[00:15] vorlon: I am failing to test my latest edition of resolved integration with ifupdown & isc-dhcp by upgrading xenial to groovy. Because of invalid shell syntax in ifenslave. I don't think diff conflict markers are valid in dash sh. [00:15] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave/tree/debian/ifenslave.if-pre-up?h=applied/ubuntu/devel#n129 [00:15] vorlon: do you want to fix it up? or should i? can we just sync ifenslave at this point? [00:15] (forcesync) [00:15] vorlon: it is orphaned in debian, so we can just upload our delta there. [00:42] "diff conflict markers" well then [00:43] xnox: I don't know than any of these changes are correct in Debian where ifupdown still exists [00:46] xnox: I'd rather we just get back in sync with Debian as-is given that this is a universe package that depends on ifupdown === tmhoang4 is now known as tmhoang [05:23] sergiodj: there must have been two libpcap uploads even we couldn't find the first one yesterday [05:24] bdmurray: was so kind to SRU-accept one and cancel the other [09:34] o/ is there a place where I can see all the bug related to a specific kernel version? [09:34] I think there is a bug in 4.15.0-109.110 related to btrfs [11:03] jamespage: o/ I'm looking at openvswitch in the SRU queue. Looks like your Xenial upload got trumped by a security update, sorry. [11:05] Looking at Bionic now [11:06] rbasak: no worries - I'll rebase [11:06] thanks [11:07] rbasak: bdmurray pinged me about the duplicate uploads as well [11:07] there more recent one is not based on a git snapshot so the delta is smaller [11:07] I spotted your comment in the bug and rejected the older one as requested [11:07] Thanks! [11:08] brill thankyou [11:14] jamespage: where did you get the new orig tarball from? It seems to mismatch https://www.openvswitch.org/releases/openvswitch-2.9.6.tar.gz - different compression, but also the raw tar [11:24] rbasak: d/copyright triggers a repack [11:24] gz->xz and exclusion of some files [11:29] Ah - thanks! [11:30] I can figure it out from there then. Seems odd and maybe wrong though - no dfsg label, and only debian/ excluded? Isn't that automatic with 3.0 (quilt) anyway? [11:30] To be clear, I'm not bothered about that for the SRU - just thought I'd mention it [11:33] vorlon: looking at the code, what we have in 2.9ubuntu1 de-races bringing multiple bonds up. I do not see anything remotely close to fixing that in debian. I've uploaded a revert back to 2.9ubuntu1 as 2.10ubuntu2 [11:33] vorlon: cause i'd rather keep bonds working the same way they did in focal and down. [11:34] vorlon: hm, but i should drop the ifenslave binary i guess. [11:51] doko: on bug 1888386, shouldn't these go via the security pocket? [11:51] bug 1888386 in openjdk-14 (Ubuntu) "SRU: backport the openjdk-13 and -14 security releases to focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1888386 [12:14] rbasak: when I talked with vorlon and sil2100, they preferred the updates pocket. but I don't mind [13:55] cpaelzer_: that's great, thanks bdmurray :) === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [14:12] mwhudson: it would be nice if you use -x option to git cherry-pick when cherrypicking things. I.e. it's hard to see in livecd-rootfs bionic, which commits have been cherrypicked and which ones are still missing. [16:09] Hey sil2100! The bionic langpack testing deadline is reached: [16:09] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/LanguagePackUpdatesQA [16:25] GunnarHj: oh well, it's better than what I expected anyway [16:25] Thanks! [16:25] I'll publish those a bit later [16:26] sil2100: Yeah, at least some of the most important languages were tested. === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch [19:11] sil2100: hi, if you are around, looks like bileto doesn't like it when a binary package is no longer built: https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/4170/groovy.html [19:11] in this case, it's a transitional package I can finally drop [19:12] "missing build on all: libpmemobj-doc (from 1.8-1ubuntu1) " [19:12] can that check be ignored? [19:39] xnox: til [20:31] ahasenack: I think https://git.launchpad.net/bileto/tree/britney/britney.conf.in needs to get https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/tree/britney.conf#n32 options ALL_BUILDARCH and HAS_ARCH_ALL_BUILDDS [20:31] if you wanted to submit a merge proposal that would probably be welcomed :> [20:32] I have no idea how britney works [20:32] but let's see [20:33] without those options britney thinks there's an arch called 'all' which can fail on its own [20:34] so I think it's going "omg where are the binaries for 'all' which I knew about before, I don't have any" [20:39] Laney: this? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/DPB45jnRf6/ [20:40] ahasenack: looks right to me [20:42] hmpf, I miss a "fork" buttin in lp [20:42] butotn* [20:43] now to figure out the push url [20:44] ok, got it [20:46] done [20:47] I'd merge if I could! [20:50] :) [20:50] thanks! :) [20:50] I also don't know if there is a separate deployment step [20:51] me neither [21:40] fork button> it's coming! [22:20] is the huge build queue fallout from the outage or did the archive rebuild get started? [22:20] actually to be that huge it must be the rebuild [22:25] mwhudson: Test rebuild, yes [22:25] cjwatson: ta [22:25] The outage should be cleared, and so far fixed in a couple of different ways ... [22:28] (Cowboyed code fix for my stupid max/min mistake; code fix under review to move the slow bit of database interaction to a better place; configuration change to have fewer concurrent download connections; code fix under review to make the librarian client use epoll rather than select so that it doesn't matter if the download process pool has lots of FDs open; and some OpenStack thwacking for ... [22:28] ... ppc64el builder resets) [22:28] Test rebuilds are good at shaking out this sort of problem [22:30] Some of this has probably been latent for a while and causing low-level problems, just not quite enough to track down and fix [22:49] cjwatson: nothing like fixing bugs several times over