are fixing the $ behavior only | 17:21 |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: ok | 17:25 |
| Odd_Bloke | bdmurray: https://code.launchpad.net/~oddbloke/apport/lp1884221/+merge/386269 | 17:27 |
| bdmurray | Odd_Bloke: thanks! | 17:32 |
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| bdmurray | jibel / xnox: can the SRU information in bug 1875045 be updated? | 18:31 |
| ubottu | bug 1875045 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity 20.04 exports existing ZFS pools" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1875045 | 18:31 |
| bdmurray | and bug 1880869 | 18:31 |
| ubottu | bug 1880869 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Use persistent device name for vdevs" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1880869 | 18:31 |
| xnox | jibel: i did ask about it before. It's not blocking testing ubiquity for the point release. | 18:46 |
| xnox | jibel: shall i drop the zfs backports, and reupload SRU without them? | 18:46 |
| jibel | xnox, do not drop the backport, I'll update the bugs and do the verification this week | 18:57 |
| xnox | tah | 19:01 |
| rafaeldtinoco | are there any plans for ifupdown deprecation ? | 20:33 |
| ogra | didnt that happen in 18.04 ? | 20:34 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I meant removal, sorry | 20:43 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ddstreet: ^ this was for our merge-review discussion | 20:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I think the sync approach and "let it go" is the best way | 20:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | will seek that | 20:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!