| RAOF | mwhudson: Yeah, symbols files for C++ projects that don't actively curate their exported symbols is a recipe for frustration. | 00:51 |
|---|---|---|
| === pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
| seb128 | rbalint_, hey, is there any chance you could have a look at why systemd autopkgtests don't like the new plymouth? | 09:19 |
| === rbalint_ is now known as rbalint | ||
| rbalint | seb128, it is on my TODO list | 09:35 |
| seb128 | rbalint, great, I would have poked at it but I'm not familiar enough with the systemd package to know how to just run that specific test easily | 09:42 |
| seb128 | plymouth didn't change much so it's a bit weird :/ | 09:42 |
| mwhudson | *** Test killed: ran too long (1h31m0s). | 09:50 |
| mwhudson | FAILruntime/pprof5465.034s | 09:50 |
| mwhudson | um | 09:50 |
| juliank | I uploaded a new apt with http changes, please watch out for hanging builds | 10:29 |
| juliank | (once it is published in proposed :D) | 10:30 |
| juliank | or autopkgtests for that matter | 10:31 |
| niub | o/ question: has python-raven been replaced by python3-sentry-sdk in ubuntu focal? | 11:12 |
| Laney | juliank: can you fix this at some point https://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/whitespace.png ? at least I assume it's whitespace :D | 11:22 |
| juliank | Laney: seems like meh | 11:22 |
| juliank | Laney: this is progress output with \r and stuff | 11:22 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: hey, could you please accept the mutter SRU for focal? It contains a further fix fixing a regression in the SRU currently under verification | 11:34 |
| Laney | oh good, you can chain transactions in aptdaemon | 12:16 |
| * Laney hopes this works | 12:16 | |
| === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc | ||
| Laney | hmm | 14:21 |
| Laney | how to show progress of the chain though, looks like you have to handle those separately | 14:21 |
| Laney | juliank: ^- right? | 14:21 |
| juliank | I don't know, I just barely keep aptdaemon working | 14:22 |
| juliank | Um, passing it's Testsuite on one arch | 14:22 |
| Laney | ok, I thought you knew it | 14:23 |
| juliank | The answer I assume is yes | 14:23 |
| juliank | But also why use aptdaemon? | 14:23 |
| Laney | update-manager | 14:23 |
| juliank | What's it for? | 14:23 |
| juliank | I sed | 14:23 |
| juliank | see | 14:24 |
| Laney | you want me to first port it to packagekit? :p | 14:24 |
| juliank | I gotta add another upgrade mode to package kit for that | 14:24 |
| juliank | But hughsie does not want it | 14:24 |
| Laney | hmm | 14:24 |
| Laney | I don't remember if you can have chained PkTransactions either | 14:25 |
| Laney | i.e. if doing that would even help | 14:25 |
| Laney | not that there's any chance I will do that :-) | 14:25 |
| * Laney wibbles | 14:27 | |
| Laney | what to do what to do | 14:27 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: I can take a look at it today finally | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | sil2100: thanks | 14:54 |
| sil2100 | Trevinho: btw. which reminds me: the bionic mutter SRU FTBFS on all arches from what I see | 14:54 |
| Trevinho | mhmhm weird | 14:55 |
| niub | fwiw https://github.com/getsentry/raven-python/blob/master/README.rst#L36 states python-raven has been phased out for Sentry-Python | 14:55 |
| Trevinho | not sure what changed, let me see | 14:56 |
| === lucas_ is now known as lucascastro | ||
| oSoMoN | what's the process to request a package be removed from the archive? file a bug (is there a template), or just ping a friendly AA ? | 16:52 |
| cjwatson | oSoMoN: file a bug with rationale, subscribe ~ubuntu-archive. I don't think there's a template | 16:57 |
| oSoMoN | ok, thanks | 16:58 |
| oSoMoN | done: bug #1890319 | 17:05 |
| ubottu | bug 1890319 in tinyjsd (Ubuntu) "Please remove tinyjsd from the archive" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890319 | 17:05 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: hi, so yes, trusty queues get zero attention from the standard SRU process - pings required :) | 18:44 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: @archive-admins pings? | 18:44 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: sru team pings really. anyway, looking no | 18:44 |
| vorlon | w | 18:44 |
| ahasenack | I pinged one, but he said he had no idea how to process trusty srus | 18:45 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: and where is this SRU supposed to go? Is it going to go in the security pocket in trusty? | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | I don't know, I assumed updates | 18:46 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: in which case the package you need in order to ensure esm updates are automatically installed by default, will not be automatically installed by default | 18:46 |
| ahasenack | well, it's definitely not going into esm | 18:46 |
| ahasenack | because of what you said | 18:46 |
| vorlon | oh wait this is update-notifier, not unattended-upgrades | 18:46 |
| ahasenack | right | 18:46 |
| sergiodj | hi there. since we're talking about "pings required", I'd like someone to take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial/+merge/388495 , please :) | 18:47 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: I actually think this should go to esm instead | 18:47 |
| sergiodj | I wasn't sure if I should subscribe someone else directly as a reviewer. I just subscribed the SRU team because that's what I saw other MPs doing | 18:47 |
| vorlon | because it's cosmetic, and only impacts the motd output aiui | 18:48 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: but that output is an incentive to enable esm | 18:48 |
| ahasenack | that's why I thought it should go into updates, so people without esm get that | 18:48 |
| ahasenack | and can see what esm would give | 18:48 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: but this only matters for the newer version of ubuntu-advantage-tools, which wasn't published when trusty standard support ended... if users were running trusty unsupported from april 2019 to january 2020 without enabling esm, does it matter now? | 18:50 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: who know, it might convince some reluctant users to enable esm? Once they start seeing the security updates they are missing? | 18:52 |
| ahasenack | s/know/knows/ | 18:52 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: I'm afraid I still don't think we should do this in trusty-updates and would like to see it go to esm instead | 19:09 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: that's fine, do I need to change anything in the packaging? | 19:10 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: I don't believe so, you just need to work with the security team to get it uploaded to the right place | 19:11 |
| ahasenack | can they fetch it from wherever it is now? | 19:11 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: technically, yes :) | 19:12 |
| ahasenack | the "limbo" | 19:12 |
| ahasenack | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=update-notifier right | 19:14 |
| vorlon | yep | 19:18 |
| ahasenack | ok, thanks, I pinged them | 19:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
