/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/07/21/#launchpad.txt

FourDollarspappacena: Could you help to check https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/691890?02:57
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
cjwatsonpappacena: ^- taking that BTW - pretty sure it's a problem with my initial implementation of git MPs11:38
pappacenaI'll take a look on what is going on there today to confirm the bug and check if it's an easy fix for the next release.13:34
cjwatsonpappacena: I have a chunk of it already TBH, but up to you13:54
pappacenaAs you prefer. If you are busy with something else, I can take that. Otherwise, it's ok if you do it. I'm checking the git merge between personal repos now.14:08
cjwatsonpappacena: How about I finish the initial refactoring I was doing to make the tests easier, and then hand over14:10
pappacenacjwatson: perfect for me!14:10
cjwatsonpappacena: https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/launchpad/+git/launchpad/+merge/387752 - then after that, I think what's going on is that I bailed out too soon in the git case from BranchMergeProposal._ensureAssociatedBranchesVisibleToReviewer14:14
cjwatsonpappacena: The stacked branch stuff doesn't make sense for git, but the first bit of _subscribeUserToStackedBranch subscribes the user to the branch itself before it starts looking at stacked branches14:15
cjwatsonpappacena: I suspect that adding a git scenario to TestBranchMergeProposalNominateReviewer will expose this (which is why I started by porting those tests to testscenarios, so that doing that would be less annoying)14:15
cjwatsonpappacena: But I haven't actually tested that theory yet, so this is definitely one to tackle in full TDD style14:16
cjwatsonpappacena: Does that roughly make sense?14:17
pappacenaIt does. Thanks for the refactoring and investigation. I'll review more in depth your MP, and work on that after.14:17
cjwatsonGreat, thanks14:19

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!