=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
bryceteward, https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/38623106:46
Laneyseb128: LocutusOfBorg: what's up with the sane stuff? libsane1 needs promoting after all or?08:37
seb128Laney, yes, LocutusOfBorg changed his mind, I will look at that after the meeting I'm currently in08:42
Laneyright, I looked at the package and it seems that libsane is the one that should be demoted eventually08:43
seb128right, libsane1 is the one to promote now08:46
LocutusOfBorgyes, sorry for saying the exact opposite :/08:54
LocutusOfBorgwe transitioned that library back and forth around 3-4 times in the last 2 years, and no ABI changes at all08:55
RAOFDidn't I already promote that?08:55
LaneyI think there was some confusion :P08:55
LocutusOfBorgthis sucks a lot, because people kept syncing it over and over from experimental, debian changed its mind and reverted that change, but we had already transitioned08:55
seb128RAOF, the binary is still in universe, if you want to try again please do, otherwise I've a look after that meeting08:59
=== ricab__ is now known as ricab
LocutusOfBorgalso RAOF please move src:libnma to main, the binaries are already in main :) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html09:26
LocutusOfBorgand I think we can also demote libsane to universe, but I'm not quite sure about that09:27
Laneywait for component-mismatches to say09:39
seb128xnox, could you look at sponsoring the update on bug #1882185 ? Olivier is out this week but he said that's going to be needed for the new firefox that is due for next week10:12
ubottubug 1882185 in nodejs (Ubuntu) "Firefox 78 requires nodejs >= 10.21" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188218510:12
seb128hum, security updates bypass the autopkgtest infra? :(10:17
LocutusOfBorgseb128, problem is that nodejs regressed a lot of stuff :/10:18
LocutusOfBorgbut meh, I can also have a look if x nox is away10:18
seb128LocutusOfBorg, how do you know if that version hasn't landed yet?10:18
seb128LocutusOfBorg, also we are going to need to update firefox one way or another10:18
seb128LocutusOfBorg, thanks10:18
LocutusOfBorgseb128, the debian tracker shows them, and nodejs are pretty much packages in sync...10:22
LocutusOfBorgin any case, lets upload and see what happens10:22
seb128LocutusOfBorg, thx10:23
mwhudsonis ubuntuwire down?10:38
seb128mwhudson, seems so, probably something to mention to IS?10:40
mwhudsoni don't think we run it though10:40
seb128wgrant might know10:41
mwhudsonyeah he is on https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuwire-sysadmins/+members#active10:42
seb128there is a #ubuntuwire also10:42
wgrantseb128, mwhudson: Is back.10:46
seb128wgrant, thx!10:46
mwhudsonwgrant: thanks10:47
=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g
LocutusOfBorgwgrant, can you please help understanding this setarch failure? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/2.35.2-4ubuntu1/+build/1949777712:18
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: It's not one I know about, but vorlon at least glanced at it a few weeks back.,12:20
LocutusOfBorgI mean, wgrant this command setarch riscv64 -v --uname-2.6 seems to give segfault, but I don't know if qemu is to blame or not12:26
LocutusOfBorgdo you have a possibility to launch that command?12:26
LocutusOfBorgand also setarch from the old util-linux in release has the same segfault, just to be sure... the regression might be in something else, kernel maybe?12:26
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: Oh really, pretty sure that used to work12:33
wgrantLet me see12:33
wgrantI just put away my board because my cat was trying to bite the fan12:33
wgrantShe'll just have to deal with it12:33
wgrantThere was an issue with related code that assumed a glibc thing was static, but it become non-static and broke on like m68k and riscv6412:34
wgrantI wonder if this is related.12:34
LocutusOfBorgthe code of setarch didn't change at all, so something else is going under the hood, but trying to gdb it gives lots of uninplemented stuff12:34
LocutusOfBorgmmm interesting12:34
LocutusOfBorglinux changed from 5.3 to 5.4, glibc from 2.31-0ubuntu7 to ubuntu1012:37
wgrantLocutusOfBorg: Where did you see that the old one has the same segfault?12:38
wgrantOh, building the old version in a PPA or something?12:38
LocutusOfBorgnope, ppa is sad12:39
LocutusOfBorgpbuilder chroot local12:39
LocutusOfBorgbased on this build, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/2.35.1-5ubuntu2/+build/19330488 changes in toolchain are not that many12:40
LocutusOfBorgthis is the focal version just no change rebuilt in bileto12:50
LocutusOfBorgold one still builds with focal14:03
LocutusOfBorglets try the new one with focal https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4114/+build/1949933214:03
seb128LocutusOfBorg, argyll/riscv seems not happy (ftbfs)14:31
LocutusOfBorgseb128, nack, not a regression14:57
seb128LocutusOfBorg, I didn't speak of regression14:57
seb128https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages just state14:57
seb128Unsatisfiable depends:14:57
seb128    argyll: riscv6414:57
LocutusOfBorgI wanted to no change rebuild just because the riscv64 was not retryable14:57
seb128I see, the changelog was confusing14:57
seb128I though you meant it would build now :)14:58
LocutusOfBorgseb128, yes, but meh14:58
LocutusOfBorgI guess britney will consider it and let it migrate anyway14:58
LocutusOfBorgit is not installable on riscv64 but also on release pocket14:58
LocutusOfBorgwhat is the workflow for a library that was in main, not in universe, and we want it in main again?15:00
LocutusOfBorg(new rsync is trying to use it in proposed)15:01
seb128LocutusOfBorg, read https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/06/23/%23ubuntu-meeting.html15:03
=== grumble is now known as rawr
tewardbryce: thanks for the link.  cpaelzer brings up some good points, but I think we need to check to see the difference between Debian and us, some things may need poked up there for them failing for things.16:10
LocutusOfBorgLaney, looks like component is now saying it, thanks! libsanesane-backends16:25
LocutusOfBorgseb128, ^^ :)16:25
Odd_Blokeslyon: bdmurray: Have you seen https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1884221 ?  (It appears to be fixed in lp:apport.)17:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1884221 in apport (Ubuntu) "`ubuntu-bug` fails with "UnboundLocalError: local variable 'project' referenced before assignment"" [Undecided,Confirmed]17:07
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: I've seen it but haven't dug into it yet17:09
Odd_Blokebdmurray: Want me to take a look?17:10
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: Sure if you are interested.17:12
Odd_Blokebdmurray: What's the appropriate way to propose the change?17:13
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: an MP against the groovy branch - not upstream17:16
Odd_Blokebdmurray: Including changelog entry?17:17
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: yes please17:18
rafaeldtinocoahasenack: https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+git/autofs/+merge/38626717:21
rafaeldtinocoif you have time for a quick +117:21
rafaeldtinocoits the same as the previous, without the & quoting as well17:21
rafaeldtinocoI'll keep the & for the SRUs since its not backed by an upstream change and we are are  fixing the $ behavior only17:21
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
ahasenackrafaeldtinoco: ok17:25
Odd_Blokebdmurray: https://code.launchpad.net/~oddbloke/apport/lp1884221/+merge/38626917:27
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: thanks!17:32
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
bdmurrayjibel / xnox: can the SRU information in bug 1875045 be updated?18:31
ubottubug 1875045 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity 20.04 exports existing ZFS pools" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187504518:31
bdmurrayand bug 188086918:31
ubottubug 1880869 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Use persistent device name for vdevs" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188086918:31
xnoxjibel:  i did ask about it before. It's not blocking testing ubiquity for the point release.18:46
xnoxjibel:  shall i drop the zfs backports, and reupload SRU without them?18:46
jibelxnox, do not drop the backport, I'll update the bugs and do the verification this week18:57
rafaeldtinocoare there any plans for ifupdown deprecation ?20:33
ogradidnt that happen in 18.04 ?20:34
rafaeldtinocoI meant removal, sorry20:43
rafaeldtinocoddstreet: ^ this was for our merge-review discussion20:52
rafaeldtinocoI think the sync approach and "let it go" is the best way20:52
rafaeldtinocowill seek that20:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!