[04:19] <mwhudson> vorlon: i love systems where inputs and outputs are so clearly correlated
[08:36] <cjwatson> mwhudson,vorlon: I thought it was clear enough: grub-efi-amd64-signed is explicitly seeded and depends on grub-efi-amd64 | grub-pc; germinate picked the first one because it had no reason not to, but explicitly adding grub-pc to the same seed satisfied that dependency so it didn't need to do anything heuristic
[08:37] <cjwatson> mwhudson,vorlon: Though the "!grub-efi-amd64" entry in Kubuntu's ship-live seed is still incorrect and unnecessary, and should be reverted
[12:03] <sil2100> GunnarHj: hey! Did you hear any feedback regarding the focal 20.04.1 base-langpack refresh that's in -proposed?
[12:03] <rafaeldtinoco> @pilot on
[12:03] <udevbot> (pilot (in|out)) -- Set yourself an in or out of patch pilot.
[12:03] <rafaeldtinoco> @pilot in
[12:12] <tsimonq2> @pilot in
[12:12] <tsimonq2> rafaeldtinoco: Are you following FIFO? LIFO?
[12:12] <tsimonq2> I don't want to step on toes.
[12:13] <rafaeldtinoco> tsimonq2: Im going through pkgs in "unknown"
[12:13] <rafaeldtinoco> nettle was blocking lots of old packages from server and foundations
[12:13] <rafaeldtinoco> and systemd
[12:13] <rafaeldtinoco> so Im tackling those
[12:14] <rafaeldtinoco> qemu tcg was blocking some others (mem constrains, so some regressions are because qemu dies) as explained by cpaelzer
[12:14] <rafaeldtinoco> old packages = various days in excuses
[12:14] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, thanks.
[12:17] <tsimonq2> (FWIW, I usually FIFO the sponsorship queue, and once I've sorted through most of them, I'll take a look at the excuses page.)
[12:18] <rafaeldtinoco> hum.. I started on monday (we are doing the weekly rotation) .. and I went for the FTBFS in [main] (getting zsys for armhf FTBFS)
[12:19] <rafaeldtinoco> and then I started tackling excuses specially for [main]
[12:20] <rafaeldtinoco> I think I missed the sponsoring queue part
[12:20] <rafaeldtinoco> :\
[12:20] <tsimonq2> I'm glad the weekly rotation started. :)
[12:21] <tsimonq2> I'm doing this for fun (I don't work for Canonical).
[12:21] <tsimonq2> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/
[12:21] <rafaeldtinoco> yep
[12:21] <rafaeldtinoco> im there
[12:21] <tsimonq2> Sweet.
[12:21] <rafaeldtinoco> nice.. thanks for syncing
[12:21] <tsimonq2> I'm looking at freecad (I asked the Debian maintainer to review the patch, I'm polishing it otherwise).
[12:21] <tsimonq2> No worries.
[12:32] <tsimonq2> Speaking of the sponsorship queue, I pushed a few commits making some minor stylistic changes. Who can git pull on prod?
[12:44] <tsimonq2> What is the best way to tell whether someone is still working for Canonical (and thus active)?
[12:47] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: That's not information that we give out in general
[12:47] <cjwatson> You can probably infer the "active" part from Launchpad karma though
[12:50] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: Fair enough.
[12:50] <tsimonq2> I am seeing a good amount of older patches in the queue that come from people that I'm not sure are still active.
[13:01] <tsimonq2> @pilot out
[14:42] <GunnarHj> sil
[14:42] <GunnarHj> sil2100: I've heard no complaints about the focal-proposed langpacks.
[18:32] <ahasenack> hi, I'm trying to test changing a dependency in an ubuntu-meta package, and I don't want to commit the change to the seeds yet
[18:33] <ahasenack> I thought I could mess arount the update.cfg file of the src:ubuntu-meta package, and point to a git repo/branch of mine
[18:33] <ahasenack> I managed to get it (the update script) to clone my branch for ubuntu, and platform, but now it's failing on "languages"
[18:34] <ahasenack> is there a quick doc/guide to do this, or is it hopeless and I just just commit, or rather perhaps, just manually add the dependency to d/control?
[22:11] <tsimonq2> ahasenack: Do you have a log?