[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-3] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[07:23] <apw> enyc, likely #ubuntu-x
[07:46] <sil2100> jibel: hey! On the isotracker I see reports for Ubuntu Desktop .1 regarding the font viewer crashing on the live session
[07:46] <sil2100> Did you see anything like that?
[07:52] <jibel> sil2100, I'm currently looking at the issue
[07:53] <jibel> it's old crashes though
[07:53] <jibel> without much info
[07:56] <jibel> indeed it crashes
[07:56] <jibel> in live session only
[07:57] <sil2100> Ok, if we had that before then I'm not as worried
[07:57] <sil2100> Can't think of a strong usecase for checking fonts on the live session
[07:58] <jibel> I get bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-font-viewer/+bug/1861961
[07:59] <RikMills> could someone kill the frameworkintegration ppa autotests currently running? I can now see where they are hanging, which was the point
[08:00] <jibel> sil2100, and not a regression since the release
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-blogliterately [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[08:25] <sil2100> xnox: argh, d-i on s390x for bionic FTBFS
[08:31] <enyc> apw: thakyou for pointer,  put note thete too
[08:32] <enyc> apw: its ' bit of a pain  when unclear what issue(s) may be  or even what packages to report
[08:32] <enyc> apw: i guess i could test 19.10 live iso
[08:32] <enyc> but still, if not xorg, not xorg video drivers, not radeon-firmware, not kernel ............
[08:33] <enyc> gtk/associated?  etc
[08:33] <apw> enyc, yep these are tricky to diagnose
[08:33] <enyc> apw: I was hoping somebody would joump on or at least give me a $clue
[08:34] <enyc> apw: i've ended up pci-extending and physically moving cards and making space to put in an actual video-card and  bypass problem that way....................
[08:34] <apw> enyc, the right place for screen corruption is ubuntu-x, they will be able to split kernel/mesa/X
[08:34] <enyc> apw: but STILL i'd be happy to help testing  changes that might make ati RS480  work
[08:34] <enyc> ok!
[08:40] <sil2100> xnox: ok, I see you have noticed and pushed the fix for it, duh
[08:40]  * sil2100 could have checked the queue before digging into this
[08:40]  * sil2100 throws away his change and accepts xnox's
[08:40] <sil2100> xnox: thanks! ;)
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (bionic-proposed) [20101020ubuntu543.17]
[08:51] <mwhudson> what is britney complaining about wrt the udebs here? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#multipath-tools
[08:52] <mwhudson> afaict the udebs it's talking about exist
[08:52] <Laney> those messages suck
[08:53] <Laney> but, component-mismatches?
[08:53] <mwhudson> i don't think so?
[08:54] <mwhudson> but maybe
[08:54] <mwhudson> oh yes
[08:54] <mwhudson> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/amd64/liburcu6-udeb/0.12.1-1 is in universe
[08:54] <mwhudson> how did that happen
[08:56] <mwhudson> and why did it not happen to the multipath-tools udebs?
[08:56] <Laney> why doesn't rmadison work on multpath-udeb
[08:56] <Laney> such knowledge being expressed here
[08:58] <mwhudson> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/amd64/multipath-udeb/0.8.4-1ubuntu1 <- sez "main"
[08:59] <Laney> nod
[08:59] <Laney> doko: ^- what made you demote liburcu6-udeb? component-mismatches or?
[09:00] <mwhudson> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/groovy-proposed/main/debian-installer/binary-amd64/Packages.gz is pretty small now but not quite empty
[09:00] <mwhudson> er s/-proposed//
[09:00] <mwhudson> Laney: how can you tell it was doko? :)
[09:01] <Laney> mwhudson: if you back up one component from the URL you gave, the smoking gun is there
[09:02] <mwhudson> Laney: ah!
[09:03] <Laney> that's one of the nice little hidden corners of LP it's good to know about sometimes
[09:04] <doko> Laney: yes, compomnent mismatches in both proposed and release
[09:04] <mwhudson> yeah i think i may have seen that page and then failed to find it again
[09:05] <doko> so why did these appear in component mismatches?
[09:05] <doko> I still have the list of demoted packages... so I could revert those
[09:06] <mwhudson> yeah that's a bit strange
[09:06] <Laney> I guess if you do that, and it comes back on c-m we can debug the report
[09:06] <mwhudson> i don't know what the long term plan is, we don't care about udebs at all for groovy afaik
[09:07] <mwhudson> but what Laney suggests makes sense
[09:07] <Laney> maybe all d-i stuff should be in universe, I dunno
[09:07] <Laney> whatever it is should be done in a considered way rather than in response here imo
[09:07] <mwhudson> yep
[09:08] <mwhudson> now does anyone want to talk about udisks2's autopkgtests or should i just bounce on retry until it works
[09:09] <Laney> file an rls-gg-incoming bug about that, I think desktop should schedule some work on thoes
[09:09]  * mwhudson goes for the latter
[09:09] <mwhudson> ok
[09:10] <mwhudson> ah there was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/1888062 already, i tagged it
[09:10] <Laney> 🕶
[09:11] <mwhudson> looks like there is an upstream patch and everything, i guess i could try applying it
[09:19] <mwhudson> doko: so will you revert your demotions?
[09:19] <mwhudson> migrating s390-tools/2.12.0-0ubuntu6/s390x to testing makes ubuntu-server/1.452/s390x uninstallable
[09:19]  * mwhudson squints
[09:21] <seb128> mwhudson, there is no much point tagging that bug
[09:21] <mwhudson> seb128: yeah i guess not
[09:21] <seb128> it's already handled with a fix commited upstream
[09:21] <mwhudson> seb128: i'm testing the upstream patch now
[09:21] <seb128> thx
[09:22] <Laney> disagree, that tagging was like 2 weeks ago, it would have made us look at it tomorrow in the meeting
[09:22] <Laney> s/tagging/comment/
[09:23] <doko> mwhudson: promoted again
[09:23] <smb> Doing some Bionic->Focal upgrades I found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/timidity/+bug/1793640 is still relevant. Workaround seems to purge timidity-daemon. That might be something to mention in release notes.
[09:26] <mwhudson> doko: thanks
[09:29] <seb128> Laney, well it's tagged so we are going to look at it :-) But I've a feeling that it will end up in us agreeing to nominate and me taking assignment since I handle udisk and I upstreamed the report that did lead to the commit that needs backporting, which is basically a no change from where we are today (I was just waiting for an upstream release to get it uploaded)
[09:33] <Laney> seb128: okey dokey, just take the assignment now :p
[09:33] <seb128> Laney, done, I should have done that when I triaged it :-)
[09:39]  * Laney eyes proposed-migration/xenial
[09:39] <Laney> why crasheth you
[09:42] <mwhudson> seb128: oh, i just uploaded the patch...
[09:43] <seb128> mwhudson, ah, even better
[09:43] <seb128> thanks!
[09:43] <mwhudson> seb128: np, +1 maint ftw
[09:43] <seb128> :-)
[09:43]  * mwhudson stops for now, let's see what britney thinks of the re-componented udebs in the morning
[10:24] <doko> still puzzled why gcc-9 tries to promote ...
[10:26] <xnox> mwhudson:  s390-tools-signed needs an upload
[10:28] <mwhudson> xnox: ah
[10:28] <mwhudson> xnox: does that require special skills?
[10:46] <rbalint_> vorlon, do you have a log about how retry-autopkgtest-regressions failing with snap-triggered tests?
[10:50] <xnox> mwhudson:  just carefully running debian/rules clean, and ensuring version numbers match.
[10:52] <mwhudson> xnox: as i'm sure you know that was an attempt to trick you into doing it :)
[10:52] <mwhudson> i will go to bed and see if i need to do it in the morning :-)
[10:53] <xnox> ahahhahahahhahahhahaa
[10:53] <sil2100> Laney: hey! Could you again re-run the snapshotting command for focal as you did last week on snakefruit? ;)
[10:53] <sil2100> Laney: since I remembered now that we just re-spun the images, so the snapshot needs to be re-run
[10:54] <sil2100> Laney: you can just re-run it as is, no need to delete anything
[10:54] <Laney> sil2100: ok!
[10:54] <Laney> lies
[10:54] <sil2100> Laney: huge thanks! :)
[10:54] <Laney> I do need to delete it
[10:54] <sil2100> You do?
[10:54] <sil2100> Ouchy
[10:54] <Laney> OSError File exists
[10:54] <Laney> feel free to fix the tool to avoid that ;-)
[10:54] <sil2100> Oh well, I guess I wouldn't know since I have no access there!
[10:55] <sil2100> ;)
[11:09] <rbalint_> sil2100, if there will be a new respin u-u is ready for release
[11:11] <rbalint_> sil2100, i have a not too special lxc container where u-u is running for 45 minutes due to not upgradable packages and fixing LP: #1877769 helps with that
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fvwm-crystal [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[11:22] <sil2100> rbalint_: I hope no respin will be required
[11:25] <sil2100> vorlon: hey! Regarding shim-signed for bionic - I guess I'd be okay with accepting the new one if we'd be able to verify it in the nearest days
[11:28] <sil2100> vorlon: I see that the new upload includes a fix on top of the existing changes, so for clarity I'd like it to include all the bugs so far in .changes
[11:28] <sil2100> Let me re-push
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.5 => 1.37~18.04.6] (core)
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.6]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.6]
[13:36] <RikMills> Laney: FYI, for pkg-kde-tools & lintian, looks like it just needs the fixed lintian now in proposed to avoid the hangs
[14:22] <ricotz> sil2100, hello, would you have time to process libreoffice 1:6.4.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 waiting in the focal/queue?
[14:23] <Laney> RikMills: cool
[14:27] <RikMills> Laney: PS. Nearly all the KDE build-needed tests should now be gone/going away, anyway \o/
[14:28] <Laney> yesssssss
[14:28] <RikMills> sorry that took so long....
[14:34] <smb> apw, could you put your generous AA hat on and let me know whether bug 1843742 looks to be reasonably set up?
[14:41] <vorlon> rbalint_: backtrace: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Kcdj9j7vBm/
[14:42] <vorlon> sil2100: shim-signed should be a pretty quick verification.  .changes, yes - do you need me to do anything there or can you reupload it with the correct -v?
[14:46] <Laney> rbalint_: vorlon: I think I fixed that one earlier, sorry for stealing the work (didn't notice the previous ping)
[14:47] <vorlon> Laney: ah cheer
[14:47] <vorlon> s
[14:47] <ahasenack> hello ubuntu-archive, could someone please take a look at this? https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/388428 It's to promote realmd and adcli to main in focal, after it was approved in groovy. The versions are identical in focal and groovy, and security gave a +1 already
[14:47] <vorlon> ahasenack: seed changes don't require ubuntu-archive signoff
[14:48] <vorlon> so don't block on us :)
[14:48] <ahasenack> correct, but I wouldn't want to change a focal seed befora an AA agrees to promote the package there
[14:48] <vorlon> ahasenack: ah right, wasn't obvious from the url, sorry
[14:48] <ahasenack> and isn't there also an imminent .1 release for focal? I also wouldn't want to break that
[14:49] <vorlon> ahasenack: it's only a supported seed so no point release impact.  +1 for the change, go for it and I can promote
[14:49] <ahasenack> thank you!
[14:52] <vorlon> sil2100: ah, you already did that hours ago, cheers ;)
[15:03] <rbalint_> Laney, thanks! vorlon  thanks, i have not seen this failure yet
[15:09] <sil2100> ricotz: let me take a look after the meetings!
[15:09] <sil2100> jibel: hey! So I see you have looked at LP: #1890137, did you check if this affects only Kubuntu or other flavors?
[15:11] <ricotz> sil2100, ty
[15:12] <seb128> sil2100, hey, chromium-browser/focal sounds like another SRU worth accepting now if possible (and trivial only changelog update), it's to make sure focal_version > bionic_security, otherwise .1 upgraders might not get the snap
[15:15] <sil2100> seb128: thanks for the info, on it as well o/
[15:16] <seb128> thanks!
[15:16] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! Did you test that better fix for the meta package removal in u-r-u? Is it ready for releasing?
[15:16] <sil2100> s/releasing/reviewing
[15:21] <ahasenack> vorlon: merged
[15:22] <bdmurray> sil2100: I did test it and uploaded it to groovy, haven't done it for Focal yet.
[15:23] <sil2100> bdmurray: if you could prep a focal upload that would be sweet, since I guess it'd be nice to fast-track it before we enable upgrades
[15:24] <bdmurray> sil2100: I was also working on this on Friday and thought it'd be good to bundle with the linux meta package removal fix
[15:24] <bdmurray> https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+git/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+merge/388513
[15:25] <jibel> sil2100, it doesn't happen on Ubuntu
[15:28] <sil2100> Let me take a look then
[15:28] <jibel> sil2100, I'm downloading kubuntu
[15:29] <bdmurray> sil2100: I haven't found many duplicates of the python-dbg issue so it may be able to wait
[15:36] <jibel> sil2100, so on kubuntu, the link does nothing because xdg-open uses kde-open which doesn't exist but the installer doesn't crash
[15:53] <sil2100> jibel: that's good news then
[15:55] <jibel> i'll file a bug for the wrong association
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.23 => 1:20.04.24] (core)
[16:35] <bdmurray> ^sil2100
[16:36] <bdmurray> I'm writing the test case now
[16:56] <jibel> sil2100, bug 1890173 it's specific to kubuntu
[16:57] <sil2100> bdmurray: \o/
[17:11] <vorlon> ahasenack: and packages promoted in -updates
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aseba-plugin-blockly [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [20180211+git-3] (no packageset)
[17:15] <ahasenack> vorlon: thank you
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset)
[17:26] <Laney> hopefully fixed p-m/xenial without breaking anything else ...
[17:26] <Laney> quite a delicate area of the code though
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset)
[17:28] <vorlon> why does c-m want to promote gcc-9?  nothing in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg or https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html explains
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset)
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:45] <sil2100> ricotz: hmmm, I wanted to accept libreoffice, but I got this error: "libreoffice_6.4.5.orig-tarballs.tar.xz is already published in archive for focal with a different SHA1 hash (dd676f6a65ab6910b90a944be59e17cb1b34b127 != 79767488a539577fb3a5db828c9245a0fbd0491c)"
[17:46] <sil2100> ricotz: how did that happen? I would expect it to get rejected on queue upload
[17:46] <sil2100> vorlon: ^ do you know?
[17:47] <sil2100> It's weird since now libreoffice is gone from the queue, but I wonder if it actually got accepted
[17:48] <ricotz> sil2100, hmm, no idea :(, I didn't create these packages. hellsworth did
[17:49] <ricotz> sil2100, I can prepare fixed ones though
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chromium-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [84.0.4147.89-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[17:52] <sil2100> ricotz: I think it might be good to start preparing new ones (and making sure that the same orig  tarballs are used as available in the archive)
[17:52] <sil2100> Ah, could it be that this was uploaded first to the queue and only afterwards to groovy?
[17:52] <sil2100> Anyway, I see it as accepted, but it doesn't appear anywhere, so probably LP rejected it
[17:53] <ricotz> sil2100, sorry, I don't know, hellsworth is quite new to the packaging process
[17:57] <ricotz> sil2100, https://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/libreoffice/
[17:59] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! So regarding the u-r-u SRU: I'd like to make sure about one thing as this bit us multiple times already in the past
[18:00] <sil2100> bdmurray: do you know if at any moment of time the tryMarkObsoleteForRemoval() function of MyCache in DistUpgradeCache is being used by update-manager?
[18:01] <sil2100> bdmurray: since you know how stupid this is - update-manager uses MyCache from u-r-u but doesn't call it's constructor, so I just want to make sure that update-manager won't suddenly start crashing because of self.linux_metapackage being undefined
[18:01] <sil2100> (as it's defined in the u-r-u constructor, not the update-manager MyCache-derivative)
[18:12] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'll have a look
[18:13] <sil2100> bdmurray: thanks!
[18:23] <vorlon> sil2100: that's a check that doesn't happen until after the unapproved stage
[18:39] <ahasenack> hi release team, do we have a release schedule for groovy? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GroovyGorilla/ReleaseSchedule is empty
[18:39] <ahasenack> oh
[18:39] <ahasenack> it magically appeared
[18:39] <ahasenack> it redirected to discourse, oh
[18:41] <ricotz> sil2100, is the repackaged libreoffice sufficient?
[19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: galax [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1-16] (no packageset)
[19:45] <bdmurray> sil2100: update-manager does not use "tryMarkObsoleteForRemoval" additionally I ran update-manger with the new focal u-r-u packages installed and it worked without issue
[19:51] <sil2100> bdmurray: excellent, thanks for checking!
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.24]
[21:09] <mwhudson> vorlon / ubuntu-archive: can you repromote libargon2-1-udeb to main please?
[21:09] <mwhudson> (see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#cryptsetup)
[21:21] <RikMills> vorlon: lintian in proposed newly depends on lzip, which has no i386 build. can that be sorted?
[22:03] <vorlon> mwhudson: done the other way, cryptsetup udebs demoted (since no longer used).  c-m output suggests something in main in -proposed still depends on them but we'll sort that out anon
[22:04] <vorlon> RikMills: lintian is arch: all, so why does it need to be installable on i386?
[22:05] <vorlon> RikMills: (lintian is not in the build-dep closure for i386, so I believe the answer is it doesn't need to be)
[22:05] <RikMills> when pkg-kde-tools needs lintian for i386 builds
[22:05] <mwhudson> vorlon: can we stop publishing udebs at some stage?
[22:05] <vorlon> mwhudson: possibly
[22:06] <vorlon> RikMills: ah, sounds like a bug in the germinate handling, blech
[22:07] <vorlon> RikMills: otoh why is lintian being used at build-time?
[22:07] <vorlon> it would be more convenient for me to fix this misfeature of pkg-kde-tools instead :)
[22:08] <RikMills> vorlon: pkg-kde-tools uses it for kubuntu QA and CI scripts/pages
[22:09] <vorlon> hmph
[22:09] <vorlon> :)
[22:09] <vorlon> ok I'll dig into it
[22:10] <RikMills> thanks :)
[22:13] <RikMills> vorlon: oh, and currently pkg-kde-tools does not depend on lintian, due to a separate bug with the lintian in -release, but we do want the depend back once fixed lintian in proposed migrates
[22:14]  * RikMills thinks lintian is out to get me this week!
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: album-data [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [4.05-7.1] (no packageset)
[23:14] <mwhudson> hmm how do we feel about removing src:frr i wonder