[09:45] <LocutusOfBorg> smb, hello, xen merge please? the Debian release fixes CVEs...
[10:01] <smb> LocutusOfBorg, I gladly will allow anyone who wants to have that erm... joy. More seriously, maybe in the next weeks but I more and more lack time to do those other things.
[12:48] <ahasenack> sil2100: hi, did you see my message from yesterday about bileto and it complaining about the "all" architecture?
[12:49] <ahasenack> sil2100: Laney suggested this: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/bileto/+git/bileto/+merge/388324
[12:55] <sil2100> ahasenack: oh, looking! But from the first glance it looks good
[12:55] <sil2100> ah this new britney
[13:27] <Laney> might be worth doing a diff of the whole config ...
[13:28] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: are you going to extract the ICE information for the llvm-11 build?
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> why should we do it right now?
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't want to use llvm-11 as default in groovy
[13:39] <LocutusOfBorg> its completely unstable, just an rc
[13:40] <LocutusOfBorg> interestingly it didn't happen in Debian, meh
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/490817056/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-armhf.ns3_3.31+dfsg-2_BUILDING.txt.gz
[13:54] <LocutusOfBorg> mmmm lots of ices... looks suspicius?
[16:24] <xnox> "I don't want to use llvm-11 as default in groovy" -> right now, or at all? cause i hoped that groovy final will have llvm-11 because of all the CET goodness on amd64
[16:38] <tjaalton> yeah I'd expect mesa to migrate to it
[19:51] <mwhudson> releasing subiquity to stable