[03:01] <wallyworld> kelvinliu: if you have any time this arvo, otherwise can wait til next week https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11838
[03:02] <kelvinliu> wallyworld: yep, will have a look later
[03:58] <kelvinliu> wallyworld: so will existing dev path entries be replaced with UUID one?
[03:58] <wallyworld> kelvinliu: yeah
[03:58] <wallyworld> if the uuid is known
[04:23] <kelvinliu> wallyworld: lgtm, if tested on existing applications with storage.
[04:23] <wallyworld> kelvinliu: ty
[04:23] <kelvinliu> np
[09:52] <manadart_> stickupkid or achilleasa: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11839
[09:56] <stickupkid> manadart_, you need to rebase to trigger the github actions
[10:00] <manadart_> stickupkid: Done.
[12:13] <manadart_> Need a forward merge review: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/11841
[16:00] <stickupkid> hml, I don't think we should update the error message for the invalid endpoint, because we're not using live data yet. i.e. do we get a 404 for `juju info invalid`
[16:01] <stickupkid> hml, if that's the case, then we'll need to do something else to validate the url
[16:01] <hml> stickupkid: it was from google.com
[16:01] <hml> so passes url validity checks, but… can’t do anything useful
[16:02] <stickupkid> hml, quick ho/
[16:02] <stickupkid> ?
[16:02] <hml> stickupkid: sure