| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset) | 00:35 | |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset) | 05:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset) | 05:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset) | 05:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset) | 05:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset) | 06:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset) | 06:51 | |
| apw | enyc, likely #ubuntu-x | 07:23 |
|---|---|---|
| sil2100 | jibel: hey! On the isotracker I see reports for Ubuntu Desktop .1 regarding the font viewer crashing on the live session | 07:46 |
| sil2100 | Did you see anything like that? | 07:46 |
| jibel | sil2100, I'm currently looking at the issue | 07:52 |
| jibel | it's old crashes though | 07:53 |
| jibel | without much info | 07:53 |
| jibel | indeed it crashes | 07:56 |
| jibel | in live session only | 07:56 |
| sil2100 | Ok, if we had that before then I'm not as worried | 07:57 |
| sil2100 | Can't think of a strong usecase for checking fonts on the live session | 07:57 |
| jibel | I get bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-font-viewer/+bug/1861961 | 07:58 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1861961 in gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu) "gnome-font-viewer crashed with SIGTRAP in _XEventsQueued() from XPending() from gdk_event_source_check() from g_main_context_check() from g_main_context_iterate() from g_main_context_iteration()" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 07:58 |
| RikMills | could someone kill the frameworkintegration ppa autotests currently running? I can now see where they are hanging, which was the point | 07:59 |
| jibel | sil2100, and not a regression since the release | 08:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset) | 08:04 | |
| sil2100 | xnox: argh, d-i on s390x for bionic FTBFS | 08:25 |
| enyc | apw: thakyou for pointer, put note thete too | 08:31 |
| enyc | apw: its ' bit of a pain when unclear what issue(s) may be or even what packages to report | 08:32 |
| enyc | apw: i guess i could test 19.10 live iso | 08:32 |
| enyc | but still, if not xorg, not xorg video drivers, not radeon-firmware, not kernel ............ | 08:32 |
| enyc | gtk/associated? etc | 08:33 |
| apw | enyc, yep these are tricky to diagnose | 08:33 |
| enyc | apw: I was hoping somebody would joump on or at least give me a $clue | 08:33 |
| enyc | apw: i've ended up pci-extending and physically moving cards and making space to put in an actual video-card and bypass problem that way.................... | 08:34 |
| apw | enyc, the right place for screen corruption is ubuntu-x, they will be able to split kernel/mesa/X | 08:34 |
| enyc | apw: but STILL i'd be happy to help testing changes that might make ati RS480 work | 08:34 |
| enyc | ok! | 08:34 |
| === pieq__ is now known as pieq | ||
| sil2100 | xnox: ok, I see you have noticed and pushed the fix for it, duh | 08:40 |
| * sil2100 could have checked the queue before digging into this | 08:40 | |
| * sil2100 throws away his change and accepts xnox's | 08:40 | |
| sil2100 | xnox: thanks! ;) | 08:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu543.17] | 08:43 | |
| mwhudson | what is britney complaining about wrt the udebs here? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#multipath-tools | 08:51 |
| mwhudson | afaict the udebs it's talking about exist | 08:52 |
| Laney | those messages suck | 08:52 |
| Laney | but, component-mismatches? | 08:53 |
| mwhudson | i don't think so? | 08:53 |
| mwhudson | but maybe | 08:54 |
| mwhudson | oh yes | 08:54 |
| mwhudson | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/amd64/liburcu6-udeb/0.12.1-1 is in universe | 08:54 |
| mwhudson | how did that happen | 08:54 |
| mwhudson | and why did it not happen to the multipath-tools udebs? | 08:56 |
| Laney | why doesn't rmadison work on multpath-udeb | 08:56 |
| Laney | such knowledge being expressed here | 08:56 |
| mwhudson | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/amd64/multipath-udeb/0.8.4-1ubuntu1 <- sez "main" | 08:58 |
| Laney | nod | 08:59 |
| Laney | doko: ^- what made you demote liburcu6-udeb? component-mismatches or? | 08:59 |
| mwhudson | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/groovy-proposed/main/debian-installer/binary-amd64/Packages.gz is pretty small now but not quite empty | 09:00 |
| mwhudson | er s/-proposed// | 09:00 |
| mwhudson | Laney: how can you tell it was doko? :) | 09:00 |
| Laney | mwhudson: if you back up one component from the URL you gave, the smoking gun is there | 09:01 |
| mwhudson | Laney: ah! | 09:02 |
| Laney | that's one of the nice little hidden corners of LP it's good to know about sometimes | 09:03 |
| doko | Laney: yes, compomnent mismatches in both proposed and release | 09:04 |
| mwhudson | yeah i think i may have seen that page and then failed to find it again | 09:04 |
| doko | so why did these appear in component mismatches? | 09:05 |
| doko | I still have the list of demoted packages... so I could revert those | 09:05 |
| mwhudson | yeah that's a bit strange | 09:06 |
| Laney | I guess if you do that, and it comes back on c-m we can debug the report | 09:06 |
| mwhudson | i don't know what the long term plan is, we don't care about udebs at all for groovy afaik | 09:06 |
| mwhudson | but what Laney suggests makes sense | 09:07 |
| Laney | maybe all d-i stuff should be in universe, I dunno | 09:07 |
| Laney | whatever it is should be done in a considered way rather than in response here imo | 09:07 |
| mwhudson | yep | 09:07 |
| mwhudson | now does anyone want to talk about udisks2's autopkgtests or should i just bounce on retry until it works | 09:08 |
| Laney | file an rls-gg-incoming bug about that, I think desktop should schedule some work on thoes | 09:09 |
| * mwhudson goes for the latter | 09:09 | |
| mwhudson | ok | 09:09 |
| mwhudson | ah there was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/1888062 already, i tagged it | 09:10 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1888062 in udisks2 (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest became very flaky in Groovy" [High,Confirmed] | 09:10 |
| Laney | 🕶 | 09:10 |
| mwhudson | looks like there is an upstream patch and everything, i guess i could try applying it | 09:11 |
| mwhudson | doko: so will you revert your demotions? | 09:19 |
| mwhudson | migrating s390-tools/2.12.0-0ubuntu6/s390x to testing makes ubuntu-server/1.452/s390x uninstallable | 09:19 |
| * mwhudson squints | 09:19 | |
| seb128 | mwhudson, there is no much point tagging that bug | 09:21 |
| mwhudson | seb128: yeah i guess not | 09:21 |
| seb128 | it's already handled with a fix commited upstream | 09:21 |
| mwhudson | seb128: i'm testing the upstream patch now | 09:21 |
| seb128 | thx | 09:21 |
| Laney | disagree, that tagging was like 2 weeks ago, it would have made us look at it tomorrow in the meeting | 09:22 |
| Laney | s/tagging/comment/ | 09:22 |
| doko | mwhudson: promoted again | 09:23 |
| smb | Doing some Bionic->Focal upgrades I found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/timidity/+bug/1793640 is still relevant. Workaround seems to purge timidity-daemon. That might be something to mention in release notes. | 09:23 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1793640 in timidity (Ubuntu) "Pulseaudio fails to detect sound card, while timidity is installed" [High,Triaged] | 09:23 |
| mwhudson | doko: thanks | 09:26 |
| seb128 | Laney, well it's tagged so we are going to look at it :-) But I've a feeling that it will end up in us agreeing to nominate and me taking assignment since I handle udisk and I upstreamed the report that did lead to the commit that needs backporting, which is basically a no change from where we are today (I was just waiting for an upstream release to get it uploaded) | 09:29 |
| Laney | seb128: okey dokey, just take the assignment now :p | 09:33 |
| seb128 | Laney, done, I should have done that when I triaged it :-) | 09:33 |
| * Laney eyes proposed-migration/xenial | 09:39 | |
| Laney | why crasheth you | 09:39 |
| mwhudson | seb128: oh, i just uploaded the patch... | 09:42 |
| seb128 | mwhudson, ah, even better | 09:43 |
| seb128 | thanks! | 09:43 |
| mwhudson | seb128: np, +1 maint ftw | 09:43 |
| seb128 | :-) | 09:43 |
| * mwhudson stops for now, let's see what britney thinks of the re-componented udebs in the morning | 09:43 | |
| doko | still puzzled why gcc-9 tries to promote ... | 10:24 |
| xnox | mwhudson: s390-tools-signed needs an upload | 10:26 |
| mwhudson | xnox: ah | 10:28 |
| mwhudson | xnox: does that require special skills? | 10:28 |
| rbalint_ | vorlon, do you have a log about how retry-autopkgtest-regressions failing with snap-triggered tests? | 10:46 |
| xnox | mwhudson: just carefully running debian/rules clean, and ensuring version numbers match. | 10:50 |
| mwhudson | xnox: as i'm sure you know that was an attempt to trick you into doing it :) | 10:52 |
| mwhudson | i will go to bed and see if i need to do it in the morning :-) | 10:52 |
| xnox | ahahhahahahhahahhahaa | 10:53 |
| sil2100 | Laney: hey! Could you again re-run the snapshotting command for focal as you did last week on snakefruit? ;) | 10:53 |
| sil2100 | Laney: since I remembered now that we just re-spun the images, so the snapshot needs to be re-run | 10:53 |
| sil2100 | Laney: you can just re-run it as is, no need to delete anything | 10:54 |
| Laney | sil2100: ok! | 10:54 |
| Laney | lies | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | Laney: huge thanks! :) | 10:54 |
| Laney | I do need to delete it | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | You do? | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | Ouchy | 10:54 |
| Laney | OSError File exists | 10:54 |
| Laney | feel free to fix the tool to avoid that ;-) | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | Oh well, I guess I wouldn't know since I have no access there! | 10:54 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 10:55 |
| rbalint_ | sil2100, if there will be a new respin u-u is ready for release | 11:09 |
| rbalint_ | sil2100, i have a not too special lxc container where u-u is running for 45 minutes due to not upgradable packages and fixing LP: #1877769 helps with that | 11:11 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1877769 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Rewinding cache triggers obsolete adjustments consuming a lot of CPU" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1877769 | 11:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fvwm-crystal [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 11:17 | |
| sil2100 | rbalint_: I hope no respin will be required | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: hey! Regarding shim-signed for bionic - I guess I'd be okay with accepting the new one if we'd be able to verify it in the nearest days | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: I see that the new upload includes a fix on top of the existing changes, so for clarity I'd like it to include all the bugs so far in .changes | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | Let me re-push | 11:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.5 => 1.37~18.04.6] (core) | 11:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.6] | 11:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.6] | 11:42 | |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| RikMills | Laney: FYI, for pkg-kde-tools & lintian, looks like it just needs the fixed lintian now in proposed to avoid the hangs | 13:36 |
| ricotz | sil2100, hello, would you have time to process libreoffice 1:6.4.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 waiting in the focal/queue? | 14:22 |
| Laney | RikMills: cool | 14:23 |
| RikMills | Laney: PS. Nearly all the KDE build-needed tests should now be gone/going away, anyway \o/ | 14:27 |
| Laney | yesssssss | 14:28 |
| RikMills | sorry that took so long.... | 14:28 |
| smb | apw, could you put your generous AA hat on and let me know whether bug 1843742 looks to be reasonably set up? | 14:34 |
| ubot5 | bug 1843742 in irda-utils (Ubuntu) "irda-utils ftbfs in eoan" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843742 | 14:34 |
| vorlon | rbalint_: backtrace: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Kcdj9j7vBm/ | 14:41 |
| vorlon | sil2100: shim-signed should be a pretty quick verification. .changes, yes - do you need me to do anything there or can you reupload it with the correct -v? | 14:42 |
| Laney | rbalint_: vorlon: I think I fixed that one earlier, sorry for stealing the work (didn't notice the previous ping) | 14:46 |
| vorlon | Laney: ah cheer | 14:47 |
| vorlon | s | 14:47 |
| ahasenack | hello ubuntu-archive, could someone please take a look at this? https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/388428 It's to promote realmd and adcli to main in focal, after it was approved in groovy. The versions are identical in focal and groovy, and security gave a +1 already | 14:47 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: seed changes don't require ubuntu-archive signoff | 14:47 |
| vorlon | so don't block on us :) | 14:48 |
| ahasenack | correct, but I wouldn't want to change a focal seed befora an AA agrees to promote the package there | 14:48 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: ah right, wasn't obvious from the url, sorry | 14:48 |
| ahasenack | and isn't there also an imminent .1 release for focal? I also wouldn't want to break that | 14:48 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: it's only a supported seed so no point release impact. +1 for the change, go for it and I can promote | 14:49 |
| ahasenack | thank you! | 14:49 |
| vorlon | sil2100: ah, you already did that hours ago, cheers ;) | 14:52 |
| rbalint_ | Laney, thanks! vorlon thanks, i have not seen this failure yet | 15:03 |
| sil2100 | ricotz: let me take a look after the meetings! | 15:09 |
| sil2100 | jibel: hey! So I see you have looked at LP: #1890137, did you check if this affects only Kubuntu or other flavors? | 15:09 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1890137 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity crashes when "release notes" selected" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890137 | 15:10 |
| ricotz | sil2100, ty | 15:11 |
| seb128 | sil2100, hey, chromium-browser/focal sounds like another SRU worth accepting now if possible (and trivial only changelog update), it's to make sure focal_version > bionic_security, otherwise .1 upgraders might not get the snap | 15:12 |
| sil2100 | seb128: thanks for the info, on it as well o/ | 15:15 |
| seb128 | thanks! | 15:16 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: hey! Did you test that better fix for the meta package removal in u-r-u? Is it ready for releasing? | 15:16 |
| sil2100 | s/releasing/reviewing | 15:16 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: merged | 15:21 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I did test it and uploaded it to groovy, haven't done it for Focal yet. | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: if you could prep a focal upload that would be sweet, since I guess it'd be nice to fast-track it before we enable upgrades | 15:23 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I was also working on this on Friday and thought it'd be good to bundle with the linux meta package removal fix | 15:24 |
| bdmurray | https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/388513 | 15:24 |
| jibel | sil2100, it doesn't happen on Ubuntu | 15:25 |
| sil2100 | Let me take a look then | 15:28 |
| jibel | sil2100, I'm downloading kubuntu | 15:28 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I haven't found many duplicates of the python-dbg issue so it may be able to wait | 15:29 |
| jibel | sil2100, so on kubuntu, the link does nothing because xdg-open uses kde-open which doesn't exist but the installer doesn't crash | 15:36 |
| sil2100 | jibel: that's good news then | 15:53 |
| jibel | i'll file a bug for the wrong association | 15:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.23 => 1:20.04.24] (core) | 16:34 | |
| bdmurray | ^sil2100 | 16:35 |
| bdmurray | I'm writing the test case now | 16:36 |
| jibel | sil2100, bug 1890173 it's specific to kubuntu | 16:56 |
| ubot5 | bug 1890173 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[kubuntu] "Release notes" link doesn't open" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890173 | 16:56 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: \o/ | 16:57 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: and packages promoted in -updates | 17:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aseba-plugin-blockly [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [20180211+git-3] (no packageset) | 17:15 | |
| ahasenack | vorlon: thank you | 17:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset) | 17:20 | |
| Laney | hopefully fixed p-m/xenial without breaking anything else ... | 17:26 |
| Laney | quite a delicate area of the code though | 17:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset) | 17:28 | |
| vorlon | why does c-m want to promote gcc-9? nothing in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg or https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html explains | 17:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset) | 17:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset) | 17:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 17:45 | |
| sil2100 | ricotz: hmmm, I wanted to accept libreoffice, but I got this error: "libreoffice_6.4.5.orig-tarballs.tar.xz is already published in archive for focal with a different SHA1 hash (dd676f6a65ab6910b90a944be59e17cb1b34b127 != 79767488a539577fb3a5db828c9245a0fbd0491c)" | 17:45 |
| sil2100 | ricotz: how did that happen? I would expect it to get rejected on queue upload | 17:46 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: ^ do you know? | 17:46 |
| sil2100 | It's weird since now libreoffice is gone from the queue, but I wonder if it actually got accepted | 17:47 |
| ricotz | sil2100, hmm, no idea :(, I didn't create these packages. hellsworth did | 17:48 |
| ricotz | sil2100, I can prepare fixed ones though | 17:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chromium-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [84.0.4147.89-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 17:50 | |
| sil2100 | ricotz: I think it might be good to start preparing new ones (and making sure that the same orig tarballs are used as available in the archive) | 17:52 |
| sil2100 | Ah, could it be that this was uploaded first to the queue and only afterwards to groovy? | 17:52 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, I see it as accepted, but it doesn't appear anywhere, so probably LP rejected it | 17:52 |
| ricotz | sil2100, sorry, I don't know, hellsworth is quite new to the packaging process | 17:53 |
| ricotz | sil2100, https://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/libreoffice/ | 17:57 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: hey! So regarding the u-r-u SRU: I'd like to make sure about one thing as this bit us multiple times already in the past | 17:59 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: do you know if at any moment of time the tryMarkObsoleteForRemoval() function of MyCache in DistUpgradeCache is being used by update-manager? | 18:00 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: since you know how stupid this is - update-manager uses MyCache from u-r-u but doesn't call it's constructor, so I just want to make sure that update-manager won't suddenly start crashing because of self.linux_metapackage being undefined | 18:01 |
| sil2100 | (as it's defined in the u-r-u constructor, not the update-manager MyCache-derivative) | 18:01 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I'll have a look | 18:12 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: thanks! | 18:13 |
| vorlon | sil2100: that's a check that doesn't happen until after the unapproved stage | 18:23 |
| ahasenack | hi release team, do we have a release schedule for groovy? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GroovyGorilla/ReleaseSchedule is empty | 18:39 |
| ahasenack | oh | 18:39 |
| ahasenack | it magically appeared | 18:39 |
| ahasenack | it redirected to discourse, oh | 18:39 |
| ricotz | sil2100, is the repackaged libreoffice sufficient? | 18:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset) | 19:30 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: update-manager does not use "tryMarkObsoleteForRemoval" additionally I ran update-manger with the new focal u-r-u packages installed and it worked without issue | 19:45 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: excellent, thanks for checking! | 19:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.24] | 19:56 | |
| mwhudson | vorlon / ubuntu-archive: can you repromote libargon2-1-udeb to main please? | 21:09 |
| mwhudson | (see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#cryptsetup) | 21:09 |
| RikMills | vorlon: lintian in proposed newly depends on lzip, which has no i386 build. can that be sorted? | 21:21 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: done the other way, cryptsetup udebs demoted (since no longer used). c-m output suggests something in main in -proposed still depends on them but we'll sort that out anon | 22:03 |
| vorlon | RikMills: lintian is arch: all, so why does it need to be installable on i386? | 22:04 |
| vorlon | RikMills: (lintian is not in the build-dep closure for i386, so I believe the answer is it doesn't need to be) | 22:05 |
| RikMills | when pkg-kde-tools needs lintian for i386 builds | 22:05 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: can we stop publishing udebs at some stage? | 22:05 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: possibly | 22:05 |
| vorlon | RikMills: ah, sounds like a bug in the germinate handling, blech | 22:06 |
| vorlon | RikMills: otoh why is lintian being used at build-time? | 22:07 |
| vorlon | it would be more convenient for me to fix this misfeature of pkg-kde-tools instead :) | 22:07 |
| RikMills | vorlon: pkg-kde-tools uses it for kubuntu QA and CI scripts/pages | 22:08 |
| vorlon | hmph | 22:09 |
| vorlon | :) | 22:09 |
| vorlon | ok I'll dig into it | 22:09 |
| RikMills | thanks :) | 22:10 |
| RikMills | vorlon: oh, and currently pkg-kde-tools does not depend on lintian, due to a separate bug with the lintian in -release, but we do want the depend back once fixed lintian in proposed migrates | 22:13 |
| * RikMills thinks lintian is out to get me this week! | 22:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: album-data [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [4.05-7.1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| mwhudson | hmm how do we feel about removing src:frr i wonder | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
