/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/08/04/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nanoc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.11.14-1] (no packageset)05:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset)05:31
julianksil2100: I'd like to unblock shim again, see https://code.launchpad.net/~juliank/britney/hints-ubuntu--unblock-shim/+merge/388647 - the block was for the old (broken) version we wanted to keep in proposed, but didn't08:03
julianksil2100: Is there a chance you could merge this for me? :)08:03
juliankLaney: ^ if something is blocked by a hint, update_excuses says to contact debian-release, probably should say to contact ubuntu-release :D08:04
juliankNot touching package due to block request by ubuntu-release (please contact debian-release if update is needed)08:05
Laneyheh08:06
Laneythose guys can deal with it, that's fine by me08:06
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
sil2100juliank: oh yea, indeed we can now proceed with stuff!08:21
sil2100Let me check that and merge08:22
rbalint_sil2100, could you please also merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/388558 ?08:34
rbalint_(for systemd)08:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200513-1~18.04.1 => 1.0.20200513-1~18.04.2] (no packageset)08:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200513-1~20.04.1 => 1.0.20200513-1~20.04.2] (no packageset)08:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1 => 1.0.20200513-1~16.04.2] (no packageset)08:44
jibelsil2100, I just finished testing focal on hw with nvidia and rst drives. It's all good. I still have to test it on VMWare but I cannot at the moment, I've to reboot to disable secure boot.08:48
jibelI'll do a PXE installation, then I think we're done for desktop.08:48
Laneyit shuld say ubuntu-release at the next run08:49
Laneyshould08:49
Laneygive me message editing please08:49
sil2100jibel: \o/08:52
sil2100rbalint_: looking08:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libglvnd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)09:12
=== rbalint_ is now known as rbalint
mwhudsonubuntu-archive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frr/+bug/189025909:36
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1890259 in frr (Ubuntu) "remove this package from release and proposed" [Undecided,New]09:36
apwmwhudson, i believe if that gets removed from proposed then it will never come back; autosync will ignore it09:37
mwhudsonapw: i was under the impression that there was an explicit black list of Things We Do Not Want09:38
apwmwhudson, why is demoting it to -proposed not sufficient ... obviously this would need blocking too09:38
apwmwhudson, it is taken from the removals log09:38
mwhudsonhm09:38
apwbut why would it not be ok to pull it back to -proposed09:38
apwand hold it there09:39
mwhudsonoh right yes probably just deleting the one in release would be fine09:39
mwhudsonno need to hold it there, the failing autopkgtests will do that part just fine09:39
apwok09:39
seb128apw, mwhudson, if you delete from proposed the same version will not be synced again09:43
seb128but the next one will09:43
mwhudsonyeah that's what i thought09:43
apwhmmm, ok09:43
seb128so it depends if you want the package to be out of the archive for good09:43
mwhudsonbut apw is right that just deleting from release should let json-c migrate09:43
apwnope we don't09:43
seb128or if you want it back on the next debian upload09:43
seb128k, then deleting from proposed would be fine09:43
seb128but sounds like deleting from release is what you want there09:44
seb128apw, are you doing the removal?09:44
apwwhich what i am propsing to do yes09:44
apwseb128, yes i am planning on it if the other assertions pan out09:44
apwfor clarity, i am proposing to remove it from -release only09:44
seb128+109:44
xnoxLaney:  sil2100: why is there ubuntu-release block in groovy? I don't see anything on the schedule.09:46
apwxnox, where do you see that ?09:47
mwhudsonapw: yes release only deletiong please09:48
apwmwhudson, gone09:48
mwhudsonapw: thanks09:48
apwxnox, i only see 4 packages blocked, all by me09:48
xnoxright i am blind09:48
xnoxshim was blocked too, because of the old revert, and that got dropped now.09:48
xnoxeverything is good09:49
rbalintsil2100, please drop glibc from groovy-proposed, i'm preparing 2.32 soon to land instead09:54
rbalintsil2100, also i've discovered issues with the nanosleep fallback09:55
dokomwhudson, Laney: are the udebs issues now sorted out?09:57
mwhudsondoko: seems so09:57
dokorbalint: why drop it?09:57
dokook, somebody looking now why they are up to demotion?09:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2] (no packageset)10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2] (no packageset)10:00
mwhudsondoko: i wasn't planning to10:03
mwhudsondoko: i think it's probably reasonable that they are to be demoted, but the question is why not enough of them are being suggested for demotion, or something like that10:04
rbalintdoko, i think it is broken and should not be released so keeping it in -proposed is not useful10:08
rbalintdoko, i've saved the observed regressions to be triaged later and as a reference for next uploads10:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (focal-proposed/main) [1:6.4.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:6.4.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)10:19
xnoxdoko:  we dropped d-i in groovy, and removed d-i builds. Hence majority of udeb-only packages are falling off to universe as expected. We still need to remove / demote more things.10:20
xnoxdoko:  or i guess we could seed them back to main, if that's too much churn.10:20
xnoxdoko:  ideally i hoped for doing "noudeb" build profile in launchpad to stop generating them altogether. But that's not implemented.10:21
Laneyc-m is offering up udeb things for demotion that still have depends in main, seems like a bug in the report10:21
Laneyyou could ignore it by doing more radical stuff, true, but the report does seem buggy right now10:21
Laneymwhudson noted that in the +1 maint status report10:21
xnoxi see10:21
xnoxwell imho, no udebs should exist =)10:21
mwhudsonis there a noudebs profile or something? or do we teach launchpad to stop publishing them?10:22
mwhudsonit's not worth having delta on packages just to hack the udebs out10:22
xnoxmwhudson:  there is noudeb profile, i'm not sure where/how to inject it.10:22
marcustomlinsonsil2100: please could you approve the libreoffice upload in focal. this actually was previously accepted but failed due to different orig tarball checksums. should be fixed now.10:22
xnoxmwhudson:  i wish we would inject build profile "ubuntu" to be fair. Would make so many things eaiser. I.e. specifying/excluding ubuntu-only build-deps in debian/control.10:23
mwhudsonxnox: sounds like a job for the asbestos pants10:24
mwhudsonalthough i don't really understand why profile stuff is as contentious as it is10:24
Laneyit would have some similar issues to the vendor-specific patch series that the tech ctte recently banned10:25
Laneyso yeah, don't expect a smooth ride imo10:25
xnoxtrue it would.10:25
xnoxmwhudson:  Laney: so at https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/launchpad-buildd/+git/launchpad-buildd/+merge/38646610:26
xnoxi was asked to "is that we need to consider the plan for those when designing this."10:26
xnoxi.e. have a plan for arbitrary profiles i guess.10:26
cjwatsonNot necessarily a complete plan, but at least have thought about it so that we don't put a single-purpose hack in place only to have to supersede it with something else later10:31
xnoxok10:32
xnoxalso somehow i wonder if it needs to be in-distro anyway as well. for something that is applied so fundamental.10:32
xnoxi.e. if we break udeb build for some reason, then packages will fail to `debuild -- binary` locally, unless one knows to set `noudeb` profile.10:33
xnoxthat would be sad too.10:33
cjwatsonIt's not clear to me whether it's worth separating build and publish logic.  I know we do it for ddebs ...10:38
RikMillswill the new lintian deps need a proper MIR to promote them?10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset)11:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset)11:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset)11:22
xnoxvorlon:  uploaded rebuild of shim-canonical, and seeded it into a main seed, and seeded it. As signed things are not published for universe.11:22
xnoxvorlon:  also i wonder if we can reproducibly reubild existing shim, to allow normal archive signing of it.11:23
apwxnox, i don't think that is an accurate statement about signed and universe; i believe the correct statement is "all signed things regardless of component are published in dists/main"11:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset)11:27
xnoxhmmmm11:29
xnoxah11:30
xnoxapw:  signing has never been accepted yet.11:30
xnoxapw:  can you please reject _1_ from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=shim11:31
apwxnox, gone11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1]11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1]11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset)11:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted album-data [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.05-7.1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanoc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.11.14-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aseba-plugin-blockly [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20180211+git-3]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fvwm-crystal [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.1+dfsg-2]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16]11:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-3]11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-4]11:44
cjwatsonapw: That would surprise me11:55
cjwatsonapw: Huh, you do appear to be correct11:55
cjwatsonI guess we didn't have a good alternative due to the incomplete data model11:56
apwcjwatson, my memory is we literally do not have the component in the signing context12:03
jibelsil2100, I've a very simple fix for bug 1890173 but it'll be for .2 at this point.12:36
ubot5bug 1890173 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[kubuntu] "Release notes" link doesn't open" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189017312:36
cjwatsonapw: Yeah, you're probably right.  Sigh @ custom uploads12:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~20.04.2]13:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~18.04.2]13:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.2]13:42
=== M_hc[m] is now known as _hc
bdmurraysil2100: I've verified the fix for LP: #1889449 but was hoping somebody else would test it too just to be extra extra safe.14:16
ubot5Launchpad bug 1889449 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "18.04 to 20.04.1 upgrade on raspberry pi removes too many kernel meta packages" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188944914:16
bdmurraysil2100: I'm also trying to fix LP: #1888916 but might be missing information.14:17
ubot5Launchpad bug 1888916 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Groovy) "upgrade from bionic to focal a server with molly-guard moves back sources.list to bionic entries" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/188891614:17
sil2100bdmurray: should we ping klebers?14:42
bdmurraysil2100: he's testing it now14:42
kleberssil2100, bdmurray: the upgraded worked now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889449/comments/915:33
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1889449 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "18.04 to 20.04.1 upgrade on raspberry pi removes too many kernel meta packages" [High,Fix committed]15:33
bdmurrayklebers: Great, thanks for testing it!15:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2]15:34
sil2100klebers, bdmurray: thanks!15:42
sil2100I'd say let's leave it around in -proposed until tomorrow and release it then15:43
bdmurraysil2100: Alright, sounds good15:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: probert (focal-proposed/main) [0.0.18 => 0.0.18build1] (no packageset)15:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (focal-proposed/main) [8.2001.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.2001.0-1ubuntu1.1] (core)16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitit [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.13.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)17:12
vorlonxnox: I don't see a need for reproducibly rebuilding existing shim, vs just changing the shim source to include the efi signing tarball18:01
vorlonRikMills: so I think the right ordering here is for pkg-kde-tools to restore its dependency on lintian, then let germinate do its thing, then get lzip bootstrapped into the whitelist18:23
vorlonRikMills: also lzip is currently in universe, as is libipc-run3-perl, so lintian isn't going anywhere without an MIR18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.154.1ubuntu9]19:13
vorlonsil2100, bdmurray: shim-signed/bionic is verified, should I release that?  that implies respins, doesn't it19:19
vorlonsil2100: ah but this is respins for bionic, which we still have a week on - I'll go ahead and release it now19:20
sil2100vorlon: yes, please o/19:57
sil2100There's still kmod/systemd/d-i for bionic that need releasing, but I wanted to give systemd one more day of aging just-in-case19:58
vorlonsil2100: yeah there are also some autopkgtest regressions on systemd that I'm hammering retry buttons on20:05
vorlondoko: are there any behavior changes in gcc-10 regarding . being an implicit include path or something?  qtwebkit-opensource-src FTBFS saying it can't find XPathGrammar.hpp which is in the same directory as the source file20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitit [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.13.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.13.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)20:18
ddstreetvorlon autopkgtest regression for linux-aws-edge is lp: #1890178 and umockdev is lp: #183146720:24
ubot5Launchpad bug 1890178 in linux-aws-edge (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest fails 'rebuild' test due to missing/deleted spl-linux version in debian/dkms-versions" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189017820:24
ubot5Launchpad bug 1831467 in umockdev (Ubuntu Focal) "test-umockdev tests flaky on armhf (and sometimes other archs)" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183146720:24
ddstreetthe linux-hwe-5.4 test failure is a timeout, but it's also armhf, so nothing surprising there, armhf is always slow20:26
ddstreetwell, our armhf-container-inside-arm64-instance is always slow, at least20:26
RikMillsvorlon: ack on pkg-kde-tools. probably versioning the lintian dep so it stays in proposed with the fixed lintian21:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpcbind (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.3-0.6 => 0.2.3-0.6ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core)21:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpcbind (xenial-proposed/main) [0.2.3-0.2ubuntu0.1 => 0.2.3-0.2ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core)21:31
mwhudsonargh json-c is entangled with boost?21:41
mwhudsonwhy was that not showing yesterday21:42
mwhudsonvorlon: has #include <> vs #include "" changed for gcc-10 i wonder?21:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest-hexdifferences-perl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.001-2] (no packageset)23:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)23:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: metamath-databases [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.0.0~20200715.git5b44899-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-1] (no packageset)23:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-settings-tesla-450 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [450.57-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-settings-tesla-450 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [450.57-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset)23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset)23:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-2] (no packageset)23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-2] (no packageset)23:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset)23:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset)23:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-2] (no packageset)23:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)23:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)23:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)23:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)23:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset)23:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset)23:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cod-tools [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.0.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-settings-tesla-450 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [450.57-1] (no packageset)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset)23:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset)23:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)23:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)23:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cod-tools [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.0.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!