[01:32] <xnox> vorlon:  downgrade request https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-hledger-lib/+bug/1886884
[01:32] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1886884 in haskell-hledger-lib (Ubuntu) "RM downgrade haskell-hledger-lib to comaptible ansi / tasty one" [Undecided,Triaged]
[02:06] <xnox> level 15 only need removals
[02:07] <xnox> level 16 needs removals & update to haskell-snap
[02:08] <xnox> level 17 needs removals
[02:11] <xnox> ubuntu-archive would be nice if
[02:11] <xnox> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive?field.searchtext=haskell&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_
[02:11] <xnox> no_package= were processed
[02:12] <xnox> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive?field.searchtext=haskell
[02:12] <xnox> better url =)
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1079.89]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1020.20]
[05:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1092.102] (kernel)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1092.102]
=== tomwardill_ is now known as tomwardill
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (focal-backports/universe) [221.1-1~ubuntu20.04.1 => 223-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [223-1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.4-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.36.4-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cifs-utils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:6.8-1ubuntu1]
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1079.89~16.04.1] (kernel)
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1]
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1079.89~16.04.1]
[10:53] <rbasak> sil2100: o/
[10:53] <rbasak> I had been reviewing the systemd SRUs yesterday
[10:53] <rbasak> But it's very lengthy so I didn't finish
[10:53] <rbasak> I can hand over to you if you'd like
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
=== M_hc[m] is now known as _hc
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho
[13:09] <sil2100> joalif, ddstreet: hey! I'm looking at libseccomp for focal right now, was wondering if maybe you discussed this upload with the security team by any chance?
[13:10] <sil2100> joalif, ddstreet: since I suppose the 2.4.3 SRU is also in the -security pockets, so maybe we'd want to have the performance regression fix there as well?
[13:31] <ddstreet> sil2100 i at least mentioned it in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1877633/comments/20, i'm not sure if amurray or jdstrand would prefer it go into -security instead; joalif may have talked to them already as well
[13:31] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1877633 in libseccomp (Ubuntu Groovy) "libseccomp 2.4.3 (and 2.4.2) is not correctly resolving (at least) the getrlimit syscall on arm64" [High,Fix released]
[13:32] <amurray> hey folks - I am not opposed to this going into -security - but it should go via the SRU process still (like the 2.4.3 update did)
[13:32] <amurray> ie. first to -updates and then we can publish it to -security as well
[13:38] <joalif> sil2100, ddstreet  I had discussed this bug with jdstrand about who's gonna work on it and security team had no plans (at that time) to work on it so I took it over
[13:38] <rbasak> sil2100: o/ did you see my ping above about the systemd SRUs? I probably won't get time to look again today but I don't want to see the effort I already put in wasted.
[13:42] <joalif> sil2100, now whether we want this fix in -security pocket I *think* it's up to the security team
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[13:59] <sil2100> rbasak: hey! Ah! Yeah, I can try picking those up - did you write up your review so-far somewhere?
[14:00] <rbasak> sil2100: not yet - I was going to do that here if you wanted it. Actually I can pastebin I guess.
[14:01]  * rbasak does that now
[14:04] <sil2100> rbasak: thanks! ;)
[14:04] <sil2100> joalif, ddstreet: I was asking since for this to go to -security we'd need to build it in a -security PPA and then bin-copy to -proposed
[14:05] <sil2100> So accepting it as is would be a waste as it would have to be rebuilt later anyway with a version bump
[14:08] <ddstreet> i think it's super late for a-murray, i guess we could wait for his response tomorrow, or see what jdstrand says
[14:09] <rbasak> sil2100: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nnHrytzRs8/
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-signed [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.10.3ubuntu2]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.13-0~eoan1]
[14:11] <jdstrand> ddstreet: amurray is awake due to the sprint. he can probably answer a question
[14:11] <amurray> I responded above
[14:12] <amurray> "I am not opposed to this going into -security - but it should go via the SRU process still (like the 2.4.3 update did) ie. first to -updates and then we can publish it to -security as well"
[14:15] <sil2100> amurray, jdstrand: thanks!
[14:16] <sil2100> So I'll do it like this: I'll review what's in the queue and if it's good, I'll upload those to a -security enabled bileto PPA, wait for it to build and then bin-copy into -proposed for regular SRU processing
[14:16] <sil2100> But then once it's verified, we can safely copy to both -updates and -security without any rebuilds needed
[14:17] <xnox> ubuntu-archive can we revert ghc back to what we shipped in focal? the current state is quite mad.
[14:17] <xnox> or like force it?
[14:18] <xnox> i don't care that a lot of it is not installable. when most of it, is.
[14:19] <jdstrand> sil2100: that sounds like a nice approach
[14:21] <amurray> sil2100 jdstrand: for -security we normally build without -updates - would we need to do say a no-change-rebuild before publishing it to -security?
[14:25] <sil2100> amurray: that's what I meant building in a bileto -security enabled PPA
[14:26] <jdstrand> amurray: yeah, what sil2100 said
[14:26] <amurray> sil2100: ah ok I wasn't sure if that meant -security and -updates
[14:26] <sil2100> amurray: this will be a PPA with only -security enabled, with everything else set up like in the archive
[14:26] <sil2100> On it!
[14:26] <amurray> right - sounds great
[14:26] <amurray> sil2100: thanks :)
[16:17] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: sorry I missed you direct ping 2 days ago, I was on PTO until today https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1881018  the email comment to the SRU team looks like it got blocked in mailing list moderator approval. I've pinged stgraber a few mins ago about letting that email through. cjwatson might be moderator of ubuntu-release mailing list too?
[16:17] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1881018 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (19.4.33 to 20.2-45) Xenial, Bionic, Eoan and Focal" [Undecided,In progress]
[16:18] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: ah, good thing we talked about it then
[16:21] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: yeah I think my request  got lost in the mid-cycle sprint meetings folks have been participating in.  basically it's a request to allow "solutions testing" supplemental SRU validation to be limited to "field-ready" LTS releases (which now is Bionic-only at the moment, instead of potentially Xenial and Bionic and Focal).
[16:21] <blackboxsw> so that's the only outstanding question with the cloud-init SRU
[16:23] <blackboxsw> all validation logs and testing is  otherwise complete. But, wanted to make our SRU exception a bit more 'flexible' given that solutions testing team will always only test what LTS are "applicable" for their field-supported deployments
[16:46] <vorlon> rolling back haskell-hledger-lib, haskell-hledger, knock-on from rolling back haskell-tasty
[16:51] <vorlon> xnox: revert ghc> nack; we should just finish removing the packages that are incompatible with the current version, and move forward
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.13.3+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[18:09] <Laney> I think new proposed-migration is good now, so I'm probably going to swap it in tomorrow
[18:09] <Laney> just a heads up :>
[18:12] <xnox> vorlon:  i really want haskell-haskell-gi-base to be removed from groovy-propsoed (rollback), such that i can upload a rebuild of 0.21.5-1build1
[18:12] <xnox> vorlon:  it would unblock me from reaching the next level in the haskell-tracker game
[19:06] <vorlon> rolling back haskell-haskell-gi-base per xnox request
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bsdmainutils [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [12.1.3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:21] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: Maybe you could just have whoever approved the cloud-init SRU exception sign off on the solutions testing change rather than waiting for the mailing list moderator.
[23:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.37 => 1:18.04.38] (core)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ibus-typing-booster [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.9.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pot [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)