[00:20] <heewa> Hi! I've been seeing huge memory leaks in gnome-shell-calendar-server, like several GBs in a couple days. I finally tracked it down and I think I plugged them. I'm going to submit the changes to gnome, but what do I do from Ubuntu's end? Wait for those changes to trickle down, or submit a patch to the ubuntu package?
[00:28] <sarnold> heewa: please file a bug with ubuntu-bug <packagename> -- waiting for trickle-down probably means it wouldn't be fixed until 20.10 is released, and previous releases wouldn't be fixed until someone notices the problem, backports and tests fixes, etc
[00:30] <JanC> probably best to do both, and link the upstream GNOME bug into the Ubuntu bug  :)
[00:33] <sarnold> oh yes most definitely :)
[00:33] <sarnold> thanks JanC
[00:33] <sarnold> good thing it's friday afternoon...
[00:33] <sarnold> it *is*, right?
[00:33] <heewa> What'll happen when the commit hits downstream while a duplicate patch is there?
[00:35] <JanC> sarnold: it's already Saturday here  ;)
[00:35] <sarnold> the groovy version will either import the new version from upstream before your patch is accepted into focal, or if groovy is patched, the patch will be dropped on a future sync from debian by whoever does the merge
[00:35] <sarnold> JanC: yay :D
[00:36] <JanC> that's why you want both upstream & downstream to be aware also...
[00:37] <heewa> @sarnold, Oh I fixed it for the version ubuntu 20.04 (focal-devel, so almost released). Should I try to fix it in other versions?
[00:38] <sarnold> heewa: focal was released two months ago
[00:39] <sarnold> heewa: "best" in my opionion would be providing ubuntu with a fix for focal and providing upstream gnome with a fix for whatever is tip of their development process
[00:40] <heewa> Oh, lol, I thought focal-devel was used for updates to focal. This is my first ubuntu (and gnome) contribution. Where should I put my patch?
[00:40] <sarnold> aha! :) focal-updates gets regular bug fixes, focal-security gets security-relavant bug fixes
[00:41] <sarnold> you should start with whatever version in -release, -security, or -updates is the newest
[00:41] <heewa> Also, ubuntu-bug collects diagnostic info, right? Does that mean I should revert to the version that has the leak, wait a few days, then submit a bug report so that it has the leak as part of the info?
[00:42] <sarnold> if you've got a patch in hand, the collected diagnostics probably aren't super-useful
[00:43] <sarnold> they're an incredible lifesaver for most bug reports, I'm really glad we collect them, it's great to quickly skim through a few files and say "oh this computer looks like its hard drive is dying" or "wow these other errors are far more important", etc
[00:44] <heewa> ah, that does sound super useful
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC