| xnox | vorlon: downgrade request https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-hledger-lib/+bug/1886884 | 01:32 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1886884 in haskell-hledger-lib (Ubuntu) "RM downgrade haskell-hledger-lib to comaptible ansi / tasty one" [Undecided,Triaged] | 01:32 |
| xnox | level 15 only need removals | 02:06 |
| xnox | level 16 needs removals & update to haskell-snap | 02:07 |
| xnox | level 17 needs removals | 02:08 |
| xnox | ubuntu-archive would be nice if | 02:11 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive?field.searchtext=haskell&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_ | 02:11 |
| xnox | no_package= were processed | 02:11 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive?field.searchtext=haskell | 02:12 |
| xnox | better url =) | 02:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1079.89] | 05:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1020.20] | 05:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1092.102] (kernel) | 05:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1092.102] | 05:58 | |
| === tomwardill_ is now known as tomwardill | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (focal-backports/universe) [221.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1 => 223-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset) | 08:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [223-1~ubuntu20.04.1] | 08:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.4-0ubuntu1] | 09:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cifs-utils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:6.8-1ubuntu1] | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1079.89~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 09:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1079.89~16.04.1] | 10:22 | |
| rbasak | sil2100: o/ | 10:53 |
| rbasak | I had been reviewing the systemd SRUs yesterday | 10:53 |
| rbasak | But it's very lengthy so I didn't finish | 10:53 |
| rbasak | I can hand over to you if you'd like | 10:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 11:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 11:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 11:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 11:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 11:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 11:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 11:55 | |
| === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 12:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 13:04 | |
| === Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
| sil2100 | joalif, ddstreet: hey! I'm looking at libseccomp for focal right now, was wondering if maybe you discussed this upload with the security team by any chance? | 13:09 |
| sil2100 | joalif, ddstreet: since I suppose the 2.4.3 SRU is also in the -security pockets, so maybe we'd want to have the performance regression fix there as well? | 13:10 |
| ddstreet | sil2100 i at least mentioned it in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1877633/comments/20, i'm not sure if amurray or jdstrand would prefer it go into -security instead; joalif may have talked to them already as well | 13:31 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1877633 in libseccomp (Ubuntu Groovy) "libseccomp 2.4.3 (and 2.4.2) is not correctly resolving (at least) the getrlimit syscall on arm64" [High,Fix released] | 13:31 |
| amurray | hey folks - I am not opposed to this going into -security - but it should go via the SRU process still (like the 2.4.3 update did) | 13:32 |
| amurray | ie. first to -updates and then we can publish it to -security as well | 13:32 |
| joalif | sil2100, ddstreet I had discussed this bug with jdstrand about who's gonna work on it and security team had no plans (at that time) to work on it so I took it over | 13:38 |
| rbasak | sil2100: o/ did you see my ping above about the systemd SRUs? I probably won't get time to look again today but I don't want to see the effort I already put in wasted. | 13:38 |
| joalif | sil2100, now whether we want this fix in -security pocket I *think* it's up to the security team | 13:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.2] | 13:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.2] | 13:50 | |
| sil2100 | rbasak: hey! Ah! Yeah, I can try picking those up - did you write up your review so-far somewhere? | 13:59 |
| rbasak | sil2100: not yet - I was going to do that here if you wanted it. Actually I can pastebin I guess. | 14:00 |
| * rbasak does that now | 14:01 | |
| sil2100 | rbasak: thanks! ;) | 14:04 |
| sil2100 | joalif, ddstreet: I was asking since for this to go to -security we'd need to build it in a -security PPA and then bin-copy to -proposed | 14:04 |
| sil2100 | So accepting it as is would be a waste as it would have to be rebuilt later anyway with a version bump | 14:05 |
| ddstreet | i think it's super late for a-murray, i guess we could wait for his response tomorrow, or see what jdstrand says | 14:08 |
| rbasak | sil2100: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nnHrytzRs8/ | 14:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-signed [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.10.3ubuntu2] | 14:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.13-0~eoan1] | 14:11 | |
| jdstrand | ddstreet: amurray is awake due to the sprint. he can probably answer a question | 14:11 |
| amurray | I responded above | 14:11 |
| amurray | "I am not opposed to this going into -security - but it should go via the SRU process still (like the 2.4.3 update did) ie. first to -updates and then we can publish it to -security as well" | 14:12 |
| sil2100 | amurray, jdstrand: thanks! | 14:15 |
| sil2100 | So I'll do it like this: I'll review what's in the queue and if it's good, I'll upload those to a -security enabled bileto PPA, wait for it to build and then bin-copy into -proposed for regular SRU processing | 14:16 |
| sil2100 | But then once it's verified, we can safely copy to both -updates and -security without any rebuilds needed | 14:16 |
| xnox | ubuntu-archive can we revert ghc back to what we shipped in focal? the current state is quite mad. | 14:17 |
| xnox | or like force it? | 14:17 |
| xnox | i don't care that a lot of it is not installable. when most of it, is. | 14:18 |
| jdstrand | sil2100: that sounds like a nice approach | 14:19 |
| amurray | sil2100 jdstrand: for -security we normally build without -updates - would we need to do say a no-change-rebuild before publishing it to -security? | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | amurray: that's what I meant building in a bileto -security enabled PPA | 14:25 |
| jdstrand | amurray: yeah, what sil2100 said | 14:26 |
| amurray | sil2100: ah ok I wasn't sure if that meant -security and -updates | 14:26 |
| sil2100 | amurray: this will be a PPA with only -security enabled, with everything else set up like in the archive | 14:26 |
| sil2100 | On it! | 14:26 |
| amurray | right - sounds great | 14:26 |
| amurray | sil2100: thanks :) | 14:26 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: sorry I missed you direct ping 2 days ago, I was on PTO until today https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018 the email comment to the SRU team looks like it got blocked in mailing list moderator approval. I've pinged stgraber a few mins ago about letting that email through. cjwatson might be moderator of ubuntu-release mailing list too? | 16:17 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,In progress] | 16:17 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: ah, good thing we talked about it then | 16:18 |
| blackboxsw | bdmurray: yeah I think my request got lost in the mid-cycle sprint meetings folks have been participating in. basically it's a request to allow "solutions testing" supplemental SRU validation to be limited to "field-ready" LTS releases (which now is Bionic-only at the moment, instead of potentially Xenial and Bionic and Focal). | 16:21 |
| blackboxsw | so that's the only outstanding question with the cloud-init SRU | 16:21 |
| blackboxsw | all validation logs and testing is otherwise complete. But, wanted to make our SRU exception a bit more 'flexible' given that solutions testing team will always only test what LTS are "applicable" for their field-supported deployments | 16:23 |
| vorlon | rolling back haskell-hledger-lib, haskell-hledger, knock-on from rolling back haskell-tasty | 16:46 |
| vorlon | xnox: revert ghc> nack; we should just finish removing the packages that are incompatible with the current version, and move forward | 16:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) | 18:04 | |
| Laney | I think new proposed-migration is good now, so I'm probably going to swap it in tomorrow | 18:09 |
| Laney | just a heads up :> | 18:09 |
| xnox | vorlon: i really want haskell-haskell-gi-base to be removed from groovy-propsoed (rollback), such that i can upload a rebuild of 0.21.5-1build1 | 18:12 |
| xnox | vorlon: it would unblock me from reaching the next level in the haskell-tracker game | 18:12 |
| vorlon | rolling back haskell-haskell-gi-base per xnox request | 19:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:31 | |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: Maybe you could just have whoever approved the cloud-init SRU exception sign off on the solutions testing change rather than waiting for the mailing list moderator. | 22:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.37 => 1:18.04.38] (core) | 23:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ibus-typing-booster [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.9.3-1] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 23:37 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!