[00:42] <vorlon> the docs package build requires a rebuild of all the sources?  how horrible
[00:42] <xnox> it's not that dramatic, it builds/extracts api things. it's a lot quicker than the other two
[00:43] <xnox> but like parsing is done with the compiler hence like monadfail stuff often already failed at doc generation.
[00:43] <vorlon> doko: a rerun of update-i386-whitelist wants to drop gcc-snapshot out of the list for groovy; seems this is because it was deleted from the release pocket yesterday.  does this need added to the overrides in the script?
[00:44] <vorlon> doko: (current package has built on i386, so if it's coming back to the release pocket it doesn't hurt things to have it temporarily dropped from the whitelist right now)
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed gcc-snapshot from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libdigest-hmac-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libemail-valid-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libnet-dns-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libnet-ip-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libtext-levenshtein-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libdata-validate-domain-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libtime-duration-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-440-server to i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 to i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server to i386-whitelist in groovy
[04:20] <mwhudson> xnox, vorlon: ah
[04:58] <ricotz> vorlon, hi, does this affect to focal too already? https://code.launchpad.net/~albertomilone/ubuntu-archive-tools/nvidia-450-whitelist/+merge/387503
[04:58] <ricotz> otherwise this needs to be fixed for a focal "seed" too
[06:49] <doko> vorlon: yes, I removed it to speed up the libgc transition, didn't think that it would be dropped
[07:00] <doko> Laney: something changed with the new ben: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/libgc.html  the riscv64 column isn't marked as bad
[08:20] <Laney> doko: if you put your mouse on the ‽ you get some more information about the state
[08:24] <doko> Laney: is the "red" marking gone for everything?
[08:32] <Laney> doko: no
[08:32] <Laney> doko: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ben/-/blob/master/doc/refman.txt#L244 does this help?
[08:33] <Laney> It could be in this case that anything which mateches /libgc1c2/ also matches /libgc1/
[08:33] <Laney> i.e. put some \b in
[08:33] <doko> ok, I'll try that one. the debian auto tracker already has this
[09:59] <Laney> oops, I messed up when checking out the transition tracker branch
[09:59] <Laney> the 'go' script assumed it was a bound branch, but I 'brz branch'ed it
[09:59] <Laney> should be fixed for subsequent runs, and the configs should actually update now
[10:00]  * Laney always got slightly confused by that concept
[10:01] <Laney> maybe not confused, but I forget about its existence regularly
[10:28] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, we got an arm64 important fix for build failure in glibc/debian/sid, can we please have a merge in Ubuntu?
[10:29] <LocutusOfBorg>    * debian/patches/any/git-surplus-tls-accounting.diff: backport TLS surplus
[10:29] <LocutusOfBorg>      accounting from upstream.  Closes: #964141.
[10:31] <doko> rbalint: ^^^
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> this fixes *lots* of failures on arm64, just google for "cannot allocate memory in static TLS block"
[10:34] <doko> just wondering why we didn't see that before. or did we see that?
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> we did see that, in really lots of places
[10:40] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. pyside2
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> for some reasons, e.g. jemalloc people, and other python folks, found that changing the order of the imported libraries was "hiding" the issue
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> so, the world workarounded that issue
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> except for pyside2, because for qtwebengine, even changing the preload order didn't work, because of meh, size maybe?
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I would even SRU for focal this change
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (focal-proposed) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.5]
[12:18] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, node-srs: can we please kick it out? it is out from testing, and FTBFS with new nodejs. No rc bug in Debian for the new failure because they didn't even fix the old one
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [1.187.2]
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.7 => 20.04.8] (desktop-core) (sync)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freecad (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.16.6712+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 => 0.16.6712+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[12:36] <xnox> sil2100:  please push .44 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/2.525.44 into livecd-rootfs git repo ubuntu/bionic branch?
[12:37] <xnox> sil2100:  or is there a merge proposal that i should merge it?
[12:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluebird-gtk-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2-1 => 1.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:44] <sil2100> xnox: ok, doing that!
[12:44] <sil2100> (there is an MP for that, but I'll just merge it now)
[12:50] <sil2100> xnox: done
[12:53] <xnox> thanks
[13:23] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, doko  i plan doing the merge and landing glibc fixes early next week
[13:23] <rbalint> i think it does not fully fix +1 maintenance for me, hence the next week
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[13:48] <xnox> pandoc failed to build
[13:48] <xnox> uploading it again, but now adding riscv64 to no-optimization builds
[13:49] <xnox> it seems like it must have failed during the profiling build
[13:49] <xnox> mwhudson:  vorlon: ^
[13:49] <xnox> there is no build-log
[13:50] <xnox> i wonder if we should report this to ghc upstream, that new llvm profiling builds not happy on arm & riscv64
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ipxe (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4-0ubuntu3.1 => 1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4-0ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[14:15] <rbalint> Laney, could you please revisit https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu-archive-tools/retry-intermittent/+merge/384468 ? the branch name is a misnomer since it just retries failures based on any user-provided pattern
[14:15] <rbalint> Laney, i can rename the branch if that's preferred
[14:48] <Laney> rbalint: I'll try to take a look next week, thanks for the ping
[14:48] <Laney> bdmurray: sil2100: Just realised it's eoan day
[14:49] <Laney> maybe we should do the changelogs.u.c bit and the announcement today and the rest another time?
[14:50] <bdmurray> Laney: I did the Error Tracker stuff yesterday, can do changelogs today
[14:50] <Laney> merci merci
[14:51] <Laney> sil2100: just seen that appliance images mr comment, note we're in the middle of switching to ancientminister right now
=== Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Focal 20.04, Bionic 18.04.4 | Archive: Open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Groovy Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis
[14:58] <Laney> back online on the new host now, cdimage members should get mail shortly
[15:43] <Laney> bdmurray: sil2100: I'll send the EOL email then
[15:43] <sil2100> Laney: thank you for that!
[15:44] <sil2100> And for all the EOLing work ;)
[15:45] <Laney> none of the hard stuff has happened yet :p
[15:47] <Laney> I wonder if I should add *the* comma in
[15:50] <vorlon> xnox: thanks for the reupload of pandoc.  also, <table flip>
[15:53] <bdmurray> meta-release updated
[16:03] <vorlon> doko: it gets dropped because seed generation only looks at the release pocket, not -proposed; so things missing from release pocket get dropped
[16:04] <vorlon> rbalint: why do we want to let python-cogent into the release pocket with failing autopkgtests, vs deleting it from -proposed and letting Debian fix it?
[16:05] <Laney> it's sent
[16:05] <Laney> vorlon: can haz moderation?
[16:06] <vorlon> Laney: done
[16:07] <Laney> merci
[16:08] <vorlon> není zač
[16:08] <rbalint> vorlon, it is just the autopkgest that does not pass on single core machine, the packages is ok
[16:09] <vorlon> rbalint: ok.  I asked this question on the mp also if you want to answer there :)
[16:09] <rbalint> vorlon, i just saw it
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu7.1 => 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu7.2] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.11.9-3] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.11.9-3] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libyang [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.176-2] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.11.9-3] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libyang [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.176-2] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: equinox-bundles [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.16+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libyang [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.176-2] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: neutron-tempest-plugin [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.11.9-3] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.11.9-3] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unifont [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:13.0.03-1] (core)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libyang [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.176-2] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libyang [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.176-2] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.11.9-3] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:56] <xnox> vorlon:  mwhudson: regular build finished, profiled build starting on pandoc riscv64
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rabbitmq-server (bionic-proposed/main) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 3.6.10-1ubuntu0.4] (ubuntu-server)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:05] <xnox> apw:  groovy-release kernel is very old. the one from -proposed not migrating, as it needs NBS cleanup, etc. i've copied up focal-proposed kernel to groovy-proposed
[21:05] <xnox> apw:  but it would be nice if we can somehow migrate it to groovy-release.
[21:05] <xnox> apw:  all our autopkgtests using vulnerable kernels basically.
[21:06] <xnox> as well as daily groovy images =/
[21:06] <apw> xnox, good point, will get someone to poke the testing and see if we can get it out
[21:06] <apw> it has to be better than nothing
[21:09] <xnox> apw:  i think it needs AA to cleanup all the intermediate stuff out.
[21:09] <apw> yep i assumed i was on the hook for that
[21:09] <xnox> apw:  i feel like you might want to remove blocking hint on groovy kernel altogether?
[21:09] <xnox> apw:  it feels odd to block copy up kernels.
[21:10] <xnox> but you feel different.
[21:10] <apw> they are blocked till the primaries pass testing, and then released togther in theory
[21:10] <xnox> ack
[21:10] <xnox> apw:  how much should be copied up then? everything?
[21:10] <apw> the things marked copy up in our table; i have scripting to do it
[21:11] <xnox> apw:  i feel like i want ongoing report of things archive-wide that are older in groovy-release than focal-proposed
[21:11] <xnox> apw:  is that report published somewhere? cause like any core-dev can copy things up to devel-proposed. there is nothing special about that.
[21:13] <xnox> copied up linux & linux-riscv
[21:14] <xnox> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#kernel-packages i guess is a good list
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suitesparse [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.21 => 1:20.04.22] (core)
[22:20] <tsimonq2> On today's episode of "what was I thinking?" - please REJECT bluebird-gtk-theme from bionic UNAPPROVED.
[22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluebird-gtk-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3-1 => 1.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio)
[22:24] <tsimonq2> *That* is where it should go.
[22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected bluebird-gtk-theme [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[22:26] <vorlon> Laney: the new-britney output for build-essential looks wrong; it says it's not running autopkgtests on armhf/arm64/s390x but this is only arch: all packages that are uninstallable
[22:31] <Eickmeyer[m]> bluebird-gtk-theme hasn't been used by Ubuntu Studio in years, I don't know why it's still in our packageset. That's 100% a Xubuntu thing.
[22:31] <Eickmeyer[m]> tsimonq2: ^
[22:33] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: node-srs: what do you want to do with node-millstone
[22:35] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: n/m, I'll remove it
[22:39] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer[m]: It's in the seed for Bionic and Focal, is it still there for Groovy?
[22:39] <tsimonq2> Er, the packageset.
[22:47] <xnox> pandoc is still building =(
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icingaweb2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-1 => 2.4.1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[22:52] <vorlon> still building is better than not still building
[22:54] <xnox> last time it failed after 130
[22:54] <xnox> it's at 118 at the moment
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqalculate [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqalculate [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqalculate [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 46 entries have been added or removed
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqalculate [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openscap (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.15-1ubuntu0.1 => 1.2.15-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openscap (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.16-2ubuntu3 => 1.2.16-2ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqalculate [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.0-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqalculate [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.0-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqalculate [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.0-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqalculate [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.0-1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted equinox-bundles [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.16+dfsg-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.9-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libyang [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.176-2]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libyang [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.176-2]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted neutron-tempest-plugin [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unifont [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1:13.0.03-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.9-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libyang [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.176-2]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suitesparse [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.8.1+dfsg-1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.9-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqalculate [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libyang [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.176-2]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.9-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.9-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.11.9-3]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libyang [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.176-2]
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-growl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cooler [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.8-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqalculate [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.0-1]
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-growl [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.1+dfsg-1]
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cooler [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.8-1]
[23:27] <xnox> at 130 point
[23:32] <xnox> please ubuntu archive reject uploads with ~ppa in the version string
[23:34] <xnox> it did =) cause it was lower anyway, good.
[23:36] <tsimonq2> I almost wonder if such a check could be automatic.
[23:49] <xnox> pandoc at 131