[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsis-jhdf5-java [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [19.04.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2:16.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-eventlet (focal-proposed/main) [0.25.1-2build1 => 0.25.1-2ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.11-1~focal1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.3.11-1~focal1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.11-1~focal1]
[09:01] <ginggs> would someone please review https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/britney/hints-ubuntu-python-pybedtools-armhf-v2/+merge/386661 and https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/britney/hints-ubuntu-python-loompy/+merge/386663 ?
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4]
[10:37] <xnox> vorlon:  i made a mistake.
[10:37] <xnox> ubuntu-archive please RM haskell-ansi-wl-pprint 0.6.9-2build1 from proposed
[10:38] <xnox> such that rebuild of .8 can be uploaded, to hopefully get co-installable ghc stack
[11:00] <Laney> eek, focal runs of the new proposed-migration are crashing
[11:00] <Laney> let me see ...
[11:01] <seb128> xnox, removed
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.20]
[11:48] <xnox> ubuntu-archive pleasee RM https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-regex-tdfa-text/+bug/1886038 blocking ghc transition
[11:58] <sil2100> xnox: looking o/
[12:03] <sil2100> xnox: looks legit, proceeding
[12:13] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, do you think we can remove a couple of haskell libraries on riscv64?
[12:14] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. haskell-token-bucket
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted less [source] (focal-proposed) [551-1ubuntu0.1]
[12:26] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  no, we should not.
[12:27] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  let it be, or i was thinking to upload and make the test suite not be that time sensitive on riscv. It's not running on real hardware to expect accurate clock to get 10 Hz right
[12:28] <LocutusOfBorg> please upload on debian, we don't want all the delta on haskell packages
[12:29] <LocutusOfBorg> its easy, all the libs are in a single git repo
[12:29] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:   most of debian haskell is currently FTBFS and not installable as a whole, we are trying to revert a few packages to make ghc migratable.
[12:29] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  plus riscv64 is not releasable arch in debian? did it regress there too?
[12:32] <xnox> seb128:  so 8 rebuild is failing to upload into groovy-proposed, because https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-ansi-wl-pprint/0.6.9-2 supposedly is there.
[12:32] <xnox> not sure if i need to wait for a publishing cycle, or if the superseeded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-ansi-wl-pprint/0.6.9-2 needs to be removed from groovy-proposed (is that even a thing?!)
[12:36] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, if you disable tests on riscv64 its fine in debian too, even if just a port arch
[12:37] <seb128> xnox, bah, fixed now. I removed 0.6.9-2build1 earlier but since that failed to build the 0.6.9-2 binaries were not superseeded, and removing 0.6.9-2build1 didn't remove them with it
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openldap (eoan-proposed/main) [2.4.48+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1 => 2.4.48+dfsg-1ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)
[12:44] <seb128> xnox, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-ansi-wl-pprint/0.6.8.2-2ubuntu1 working now
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openldap (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.45+dfsg-1ubuntu1.5 => 2.4.45+dfsg-1ubuntu1.6] (ubuntu-server)
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openldap (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.8 => 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.9] (ubuntu-server)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.10-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.10-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (focal-proposed) [6.1.10-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[13:07] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! You around? I was looking at the xorg-server focal SRU - I think it's good-ish, but I see there's a leftover patch in the main source directory
[13:07] <sil2100> tjaalton: looks like xfree86-add-drm-modes-on-non-GTF-panels.patch is both in debian/patches and in the root directory
[13:08] <sil2100> tjaalton: could you re-upload with it cleaned up?
[13:08] <tjaalton> oh man
[13:08] <tjaalton> sil2100: sure..
[13:09] <tjaalton> *.patch is in .gitignore
[13:09] <tjaalton> ...
[13:10] <tjaalton> sil2100: uploaded
[13:11] <sil2100> \o/
[13:11] <sil2100> :)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (focal-proposed/main) [2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.1 => 2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[13:11] <arnatious> sil2100 got a moment for a newbie SRU/packaging question?
[13:13] <sil2100> arnatious: hey! Sure
[13:13] <arnatious> sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175 is the bug in question
[13:13] <sil2100> oSoMoN: hey! Looking at the librsvg SRU for focal right now - I see that the get/set_dpi_x/y symbols got removed but the ABI didn't get bumped
[13:14] <arnatious> Basically a set of linters got left behind at 3.7 when python got bumped to 3.8 in focal
[13:14] <sil2100> oSoMoN: is it safe? Won't this break existing applications? Shouldn't the soname be bumped?
[13:16] <arnatious> sil2100: The package and its two dependencies are updated to a correct version, fixing the issue, in groovy-proposed
[13:20] <sil2100> arnatious: ah, you mean for instance that python-flake8 is still 3.7.9 etc?
[13:21] <arnatious> sil2100: yeah, it and its two dependencies are the 3.7.9 version
[13:23] <arnatious> sil2100: a version that supports 3.8 just made it into groovy-proposed, I don't know the first thing about packaging though so following the packaging/SRU guides fell apart at
[13:23] <arnatious> "To stage an upload, follow the usual process" https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Staging_an_upload
[13:25] <sil2100> arnatious: ok, so this does seem like it would warrant a backport from groovy to focal
[13:25] <arnatious> sil2100 right - but backports don't go to everyone by default right?
[13:25] <sil2100> arnatious: ah, by 'backport' I mean an SRU backport, not the 'backports' backport ;) Sorry for being a bit confusing
[13:26] <sil2100> arnatious: so there are cases where we allow backporting new upstream releases of packages as SRUs for stable series, if there is enough rationale for it
[13:26] <arnatious> sil2100 ah yeah that's what I was going for
[13:28] <sil2100> arnatious: how it's done is usually the packaging person taking the latest version that we want to backport, add on top of it a new changelog entry with a version number that's lower than the backported version (so in case of python-flake8 that could be for instance 3.8.3-1~20.04.1 or similar), opening an SRU bug (as per the SRU process), linking it in the changelog entry and uploadng to focal
[13:30] <arnatious> sil2100: gotcha, I have the bug filled up already, should I take the debs of the 3 packages and follow https://ubuntu-packaging-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixing-a-bug.html ?
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spl-linux (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1ubuntu2.1 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu2.2] (no packageset)
[13:53] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  https://hackage.haskell.org/package/chell looks odd, because chell-quickcheck was not updated, and it appears to be in git as "three packages"
[13:53] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  how do i package all three things from https://github.com/typeclasses/chell ? instead of just chell, without chell-quickcheck?
[13:53] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  or upsstream should have released chell-quickcheck and chell-hunit too?
[13:59] <oSoMoN> sil2100, hey, thanks for looking into the librsvg SRU! I *think* the symbol changes are safe and do not require a soname change, but I'll triple check and will comment on the bug
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.2]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.2]
[14:08] <seb128> sil2100, hey, could you move bug #1876286 to updates? quite some users are waiting on it and it was verified by several users (but they didn't change the tag so it missed your round earlier)
[14:12] <sil2100> arnatious: I think that makes sense, yes! If you need those changes sponsored, subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug and (I guess best) attach the debdiffs for the packages to the bug
[14:13] <sil2100> seb128: looking! When I was doing publishing the tags weren't switched yet
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected glib-networking [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.1-0ubuntu1]
[14:14] <seb128> sil2100, right, I switched them today, the users who tested didn't do it
[14:29] <oSoMoN> sil2100, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1884326/comments/5
[14:31] <sil2100> oSoMoN: excellent, thanks for the investigation!
[14:38] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, why do you need them?
[14:40] <LocutusOfBorg> and yes, I guess they should have released 3 packages
[14:40] <LocutusOfBorg> but if you want to join #debian-haskell, even better
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> and on package-plan you can see why cell is sad
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> https://salsa.debian.org/haskell-team/package-plan/-/blob/master/packages.txt
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg> and lots of new ghc libraries are waiting debian/new queue
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librsvg [source] (focal-proposed) [2.48.7-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[14:50] <seb128> sil2100, thanks!
[14:55] <sil2100> seb128: I see the xenial failed ADT tests are now good, releasing that as well!
[14:58] <seb128> sil2100, thanks! and yeah, amurray fixed those tests in the glib-networking security update (I rejected the bionic SRU in the queue for that then since it was superseeded by that upload)
[15:04] <arnatious> sil2100: should I attach the debdiff between 3.8.3-1 and 3.8.3~20.04.1
[15:05] <arnatious> sil2100: or should I attach between the one currently in focal, i.e. between 3.7.9-3 and 3.8.3~20.04.1
[15:05] <arnatious> I'm guessing the latter
[15:07] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  well, it's blocking ghc migration. So i either need to remove the now FTBFS chell-quick.... or i need a new one.
[15:07] <sil2100> arnatious: against the current one in focal, yes :)
[15:07] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  if it's unused, why is it in debian & ubuntu? =)
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't remember honestly but package_plan should contain why it was packaged and who needs it
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case, if we move the conversation to #debian-haskell, we can avoid headaches!
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-5.7 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-14.15] (no packageset)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1019.19] (no packageset)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-5.7 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-14.15] (no packageset)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-5.7 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.7.0-14.15] (no packageset)
[16:18] <arnatious> sil2100: uploaded the three debdiffs, anything else I need to do?
[16:20] <sil2100> arnatious: did you subscribe ubuntu-sponsors?
[16:21] <sil2100> Someone will try getting to those and sponsoring them for you - also, you can try poking someone directly for sponsorship too!
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1019.19]
[16:22] <arnatious> sil2100: brian's bot did the subscribing for me
[16:23] <arnatious> sil2100: I don't need to push anything with bazaar or dput anything now do I?
[16:27] <sil2100> arnatious: do you have upload rights to Ubuntu?
[16:30] <arnatious> sil2100: uh I mean I'm in the Canonical team if that grants anything but have never touched packaging before
[16:52] <sil2100> arnatious: that's not enough! ;) To upload to the Ubuntu archive you have to be an ubuntu-core-dev or motu
[16:53] <sil2100> arnatious: anyway, now this should be in theory enough - you can try poking around people with upload rights to sponsor those for you
[16:53] <sil2100> And then I can review them from the SRU queue
[16:55] <arnatious> sil2100: Hmm badger jdstrand you say?
[17:31] <jdstrand> arnatious: someone from ubuntu-sponsors will review the debdiffs and upload on your behalf in due course. if this is an emergency, let's take the conversation elsewhere and we can discuss if I should pivot to this and sponsor for you
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (focal-proposed) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [source] (focal-proposed) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:11] <vorlon> xnox: do you know why the tracker says haskell-optparse-applicative is broken, but I can install it in a groovy env here?
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [amd64] (focal-proposed) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [amd64] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [amd64] (focal-proposed) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:20] <xnox> vorlon:  not for me.
[18:20] <xnox> apt install ghc libghc-optparse-applicative-dev libghc-optparse-applicative-prof libghc-optparse-applicative-doc
[18:20] <xnox> libghc-optparse-applicative-dev : Depends: libghc-ansi-wl-pprint-dev-0.6.9-16270 but it is not installable
[18:21] <vorlon> ah I probably failed to update apt indices after ansi-wl-pprint was rebuilt
[18:21] <vorlon> thanks
[18:21] <xnox> vorlon:  needs rebuild against downgraded haskell-ansi-wl-pprint such that it uses 0.6.8 again?
[18:22] <vorlon> yeah
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [440.95.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [i386] (bionic-proposed) [418.152.00-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:54] <vorlon> sil2100, Laney: opinions on https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-archive-tools/close-EOL-bugs/+merge/386770 ?
[19:55] <vorlon> (and dear God, why was there no tool for this previously? I don't need to be closing 290 bug tasks by hand)
[20:02] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^ also you :)
[20:03] <vorlon> bdmurray: also, is this entry in the EOL checklist still accurate? "Update submit.py in https://code.launchpad.net/~daisy-pluckers/daisy/trunk to reject crashes from the EoL release, which will also increment a counter for that specific release e.g. unsupported.eol_raring."
[20:05] <vorlon> bdmurray: ah, the code moved to utils.py, so I'll fix the checklist
[20:05] <bdmurray> vorlon: yeah
[20:06] <vorlon> bdmurray: and do we have a script somewhere that unsubscribes teams from packages which are no longer in main or restricted for supported releases?
[20:06] <bdmurray> vorlon: I'd add a comment saying something about just closing the end of life release task not the bug in general.
[20:07] <vorlon> bdmurray: in the code?
[20:07] <bdmurray> yes
[20:07] <vorlon> """Close out remaining open bug tasks in Launchpad for an EOL series."""
[20:07] <vorlon> is that not sufficient?
[20:07] <bdmurray> bug.add_comment()
[20:07] <bdmurray> or something like that
[20:07] <vorlon> oh, you mean adding a comment to the bug
[20:10] <bdmurray> I found this in my home dir https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8G5Tkkfn4v/
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: build-essential [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.8ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:11] <bdmurray> lpl_common is from ubuntu-qa-tools
[20:13] <vorlon> bdmurray: added code to post a comment; how's that?
[20:13] <vorlon> bdmurray: seems like that could trade lpl_common for launchpadlib, and be added to ubuntu-archive-tools?
[20:17] <vorlon> bdmurray: oh but this also doesn't calculate what packages the teams need to be unsubscribed from :/
[20:17] <bdmurray> vorlon: ah, you've said so many words I couldn't retain them all
[20:18] <bdmurray> I'd expand EOL rather than using "jargon".
[20:20] <vorlon> bdmurray: fixed
[20:28] <vorlon> rolling back haskell-vector-space to let haskell-vector-space-points build
[20:37] <vorlon> rolling back haskell-concurrent-output, because the -proposed version needs the newer haskell-ansi-terminal that was rolled back
[21:38] <vorlon> huh haskell-vector-space-points still ftbfs, so bringing haskell-vector-space back
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-5.7 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.7.0-14.15]
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-5.7 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.7.0-14.15]
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-5.7 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.7.0-14.15]
[22:50] <xnox> ubuntu-archive "Notice(queuebot): New binary: build-essential [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.8ubuntu3] (core, i386-whitelist)" for being able to use mk-sbuild --target riscv64
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted build-essential [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [12.8ubuntu3]