ubptgbot | <matv1> thanks very much for that great Teleports update. Finaly makes my Pinephone that much more usable! | 00:14 |
---|---|---|
ubptgbot | ekonindaernan was added by: ekonindaernan | 05:26 |
ubptgbot | bittin1 was added by: bittin1 | 07:49 |
ubptgbot | <bittin1> some UBPorts talk in this weeks LUP | 07:49 |
ubptgbot | <bittin1> https://linuxunplugged.com/364 | 07:50 |
ubptgbot | <bittin1> 33 minutes in | 07:50 |
ubptgbot | <Stereofont> @zoomer296 [I understand why it was removed, and I'm glad it was. There was just a bit of a …], They do. The forum is often a better place for a question or very specific advice. There, it can be picked up a week later and threads can develop | 08:22 |
ubptgbot | <mark alexa> Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consider it a request feature. I've got this person keeps calling me and I want to block the person without having to change my number. Redirecting to voicemail would do but there's no such option specifically. | 09:40 |
ubptgbot | <Stereofont> @mark alexa [Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consi …], The carrier may be able to help? I agree that in phone would be good. It has been discussed before. Confinement may be an obstacle? If we could assign ringtones you could select a silent one 😎 | 09:43 |
ubptgbot | <mark alexa> I searched how my carrier can help, the thing is carrier advice was applicable to Android and iPhones users only. UT is third-party mobile os not supported by major carriers. The only thing they could do is change the number. | 09:47 |
ubptgbot | <Stereofont> Dual SIM is a good way to transition gradually | 09:49 |
ubptgbot | <NotKit> technically it can be probably handled inside telephony-service | 09:49 |
ubptgbot | <Stereofont> Harassment by phone is a criminal offence of course. Also could get their account closed | 09:50 |
ubptgbot | <NotKit> there is in particular telephony-service-approver | 09:50 |
ubptgbot | <NotKit> if anyone wants to dig into code, that is the relevant function: https://github.com/ubports/telephony-service/blob/xenial/approver/approver.cpp#L425 - it already fetches contact, so probably some kind of flag could be checked to avoid sound/vibration | 09:54 |
ubptgbot | <Stereofont> If you switched your SIM to Android for a few days and blocked, maybe they would give up? | 09:56 |
ubptgbot | <j2g2rp> @mark alexa [Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consi …], There is a app, but is closed source and unconfined. … I don't know if it works yet because my bq got broken and I didn't purchased it again for my nexus 5 . I don't know if it works on pinephone either. … http://f-call-dev.blogspot.com/ | 11:31 |
ubptgbot | <j2g2rp> @mark alexa [Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consi …], [Edit] There is an app, but is closed source and unconfined. … I don't know if it works yet because my bq got broken and I didn't purchased it again for my nexus 5 . I don't know if it works on pinephone either. … http://f-call-dev.blogspot.co | 11:31 |
ubptgbot | m/ | 11:31 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> @NotKit [if anyone wants to dig into code, that is the relevant function: https://github. …], mark perhaps we should file a feature request on this repo? perhaps with the tip Thekit gave, that way we can track it better | 12:09 |
ubptgbot | <NotKit> @Fuseteam project management is probably a better place | 12:10 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> actually there's a open issue about it https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/issues/738 | 12:11 |
gitbot | ubports issue 738 in ubuntu-touch "Feature Request: Some way to ignore/silence nuisance/unwanted callers (such as custom ringtone per contact)" [Enhancement, Open] | 12:11 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> project management? | 12:11 |
ubptgbot | <NotKit> The one you linked :) | 12:11 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> ah lol | 12:11 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> let's add the info to it xD | 12:11 |
ubptgbot | <mark alexa> Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected straight to voicemail. | 12:12 |
ubptgbot | <NotKit> One step at a time I guess | 12:13 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> step 1 add your thoughts to the issue you get subscribed to it xD | 12:14 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> i am almost tempted to copy paste the link to the code TheKit mentioned 😂 | 12:15 |
ubptgbot | <arudy> @mark alexa [Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected st …], Silenting without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pretant you were AFK and didnt silenced them (for your own reason) | 12:16 |
ubptgbot | <arudy> @mark alexa [Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected st …], [Edit] Silenting without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pretend you were AFK and didnt silenced them (for your own reason) | 12:16 |
ubptgbot | <arudy> @mark alexa [Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected st …], [Edit] Silencing without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pretend you were AFK and didnt silenced them (for your own reason) | 12:16 |
ubptgbot | <mrcyjanek> @arudy [Silencing without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pr …], +1 | 12:17 |
ubptgbot | <arudy> it's a feature my reason (my privacy) first :) | 12:18 |
ubptgbot | <arudy> if i want to send to voicemail, just clic the red button :) | 12:18 |
ubptgbot | <arudy> [Edit] it's a feature, my reason ,my privacy first :) | 12:18 |
ubptgbot | Mauricio Ardila was added by: Mauricio Ardila | 12:49 |
ubptgbot | <malditobastardo> There is a paid app | 13:21 |
ubptgbot | <malditobastardo> The one @j2g2rp linked | 13:21 |
ubptgbot | <malditobastardo> Give it a try | 13:21 |
ubptgbot | Dmitriy was added by: Dmitriy | 13:42 |
ubptgbot | <Dmitriy> How hard would it be to add ath9k usb-wifi adapters support ? Assuming that Android 3.x kernel is available ? Or where can I find halium-enabled kernels. Let's say device is `nexus 5` or `xiaomi x4 santoni` | 13:45 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> @Dmitriy [How hard would it be to add ath9k usb-wifi adapters support ? Assuming that Andr …], Here for N5 (note that this is Halium 7.1 kernel which is not yet released to public) https://github.com/ubports/android_kernel_lge_hammerhead/tree/halium-7.1 | 13:51 |
ubptgbot | <Danqok> https://github.com/ubports-santoni | 13:53 |
ubptgbot | <anpok> @ma ma [hey everyone, does anyone know if there is contact to https://www.shiftphones.co …], We received a few dev devices.. @NotKit had ut running to some degree | 14:00 |
ubptgbot | <Dmitriy> @Flohack [Here for N5 (note that this is Halium 7.1 kernel which is not yet released to pu …], So it is matter of editing config file, run `make_defconfig.sh` and it should spit up new kernel which I should replace with my TWRP ? | 14:01 |
ubptgbot | <anpok> So yeah there is contact..we are looking forward to their upcoming hardware.. | 14:01 |
ubptgbot | <gischpelino> I think call blocking on UT is a must have. *Feature request* | 14:02 |
ubptgbot | <Dmitriy> @Danqok [https://github.com/ubports-santoni], Do you have by chance also kernel for Xiaomi Kenzo/Kate ? (Ideally with halium support) | 14:04 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> @Dmitriy [So it is matter of editing config file, run make_defconfig.sh and it should spit …], No, you need to run mka halium-boot from top level folder (after setting up the whole tree correctly). Android builds are a bit different than ordinary Linux kernel make | 14:08 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> because boot.img contains kernel + initrd stuff that brings up the rootfs | 14:09 |
ubptgbot | <Danqok> https://github.com/sailfishos-kenzo but sailfish is using libhybris, not halium | 14:11 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> @gischpelino [I think call blocking on UT is a must have. *Feature request*], please comment about it here https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/issues/738 | 14:12 |
gitbot | ubports issue 738 in ubuntu-touch "Feature Request: Some way to ignore/silence nuisance/unwanted callers (such as custom ringtone per contact)" [Enhancement, Open] | 14:12 |
ubptgbot | <Danqok> @Dmitriy [Do you have by chance also kernel for Xiaomi Kenzo/Kate ? (Ideally with halium s …], I own kate device (currently broken display), was trying porting before, but not many things worked. My repos: https://github.com/dano6 | 14:14 |
ubptgbot | <Danqok> I dont know about anybody else working on it | 14:16 |
ubptgbot | <ma ma> @anpok [We received a few dev devices.. @NotKit had ut running to some degree], ah okay, thanks for answer! so there was a contact to shiftphone before. there also is a topic in the UBports forum/general on this. | 14:18 |
ubptgbot | <Dmitriy> @Danqok [I own kate device (currently broken display), was trying porting before, but not …], Understood, thank you! | 14:21 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> after hearing more about /e/ and some services they offer i wonder if the /e/ foundation and the ubports foundation can also collaborate to a certain degree | 14:23 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> [Edit] after hearing more about /e/ and some services they offer to users i wonder if the /e/ foundation and the ubports foundation can also collaborate to a certain degree | 14:24 |
=== clopez_ is now known as clopez | ||
ubptgbot | <anpok> The main dev is from austria.. maybe Flo already knows him | 14:32 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> @anpok [The main dev is from austria.. maybe Flo already knows him], Wut? No | 14:34 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> Let me get in touch with him 😆 | 14:35 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> i thought it was estonia | 14:35 |
ubptgbot | <Steve Kueffer> @gischpelino [I think call blocking on UT is a must have. *Feature request*], I do agree! Perhaps it’s possible to block incoming calls from specific numbers using a key sequence on the dialler as temporary workaround , (ex: *#31+16784534*...) But I’m unable to find those keys on the web... | 15:32 |
ubptgbot | <gischpelino> @Steve Kueffer [I do agree! Perhaps it’s possible to block incoming calls from specific numbers …], that one does not show your number to recipient. … Maybe tis helps, search web for 'gsm service codes'. … http://www.borgus.net/gsmkode.htm | 15:54 |
ubptgbot | <Steve Kueffer> @gischpelino [that one does not show your number to recipient. … Maybe tis helps, search web for …], Oh great Thank you. That’s what I was looking for. Unfortunately there’s no key to bar a specific number... | 16:26 |
devrtz | 1/quit | 16:42 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> @dohbee [i thought it was estonia], Confirmed he is Austrian 😆 | 16:44 |
ubptgbot | <zoomer296> One thing I've noticed with Ubuntu Touch during my time using it is that for an OS designed with phablets in mind, a lot of its controls are placed out of reach. … Is there any way we could get a back gesture on the bottom-right edge? | 17:02 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> then here's the question to you: what could be used as a back gesture? | 17:38 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> throwing the phone | 17:41 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> the idea of a way to "go back" has been discussed a couple of times but so far there has been no idea how to do it in the design in the os | 17:41 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> shaking the phone has been mentioned yes but no verdict on that iirc xD | 17:42 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> no, i mean like throwing your phone into a volcano | 17:44 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> go back, whence ye came, infernal beast | 17:44 |
ubptgbot | <UniversalSuperBox> I believe it's called a "yeet" nowadays | 17:45 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> lol | 17:50 |
ubptgbot | <amyosx> @UniversalSuperBox [I believe it's called a "yeet" nowadays], YEEEEEEETTTT THOSE 'NADES | 18:00 |
ubptgbot | <amyosx> @UniversalSuperBox [I believe it's called a "yeet" nowadays], [Edit] YEEEEEEETTTT THOSE 'NADES BOOOYYYYYSSSSS | 18:00 |
ubptgbot | <amyosx> - my friend when we play PUBG | 18:01 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> @Fuseteam [shaking the phone has been mentioned yes but no verdict on that iirc xD], Now that I see rotation sensor is working how about a 90° rotate along z axis (the exis that goes along the long side of the device)? That would feel quite natural | 18:35 |
ubptgbot | iifraz was added by: iifraz | 18:44 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> @Fuseteam [the idea of a way to "go back" has been discussed a couple of times but so far t …], there is many diffrent ways of going back, within app, and within os navigation | 18:52 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> so are we talking of within app - if we implement a second shortcut for the page navigation, this would perhaps only work with qml apps, maybe only ones using our toolkit | 18:53 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> but if tracking app, and window navigation, you would need tracking of every movement | 18:54 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> a 'chain' of navigation | 18:55 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> but what do you do when hitting back after opening app? close it? navigate to blank screen, previous app? | 18:56 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> @mateosalta [so are we talking of within app - if we implement a second shortcut for the page …], it would have to be implemented in a way that synthesizes the "back" keypress | 18:57 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> then you have the idea of back within the browser | 18:58 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> erg, then i remember when chrome desktop linked 'backspace' to back... | 18:59 |
ubptgbot | <UniversalSuperBox> That is implemented in morph-browser as well | 19:00 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> if you hit backspace a few times while editing text, it went to the previous page | 19:00 |
ubptgbot | <UniversalSuperBox> That was more a case of your cursor leaving the text field | 19:00 |
ubptgbot | <UniversalSuperBox> But yes, does exist. | 19:00 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> so bad, happened many times on fill out forms for stuff | 19:01 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> of course our gov stuff didnt implement properly - quote at the top said not to use the browsers navigation... or all work lost | 19:03 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> yeah computers are bad | 19:03 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> i think apps handling it per app is good for now | 19:04 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> rather that then something that works diffrently in diffrent situations, or not at all in some | 19:05 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> but maybe there could be a uuitk hack that moves the header bar? | 19:08 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> no | 19:09 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> not offically of course | 19:09 |
ubptgbot | <dohbee> it's a bunch of c++ and stuff | 19:09 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> would be an ugly mess | 19:10 |
ubptgbot | <mateosalta> because most apps also have something else linked to the osk | 19:11 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> @Flohack [Now that I see rotation sensor is working how about a 90° rotate along z axis (t …], could work why not? xD | 19:32 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> @mateosalta [there is many diffrent ways of going back, within app, and within os navigation], and then there's that aspect | 19:33 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> tldr; is a not so easy to implement | 19:35 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> especially across different form factors | 19:35 |
ubptgbot | yatman7117 was added by: yatman7117 | 21:30 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> @mateosalta [i think apps handling it per app is good for now], actually this is a good point | 21:47 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> like say teleports could have it's own bottom swipe(which is currently unused) that includes a way to go back while that doesn't apply to morph | 21:49 |
ubptgbot | <iifraz> Does Ubuntu Touch work on Redmi Note 8 Pro | 23:00 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> the only devices where it works in at devices.ubuntu-touch.io | 23:09 |
ubptgbot | DanielS79 was added by: DanielS79 | 23:09 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> any other devices will have to be ported by owners of the device in question | 23:09 |
ubptgbot | <iifraz> 🙂 thx | 23:11 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> (Photo, 371x237) https://irc.ubports.com/9UAovJbU.png | 23:13 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> this deffo feels better worded now haha | 23:13 |
ubptgbot | <Fuseteam> still a bit wordy but better | 23:13 |
ubptgbot | <Flohack> @Fuseteam [<reply to media>], Great message! | 23:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!