[00:03] <mwhudson> is there a sensible way to restrict autopkgtests to certain architectures?
[00:03] <mwhudson> skip-not-installable is sorta related but also not really right
[01:04] <vorlon> rolling back haskell-cborg, which got synced and delays the transition
[01:05] <vorlon> rolling back haskell-optparse-simple, haskell-pretty-simple, haskell-streaming-commons which got synced and delay the transition
[01:05] <mwhudson> vorlon: i think https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#glib2.0 is also relevant
[01:05] <mwhudson> (via qemu)
[01:05] <vorlon> >_<
[01:05] <vorlon> will look in a moment
[01:05] <mwhudson> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libx/libxmlb/groovy/ppc64el looks like something to badtest
[01:06] <mwhudson> not sure what's going on though
[01:06] <mwhudson> maybe oom
[01:07] <mwhudson> systemd seems to be flakiness in test-in-lxd
[01:07] <vorlon> update_excuses mentions built-using glib2.0 but I'm hoping that's not a blocker
[01:07] <mwhudson> and sbd is just strange
[01:08] <mwhudson> i thought built-using was a blocker now
[01:08] <mwhudson> guess we'll find out in the next run
[01:08] <vorlon> ... it hasn't been discussed that it would be
[01:08] <vorlon> and the output doesn't say that it's blocking
[01:08] <vorlon> but systemd autopkgtest failure would block
[01:08] <mwhudson> oh "Installability of Build-Depends is now considered for migrating"
[01:08] <mwhudson> not built-using
[01:13] <vorlon> ugh that also makes things more fragile
[01:18] <mwhudson> uh huh "Invalidated by built-using"
[01:28] <vorlon> :|
[01:30] <vorlon> why does qemu declare Built-Using anyway
[01:31] <vorlon> well when that's the only blocking issue, I'll override
[01:32] <vorlon> but we should also probably correct that policy for Ubuntu, because we don't retain old binaries in the release pocket referenced by Built-Using, therefore this just causes pointless delays
[01:33]  * mwhudson drums fingers
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.22 => 1:20.04.23] (core)
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tao-config [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0+git20200604.84a7383-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tao-config [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0+git20200604.84a7383-2] (no packageset)
[05:39] <mwhudson> vorlon: i think it might be shoving time
[05:40] <mwhudson> (i.e. qemu just held back by built-using constraints)
[06:02] <vorlon> mwhudson: hint added
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
[06:32] <mwhudson> vorlon: <dramatic music>
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.23]
[08:56] <sil2100> tseliot_: hey! Looking at your focal ubuntu-drivers-common SRU - I see the .changes file mentions LP: #1882402, but I don't see a clear test case for that bug - and not sure if it was actually fixed?
[08:56] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1882402 in ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu-drivers allows installation of (nvidia-340) drivers, which are broken/break things (Kubuntu 20.04)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1882402
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nss (bionic-proposed/main) [2:3.35-2ubuntu2.9 => 2:3.35-2ubuntu2.10] (core)
[09:08] <xnox> looks like it's migrating
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nss (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.49.1-1ubuntu1.2 => 2:3.49.1-1ubuntu1.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:23] <mwhudson> yeah seems so
[09:56] <xnox> so, i feel like i must copy the new ghc inplace now that fixes big-endian bug
[10:02] <mwhudson> that means retriggering all the autopkgtests in the world but no transition?
[10:07] <xnox> mwhudson:  i don't think haskell has any autopkgtests, does it?
[10:08] <mwhudson> oh maybe not
[10:08] <xnox> i mean it effectively does static linking and runs all tests at build time, how wrong could things go?
[10:08] <xnox> i see ghc tries to compile hello-word as an autopkgtest
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> but does this require to rebuild everything, right?
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> because of s390x abi changes?
[10:25] <xnox> Yeap
[10:25] <xnox> But ghc has just migrated, so it's not too bad.
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to do something before the world comes back
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> like protobuf
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.175~18.04.1 => 0.175~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> and icu?
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
=== M_hc[m] is now known as _hc
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.3-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tao-config [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0+git20200604.84a7383-1]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tao-config [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0+git20200604.84a7383-2]
[11:13] <tseliot_> sil2100, that bug report is just a false positive, not an actual bug. The "fix" is about not showing the error
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gxr [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.15.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gxr [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.15.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gxr [s390x] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.15.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:17] <Laney> I just pushed https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/commit/?id=ebbc7b5d0ef58b1601a01413c7008a7161ec5ce6
[11:17] <Laney> should make excuses a bit clearer wrt transitions
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gxr [armhf] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.15.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gxr [arm64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.15.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:28] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: fyi, protobuf ftbfs on i386
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gxr [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [0.15.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:40] <Laney> vorlon: I'll disable the Built-Using policy now, agreed it doesn't make much sense if the referenced source can disappear, but I think we should enable it once the Launchpad support is in place - should be this cycle.
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-14 (focal-proposed/universe) [14.0.1+7-1ubuntu1 => 14.0.2+12-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist)
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-13 (focal-proposed/universe) [13.0.3+3-1ubuntu2 => 13.0.4+8-1~20.04] (i386-whitelist)
[12:27] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, yep thanks
[12:39] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, do you have any clue for the failure?
[12:48] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I think you will appreciate a lot this approach from mapreri https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bzip2/-/commit/7103774c39080518e74aff988c38c033d6433a8c
[12:48] <LocutusOfBorg> no need to define anything, with this bash syntax
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
[13:07] <seb128> hey there, when are the expect dates for getting things in focal .1? Until when do we have to get things accepted in proposed to still be able to make it?
[13:09] <xnox> seb128:  there is still time, but it is tight.
[13:09] <xnox> seb128:  what sort of things?
[13:11] <xnox> seb128:  i think we are hoping to have candidates on the 30th. Ideally things should be in -updates by then. Thus i guess you can still upload stuff today/tomorrow.
[13:11] <xnox> seb128:  but there a chance that a block will be placed on them preventing from migrating.
[13:11] <seb128> xnox, well, I'm concerned that some updates are in the queue for 15 days and not getting reviewed
[13:11] <seb128> we aimed at getting GNOME 3.36.4 in .1
[13:11] <seb128> but things are not moving :-/
[13:12] <seb128> we probably would like to get some other updates that are waiting like the ubuntu-drivers-common one
[13:13] <seb128> or the new bug fix libreoffice update
[13:14]  * xnox checks if libreoffice built on riscv64 and how many weeks it takes there
[13:15] <xnox> seb128:  so, gnome does not sound like it's critical to be on the iso, right? it doens't prevent installation on any hardware?
[13:15] <xnox> seb128:  which ubuntu-drivers-common fixes are they? => do those prevent completing the installation on any hardware?
[13:15] <xnox> seb128:  cause otherwise they can all go as SRUs post .1 release media.
[13:16] <xnox> seb128:  we must not delay .1 release.
[13:17] <seb128> xnox, it's not install critical no, still we worked on timeline to get the current stack of our upstream included and it's frustrating that we get to ship an outdated version because we are not able to get things reviewed in a timelined fashion
[13:18] <xnox> *nod*
[13:19] <xnox> at least oem-* packages are being cranked through all the cranks at a priority
[13:19] <seb128> right, that's probably more important than normal updates, so that at least makes sense
[13:20] <xnox> yeap focal queue is long 32 packages
[13:33] <sil2100> tseliot_: then let me remove it from the changelog then - if for an SRU anything is in the changelog, it needs to go through the usual verification process
[13:34] <sil2100> tseliot_: and this is not it
[13:34] <tseliot_> sil2100, ok, thanks
[13:36] <ginggs> tseliot_: hi, should src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 be removed from proposed and added sync-blacklist?
[13:37] <tseliot_> ginggs, yes, we have the -server series for that. We should definitely blacklist all the -teslas
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: protobuf [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [3.12.3-2ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.1.1 => 1:0.8.4~0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[13:51] <hellsworth> hey bdmurray could you please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1886692
[13:51] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1886692 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " [SRU] libreoffice 6.4.5 for focal" [High,In progress]
[13:58] <ginggs> sil2100: would you please remove nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 as above?  can you do the sync-blacklist too?
[13:59] <ginggs> maybe as well sync-blacklist nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450 as well, currently in debian NEW
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: munin (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.0.25-2ubuntu0.16.04.3 => 2.0.25-2ubuntu0.16.04.4] (no packageset)
[14:20] <sil2100> ginggs: hey! Will try to get to that in a moment ;)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.1]
[14:24] <Trevinho> bdmurray: hey, do you have some time to look at the mutter (there's an old version to remove at this point), gnome-shell and libfprint SRUs?
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simple-scan [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.0]
[14:28] <xnox> ghc incoming
=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted im-config [source] (focal-proposed) [0.44-1ubuntu1.1]
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-extras [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.31-1ubuntu1.1]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gxr [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.15.1-2]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gxr [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.15.1-2]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gxr [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.15.1-2]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gxr [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.15.1-2]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gxr [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.15.1-2]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gxr [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.15.1-2]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-snapshot [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted infinity [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.5-0ubuntu1]
[15:01] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: I'm back from my two week vacation. I must say, I'm disappointed as I have been watching the queue a little in this time. If it's truly a queue, then why haven't the 8 package uploads been reviewed yet?
[15:04] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: from the NEW queue on groovy you mean?
[15:04] <Eickmeyer> Correct.
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: infinity [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:05] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Specifically, the 8 packages uploaded exactly two weeks ago (2020-07-07)
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted infinity [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.5-0ubuntu1]
[15:06] <sil2100> Yeah, due to the point-releases and other, I sadly didn't have the time to do any unrelated NEW reviews, will try to allocate some cycles for that
[15:07] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Thanks. Speaking of the point-releases, Ubutnu Studio Focal is still FTBFS and I thought there were going to be some fixes (I think xnox was working on that iirc) to get it to build.
[15:13] <bdmurray> Trevinho: For which release(s)?
[15:13] <Trevinho> bdmurray: focal
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.1 => 20.04.15.2] (core)
[15:23] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  Laney prepared a fix, i did review it, but i think it's not uploaded?
[15:23] <Eickmeyer> xnox: Ok, thanks for the update. Still getting FTBFS emails, so that's what was concerning.
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.24-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:26] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: ^ That's for bug 1873944, initially rejected by you since I had the bug number wrong in the changelog. Fixed.
[15:26] <ubot5> bug 1873944 in rapid-photo-downloader (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Upgrade rapid-photo-downloader to version 0.9.24" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873944
[15:26] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: If you have a cycle free, plz expedite that as it would be good for that to land in 20.04.1.
[15:29] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: I have concerns about that upload because it is a version bump and only references one bug and there is no mirorelease exception for rapid-photo-downloader.
[15:29] <bdmurray> And not autopkgtests
[15:30] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Well, apparently the version in focal is crashing, so there's that.
[15:30] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: so just fix the crash
[15:30] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: That's what this does, straight from the dev. The dev wrote the SRU.
[15:32] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: I mean only that crash and not the dozen other things that are in this upload.
[15:32] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I don't know how to do that. I'm not a coder. I only package things.
[15:38] <sil2100> ginggs: package removed! (sorry it took a while)
[15:38] <sil2100> ginggs: also, added it to the sync blacklist
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smart-notifier (focal-proposed/universe) [0.28-5build1 => 0.28-6~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:08] <bdmurray> sil2100: Is there anything special I should do if I sru-release libsecomp? You mentioned the -security pocket in bug #1861177.
[16:08] <ubot5> bug 1861177 in libseccomp (Ubuntu Focal) "seccomp_rule_add is very slow" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1861177
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.2 => 2.664.3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[16:12] <Laney> ^- sil2100 one of your changes there, the bug needs SRUing
[16:13] <Laney> please also could someone review ubiquity, it's needed for .1 and I would like to give the team a chance to test it so I can follow up if it needs it
[16:13] <bdmurray> Laney: I can do ubiquity
[16:13] <blackboxsw> cjwatson: or stgraber If either of get a min to moderate ubuntu-release mailing list. I have just sent another email waiting on moderator approval  entitled "SRU Exception Proposal: ubuntu-advantage-tools/ubuntu-advantage-pro package".
[16:14] <Laney> bdmurray: cheers
[16:14] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: thanks again for the ua-client fix and your patience there. landed
[16:18] <cjwatson> blackboxsw: done
[16:22] <bdmurray> seb128: Did you test keybindings with eog in focal? bug 1886480.
[16:22] <ubot5> bug 1886480 in eog (Ubuntu Focal) "SRU the current 3.36.3 stable update " [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1886480
[16:23] <seb128> bdmurray, I don't remember if I did at the time I did the verification but I just gave those a round of testing and they work without issue
[16:24] <bdmurray> seb128: okay, I'll go ahead and release it then.
[16:24] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks!
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.2]
[16:33] <Laney> 😘
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.0-2~ubuntu20.04.1 => 20.04.0-3~ubuntu20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (focal-proposed/main) [2.3 => 2.3ubuntu0.1] (core)
[16:40] <hellsworth> hey bdmurray could you please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1886692
[16:40] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1886692 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " [SRU] libreoffice 6.4.5 for focal" [High,In progress]
[16:40] <bdmurray> hellsworth: its on my list for the day
[16:43] <blackboxsw> thanks cjwatson
[16:47]  * cjwatson adds Laney to ~ubuntu-archive
[16:47] <tumbleweed> o_O :)
[16:47] <tumbleweed> REMOVE ALL THE PACKAGES
[16:47] <cjwatson> (after some internal discussion)
[16:47] <seb128> Laney, welcome on board!
[16:48] <seb128> cjwatson, thanks for doing the actually adding
[16:48] <cjwatson> hardest thing on my todo list for today (er not really)
[16:49] <seb128> :-)
[16:49] <Laney> ah great, thanks cjwatson & seb128
[16:50] <cjwatson> thank *you*
[16:50] <Laney> that's been a trivially short journey
[16:50] <Laney> ahem
[16:56] <ginggs> sil2100: thank you!
[17:08] <sil2100> Laney: welcome to the team!
[17:11] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: For rapid-photo-downloader, should I apply for an SRU exception?
[17:12] <Eickmeyer> Laney: If you would like, I can fix ubuntustudio-default-settings as part of that SRU for focal.
[17:12] <Laney> Eickmeyer: Go for it if you want, it's tidier that way
[17:12] <Eickmeyer> Laney: ack
[17:12]  * Laney high fives sil2100 
[17:13] <Eickmeyer> Laney is an archive admin?? AWESOME! Congrats!
[17:13] <Laney> 😌
[17:14] <Eickmeyer> Laney: Do you feel that weight? That's the burden on your shoulders. :)
[17:15] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: You might want to look at what it takes to get an SRU exception before heading down that route.
[17:15] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Ok, sounds good. Thing is, you've neither rejected the upload nor the SRU, so I'm guessing it's still under consideration?
[17:16] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: I'll just reject it, we can save still accept things from that queue if we need to.
[17:17] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Ok. I assume you'll comment on the SRU as to why so the dev knows why? In the meantime, I'll probably just throw it in Ubuntu Studio Backports.
[17:20] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: yes, looking at the upstream Changelog again it seems to me like SRU'ing 0.9.23a1 would just fix the segfault and be the quickest path forward to get it fixed in focal-updates.
[17:20]  * RikMills congratulates Laney
[17:21] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Ok, I'll see if I can do that.
[17:22] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: It looks like this rev has that fix only https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dlynch3/rapid/zeromq_pyqt/revision/1247
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-taskflow (focal-proposed/main) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 4.1.0-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[17:23] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I'll take a look shortly and see if I can get it going. :)
[17:24]  * Eickmeyer is catching up after vacation
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-automod [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-dlv-list [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pest-derive [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-entities [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-basic-auth [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unchecked-index [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] <tsimonq2> Laney: Hey, I have a package for you to review. Should be hitting source NEW shortly.
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: laneys-giraffe (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-automod [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] <ahasenack> laneys-giraffe?
[17:29] <tsimonq2> Precisely.
[17:30] <ahasenack> is that an initiation thing? :)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.24-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-dlv-list [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] <tsimonq2> Something like that.
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-entities [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pest-derive [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unchecked-index [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] <Eickmeyer> Laney: Since it's a native package, would a quick version bump for ubuntustudio-default-settings for the SRU (20.04.3 => 20.04.4) be acceptable for this?
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-automod [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:38] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: that version number sounds fine
[17:38] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks. :)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-automod [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-dlv-list [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-dlv-list [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-entities [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-entities [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unchecked-index [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] <bdmurray> hellsworth: Is this new version in groovy yet?
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pest-derive [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2 => 20.04.4] (ubuntustudio)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unchecked-index [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pest-derive [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:45] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Please reject ubuntustudio-default-settings 20.04.4, I didn't realize that it includes a different delta that's incompatible without an upload of ubuntustudio-menu.
[17:46]  * Eickmeyer hangs head in shame
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.2+tod1-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.4]
[18:07] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Thanks. New upload on that incoming.
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2 => 20.04.2.1] (ubuntustudio)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-automod [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-entities [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unchecked-index [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-dlv-list [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pest-derive [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[18:25] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: how did rapid-photo-downloader end up in the focal queue again?
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]
[18:31] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Uh... just now? I didn't upload except that one earlier today.
[18:31] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Only other one I uploaded was ubuntustudio-default-settings.
[18:32] <Eickmeyer> I see your reject: [10:30:43 am] [queuebot] Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.24-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:32] <Eickmeyer> But, I didn't upload after that, bdmurray.
[18:33] <Eickmeyer> (sorry for the delay on that response, had a minor breaker trip here)
[18:37] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: the one I rejected was uploaded 2020-07-01
[18:38] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Weird. I didn't see that upload when I checked earlier today, so I thought I had forgotten to upload it. Feel free to reject again.
[18:38] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: And sorry about that. My mistake.
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.3]
[18:39] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: No big deal, the timing was just confusing! I think the queue had / has two pages worth of uploads at the moment.
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.24-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[19:11] <vorlon> Laney: Built-Using> ta
[19:12] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: bzip2> wfm though I think such such posix shell tricks are less readable for many people :)
[19:33] <bdmurray> rbasak, vorlon, sil2100... ubuntu-sru-team meeting?
[19:34] <vorlon> bdmurray: I'm off today
[19:34] <bdmurray> vorlon: ah, I see that now - sorry!
[19:52] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, at the end I did something like this:
[19:52] <LocutusOfBorg> +eval $(dpkg-architecture -s)
[19:52] <LocutusOfBorg> +PKG_CONFIG=$DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE-pkg-config
[19:52] <LocutusOfBorg> +CC=$DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE-gcc
[19:52] <LocutusOfBorg> this works nicely and its readable :)
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected laneys-giraffe [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.1]
[19:55] <rbasak> bdmurray: sorry, with previous poor attendence I stopped holding my evenings for it unless I know it's happening, and I didn't get round to asking in advance this time
[19:59] <bdmurray> rbasak: That's fair, I feel like I need a reminder to update the agenda the day before.
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[20:11] <kanashiro> ubuntu-archive: sorry for bothering but could you please take a look at LP #1868500 ?
[20:12] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1868500 in golang-github-prometheus-client-golang (Ubuntu) "Please remove binaries for 0.9.2-0ubuntu3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868500
[20:12] <kyrofa> Hey bdmurray, any chance we could get this into proposed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/orocos-kdl/+bug/1871725
[20:12] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1871725 in orocos-kdl (Ubuntu Focal) "python3-pykdl: PyKDL crashes Python 3 interpretter (SIGABRT) if any API accepting a str is used" [Medium,In progress]
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted orocos-kdl [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-7ubuntu1]
[20:19] <kyrofa> Ahh, thank you
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.7-0ubuntu1]
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected smokeping [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.3-2ubuntu20.04.1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (focal-proposed) [19.11.3-0ubuntu0.1]
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpdk [source] (bionic-proposed) [17.11.10-0ubuntu0.1]
[21:22] <ahasenack> hi, apt can't find recode:i386, but it exists in lp: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/recode/3.6-24
[21:22] <ahasenack> maybe something went wrong when groovy was created, since the last build was from focal?
[21:22] <ahasenack> oh, and let me rephrase, I cannot find recode:i386 for groovy, that is
[21:23] <ahasenack> and firebird 3.0 i386 is stuck pending this: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firebird3.0/3.0.6.33328.ds4-2
[21:23] <ahasenack> ubuntu-archive ^
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-snapshot [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:12~++20200715052739+d6e79e3dd6d-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.2-0ubuntu1]
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ipxe [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+git-20190109.133f4c4-0ubuntu3.2]
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bluebird-gtk-theme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openscap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.16-2ubuntu3.1]
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (focal-proposed) [2:3.49.1-1ubuntu1.3]
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.35-2ubuntu2.10]
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openscap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.15-1ubuntu0.2]
[22:57] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive a while ago src:continuity got mistakenly deleted from proposed (what should have happened is that the binary package of the same name needs to be removed from release)
[22:57] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: can one of you fix this up? I don't think it's somehting I can do
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu1]
[23:00] <RAOF> "mwhudson" (https://matrix.to/#/@freenode_mwhudson:matrix.org): so you just need the binary removed from release, right?
[23:01] <mwhudson> RAOF: yes, and my attempt to re-sync the package from debian failed
[23:01] <mwhudson> so i might need help with that bit too
[23:02] <mwhudson> RAOF: also http://michael.hudsondoyle.geek.nz/raof.png
[23:03] <RAOF> Hah. I see the IRC bridge needs updating for some formatting changes 😀
[23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-boxes [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.5-0ubuntu1]
[23:05] <mwhudson> yeah
[23:11] <RAOF> Why does the continuity binary need to be removed from release?
[23:14] <mwhudson> because the package in unstable no longer builds that binary
[23:15] <mwhudson> RAOF: ^
[23:15] <RAOF> Fair cop.
[23:34] <bryce> RAOF, heya, don't know if you saw andreas' question earlier about recode:i386; it exists in lp but seems to be lacking a build for groovy.  This is making firebird3.0 stuck, which in turn php7.4 depends on.
[23:35] <bryce> RAOF, would a no-change rebuild unstick recode?  Or do you have a cleverer solution?
[23:35]  * RAOF has a look
[23:35] <mwhudson> most things are not built for i386 on groovy
[23:35] <mwhudson> why is php?
[23:36] <bryce> mwhudson, I was wondered that question myself, too :-)
[23:36] <mwhudson> is launchpad being slow for everyone or just me?
[23:37] <mwhudson> all requests seem to sit for ~5s before anything happens
[23:37] <bryce> mwhudson, yeah it seems a touch slower than usual for me today
[23:38] <mwhudson> vorlon: any idea why php7.4 is getting built for i386?
[23:38] <mwhudson> "  * No-change rebuild to enable build for i386" back in february
[23:41] <mwhudson> bah
[23:41] <mwhudson> RAOF: can you reject pam from focal unapproved?
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.1-5ubuntu4 => 1.3.1-5ubuntu4.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pam [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.1-5ubuntu4.1]
[23:45]  * mwhudson tries again
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.1-5ubuntu4 => 1.3.1-5ubuntu4.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.1 => 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.2] (core)