[14:28] <cpaelzer> ddstreet: jamespage: sarnold: didrocks: doko: ping for MIR meeting soon
[14:28] <cpaelzer> I think didrocks and doko are out atm
[14:29] <seb128> I can confirm that didrocks is out
[14:30] <cpaelzer> ok let us get this started, I hope anyone else responds :-)
[14:30] <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:30] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Jun 30 14:30:46 2020 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[14:30] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[14:30] <cpaelzer> #topic Review of previous action items
[14:31] <cpaelzer> out of the processing of a fonts MIR I took the action to clarify if there is a formal statement
[14:31] <cpaelzer> turned out this was an unwritten agreement by the archive admins
[14:31] <sarnold> good morning
[14:31] <cpaelzer> after clarifying with vorlon I was putting it into a written statement on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess?action=show&redirect=MIRTeam#Font_Packages
[14:31] <ddstreet> o/
[14:31] <cpaelzer> Are there any objections to this section?
[14:33] <sarnold> it's a bit vague, but probably archive admin / mir team folks would know what those assumptions are
[14:33] <cpaelzer> yeah I didn't want to make a new book out of it, and a good portion of it is copied from the mail thread with vorlon
[14:34] <cpaelzer> the question is more like "do you think it will cause trouble" more than "improve the wording" - the latter everone can do on his own :-)
[14:34] <cpaelzer> ddstreet: are you ok as well?
[14:34] <ddstreet> yep sounds ok
[14:34] <cpaelzer> we are not toomany people today so I'd like to see an "ok" from both of you
[14:34] <cpaelzer> thanks
[14:35] <cpaelzer> I'll remove the --draft-- block
[14:35] <cpaelzer> done
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:35] <cpaelzer> today there are a few mroe things
[14:35] <cpaelzer> more
[14:35] <cpaelzer> xxhash was resolved between desktop and foundations
[14:36] <cpaelzer> seb128: was so kind to join (replacing dodk's AA powers)
[14:36] <cpaelzer> seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/teckit/+bug/1803230 can be promoted to main in groovy
[14:36] <cpaelzer> would you be so kind to do that?
[14:36] <cpaelzer> I'm going on in component mismatches - qemu->liburing I have completed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liburing/+bug/1878006 for
[14:37] <seb128> cpaelzer, k
[14:37] <cpaelzer> this will need  a security review @sarnold
[14:37] <cpaelzer> but it is really really really small
[14:37] <cpaelzer> hopefully that means it might go rather fast, but you'll let us know once the team planned it I guess
[14:38] <cpaelzer> next mismatch is lintian -> libdata-validate-domain-perl, doko wanted to look for that but he isn't here - so let us skip that this week
[14:38] <cpaelzer> and the final mismatch that is not a usual-suspect is devscripts -> pristine-tar
[14:38] <cpaelzer> that is part of a recent merge, I asked kanashiro of the current +1 duty to take a look - we need to revert a change that got in with that recent merge
[14:39] <cpaelzer> no one wants to promote pristine-tar and all dependencies
[14:39] <cpaelzer> that would be proposed mismatches from my POV, and comments / additions ?
[14:40] <cpaelzer> no?
[14:40] <sarnold> I cant recall, did we discuss the node-jquery self-referential loop?
[14:40] <sarnold> in -proposed.svg
[14:41] <cpaelzer> not that I'd remember
[14:41] <cpaelzer>  node-jquery | 3.5.1+dfsg-4 | groovy-proposed/universe | source, all
[14:42] <cpaelzer> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html
[14:42] <cpaelzer> there are more details there
[14:42] <cpaelzer> seems to be
[14:42] <cpaelzer> [Reverse-Depends: libjs-jquery (MAIN)]
[14:43] <cpaelzer> that is src:jquery
[14:43] <cpaelzer> yeah that came in with 3.5.1+dfsg-4
[14:44] <cpaelzer> sarnold: I think that binary moved between sources
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Package: libjs-jquery
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Version: 3.5.1+dfsg-4
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Source: node-jquery
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Package: libjs-jquery
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Version: 3.3.1~dfsg-3
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Source: jquery
[14:45] <cpaelzer> the revdep list of libjs-jquery is gigantic
[14:45] <cpaelzer> does anyone recognize (or remember) for which use-case it was added?
[14:47] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jquery/+bug/308911
[14:47] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jquery/+bug/1513536
[14:47] <cpaelzer> this would be foundations task to look for
[14:47] <cpaelzer> but without doko here we need to postpone that
[14:48] <cpaelzer> mclemenceau: ^^ or could you ask in the team for someone to look after the component mismatches of jquery due to what seems to be a move between different srouce packages?
[14:48] <cpaelzer> mclemenceau: can come back to us at any time, I'll go on with the meeting so we can make it in time
[14:49] <cpaelzer> thanks sarnold for bringing this one up
[14:49] <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
[14:49] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:49] <cpaelzer> two OEM cases that have a special-case-excuse and the known jeepney for jamespage
[14:49] <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[14:49] <cpaelzer> this category has more today
[14:49] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:50] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libubootenv/+bug/1885142
[14:50] <cpaelzer> I've processed that last week
[14:50] <cpaelzer> once waveform has resolved the few things I wanted it can be promoted - until then incomplete
[14:50] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nacl/+bug/1885283
[14:51] <cpaelzer> I handled that as well and seb128 will look into changing to the sodium package already in main
[14:51] <cpaelzer> those were FYI, nothing to discuss in this category
[14:51] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[14:51] <cpaelzer> It might be worth to mention that I'm off next and in three weeks
[14:51] <cpaelzer> so someone else will do the meeting chairing
[14:52] <cpaelzer> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MainInclusionProcess?action=show&redirect=MIRTeam#MIR_Team_weekly_status_meeting will be your friend
[14:52] <seb128> cpaelzer, I already got a reply from upstream (which pointed out that x25519 curve implementation should be already enabled if building openssl)
[14:52] <cpaelzer> interesting
[14:53] <cpaelzer> mclemenceau: you can get in touch with me at any time later (not waiting with the end-of-meeting)
[14:53] <cpaelzer> I'm not in special numbers mood today, lets count up negative numbers to zero
[14:53] <cpaelzer> -5
[14:53] <cpaelzer> -4
[14:53] <cpaelzer> -3
[14:53] <cpaelzer> -2
[14:53] <cpaelzer> -1
[14:53] <cpaelzer> #endmeeting
[14:53] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Jun 30 14:53:41 2020 UTC.
[14:53] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-06-30-14.30.moin.txt
[14:53] <cpaelzer> thnkas everyone
[14:53] <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :)
[14:54] <ddstreet> o/