| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] has been updated (20200728.1) | 01:32 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, will fix dnsdist | 06:52 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | can you please rollback pokerth? | 06:53 |
| jamespage | bdmurray: the later one - check the details on the bug referenced | 07:04 |
| Laney | let me do a couple, I think we can get protobuf + re2 through with a couple of surgical tweaks | 07:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | looks like somebody is rolling back pokerth and gazebo, thanks | 07:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm preparing dnsdist in bileto | 07:11 |
| Laney | ok | 07:15 |
| Laney | nobody touch anything, let's see what all of those did | 07:15 |
| Laney | pretty please | 07:16 |
| tjaalton | how unethical is it to review a package from the sru queue that I sponsored? | 08:23 |
| seb128 | tjaalton, easy to workaround by pinging someone else from the SRU team | 08:24 |
| tjaalton | yes, so there's rtl8821ce-dkms for focal | 08:24 |
| apw | tjaalton, if you are sponsoring a package it is assumed the uploader is not yet trusted to be the first eyes, this makes you the first eyes; the general theory behind the sru queue is there should be two eyes, the uploader/sponsor and the accepting sru-team member | 08:38 |
| apw | tjaalton, so self-review is generally frowned upon outside exceptional circumstances; but asking someone explicitly to do so when it would not get done because it is your day etc is normal there | 08:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, frogatto needs another rebuild, because riscv64 didn't pick the new boost | 08:43 |
| tjaalton | apw: yep, exactly as I thought so I haven't done that | 08:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, 💖 | 08:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you can copy-back stuff if you want :D | 08:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe after a publisher run | 08:48 |
| Laney | ah good | 08:48 |
| Laney | ok, I will put the things back shortly | 08:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I wasn't aware re2 was ready to go, I was preparing a dnsdist with only protobuf on bileto to disentangle them | 08:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I should have also finally fixed dkms sadness | 08:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | will look at gnss-sdr now | 08:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks rbalint :) (wrt glibc) | 08:51 |
| Laney | that should do it, hopefully | 09:04 |
| Laney | others can have fun massaging boost/icu/node | 09:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsys (focal-proposed/main) [0.4.6 => 0.4.7] (no packageset) | 09:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openvswitch [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.6-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 10:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ifenslave [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.10ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 11:21 | |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: fun. | 11:34 |
| ginggs | would someone please remove nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-450 from proposed and add it to sync-blacklist ? | 11:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpcbind [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.3-0.2ubuntu0.1] | 11:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1066.71] (no packageset) | 11:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smart-notifier [source] (focal-proposed) [0.28-6~ubuntu20.04.1] | 12:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.0-3~ubuntu20.04.1] | 12:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1066.71] | 12:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bcache-tools (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.8-3 => 1.0.8-3ubuntu0.1] (edubuntu, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 12:44 | |
| dannf | fyi, there's 2 extraneous "/focal" subdirs in the zsync link for arm64/server-live http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/414/builds/218103/downloads | 13:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smokeping (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.3-2 => 2.7.3-2ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:38 | |
| Laney | ginggs: can you file a bug for paper trail please? | 13:48 |
| Laney | dannf: fixed | 13:48 |
| dannf | Laney: thx! | 13:48 |
| ginggs | Laney: I will if you really want, but if you look in the sync-blacklist.txt you'll see the previous versions are there with a comment | 13:50 |
| Laney | ginggs: ah ok, that seems fine then | 13:52 |
| ginggs | Laney: thanks :) | 13:52 |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-enum-iterator [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libsystemd [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-enum-iterator [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (focal-proposed) [3:18.3.2-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] | 14:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-enum-iterator [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libsystemd [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libsystemd [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-enum-iterator [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-enum-iterator [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libsystemd [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-libsystemd [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasdaemon [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.5-1ubuntu1.1] | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-enum-iterator [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset) | 14:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.18-2ubuntu3.16] | 14:44 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, some autopkgtest outage? https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/m/makedumpfile/20200729_141830_4829c@/log.gz | 14:47 |
| Laney | I don't think so, probably more likely to be to do with that package, feel free to try it yourself locally | 14:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack! | 14:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | crash PASS | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest [17:04:08]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ summary | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | crash PASS | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | qemu-system-x86_64: terminating on signal 15 from pid 32114 (/usr/bin/python3) | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, ^^ | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is how I ran it sudo autopkgtest --shell-fail --apt-upgrade makedumpfile_1.6.7-3ubuntu1.dsc -- qemu --ram-size=1536 ~/autopkgtest-groovy-amd64.img | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and looks like working correctly here | 15:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (bionic-proposed) [24-1ubuntu3.5] | 15:06 | |
| Laney | k, dunno, sorry I'm busy working on something else, maybe someone from the kernel team wants to look | 15:14 |
| Laney | can't debug random failures right now | 15:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.3] | 15:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1~build1] (no packageset) | 17:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1~build1] (no packageset) | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu614 => 20101020ubuntu614.1] (core) | 17:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1~build1] (no packageset) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (bionic-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu543.15 => 20101020ubuntu543.16] (core) | 18:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [20101020ubuntu614.1] | 18:22 | |
| xnox | apw: bjf: i see there is linux kernel in xenial-proposed. Is that kernel for xenial point release, and it will be out soon? | 18:24 |
| xnox | will it be out by 13th of August? | 18:24 |
| bjf | xnox, it was my understanding that the xenial-updates kernel is for the .7 release. sil2100 ^ ? | 18:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1~build1] (no packageset) | 18:25 | |
| bjf | apw, ^ (xnox query) | 18:26 |
| bjf | xnox, i do appreciate you thinking i still know any of this | 18:26 |
| xnox | apw: bjf: i must rebuild d-i against a kernel, to vendorize fixed grub. | 18:27 |
| xnox | apw: bjf: thus i must have no kernel in -proposed. | 18:27 |
| xnox | apw: bjf: so either linux should be removed from xenial-proposed, or it must migrate to updates, for me to rebuild d-i for the .7 release. | 18:28 |
| cjwatson | You could probably build it in a PPA with suitable dependencies set, and also a following wind | 18:28 |
| xnox | cjwatson: i can, and i've done that before. But fiddly. Plus this is missmatch of expectations. | 18:28 |
| xnox | apw: bjf: please confirm which one of the two kernels you want in xenial .7 | 18:29 |
| apw | xnox, I can withdraw the current kernel from -proposed if needed | 18:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-enum-iterator [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 18:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-enum-iterator [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 18:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-enum-iterator [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 18:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libsystemd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libsystemd [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libsystemd [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-enum-iterator [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-enum-iterator [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libsystemd [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-enum-iterator [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.6.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-libsystemd [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| apw | klebers: ^^ which xenial kernel would you prefer in the point release | 18:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glusterfs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [8.0-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-rsubread [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.5-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-rsubread [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.5-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-rsubread [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.5-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-rsubread [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.5-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-rsubread [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.2.5-1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Focal 20.04.1] (20101020ubuntu614.1) has been added | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Focal 20.04.1] (20101020ubuntu614.1) has been added | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Focal 20.04.1] (20101020ubuntu614.1) has been added | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Focal 20.04.1] (20101020ubuntu614.1) has been added | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Focal 20.04.1] (20101020ubuntu614.1) has been added | 18:30 | |
| sil2100 | xnox: the one in -updates is the kernel we want | 18:37 |
| sil2100 | apw: ^ | 18:37 |
| sil2100 | At least that came out from my discussions with klebers, the -proposed one wasn't prepared with images in mind | 18:38 |
| xnox | apw: please remove linux from xenial-proposed temporarily, for me to rebuild d-i, and let that migrate to updates. Then resurrect xenial proposed kernel. | 18:39 |
| sil2100 | xnox: I guess you can build d-i in a PPA without -proposed enabled and then bin-copy? | 18:39 |
| xnox | apw: effectively d-i upload is security upload. | 18:39 |
| xnox | sil2100: i can do that too, but it makes review harder. | 18:39 |
| xnox | apw: i guess removal is pain, and bileto is pain, but i guess bileto ppa is less pain overall. | 18:40 |
| sil2100 | True, but if you use bileto, this should not be that bad! I guess it's up to apw at this point, as I don't know how problematic it will be | 18:40 |
| xnox | apw: bjf: klebers: building d-i in bileto against updates only. should not require removing any kernels. | 18:41 |
| sil2100 | xnox: ping me when you have something ready! Or if you need any help with those | 18:41 |
| sil2100 | I'm at your service | 18:42 |
| xnox | ddstreet: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/systemd/+bug/1881972 & https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/systemd/+bug/1832754 test cases need improvement. It is now blocking building & releasing debian-installer security update. | 18:52 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1881972 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "systemd-networkd crashes with invalid pointer" [Medium,Incomplete] | 18:52 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1832754 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) ""shutdown[1]: Failed to wait for process: Protocol error" at shutdown or reboot and hangs." [Medium,Incomplete] | 18:52 |
| xnox | sil2100: bileto didn't help, becuase d-i itself encodes -proposed. purging that, testbuilding, if good will upload. | 19:16 |
| sil2100 | Crap | 19:18 |
| xnox | sil2100: it's not critical | 19:21 |
| vorlon | we still have the option of removing the kernel from -proposed and then readding | 19:24 |
| vorlon | xnox: d-i build failure: because grub2 signed artifacts are only accepted for focal-proposed and not for focal-updates | 19:28 |
| vorlon | I don't recall this having been a thing but it seems I need to accept them in focal-updates also | 19:29 |
| vorlon | (or else manually copy from focal-proposed to focal-updates) | 19:29 |
| vorlon | cjwatson: ^^ do you recall what the intent has been here? | 19:29 |
| xnox | vorlon: i am at the same conclusion | 19:30 |
| xnox | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/focal-updates/main/uefi/grub2-amd64 | 19:30 |
| xnox | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main/uefi/grub2-amd64/ | 19:30 |
| xnox | are both out of date | 19:30 |
| vorlon | Binary files focal-proposed/5.4.0-42.46/vmlinuz-5.4.0-42-generic.efi.signed and focal-updates/5.4.0-42.46/vmlinuz-5.4.0-42-generic.efi.signed differ | 19:32 |
| ddstreet | rbalint_ xnox can you review the patches for lp #1832754; it's unlikely i will be spending time to try to figure out a specific reproducer | 19:32 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1832754 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) ""shutdown[1]: Failed to wait for process: Protocol error" at shutdown or reboot and hangs." [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1832754 | 19:32 |
| vorlon | so it seems re-signing is the existing procedure | 19:32 |
| xnox | vorlon: sigh | 19:33 |
| xnox | vorlon: it would be nice if signing used audit logs of signatures created. And reuse existing sigs, if one gets re-requested. | 19:33 |
| apw | vorlon: we have to resign as they are not copied with the debs. resigning is idempotent so is ok | 19:34 |
| apw | if we don't then when proposed is purged we don't have a full set in -updates | 19:34 |
| vorlon | apw: if it were idempotent, my diff command wouldn't have reported a difference | 19:35 |
| vorlon | the signatures are different (possibly due to date stamps), and that increases the amount of crypto material that could potentially be used to attack the key | 19:36 |
| vorlon | xnox: accepted now for -updates, all series | 19:37 |
| xnox | tah | 19:37 |
| xnox | apw: vorlon: we could make them idempotent / reproducible. I.e. if they used the changelog date of the source build. Or like include the timestamp in the tarball that one wants to use. | 19:38 |
| apw | vorlon: hrm, now why do I think they are meant to come out the same ... odd | 19:38 |
| vorlon | apw: it is /merely/ a doubling of the number of signed artifacts, which are already quite numerous, so maybe it's not worth worrying about in practice | 19:39 |
| vorlon | xnox: having signature dates be manipulatable via the changelog, WHAT COULD GO WRONG | 19:39 |
| xnox | vorlon: inside the signing tarball. | 19:40 |
| vorlon | still :) | 19:40 |
| xnox | vorlon: or like take the timestamp of the thing one build. | 19:40 |
| xnox | vorlon: surely it's /trippling/ because -proposed, -updates, -security? | 19:41 |
| vorlon | xnox: possibly | 19:41 |
| xnox | vorlon: keeping track of all signatures made, and reusing for the same signature for the same binary => also sounds dubious. | 19:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1~build1] (no packageset) | 19:43 | |
| cjwatson | vorlon: I do not. We should probably arrange to copy the signature but I'd have to check (and am EOW) | 19:49 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: Should the grub updates be phasing? | 19:59 |
| xnox | bdmurray: yes | 20:04 |
| xnox | bdmurray: as per normal. | 20:04 |
| sil2100 | So how are you proceeding? Are we pulling out the kernel from xenial-proposed? | 20:27 |
| xnox | sil2100: no, not yet. | 20:30 |
| xnox | sil2100: i had pizza, and signatures were not published. retried focal build waiting for it to pass. | 20:30 |
| xnox | sil2100: retries of xenial in bileto, without proposed in either source code and the build still seems to fail. SO not sure what's going on, maybe i got my numbers wrong. | 20:31 |
| xnox | sil2100: so if you look at https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4171/+packages | 20:34 |
| xnox | you can see that it build fine on all architectures, but amd64 | 20:34 |
| xnox | what's missing / wrong about it? | 20:34 |
| xnox | focal d-i now built fine! | 20:37 |
| xnox | oooooh | 20:42 |
| xnox | i wonder if our signing is all wrong in xenial | 20:42 |
| xnox | aha | 20:43 |
| xnox | apw: last time we built xenial the kernel-signed-image-4.4.0-142-generic-di_4.4.0-142.168_amd64.udeb package had ./boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-142-generic.efi.signed | 20:44 |
| xnox | apw: whereas kernel-signed-image-4.4.0-186-generic-di_4.4.0-186.216_amd64.udeb ships ./boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-186-generic and kernel-signed-image-4.4.0-187-generic-di_4.4.0-187.217_amd64.udeb ships ./boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-187-generic | 20:45 |
| xnox | apw: klebers: is that intentional that signing got changed and rename in xenial since .6 release? | 20:46 |
| apw | xnox, yes... the names changed with the drive to only booting signed kernels, and thus there only being signed kernels | 20:46 |
| xnox | apw: klebers: i can backport changes to support '.signed'-less things in d-i. | 20:46 |
| apw | xnox, we used to have vmlinuz and vmlinuz.efi | 20:47 |
| apw | .signed | 20:47 |
| apw | and grub picked the right one, now ... we only have vmlinuz | 20:47 |
| xnox | cool. test building. | 20:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-applet (focal-proposed/main) [1.8.24-1ubuntu2 => 1.8.24-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core) | 21:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (xenial-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu451.28 => 20101020ubuntu451.29] (core) | 21:25 | |
| xnox | vorlon: ^ the above d-i should hopefully build fine in xenial. | 21:26 |
| xnox | or bdmurray or sil2100 | 21:26 |
| vorlon | looking | 21:28 |
| vorlon | accepted | 21:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [20101020ubuntu451.29] | 21:30 | |
| sil2100 | o/ | 21:30 |
| vorlon | xnox: all grub2-triggered autopkgtests passed | 21:54 |
| xnox | horay. | 22:15 |
| xnox | vorlon: d-i in focal is odd in britney | 22:16 |
| xnox | debian-installer-udebs/amd64 has unsatisfiable dependency | 22:16 |
| xnox | debian-installer-udebs/arm64 has unsatisfiable dependency | 22:16 |
| xnox | but what is it? does britney know aobut udebs? | 22:16 |
| sil2100 | hm | 22:18 |
| sil2100 | Wonder which dependency britney considers unsatisfiable | 22:24 |
| xnox | vorlon: sil2100: what needs doing to get d-i in xenial & focal released to updates? | 22:54 |
| xnox | we don't have automated tests for d-i do we.... do we manually test them first? | 22:55 |
| sil2100 | xnox: usually we build -proposed based images to test those, but then again, I guess we could just publish them to -updates and simply re-spin the candidate images | 23:10 |
| sil2100 | As there is no risk of breakage | 23:10 |
| sil2100 | (other than on the new images) | 23:10 |
| sil2100 | xnox: let me release those into -updates, focal looks fine so I'll proceed with that one | 23:14 |
| sil2100 | (and I can then spin up the images) | 23:14 |
| sil2100 | focal done | 23:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iotjs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0-2] (no packageset) | 23:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iotjs [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0-2] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnss-sdr [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.13-1] (no packageset) | 23:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iotjs [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0-2] (no packageset) | 23:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iotjs [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0-2] (no packageset) | 23:33 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!