[00:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728)
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
=== valorie is now known as valorie_
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pulseaudio [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:11.1-1ubuntu7.10]
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpcap (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.1 => 1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.2] (core)
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, should we do a boost-icu transition too?
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg>  liblucene++0v5 : Depends: libboost-regex1.71.0-icu66
[08:32] <LocutusOfBorg> this happens in poedit
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> in the meanwhile I'm rebuilding lucene++
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (focal-proposed/main) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.2 => 1:0.8.4~0.20.04.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:11] <Laney> some of the lxd-armhf machines are borked, will destroy & re-create them
[09:11] <Laney> (might just do them all, that'll be quicker)
[09:12] <Laney> a job to do this on a rolling basis would be neat if anyone wants a fun task ...
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1:0.8.4~0.20.04.3]
[09:47] <Trevinho> SRU team ping: can you please check mutter and shell in focal queue?
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-1]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-1]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-1]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-1]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-1]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.1-1]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.44 => 2.525.45] (desktop-core)
[10:55] <doko> xnox: is the icu tracker correct? asc migrated, but still shows as bad
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rsubread [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rsubread [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rsubread [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rsubread [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1] (no packageset)
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-rsubread [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1] (no packageset)
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: raspberrypi-userland (groovy-proposed/primary) [0~20200520+git2fe4ca3-0ubuntu1]
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8821ce (focal-proposed/universe) [5.5.2.1-0ubuntu3 => 5.5.2.1-0ubuntu4~20.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:08] <Laney> Looks like it got the levels wrong wrt boost, probably something to do with the provides
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (bionic-proposed/universe) [7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (focal-proposed/universe) [8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.1 => 8613-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> can we please wait a little bit with icu/boost rebuilds?
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm mostly over with protobuf/re2 transition
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> oh damn, clichouse is entangling them already :/
[13:09] <LocutusOfBorg> and node-re2 is entangling with nodejs hurray
[13:59] <Laney> we can probably boot those out
[14:05] <Laney> will do that
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-boxes (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.5-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.5-0ubuntu2] (desktop-extra)
[14:12] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: done, now get protobuf to go
[14:25] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, I'm trying to figure out gnss-sdr, and compiz on s390x
[14:27] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, also gnss-sdr can be kicked out? because it needs boost/icu to build...
[14:27] <Laney> looks ok
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll try to fix again once gnuradio publishes
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, mir autopkgtest looks suspiciously related to icu/boost
[14:29] <LocutusOfBorg> or maybe just a slow answer
[14:29] <Laney> they have #ubuntu-mir iirc, might have more luck there
[14:32] <Laney> gnss-sdr gone
[14:32] <Laney> so just compiz/s390x, and that has rdeps
[14:33] <Laney> (but probably questionable value ...)
[15:03] <vorlon> apw: component-mismatches says we want to promote linux-5.7, which also does not have a kernel-packages subscriber
[15:03] <apw> vorlon, that one is just about dead i believe, and will be removed rather
[15:03] <apw> sforshee, ^ you are moving off -5.7 right?
[15:04] <sforshee> apw: right
[15:04] <apw> sforshee, how long before it can be wacked
[15:04] <sforshee> apw: it should be ok to go ahead and remove it I think
[15:12] <apw> sforshee, that had a non-overlapping synthetic udeb didn't it ?
[15:13] <apw> oh but the primary kernl package probabally provides things
[15:15] <apw>  Provides: efi-modules, ext3-modules, ext4-modules, kernel-image, squashfs-modules
[15:15] <apw> ok confirmed, i believe this is why those things are trying to pull it into main, even though there is something in main which already provides them; in that sense a false positive
[15:16] <apw> and also it is safe to remove them because there is other provision
[15:16] <xnox> apw: is that in groovy, or some other suite?
[15:16] <apw> groovy-proposed
[15:16] <xnox> apw:  hm, there should be nothing that tries to pull them in =/
[15:16] <xnox> oh
[15:16] <xnox> yes
[15:16] <xnox> yes it will.
[15:16] <apw> partman's udebs depend on some of the provides:
[15:17] <xnox> apw:  until we implement building with `noudeb` profile and remove all the udebs.
[15:17] <xnox> apw:  also `partman-base` should have been removed from groovy
[15:17] <xnox> (the rest of partman-* was)
[15:17] <apw> anyhow, we should ignore component-missmatch-proposed's desire to pull it in, and i believe it safe to remove; and i will do that in a bit
[15:18] <xnox> yeap
[16:08] <vorlon> Laney: so I added a block linux-5.7 to work around the tracebacks and let things migrate; feel free to twiddle that as necessary for debugging
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> why the hell is cura-engine still installing both old and new protobuf in autopkgtests? https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/c/cura-engine/20200728_140842_89b0d@/log.gz
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> it fails because we can't have both
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[16:10] <Laney> vorlon: ah, I think I fixed it, will drop that
[16:10] <vorlon> Laney: ok, cheers
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zita-ajbridge (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.4-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio)
[16:17] <Eickmeyer> ^ bug 1889146
[16:17] <ubot5> bug 1889146 in zita-ajbridge (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Loss of USB device causes zita-ajbridge to run cpu at 100% and hang" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1889146
[16:18] <Laney> I'm going to try rolling back sysdig, new one looks like it's broken on armhf
[16:27] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, thanks!
[16:28] <xnox> vorlon:  i am now wondering if most of my binNMUs that I uploaded were all wrong.
[16:28] <xnox> i can't seem to find a bunch of them, and some have migrated cause they managed to build against 66 icu.
[16:33] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: cura-engine needs a trigger on libarcus, want to do that?
[16:35] <xnox> separate thing
[16:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I think I just did that
[16:37] <Laney> neat, it passed
[16:39] <bryyce> is there something I can do to help remove the remaining php-horde-* bits?  (see lp: #1880776)  There's a couple handfuls of packages on excuses like php-horde-activesync, php-horde-core, etc.
[16:39] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1880776 in php-horde (Ubuntu) "Please blacklist and remove php-horde and php-horde-* from groovy (and future releases)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1880776
[16:44] <xnox> vorlon:  hm https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0ad/0.0.23.1-4ubuntu4/+build/19741761 what's going on =( no build log?!
[16:51] <Laney> I think there's an outage of sorts going on at the minute which cjwatson is working on
[16:52] <cjwatson> Indeed
[17:04] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, we need also a gazebo trigger
[17:05] <Laney> I've hinted that and something else, it's some apt weirdness getting the right versions of boost-icu installed
[17:05] <LocutusOfBorg> done, hopefully
[17:05] <Laney> took ages fiddling around in a vm and made it pass in the end
[17:06] <LocutusOfBorg> I think gazebo just needed an hint without boost inside
[17:06] <Laney> so I added a skiptest ...
[17:06] <Laney> well if yours works, good :-)
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> now we are waiting for the outage to finish
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> compiz build looks sad
[17:08] <Laney> just the outage mentioned above, should hopefully unstick itself when that's fixed
[17:09] <Laney> I think it's going to come down to just mir remaining
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> mir is "fixed"
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, test disabled in s390x
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> btw I *think* sysdig removal was not correct, better hint on armhf
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [/var/lib/dkms/sysdig/0.26.7/build/sysdig-probe.ko] undefined!
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> well, I see no div in the diff between .4 and .7
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> probably a new kernel module added?
[17:10] <Laney> we'll see
[17:11] <xnox> doko:  fixed up icu67 tracker, it was wrong. Will take a little bit for it to republish.
[17:12] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: I think you confused mir and compiz
[17:13] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/1.7.1-0ubuntu7
[17:13] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, ^^
[17:14] <LocutusOfBorg> needs riscv64 to finish build
[17:14] <LocutusOfBorg> and compiz is fixed on s390x
[17:14] <Laney> I know, that doesn't say disabled test on s390x
[17:14] <LocutusOfBorg> yep :)
[17:14] <Laney> soooooo
[17:14] <LocutusOfBorg> + * Linux 5.6 kernels no longer include the old 32-bit timeval
[17:14] <LocutusOfBorg> + * structures. But the syscalls (might) still use them.
[17:15] <LocutusOfBorg> sysdiag might have regressed in this
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.2]
[17:17] <Laney> it seems moderately active upstream, if you wanted to look there might be a commit
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libpcap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.2]
[17:18] <bdmurray> How many double uploads can one SRU queue have?
[17:20] <bdmurray> jamespage: There are 2 uploads of openvswitch in the bionic SRU queue. Is there one that you prefer? The diffs are substantially different in size.
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpcap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.2]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-2ubuntu1.2]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.2]
[18:34] <Eickmeyer> RAOF or bdmurray: Could we get a quick look at the zita-ajbridge upload for bug 1889146? This fixes a regression causing 100% CPU usage.
[18:35] <ubot5> bug 1889146 in zita-ajbridge (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Loss of USB device causes zita-ajbridge to run cpu at 100% and hang" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1889146
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zita-ajbridge [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.4-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[18:56] <Eickmeyer> Thanks!
[19:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (bionic-proposed/main) [3.98ubuntu11~18.04.1 => 3.98ubuntu11~18.04.2] (core)
[20:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.98ubuntu11~18.04.2]
[20:07] <ddstreet> bdmurray hello, got a request to review the systemd upload in bionic, it's been there for 20 days
[20:08] <ddstreet> it fixes the bugs listed in the changelog (including a FTBFS on arm64), and also there's a new issue that requires a rebuild after kmod is accepted, for LP: #1889297
[20:08] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1889297 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "Bionic: debian-installer FTBFS because udev-udeb depends on libkmod2 not libkmod2-udeb" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1889297
[20:09] <ddstreet> so the kmod patch is needed first, before systemd is accepted
[20:10] <ddstreet> mfo is working on the kmod revert i believe
[20:12] <bdmurray> ddstreet: so there is nothing for me to do yet?
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.45]
=== valorie_ is now known as valorie
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icingaweb2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.1-1 => 2.4.1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected icingaweb2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.10-1ubuntu0.4]
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ntp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-5ubuntu7.2]
[20:40] <ddstreet> bdmurray i thought mfo had already uploaded kmod, but looks like not, so no nothing yet. sorry.
[20:54] <mfo> ddstreet, bdmurray: yup, kmod is not yet uploaded.  it's waiting on PPA builders. :/ as soon as that is finished and tested i'll upload.  thanks.
[20:55] <mfo> oh, sending the msg did help. builders started! :D
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.policy [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.33.1-0ubuntu3]
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.3.0-1ubuntu0.3]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.1.0-3ubuntu0.4]
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icingaweb2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.1-1ubuntu0.1]
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backport-iwlwifi-dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [7906-0ubuntu4~18.04.2]
[22:16] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please once built everywhere, rollback pokerth 1.1.2-1build9 to pokerth 1.1.2-1build8 thanks
[22:16] <LocutusOfBorg> protobuf is ready for migration
[22:17] <LocutusOfBorg> (see backlog, we were holding back some packages to avoid protobuf entangling with icu/nodejs/re/boost
[22:17] <LocutusOfBorg> )
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (bionic-proposed/main) [24-1ubuntu3.4 => 24-1ubuntu3.5] (core)
[22:49] <mfo> bdmurray, just uploaded kmod to bionic, if you have a chance. thanks!
[22:49] <mfo> it needs to build/be avail before systemd.
[22:53] <xnox> i would call it critical for the bionic point release
[22:54] <bdmurray> xnox: which it? systemd or kmod?
[22:56] <xnox> bdmurray:  both, they are related =)
[22:56] <xnox> "ressurect kmod-udeb, make systemd's udebs use kmod-udebs again"
[23:01] <bdmurray> Okay, I've somewhere to be shortly but will try and look at it later this evening
[23:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: how can protobuf be ready to go? dnsdist is tied to both protobuf and re2
[23:22] <mfo> xnox, i believe you're aware, but just in case, please note that systemd in bionic's upload queue has more changes than the systemd debdiff attached in LP#1889297 (which was more of a "no change rebuild" w/ just a fix to arm64 FTBFS), if that's the one you looked at recently.
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1)
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1)