[01:29] <callmepk> good morning
[06:00] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers, happy Monday!
[06:00] <jamesh> hi oSoMoN 
[06:00] <oSoMoN> hey jamesh 
[06:23] <didrocks> good morning
[06:25] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks 
[06:32] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN, bon week-end ?
[06:34] <callmepk> good morning oSoMoN jamesh didrocks 
[06:37] <oSoMoN> didrocks, très bon, et toi?
[06:37] <oSoMoN> hey callmepk 
[06:42] <jamesh> hi callmepk, didrocks 
[06:43] <didrocks> hey callmepk, jamesh!
[06:43] <didrocks> oSoMoN: très bien, le rush final avant les vacances pour déménager, construire la cuisine, etc :)
[07:32] <clobrano> Hello everyone 0/
[07:38] <marcustomlinson> morning desktoppers
[07:39] <clobrano> could anyone point me where to open a bug to Tilix package? On 20.04 `apt show tilix` shows version 1.9.3-4build3, but once installed version is 1.9.1
[07:43] <didrocks> hyey clobrano, marcustomlinson 
[07:43] <didrocks>  tilix | 1.9.3-4build3  | focal/universe  | source, amd64, arm64
[07:43] <didrocks> clobrano: what does apt policy tilix says?
[07:43] <didrocks> say*
[07:44] <clobrano> hey didrocks, how are you? :)
[07:45] <clobrano> apt policy tilix says:
[07:45] <clobrano> tilix:
[07:45] <clobrano>   Installed: 1.9.3-4build3
[07:45] <clobrano>   Candidate: 1.9.3-4build3
[07:45] <clobrano>   Version table:
[07:45] <clobrano>  *** 1.9.3-4build3 500
[07:45] <clobrano>         500 http://it.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
[07:45] <clobrano>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[07:46] <jamesh> clobrano: I think upstream just forgot to update the version number
[07:46] <jamesh> see https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/blob/1.9.3/source/gx/tilix/constants.d#L69
[07:46] <jamesh> that's from the git tag for version 1.9.3
[07:47] <didrocks> yeah, and you obviously have the correct package installed :)
[07:47] <didrocks> those things should really be generated on release :)
[07:47] <clobrano> jamesh, indeed :D, however there is some content that seems missing as well. Version 1.9.3 is supposed to ship with Yaru scheme, which is not there
[07:48] <jamesh> clobrano: I've got no clue about that part.  Just pointing out that the "--version" output is likely to be misleading
[07:50] <oSoMoN> morning clobrano, marcustomlinson 
[07:50] <clobrano> jamesh, yes sure, I was just explaining why I got to see this version mismatch. I'll open a bug on github for this, thank you for looking at it
[07:53] <clobrano> morning oSoMoN 
[07:54] <marcustomlinson> hey didrocks and oSoMoN
[07:57] <jamesh> clobrano: looks like the Meson build script doesn't install the colour scheme: https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/blob/master/data/meson.build#L71
[07:58] <jamesh> clobrano: the yaru.json is definitely in the source tarball our package is built from, but the build system ignores it
[07:58] <clobrano> jamesh, oh that's it! Thank you, I can fix that
[08:02] <Laney> hullo
[08:12] <didrocks> hey hey Laney 
[08:17] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[08:19] <oSoMoN> salut seb128 
[08:19] <oSoMoN> morning Laney 
[08:19] <ricotz> good morning!
[08:21] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, comment ça va ? t'as passé un bon weekend?
[08:21] <seb128> hey ricotz, how are you?
[08:21] <oSoMoN> good morning ricotz 
[08:21] <seb128> hey Laney, how was the weekend?
[08:21] <oSoMoN> seb128, très bon, et toi?
[08:21] <seb128> nickel :-)
[08:23] <didrocks> salut seb128 !
[08:24] <ricotz> oSoMoN, didrocks, seb128, hey
[08:24] <ricotz> feeling good today :)
[08:24] <didrocks> hey ricotz 
[08:25] <seb128> lut didrocks, comment ça va ?
[08:25] <didrocks> ça va :) bientôt les vacances/travaux :)
[08:27] <seb128> :-)
[08:46] <Laney> moin didrocks oSoMoN seb128 
[08:46] <Laney> it was WET
[08:46] <Laney> but in between that I managed to have a coffee on a terrace which was nice, first one of those
[08:47] <Laney> hope yours was good too, probably that encrypted text said something about it
[08:48] <seb128> :-)
[08:51] <didrocks> the decryption key is public though :p
[08:51] <seb128> weekend was good, we had a bit of rain as well but managed to avoid being outside that those times :-) also we drove from East to North of France yesterday, change of scenary!
[08:55] <Laney> \o\
[08:57] <Laney> https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipPOUwMSIFn5ThvALN4-gXp-PjxepFNvTi05tepMhJK11x6SGydrzxId5Zu6Ut54Xg/photo/AF1QipPNbgDB_kyDRbLJ0U1gTBt5sCCrJyfolqGZESMA?key=M3YtYnBNamZaMlFNOEJnbU0tWXY3c3J2cEJ0bWtR
[08:57] <Laney> had to hide under a tree but it didn't help very much
[09:04] <didrocks> I would kill for this weather right now :)
[09:11] <Laney> heh
[12:35] <PaulePanter> Hi. I have a segfault message in `dmesg`. How can I find out, if a core dump file was generated?
[12:35] <PaulePanter> Would that be apport?
[12:35] <PaulePanter> https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/2279
[12:35] <gitbot> fwupd issue 2279 in fwupd "fwupd[7368]: segfault at ffffffffffffffc8 ip 00007fab5177de90 sp 00007ffd4c6404b0 error 5 in libxmlb.so.1.0.0[7fab51771000+1d000]" [Bug, Open]
[12:51] <seb128> PaulePanter, hey, check /var/log/apport.log
[13:02] <PaulePanter> seb128: It’s empty.
[13:09] <seb128> PaulePanter, is apport enabled? /etc/default/apport
[13:14] <PaulePanter> seb128: Yes, it is `enabled=1`.
[13:26] <seb128> PaulePanter, the log has maybe be rotated as apport.log.1 or such otherwise I don't know why apport doesn't work, try asking bdmurray on #ubuntu-devel
[13:35] <PaulePanter> ERROR: apport (pid 7020) Fri Jul 10 08:21:18 2020: host pid 7368 crashed in a separate mount namespace, ignoring
[13:35] <PaulePanter> seb128: Indeed, rotated.
[13:36] <seb128> PaulePanter, sounds like it didn't catch it due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1870060
[13:38] <PaulePanter> seb128: Thank you.
[13:38] <seb128> PaulePanter, yw!
[13:38] <PaulePanter> Bad luck, but it looks like the fwupd issue might be fixed upstream already. We will see.
[13:38] <seb128> PaulePanter, if you can easily trigger the bug you might want to just attach gdb to the process and get the stacktrace like that
[13:38] <PaulePanter> seb128: Unfortunately, I can’t. ;-)
[14:51] <KGB-1> mutter signed tags bfd5e7e Marco Trevisan ubuntu/3.36.4-1ubuntu2 * mutter Debian release 3.36.4-1ubuntu2 * https://deb.li/37YDR
[14:51] <KGB-1> mutter ubuntu/master 22da618 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/patches/x11-Add-support-for-fractional-scaling-using-Randr.patch * xrandr-scaling: Never try to set invalid screen sizes * https://deb.li/mS4D
[14:51] <KGB-1> mutter ubuntu/master 646d3d8 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/changelog * Update changelog * https://deb.li/3a5zz
[14:51] <KGB-1> mutter ubuntu/master fcb6436 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/changelog * Finalise changelog * https://deb.li/3I7RI
[15:09] <KGB-1> mutter signed tags 33741d8 Marco Trevisan ubuntu/3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 * mutter Debian release 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 * https://deb.li/AitU
[15:09] <KGB-1> mutter ubuntu/focal abcd9d3 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/patches/x11-Add-support-for-fractional-scaling-using-Randr.patch * xrandr-scaling: Never try to set invalid screen sizes * https://deb.li/30CBF
[15:09] <KGB-1> mutter ubuntu/focal e2681d5 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/changelog * Update changelog * https://deb.li/dSwi
[15:09] <KGB-1> mutter ubuntu/focal 1af85bc Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/changelog * Finalise changelog * https://deb.li/315Yh
[15:29] <Laney> update-manager is hard
[15:29] <seb128> :-(
[15:30] <Laney> it's alright
[15:30] <Laney> there's just not really a nice place to insert the special behaviour we need
[15:31] <Laney> have to create it
[15:34] <marcustomlinson> Laney: it's a little... complex
[15:34] <Laney> marcustomlinson: yeah
[15:34] <Laney> it's funny how it is like this and also quite rigid at the same time
[15:35] <Laney> at its core it expects to update/install/remove some packages
[15:35] <Laney> but the way it gets there is quite involved
[15:38] <marcustomlinson> yeah, I remember being all optimistic, and then seeing the code and thinking, "but how does it? where??"
[15:38] <marcustomlinson> got a lot to do with the project split I think
[15:40] <Laney> it's ok, I now have toast with super hot sriracha on
[15:41] <Laney> this makes it all ok
[15:47] <marcustomlinson> ☺