[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nanoc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [4.11.14-1] (no packageset) [05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [08:03] sil2100: I'd like to unblock shim again, see https://code.launchpad.net/~juliank/britney/hints-ubuntu--unblock-shim/+merge/388647 - the block was for the old (broken) version we wanted to keep in proposed, but didn't [08:03] sil2100: Is there a chance you could merge this for me? :) [08:04] Laney: ^ if something is blocked by a hint, update_excuses says to contact debian-release, probably should say to contact ubuntu-release :D [08:05] Not touching package due to block request by ubuntu-release (please contact debian-release if update is needed) [08:06] heh [08:06] those guys can deal with it, that's fine by me === pieq_ is now known as pieq [08:21] juliank: oh yea, indeed we can now proceed with stuff! [08:22] Let me check that and merge [08:34] sil2100, could you please also merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/388558 ? [08:34] (for systemd) [08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200513-1~18.04.1 => 1.0.20200513-1~18.04.2] (no packageset) [08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200513-1~20.04.1 => 1.0.20200513-1~20.04.2] (no packageset) [08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.1 => 1.0.20200513-1~16.04.2] (no packageset) [08:48] sil2100, I just finished testing focal on hw with nvidia and rst drives. It's all good. I still have to test it on VMWare but I cannot at the moment, I've to reboot to disable secure boot. [08:48] I'll do a PXE installation, then I think we're done for desktop. [08:49] it shuld say ubuntu-release at the next run [08:49] should [08:49] give me message editing please [08:52] jibel: \o/ [08:52] rbalint_: looking [09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libglvnd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) === rbalint_ is now known as rbalint [09:36] ubuntu-archive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frr/+bug/1890259 [09:36] Ubuntu bug 1890259 in frr (Ubuntu) "remove this package from release and proposed" [Undecided,New] [09:37] mwhudson, i believe if that gets removed from proposed then it will never come back; autosync will ignore it [09:38] apw: i was under the impression that there was an explicit black list of Things We Do Not Want [09:38] mwhudson, why is demoting it to -proposed not sufficient ... obviously this would need blocking too [09:38] mwhudson, it is taken from the removals log [09:38] hm [09:38] but why would it not be ok to pull it back to -proposed [09:39] and hold it there [09:39] oh right yes probably just deleting the one in release would be fine [09:39] no need to hold it there, the failing autopkgtests will do that part just fine [09:39] ok [09:43] apw, mwhudson, if you delete from proposed the same version will not be synced again [09:43] but the next one will [09:43] yeah that's what i thought [09:43] hmmm, ok [09:43] so it depends if you want the package to be out of the archive for good [09:43] but apw is right that just deleting from release should let json-c migrate [09:43] nope we don't [09:43] or if you want it back on the next debian upload [09:43] k, then deleting from proposed would be fine [09:44] but sounds like deleting from release is what you want there [09:44] apw, are you doing the removal? [09:44] which what i am propsing to do yes [09:44] seb128, yes i am planning on it if the other assertions pan out [09:44] for clarity, i am proposing to remove it from -release only [09:44] +1 [09:46] Laney: sil2100: why is there ubuntu-release block in groovy? I don't see anything on the schedule. [09:47] xnox, where do you see that ? [09:48] apw: yes release only deletiong please [09:48] mwhudson, gone [09:48] apw: thanks [09:48] xnox, i only see 4 packages blocked, all by me [09:48] right i am blind [09:48] shim was blocked too, because of the old revert, and that got dropped now. [09:49] everything is good [09:54] sil2100, please drop glibc from groovy-proposed, i'm preparing 2.32 soon to land instead [09:55] sil2100, also i've discovered issues with the nanosleep fallback [09:57] mwhudson, Laney: are the udebs issues now sorted out? [09:57] doko: seems so [09:57] rbalint: why drop it? [09:58] ok, somebody looking now why they are up to demotion? [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2] (no packageset) [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2] (no packageset) [10:03] doko: i wasn't planning to [10:04] doko: i think it's probably reasonable that they are to be demoted, but the question is why not enough of them are being suggested for demotion, or something like that [10:08] doko, i think it is broken and should not be released so keeping it in -proposed is not useful [10:08] doko, i've saved the observed regressions to be triaged later and as a reference for next uploads [10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (focal-proposed/main) [1:6.4.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:6.4.5-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [10:20] doko: we dropped d-i in groovy, and removed d-i builds. Hence majority of udeb-only packages are falling off to universe as expected. We still need to remove / demote more things. [10:20] doko: or i guess we could seed them back to main, if that's too much churn. [10:21] doko: ideally i hoped for doing "noudeb" build profile in launchpad to stop generating them altogether. But that's not implemented. [10:21] c-m is offering up udeb things for demotion that still have depends in main, seems like a bug in the report [10:21] you could ignore it by doing more radical stuff, true, but the report does seem buggy right now [10:21] mwhudson noted that in the +1 maint status report [10:21] i see [10:21] well imho, no udebs should exist =) [10:22] is there a noudebs profile or something? or do we teach launchpad to stop publishing them? [10:22] it's not worth having delta on packages just to hack the udebs out [10:22] mwhudson: there is noudeb profile, i'm not sure where/how to inject it. [10:22] sil2100: please could you approve the libreoffice upload in focal. this actually was previously accepted but failed due to different orig tarball checksums. should be fixed now. [10:23] mwhudson: i wish we would inject build profile "ubuntu" to be fair. Would make so many things eaiser. I.e. specifying/excluding ubuntu-only build-deps in debian/control. [10:24] xnox: sounds like a job for the asbestos pants [10:24] although i don't really understand why profile stuff is as contentious as it is [10:25] it would have some similar issues to the vendor-specific patch series that the tech ctte recently banned [10:25] so yeah, don't expect a smooth ride imo [10:25] true it would. [10:26] mwhudson: Laney: so at https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/launchpad-buildd/+git/launchpad-buildd/+merge/386466 [10:26] i was asked to "is that we need to consider the plan for those when designing this." [10:26] i.e. have a plan for arbitrary profiles i guess. [10:31] Not necessarily a complete plan, but at least have thought about it so that we don't put a single-purpose hack in place only to have to supersede it with something else later [10:32] ok [10:32] also somehow i wonder if it needs to be in-distro anyway as well. for something that is applied so fundamental. [10:33] i.e. if we break udeb build for some reason, then packages will fail to `debuild -- binary` locally, unless one knows to set `noudeb` profile. [10:33] that would be sad too. [10:38] It's not clear to me whether it's worth separating build and publish logic. I know we do it for ddebs ... [10:47] will the new lintian deps need a proper MIR to promote them? [11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset) [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset) [11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset) [11:22] vorlon: uploaded rebuild of shim-canonical, and seeded it into a main seed, and seeded it. As signed things are not published for universe. [11:23] vorlon: also i wonder if we can reproducibly reubild existing shim, to allow normal archive signing of it. [11:24] xnox, i don't think that is an accurate statement about signed and universe; i believe the correct statement is "all signed things regardless of component are published in dists/main" [11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset) [11:29] hmmmm [11:30] ah [11:30] apw: signing has never been accepted yet. [11:31] apw: can you please reject _1_ from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/groovy/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=shim [11:31] xnox, gone [11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1] [11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1] [11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-1] (no packageset) [11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.52+dfsg-2] (no packageset) [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted album-data [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.05-7.1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nanoc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [4.11.14-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frotz [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.52+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aseba-plugin-blockly [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20180211+git-3] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fvwm-crystal [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.1+dfsg-2] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-blogliterately [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.7-1] [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted galax [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.1-16] [11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-3] [11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rails [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-4] [11:55] apw: That would surprise me [11:55] apw: Huh, you do appear to be correct [11:56] I guess we didn't have a good alternative due to the incomplete data model [12:03] cjwatson, my memory is we literally do not have the component in the signing context [12:36] sil2100, I've a very simple fix for bug 1890173 but it'll be for .2 at this point. [12:36] bug 1890173 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[kubuntu] "Release notes" link doesn't open" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890173 [12:46] apw: Yeah, you're probably right. Sigh @ custom uploads [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~20.04.2] [13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~18.04.2] [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.20200513-1~16.04.2] === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc [14:16] sil2100: I've verified the fix for LP: #1889449 but was hoping somebody else would test it too just to be extra extra safe. [14:16] Launchpad bug 1889449 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "18.04 to 20.04.1 upgrade on raspberry pi removes too many kernel meta packages" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1889449 [14:17] sil2100: I'm also trying to fix LP: #1888916 but might be missing information. [14:17] Launchpad bug 1888916 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Groovy) "upgrade from bionic to focal a server with molly-guard moves back sources.list to bionic entries" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1888916 [14:42] bdmurray: should we ping klebers? [14:42] sil2100: he's testing it now [15:33] sil2100, bdmurray: the upgraded worked now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889449/comments/9 [15:33] Ubuntu bug 1889449 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "18.04 to 20.04.1 upgrade on raspberry pi removes too many kernel meta packages" [High,Fix committed] [15:33] klebers: Great, thanks for testing it! [15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] [15:42] klebers, bdmurray: thanks! [15:43] I'd say let's leave it around in -proposed until tomorrow and release it then [15:45] sil2100: Alright, sounds good [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: probert (focal-proposed/main) [0.0.18 => 0.0.18build1] (no packageset) [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rsyslog (focal-proposed/main) [8.2001.0-1ubuntu1 => 8.2001.0-1ubuntu1.1] (core) [17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitit [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.13.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [18:01] xnox: I don't see a need for reproducibly rebuilding existing shim, vs just changing the shim source to include the efi signing tarball [18:23] RikMills: so I think the right ordering here is for pkg-kde-tools to restore its dependency on lintian, then let germinate do its thing, then get lzip bootstrapped into the whitelist [18:23] RikMills: also lzip is currently in universe, as is libipc-run3-perl, so lintian isn't going anywhere without an MIR [19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.154.1ubuntu9] [19:19] sil2100, bdmurray: shim-signed/bionic is verified, should I release that? that implies respins, doesn't it [19:20] sil2100: ah but this is respins for bionic, which we still have a week on - I'll go ahead and release it now [19:57] vorlon: yes, please o/ [19:58] There's still kmod/systemd/d-i for bionic that need releasing, but I wanted to give systemd one more day of aging just-in-case [20:05] sil2100: yeah there are also some autopkgtest regressions on systemd that I'm hammering retry buttons on [20:07] doko: are there any behavior changes in gcc-10 regarding . being an implicit include path or something? qtwebkit-opensource-src FTBFS saying it can't find XPathGrammar.hpp which is in the same directory as the source file [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitit [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.13.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.13.0.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [20:24] vorlon autopkgtest regression for linux-aws-edge is lp: #1890178 and umockdev is lp: #1831467 [20:24] Launchpad bug 1890178 in linux-aws-edge (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest fails 'rebuild' test due to missing/deleted spl-linux version in debian/dkms-versions" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890178 [20:24] Launchpad bug 1831467 in umockdev (Ubuntu Focal) "test-umockdev tests flaky on armhf (and sometimes other archs)" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1831467 [20:26] the linux-hwe-5.4 test failure is a timeout, but it's also armhf, so nothing surprising there, armhf is always slow [20:26] well, our armhf-container-inside-arm64-instance is always slow, at least [21:12] vorlon: ack on pkg-kde-tools. probably versioning the lintian dep so it stays in proposed with the fixed lintian [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpcbind (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.3-0.6 => 0.2.3-0.6ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core) [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpcbind (xenial-proposed/main) [0.2.3-0.2ubuntu0.1 => 0.2.3-0.2ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core) [21:41] argh json-c is entangled with boost? [21:42] why was that not showing yesterday [21:42] vorlon: has #include <> vs #include "" changed for gcc-10 i wonder? [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest-hexdifferences-perl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.001-2] (no packageset) [23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: metamath-databases [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.0.0~20200715.git5b44899-1] (no packageset) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-settings-tesla-450 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [450.57-1] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-settings-tesla-450 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [450.57-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset) [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset) [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset) [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-2] (no packageset) [23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-2] (no packageset) [23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset) [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset) [23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mldonkey [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.1.7-2] (no packageset) [23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.4.0-2] (no packageset) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset) [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libuev [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset) [23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) [23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cava-alsa [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-1] (no packageset) [23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset) [23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cod-tools [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.0.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlogout [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-settings-tesla-450 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [450.57-1] (no packageset) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unison-2.48 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.48.4-5] (no packageset) [23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: enki-aseba [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.99-1] (no packageset) [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: librsb [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.2.0.8+dfsg.1-2] (no packageset) [23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ayatana-indicator-datetime [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset) [23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cod-tools [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.0.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)