[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x264 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x264 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-viant-assertly [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.5.4-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phoc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phoc [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phoc [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pidcat [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-3]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phoc [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phoc [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phoc [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-itemadapter [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x264 [i386] (groovy-proposed) [2:0.160.3011+gitcde9a93-2]
[02:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.13-4] (no packageset)
[02:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.13-4] (no packageset)
[02:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.13-4] (no packageset)
[02:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.13-4] (no packageset)
[02:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.13-4] (no packageset)
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.13-4]
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.13-4]
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.13-4]
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.13-4]
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.13-4]
[02:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-francoispqt-gojay [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.13-3]
[04:31] <vorlon> rolling back hlint, which has a new build-dep on a package that's ftbfs on multiple archs
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.17.2-1] (no packageset)
[06:15] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon !
[06:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I was here to ask for it :D
[06:17] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, for cyrus-imapd, can you please add a link to this bug? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966114
[06:17] <ubot5> Debian bug 966114 in src:cyrus-imapd "src:cyrus-imapd: Mail::JMAPTalk version 0.15 required--this is only version 0.13 at ./Cassandane/Cyrus/JMAPCore.pm" [Serious,Open]
[06:18] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to remember that the sadness is related to code fetched randomly over internet
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-bpf [source] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-10-cross-mipsen [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2+c1ubuntu2]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.17.2-1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-10-cross-mipsen [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2+c1ubuntu2]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-bpf [source] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-bpf [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:14] <smb> Could someone have a look at unapproved queue for iproute2 in bionic? Thanks
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-bpf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-bpf [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-bpf [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-bpf [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-bpf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[08:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-bpf [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-bpf [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[08:29] <LocutusOfBorg> jdstrand, hello, looks like apparmor is really sad and regressed testsuite in release... do you have any idea?
[08:30] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, can we please have apparmor hinted so gsoap transition can finish? I did a self test to confirm https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/apparmor/groovy/arm64
[08:30] <LocutusOfBorg> this makes also apache2 and tor migrate, finally ^^
[08:53] <Laney> ok I pushed that linux policy
[08:53] <Laney> should be able to drop the force hint
[09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (bionic-proposed/universe) [7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[09:15] <Laney> lrm is still going to need fixing for the new nvidia in groovy though
[09:53] <sil2100> tsimonq2: hey! Could you verify the ubuntu-drivers-common SRU for focal today?
[09:53] <sil2100> tsimonq2: whoops, ignore me
[09:54] <sil2100> Argh, no tseliot here?
[10:20] <xnox> Laney:  yes, that's fine. I'm not quite sure what's the right way to write the patch though. Let me try doing something, and like write extensive comments about it.
[10:20] <xnox> Laney:  ghostbusters => which ones? original or remake?
[10:21] <Laney> xnox: read the rest of the backlog first, I ended up writing a LinuxPolicy
[10:21] <Laney> remake
[10:21] <xnox> Laney:  yeah, i saw that now. I looks good. But i wonder if that would catch everything.
[10:22] <xnox> I'm thinking about linux - linux-restricted-modules - nvidia vector of uninstallability
[10:22] <xnox> and yes lrm thing.
[10:22] <Laney> apw wanted it to maybe consider lrm too
[10:22] <Laney> I can't tell if that is a real problem
[10:22] <Laney> because it's all borked atm anyway
[10:22] <Laney> :<>
[10:23] <Laney> anyway that should be a matter of extending the find_meta thing to work for lrm too, and adding a test
[10:23] <xnox> apw:  vorlon: Laney: nvidia 440 rolled to 450 in groovy. Can we please force migrate l-r-m packages for all the flavours? or i guess please respin all the kernels in groovy with 450 nvidia?
[10:23] <Laney> so there is a place to contribute if you want :>
[10:23] <xnox> Laney:  thanks =)
[10:24] <Laney> force sounds wrong, that would make uninstallables, fixing sounds right -> kernel people
[10:24] <apw> xnox, :<
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:26] <xnox> Laney:  we kind of need to get the all out by wednesday evening.
[10:26] <xnox> *them
[10:27] <xnox> apw:  Laney: vorlon: or we can rollback nvidia-440 back to 440, instead of 450.
[10:27] <Laney> apply your flames to apw
[10:27] <xnox> then we will "just" need to rebuild the lrm modules to fake up the provides/depends like we had at focal release day.
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:28] <xnox> apw:  bjf: it really feels like lack of v5.4 uploads to groovy is hindering groovy development. And "copy-up" does not work, as they are not installable in groovy.
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:32] <Laney> is it hard / impossible to spin lrm only for 450?
[10:35] <apw> xnox, indeed, we should have had a 5.5 long ago ... sigh
[10:35] <apw> Laney, cannot just do lrm, we need to rebuild the master kernel to change the version
[10:36] <Laney> nod
[10:36] <xnox> Laney:  lrm vendorizes signatures that are generated suring "linux" build.
[10:36] <xnox> or like generates the right deps / meta packages.
[10:36] <apw> xnox, we will have a think about what we should do ... likely rather than copy forward we need to have a forward rebuilt-derivative
[10:37] <xnox> right, yes.
[10:37] <xnox> apw:  cause we don't have v5.5 gcp/aws/etc yet, right? (nor do we want to?)
[10:38] <xnox> apw:  or somehow make 450 available in focal-proposed, such that 450 compatible packages are generated there too.
[10:38] <apw> xnox, yeah it is asking a lot to do all the intermediates
[10:38] <apw> xnox, yeah, will think and propose something
[10:38] <xnox> or downgrade / remove 450 from groovy for now.
[10:38] <xnox> to let kernels migrate
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-bpf [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:39] <apw> lots of options i guess, though ... sigh
[10:39] <xnox> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-450/450.57-0ubuntu2 => or "just" remove the 440 transitionals that are build by 450?
[10:40] <xnox> acutally i don't think the kernels are uninstallble, as we should have both 440 from 440, and 440 from 450 builds published in the archive, and the ones from 440 build should resolve the install time deps, no?
[10:40] <xnox> (as in remove 440 binary .deb, without actually reuploading 450)
[10:41]  * apw wonders if the dominator will undo the domination
[10:42] <xnox> apw:  you might will have to copy from groovy, back to groovy the 440 binary packages build by 440
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-bpf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:43] <apw> xnox, indeed
[10:43] <xnox> to complete the ressurection ritual.
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-bpf [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:44]  * apw wonders if we should just not copy LRM forward at all
[10:44] <xnox> will make kernels not migrate
[10:44] <xnox> will regress daily groovy ubiquity installer
[10:44] <xnox> will break secureboot with nvidia for canonical devs
[10:45] <apw> ok, well thinking hat on, we needs osmething a bit more reliable than what we have
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:49] <Laney> at least coordination with tseliot when bumping the nvidia series ...
[10:52] <xnox> apw:  can i please have 5.4.0-42.46 based upload of linux-riscv into groovy-proposed? missmatches linux-libc-headers are still preventing to rebootstrap rust compiler. Or when will the 5.4.0-42.46 based linux-riscv be spun up in focal-proposed?
[10:52] <xnox> apw:  has the fix for linux-libc-headers to be built from src:linux instead of src:linux-riscv been committed for the next sru?
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-bpf [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:52]  * xnox ponders if i should try to troll the kernel team trello boards to find answers
[10:53] <apw> doubt that will help you
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-bpf [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:17] <Laney> xnox: apw: I wonder if demote-to-proposed nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 && copy-back 440 would work
[11:17] <Laney> probably wouldn't be that nice to existing groovy/nvidia users though
[11:18] <apw> no indeed, i think we likely should be rebuilding them or something
[11:21] <Laney> yeah ok
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-bpf [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-bpf [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-bpf [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-bpf [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-bpf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[13:26] <xnox> sil2100:  verified the two oem packages in the proposed. One is really good - everything works. The other one, has OEM suites published, but they currently do not contain anything (i.e. not even an OEM meta to upgrade to)
[13:26] <xnox> but they are good enough to release to updates; and ship on ISOs; they will not break installing on those SKUs.
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [67.1-3ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:48] <sil2100> xnox: thanks!
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200611-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wireguard [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (groovy-proposed) [67.1-3ubuntu1]
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.1 => 1:0.8.4~0.20.04.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.1 => 1:0.8.4~0.20.04.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.2]
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.2]
[14:34] <dgadomski> hey sil2100, could you please take a look at systemd in x/b queues and nss in b/f queues?
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra)
[15:12] <Trevinho> sil2100: hey, could you please help with the gnome-shell SRU for focal? I've also uploaded another mutter version that fixes a regression in proposed
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1.1 => 1.0.118ubuntu1.2] (core)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.95ubuntu0.6 => 1.0.95ubuntu0.7] (core)
[15:45] <vorlon> xnox: ghc migrated... so what's next
[15:49] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please apparmor hint?
[15:49] <LocutusOfBorg> icu and protobuf transition are next, and looks like they are both ongoing
[15:50] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done (but also, I don't see baseline retests across all archs?)
[15:51] <LocutusOfBorg> don't we usually just retry on one arch to see if it regresses in release?
[15:51] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for doing it
[15:51] <xnox> vorlon:  icu! in progress.
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, Laney looks like autopkgtests are really sad because of machine meh, e.g. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/anbox/groovy/amd64
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> and lots of unknown...
[15:52] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: no, I retry /all/ failures to verify they're reproducible in the release pocket, which in principle is what should be done automatically and also spares me having to actually look at build logs before setting hints
[15:52] <vorlon> xnox: icu? what happened to libffi?
[15:53] <xnox> vorlon:  libffi => upstream still is not committing to abi.
[15:53] <vorlon> ok
[15:54] <xnox> vorlon:  doko doesn't want to do libffi without upstream commit on an abi
[15:54] <xnox> vorlon:  also icu will probably trigger bits of ghc too!
[15:54] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: merci, will look
[15:54] <vorlon> xnox: yes, I see that it does :/
[15:55] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, a toi!
[15:55] <xnox> level1 of https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/icu67.html uploaded
[15:56] <xnox> I am expecting lots of gcc-10-by-default fallout
[15:56] <vorlon> levels blah
[15:56] <xnox> vorlon:  boost.
[15:57] <xnox> vorlon:  it has to come before one rebuilds things that depend on boost-regexp
[15:57] <vorlon> will they misbuild if you don't? or will they ftbfs?
[16:27] <sil2100> dgadomski, Trevinho: let me see what can be done!
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.118ubuntu1.2]
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [83.0.4103.97-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 84.0.4147.89-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.95ubuntu0.7]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [i386] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glusterfs [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glusterfs [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sope [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.3.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spyne [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.13.15-0.1] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: json-c [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [0.14+dfsg-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sope [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.3.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glusterfs [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [8.0-1]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sope [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [4.3.2-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sope [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.3.2-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shadowsocks-v2ray-plugin [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spyne [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.13.15-0.1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glusterfs [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [8.0-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted json-c [i386] (groovy-proposed) [0.14+dfsg-1]
[17:37] <vorlon> xnox, tseliot, apw: I concur that we need to roll back nvidia-450 to let the kernel through; can someone confirm for me what version of nvidia-440 is the one we want in the release pocket right now?
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glusterfs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [8.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:43] <apw> nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
[17:43] <apw> vorlon, that is what it appears to have in the dkms-versions; let me double check it has not been updated
[17:44] <vorlon> apw: in groovy? I see 440.100-0ubuntu1 published there
[17:44] <apw> vorlon, as you know tseliot claims that the version has to be 'very' close
[17:45] <apw> vorlon, but that indeed must be the same userspace
[17:45] <vorlon> apw: but I don't see that 440.100-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 was previously published in groovy at all
[17:45] <vorlon> apw: is that really the version we require?
[17:45] <apw> vorlon, sorry i am not being clear, i believe the version you mentioned is close enough to match
[17:45] <vorlon> was the kernel in groovy-proposed a binary copy from focal?
[17:45] <vorlon> ok
[17:45] <apw> vorlon, yes, a copy-forward
[17:47] <vorlon> ok
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:49] <vorlon> xnox, apw: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 demoted back to proposed, nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 self-copied back to restore older versions of binaries, afaiu that's all that's required, so let me know if there are other issues
[17:49] <apw> vorlon, thanks
[17:53] <vorlon> xnox: looks like this icu transition has entangled with nodejs which is going nowhere fast
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:54] <tumbleweed> re2 will too
[17:56] <vorlon> well, rebuilding the other revdeps of re2 then
[18:03] <vorlon> /<<BUILDDIR>>/clickhouse-18.16.1+ds/dbms/src/Interpreters/addMissingDefaults.h:23:35: error: ‘string’ is not a member of ‘std’
[18:03] <vorlon> ok boomer
[18:03] <tumbleweed> :P
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[19:27] <hellsworth> hey release folks, libreoffice-base is missing from a fresh groovy install of the latest daily iso build
[19:28] <hellsworth> however if i do a minimum install and then install libreoffice, libreoffice-base gets installed just fine
[19:28] <hellsworth> so there's some issue with the install from an iso
[19:29] <vorlon> hellsworth: libreoffice-base is the database component of libreoffice, it has not been installed by default for a very long time
[19:29] <vorlon> (probably since before it was named 'libreoffice')
[19:30] <vorlon> we install libreoffice-{calc,impress,math,writer} as part of the default desktop, not -base
[19:30] <hellsworth> i could have sworn base was there by default but maybe i've done so many installs of libreoffice that i just expect it to be there
[20:29] <vorlon> Laney: last britney run crashed with a python backtrace, ~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/groovy/2020-07-27/17:32:29.log
[20:45] <Laney> seems so, the next one worked, wonder what that's about
[20:45] <Laney> maybe some defensive logging would be in order
[20:46] <Laney> someone might want to move the nvidia-440 tests to the non huge queue
[20:48] <Laney> I would but I'm not on a proper device
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1] (no packageset)
[21:22] <xnox> vorlon:  but i think lrm is still not installable. I will see if i need to create bileto ppa, set it to groovy-release copy all the kernels into it, and rebuild lrm against the package version of nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 as seen in groovy. As it's different to the version number in focal.
[21:23] <xnox> vorlon:  than copy lrm builds back, and then migrate them over.
[21:24] <Laney> xnox: it looks ok on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output_notest.txt ?
[21:25] <xnox> Laney:  awwww! yeah!
[21:25] <xnox> i must have been still looking at stale output!
[21:27] <Laney> ok nvidias requeued
[21:27] <Laney> will purge the old ones
[21:27] <Laney> then bed time!
[21:28] <Laney> (holy moly @ new nodejs)
[21:39] <vorlon> apw: looks like kernel-packages subscriber is missing from the newer nvidia-graphics-drivers packages http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/m-r-package-team-mapping.html#unsubscribed
[21:40] <apw> vorlon, hrmmm, not ideal
[21:40] <Laney> ah it crashed with that message again
[21:40] <Laney> will look into that tomorrow
[21:40] <vorlon> xnox: apw asserts that the versions should be compatible; and I only see autopkgtests blocking on update_excuses
[21:57] <xnox> nodejs should be a strictly confined snap
[21:58] <xnox> vorlon:  ack
[21:59] <apw> vorlon, hopfully i have sorted out the subscriptions
[23:48] <vorlon> I: [2020-07-27T23:38:03+0000] - valid != valid_excuses. valid - valid_excuses: {'linux-5.7/5.7.0-15.16'}
[23:48] <vorlon> kerneeeeeelllllll
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-1ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[23:59] <mwhudson> vorlon: just remove it!