[00:14] thanks very much for that great Teleports update. Finaly makes my Pinephone that much more usable! [05:26] ekonindaernan was added by: ekonindaernan [07:49] bittin1 was added by: bittin1 [07:49] some UBPorts talk in this weeks LUP [07:50] https://linuxunplugged.com/364 [07:50] 33 minutes in [08:22] @zoomer296 [I understand why it was removed, and I'm glad it was. There was just a bit of a …], They do. The forum is often a better place for a question or very specific advice. There, it can be picked up a week later and threads can develop [09:40] Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consider it a request feature. I've got this person keeps calling me and I want to block the person without having to change my number. Redirecting to voicemail would do but there's no such option specifically. [09:43] @mark alexa [Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consi …], The carrier may be able to help? I agree that in phone would be good. It has been discussed before. Confinement may be an obstacle? If we could assign ringtones you could select a silent one 😎 [09:47] I searched how my carrier can help, the thing is carrier advice was applicable to Android and iPhones users only. UT is third-party mobile os not supported by major carriers. The only thing they could do is change the number. [09:49] Dual SIM is a good way to transition gradually [09:49] technically it can be probably handled inside telephony-service [09:50] Harassment by phone is a criminal offence of course. Also could get their account closed [09:50] there is in particular telephony-service-approver [09:54] if anyone wants to dig into code, that is the relevant function: https://github.com/ubports/telephony-service/blob/xenial/approver/approver.cpp#L425 - it already fetches contact, so probably some kind of flag could be checked to avoid sound/vibration [09:56] If you switched your SIM to Android for a few days and blocked, maybe they would give up? [11:31] @mark alexa [Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consi …], There is a app, but is closed source and unconfined. … I don't know if it works yet because my bq got broken and I didn't purchased it again for my nexus 5 . I don't know if it works on pinephone either. … http://f-call-dev.blogspot.com/ [11:31] @mark alexa [Can a caller blocking be implemented at some point on UT devices ? You can consi …], [Edit] There is an app, but is closed source and unconfined. … I don't know if it works yet because my bq got broken and I didn't purchased it again for my nexus 5 . I don't know if it works on pinephone either. … http://f-call-dev.blogspot.co [11:31] m/ [12:09] @NotKit [if anyone wants to dig into code, that is the relevant function: https://github. …], mark perhaps we should file a feature request on this repo? perhaps with the tip Thekit gave, that way we can track it better [12:10] @Fuseteam project management is probably a better place [12:11] actually there's a open issue about it https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/issues/738 [12:11] ubports issue 738 in ubuntu-touch "Feature Request: Some way to ignore/silence nuisance/unwanted callers (such as custom ringtone per contact)" [Enhancement, Open] [12:11] project management? [12:11] The one you linked :) [12:11] ah lol [12:11] let's add the info to it xD [12:12] Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected straight to voicemail. [12:13] One step at a time I guess [12:14] step 1 add your thoughts to the issue you get subscribed to it xD [12:15] i am almost tempted to copy paste the link to the code TheKit mentioned 😂 [12:16] @mark alexa [Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected st …], Silenting without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pretant you were AFK and didnt silenced them (for your own reason) [12:16] @mark alexa [Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected st …], [Edit] Silenting without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pretend you were AFK and didnt silenced them (for your own reason) [12:16] @mark alexa [Guys, silencing the call isn't good enough. The caller needs to be redirected st …], [Edit] Silencing without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pretend you were AFK and didnt silenced them (for your own reason) [12:17] @arudy [Silencing without knocking out to the voicemail is good when you just want to pr …], +1 [12:18] it's a feature my reason (my privacy) first :) [12:18] if i want to send to voicemail, just clic the red button :) [12:18] [Edit] it's a feature, my reason ,my privacy first :) [12:49] Mauricio Ardila was added by: Mauricio Ardila [13:21] There is a paid app [13:21] The one @j2g2rp linked [13:21] Give it a try [13:42] Dmitriy was added by: Dmitriy [13:45] How hard would it be to add ath9k usb-wifi adapters support ? Assuming that Android 3.x kernel is available ? Or where can I find halium-enabled kernels. Let's say device is `nexus 5` or `xiaomi x4 santoni` [13:51] @Dmitriy [How hard would it be to add ath9k usb-wifi adapters support ? Assuming that Andr …], Here for N5 (note that this is Halium 7.1 kernel which is not yet released to public) https://github.com/ubports/android_kernel_lge_hammerhead/tree/halium-7.1 [13:53] https://github.com/ubports-santoni [14:00] @ma ma [hey everyone, does anyone know if there is contact to https://www.shiftphones.co …], We received a few dev devices.. @NotKit had ut running to some degree [14:01] @Flohack [Here for N5 (note that this is Halium 7.1 kernel which is not yet released to pu …], So it is matter of editing config file, run `make_defconfig.sh` and it should spit up new kernel which I should replace with my TWRP ? [14:01] So yeah there is contact..we are looking forward to their upcoming hardware.. [14:02] I think call blocking on UT is a must have. *Feature request* [14:04] @Danqok [https://github.com/ubports-santoni], Do you have by chance also kernel for Xiaomi Kenzo/Kate ? (Ideally with halium support) [14:08] @Dmitriy [So it is matter of editing config file, run make_defconfig.sh and it should spit …], No, you need to run mka halium-boot from top level folder (after setting up the whole tree correctly). Android builds are a bit different than ordinary Linux kernel make [14:09] because boot.img contains kernel + initrd stuff that brings up the rootfs [14:11] https://github.com/sailfishos-kenzo but sailfish is using libhybris, not halium [14:12] @gischpelino [I think call blocking on UT is a must have. *Feature request*], please comment about it here https://github.com/ubports/ubuntu-touch/issues/738 [14:12] ubports issue 738 in ubuntu-touch "Feature Request: Some way to ignore/silence nuisance/unwanted callers (such as custom ringtone per contact)" [Enhancement, Open] [14:14] @Dmitriy [Do you have by chance also kernel for Xiaomi Kenzo/Kate ? (Ideally with halium s …], I own kate device (currently broken display), was trying porting before, but not many things worked. My repos: https://github.com/dano6 [14:16] I dont know about anybody else working on it [14:18] @anpok [We received a few dev devices.. @NotKit had ut running to some degree], ah okay, thanks for answer! so there was a contact to shiftphone before. there also is a topic in the UBports forum/general on this. [14:21] @Danqok [I own kate device (currently broken display), was trying porting before, but not …], Understood, thank you! [14:23] after hearing more about /e/ and some services they offer i wonder if the /e/ foundation and the ubports foundation can also collaborate to a certain degree [14:24] [Edit] after hearing more about /e/ and some services they offer to users i wonder if the /e/ foundation and the ubports foundation can also collaborate to a certain degree === clopez_ is now known as clopez [14:32] The main dev is from austria.. maybe Flo already knows him [14:34] @anpok [The main dev is from austria.. maybe Flo already knows him], Wut? No [14:35] Let me get in touch with him 😆 [14:35] i thought it was estonia [15:32] @gischpelino [I think call blocking on UT is a must have. *Feature request*], I do agree! Perhaps it’s possible to block incoming calls from specific numbers using a key sequence on the dialler as temporary workaround , (ex: *#31+16784534*...) But I’m unable to find those keys on the web... [15:54] @Steve Kueffer [I do agree! Perhaps it’s possible to block incoming calls from specific numbers …], that one does not show your number to recipient. … Maybe tis helps, search web for 'gsm service codes'. … http://www.borgus.net/gsmkode.htm [16:26] @gischpelino [that one does not show your number to recipient. … Maybe tis helps, search web for …], Oh great Thank you. That’s what I was looking for. Unfortunately there’s no key to bar a specific number... [16:42] 1/quit [16:44] @dohbee [i thought it was estonia], Confirmed he is Austrian 😆 [17:02] One thing I've noticed with Ubuntu Touch during my time using it is that for an OS designed with phablets in mind, a lot of its controls are placed out of reach. … Is there any way we could get a back gesture on the bottom-right edge? [17:38] then here's the question to you: what could be used as a back gesture? [17:41] throwing the phone [17:41] the idea of a way to "go back" has been discussed a couple of times but so far there has been no idea how to do it in the design in the os [17:42] shaking the phone has been mentioned yes but no verdict on that iirc xD [17:44] no, i mean like throwing your phone into a volcano [17:44] go back, whence ye came, infernal beast [17:45] I believe it's called a "yeet" nowadays [17:50] lol [18:00] @UniversalSuperBox [I believe it's called a "yeet" nowadays], YEEEEEEETTTT THOSE 'NADES [18:00] @UniversalSuperBox [I believe it's called a "yeet" nowadays], [Edit] YEEEEEEETTTT THOSE 'NADES BOOOYYYYYSSSSS [18:01] - my friend when we play PUBG [18:35] @Fuseteam [shaking the phone has been mentioned yes but no verdict on that iirc xD], Now that I see rotation sensor is working how about a 90° rotate along z axis (the exis that goes along the long side of the device)? That would feel quite natural [18:44] iifraz was added by: iifraz [18:52] @Fuseteam [the idea of a way to "go back" has been discussed a couple of times but so far t …], there is many diffrent ways of going back, within app, and within os navigation [18:53] so are we talking of within app - if we implement a second shortcut for the page navigation, this would perhaps only work with qml apps, maybe only ones using our toolkit [18:54] but if tracking app, and window navigation, you would need tracking of every movement [18:55] a 'chain' of navigation [18:56] but what do you do when hitting back after opening app? close it? navigate to blank screen, previous app? [18:57] @mateosalta [so are we talking of within app - if we implement a second shortcut for the page …], it would have to be implemented in a way that synthesizes the "back" keypress [18:58] then you have the idea of back within the browser [18:59] erg, then i remember when chrome desktop linked 'backspace' to back... [19:00] That is implemented in morph-browser as well [19:00] if you hit backspace a few times while editing text, it went to the previous page [19:00] That was more a case of your cursor leaving the text field [19:00] But yes, does exist. [19:01] so bad, happened many times on fill out forms for stuff [19:03] of course our gov stuff didnt implement properly - quote at the top said not to use the browsers navigation... or all work lost [19:03] yeah computers are bad [19:04] i think apps handling it per app is good for now [19:05] rather that then something that works diffrently in diffrent situations, or not at all in some [19:08] but maybe there could be a uuitk hack that moves the header bar? [19:09] no [19:09] not offically of course [19:09] it's a bunch of c++ and stuff [19:10] would be an ugly mess [19:11] because most apps also have something else linked to the osk [19:32] @Flohack [Now that I see rotation sensor is working how about a 90° rotate along z axis (t …], could work why not? xD [19:33] @mateosalta [there is many diffrent ways of going back, within app, and within os navigation], and then there's that aspect [19:35] tldr; is a not so easy to implement [19:35] especially across different form factors [21:30] yatman7117 was added by: yatman7117 [21:47] @mateosalta [i think apps handling it per app is good for now], actually this is a good point [21:49] like say teleports could have it's own bottom swipe(which is currently unused) that includes a way to go back while that doesn't apply to morph [23:00] Does Ubuntu Touch work on Redmi Note 8 Pro [23:09] the only devices where it works in at devices.ubuntu-touch.io [23:09] DanielS79 was added by: DanielS79 [23:09] any other devices will have to be ported by owners of the device in question [23:11] 🙂 thx [23:13] (Photo, 371x237) https://irc.ubports.com/9UAovJbU.png [23:13] this deffo feels better worded now haha [23:13] still a bit wordy but better [23:16] @Fuseteam [], Great message!