/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/07/17/#ubports.txt

ubptgbot<twilipi> (Photo, 1080x1920) https://irc.ubports.com/80TGKnEE.png01:02
ubptgbot<Danfro> Sometimes I am unable to send logs with logviewer too. Sadly I could not pinpoint a pattern yet.04:20
ubptgbot<Javacookies> it's working on my Nexus 5 … my username is `Ubuntu Touch User` 😄04:27
ubptgbot<twilipi> nvm, as I got that message, I can do a indirect way by copying those stuff to my PC then pastebin04:38
ubptgbot<Dylan Gundberg> Is ubtouch on nexus 5 faster than on pinephone in terms of just speed?07:31
ubptgbot<Dylan Gundberg> General speed, opening paps, etc07:31
ubptgbot<Dylan Gundberg> Apps*07:31
ubptgbot<twilipi> in general, n5 is much matured and long-maintained since the start of this project, while pinephone is a new phone, should be a bit buggy and sluggish at start … in performance aspect, n5 is better not because of a high performance 32 bit processor(which should be a bit faster than A53), and has a better GPU, compared with crappy mali40007:40
ubptgbotand 40nm fabbed Allwinner A6407:40
ubptgbot<twilipi> @dohbee [configure your username in logviewer settings then you can send the log to a pas …], I've try my own way to put this log record to pastebin, feel free to diagnose it … https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/jqKNVCyJBf/07:41
ubptgbot<twilipi> @Dylan Gundberg [Is ubtouch on nexus 5 faster than on pinephone in terms of just speed?], and the only thing pinephone shines is its availability, pricing and friendly to flash other OS07:42
ubptgbot<Javacookies> @Dylan Gundberg [Is ubtouch on nexus 5 faster than on pinephone in terms of just speed?], on paper and their current state, Nexus 5 is a lot faster and smoother. But the Pinephone is still in its early development phase so it'll improve over time. Perhaps it'll be on par with Nexus 5 performance which I really wish will happen07:43
ubptgbot<Dylan Gundberg> Huh! Thank you for putting that in retrospect!07:43
ubptgbot<Dylan Gundberg> I'm going to be getting the 5 as well07:44
ubptgbot<twilipi> [Edit] in general, n5 is much matured and long-maintained since the start of this project, while pinephone is a new phone, should be a bit buggy and sluggish at start … in performance aspect, n5 is better not because of a high performance 32 bit processor(which should be a bit faster than A53), but also a way better better GPU, compared w07:44
ubptgbotith crappy mali400 and 40nm fabbed Allwinner A6407:44
ubptgbot<Guido> @twilipi [https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/issues/1237 … I guess that's an issue here], Using the test image worked. Shouldn't this be updated at docs.ubports.com?08:01
gitbotubports issue 1237 in ubuntu-touch "can not install anbox ,"Anbox kernel is not installed!"" [Closed]08:01
ubptgbot<twilipi> @Guido [Using the test image worked. Shouldn't this be updated at docs.ubports.com?], currently at OTA 1208:02
ubptgbot<Guido> @TotalSonic [I love my Meizu Pro 5 and think it is actually one of the very best options for …], I agree, it is one of the best options. However, I've always had problems with echos on audio calls, not on my side but on the other. Has this issue been fixed?08:03
ubptgbot<twilipi> @Guido [Using the test image worked. Shouldn't this be updated at docs.ubports.com?], what kind of teest image is? currently mine is the latest OTA-12, via installer08:04
ubptgbot<Guido> No, I was talking about Anbox and  the test image anbox-boot-turbo-test.img.08:05
ubptgbot<Guido> My post linked to my question why Anbox is no longer working on the Meizu Pro 5. And it is not if one is using the image anbox-boot-turbo.img as written in the docs but it is if one is using anbox-boot-turbo-test.img instead.08:08
ubptgbotdvsk was added by: dvsk09:21
ubptgbotitsaazim was added by: itsaazim09:33
ubptgbotHarleyQuinn227 was added by: HarleyQuinn22710:22
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> Hey, I am really a newbie in porting, all I have done is creating TWRP recovery from source and I really want to build Ubuntu Touch for my device. Can Anyone provide me with a newbie friendly article/video to start with?10:24
ubptgbot<Flohack> @HarleyQuinn227 [Hey, I am really a newbie in porting, all I have done is creating TWRP recovery …], Well you have to start on http://docs.ubports.com/en/latest/porting/introduction.html - which device is it, does it have official LinegeOS ?10:26
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> Its a really old device probably 5-6 years old, It does not have LinegeOS build for it10:27
ubptgbot<Flohack> @HarleyQuinn227 [Its a really old device probably 5-6 years old, It does not have LinegeOS build …], Without Lineage it will be harder, sometimes impossible. You need to find all needed sources yourself10:28
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> Do I have to build that first?10:28
ubptgbot<Flohack> No but it tells you what source code repos you need10:28
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> I think i could build that It will take some time though10:29
ubptgbot<Flohack> You need kernel, device and vendor repos to begin with. Often device and vendor consists of more than one repo. Also, it might be that you need to extract vendor blobs from a stock android installation10:29
ubptgbot<Flohack> 5-6 years old? It was called cyanogenmod these days, did you look for that?10:30
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> nah, Its a local phone10:31
ubptgbot<Flohack> Hmm then it will be hard :)10:31
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> well I could try following some LinegeOS building articles10:32
ubptgbot<Flohack> yes your first question must be: How would a LineageOS build look for your device? What was the original Android version it came with? Can you even unlocxk the bootloader? Is it Mediatek?10:32
ubptgbot<Flohack> Is it Huawei? 😆10:33
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> no, but close😂, I did build custom recovery for it so i guess i'll try building LineageOS10:34
ubptgbot<HarleyQuinn227> Thanks For all the information!10:34
ubptgbot<Flohack> youre welcome10:35
ubptgbotrockerdiaz was added by: rockerdiaz10:47
ubptgbotJonathan was added by: Jonathan11:17
ubptgbot<rockerdiaz> Hey guys, i'm try create muy Port to Xiaomi redmi 711:40
ubptgbot<rockerdiaz> Mm but muy device does not have linageos version11:42
ubptgbot<rockerdiaz> Android extended Is a valid ROM?11:43
ubptgbot<Shazin27> @rockerdiaz [Android extended Is a valid ROM?], AOSP extended? Just add the lineage stuff and make sure lineage boots before you try to get halium/ub touch working11:44
ubptgbot<Shazin27> Should be pretty easy11:44
ubptgbot<fredldotme> Any device tree is better than none, but if it's not LineageOS there might be some slight changes needed.11:45
ubptgbot<rockerdiaz> Ok, thx guys11:45
ubptgbot<lordhacker0727> how to increase screen on time13:04
ubptgbot<anibyl> @rockerdiaz [Mm but muy device does not have linageos version], LineageOS has builds for Redmi 7.13:17
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> @lordhacker0727 [how to increase screen on time], what do you mean?13:17
ubptgbot<lordhacker0727> @Fuseteam [what do you mean?], i meant how to increase screen time out in ubtouch13:18
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> that should be i your settings13:21
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> [Edit] that should be in your settings13:21
ubptgbot<lordhacker0727> @Fuseteam [that should be in your settings], cant found13:37
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> where are you looking?13:38
ubptgbot<mateosalta> in battery settings13:48
ubptgbot<lordhacker0727> @mateosalta [in battery settings], ok13:50
ubptgbot<twilipi> can someone able to diagnose my teleports problem?15:14
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> hmm i think the details got lost in this group, at this point it might be better to open an issue on the teleports repo on gitlab15:17
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> [Edit] hmm i think the details got lost in this group, at this point it might be better to open an issue on the teleports repo on gitlab, with all the details you've shared in this group15:17
ubptgbot<twilipi> @Fuseteam [hmm i think the details got lost in this group, at this point it might be better …], still fine, simply give this log to you, mainly the biggest issue I found is not showing any conversation detail inside a group chat/user chat/channel15:18
ubptgbot<twilipi> but anyway, I'll register an account and report that issue first15:19
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> yeah but that part is usually resolved by a cache clear15:40
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> there should a different underlying issue with your teleports install15:40
ubptgbot<twilipi> @Fuseteam [yeah but that part is usually resolved by a cache clear], nope cache clear still have the same fate15:56
ubptgbotiamdeffis was added by: iamdeffis17:10
ubptgbot<Fuseteam> usually17:10
ubptgbot<UniversalSuperBox> @iamdeffis, `/teamrt/` or out17:11
ubptgbot<iamdeffis> @UniversalSuperBox [@iamdeffis, /teamrt/ or out], what17:11
ubptgbot<iamdeffis> why17:11
ubptgbot<dohbee> please remove the slur from your username17:11
ubptgbot<iamdeffis> oh17:11
ubptgbot<iamdeffis> ok I'll use my alt without the tag instead17:11
ubptgbotcofeguy was added by: cofeguy17:14
ubptgbot<cofeguy> Is that one fine or17:14
ubptgbot<dohbee> no17:15
ubptgbot<cofeguy> this?17:15
ubptgbot<dohbee> ok17:15
ubptgbot<cofeguy> glad17:15
ubptgbot<cofeguy> [Edit] I'm glad17:16
ubptgbot<Dockerfile256> I installed Ubuntu Touch on a Nexus 5 and am trying to get my SIM card to work. The cellular carrier is Cellcom (US).19:15
ubptgbot<dohbee> @Dockerfile256 [I installed Ubuntu Touch on a Nexus 5 and am trying to get my SIM card to work. …], it's not providing service via CDMA is it?19:17
ubptgbot<Dockerfile256> no19:20
ubptgbot<Dockerfile256> Cellcom is a CDMA/LTE carrier.19:20
ubptgbot<dohbee> right it's CDMA19:28
ubptgbot<dohbee> only GSM works in UT currently19:29
ubptgbot<Dockerfile256> Is LTE supported?19:31
ubptgbot<UniversalSuperBox> Yes, but activation on CDMA is still required.19:31
ubptgbot<dohbee> yes19:31
ubptgbot<dohbee> but you can't register with a CDMA network19:31
ubptgbot<Dockerfile256> Thank you for your help.19:33
ubptgbot<Dockerfile256> Are there any plans to support CDMA in the future?19:33
ubptgbot<dohbee> smashes all the turbos19:34
ubptgbot<Flohack> lel19:34
ubptgbot<UniversalSuperBox> In other words, getting rid of the one device that causes us to need to use the workaround that breaks CDMA19:35
ubptgbot<amyosx> CDMA is just why19:35
ubptgbot<UniversalSuperBox> Or making the workaround only apply to that device19:35
ubptgbot<amyosx> I thought it was just sprint who did CDMA lol19:36
ubptgbot<amyosx> Guess not19:36
ubptgbot<amyosx> I'm too British it appears19:36
ubptgbot<UniversalSuperBox> Sprint, Verizon, US Cellular, Cellcom, and various other small carriers19:36
ubptgbot<dohbee> all the carriers that buy bandwidth from sprint/verizon19:37
ubptgbot<amyosx> @dohbee [all the carriers that buy bandwidth from sprint/verizon], Lol19:37
ubptgbot<Flohack> @UniversalSuperBox [Or making the workaround only apply to that device], Well tbh we could roll an ofono confi gparameter for that, as we do now for Samsung rild modifications19:37
ubptgbot<amyosx> Imagine using Samsung /s19:38
ubptgbot<PhoenixLandPirate> @amyosx [I'm too British it appears], never British enough19:40
ubptgbot<Flohack> Its called `ril.device=samsung_msm_822x`  but ok ^^19:40
ubptgbot<amyosx> @PhoenixLandPirate [never British enough], I drink tea all day19:40
ubptgbot<amyosx> British19:40
ubptgbot<dohbee> tea is hardly a british thing19:41
ubptgbot<dohbee> anyway19:41
ubptgbot<dohbee> ubuntu touch or something19:41
ubptgbot<amyosx> @dohbee [tea is hardly a british thing], Lol19:43
ubptgbot<amyosx> @dohbee [ubuntu touch or something], Yeah its that really cool os for phones made by some of the most talented devs19:43
ubptgbot<Flohack> @UniversalSuperBox [In other words, getting rid of the one device that causes us to need to use the …], I just looked it up, its roughly 2.5% of our user base so lets deprecate it 😆19:56
ubptgbotOnly1nrs was added by: Only1nrs21:37
ubptgbot<TheCriptoAnarquist> Fwd from "Liberales - Libertarios": [15 aplicaciones](https://www.fin-tech.es/2016/10/aplicaciones-de-la-tecnologia-blockchain.html)15 aplicaciones de la tecnología blockchain más allá de [bitcoin](http://telegra.ph/15-aplicaciones-de-la-tecnología-blockchain-más-allá-de-bitcoin-07-17) … via www.fin-tech.es21:46
ubptgbotDuk4x was added by: Duk4x22:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!