| RAOF | oSoMoN: The tinyjsd removal wants to be a removal + sync blacklist (to prevent it coming back from Debian), right? | 00:16 |
|---|---|---|
| doko | cpaelzer, coreycb: please could you pick up these in your team: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200728-groovy-groovy.html#ubuntu-server | 11:07 |
| doko | seb128, Wimpress: same for desktop: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200728-groovy-groovy.html#desktop-packages | 11:07 |
| doko | jamespage: openstack: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200728-groovy-groovy.html#ubuntu-openstack | 11:07 |
| doko | mdeslaur, sbeattie: and security: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200728-groovy-groovy.html#ubuntu-security | 11:08 |
| doko | apw, sforshee: and kernel: https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20200728-groovy-groovy.html#kernel-packages | 11:10 |
| apw | doko, what is that rebuilding against? | 11:11 |
| seb128 | doko, yes | 11:22 |
| apw | (is that just gcc-10 or somethign else) | 11:22 |
| amurray | doko: thanks for the heads up - we'll take a look | 11:48 |
| cpaelzer | doko: we have already started on it | 12:18 |
| cpaelzer | is that a different link than the one in your mail? | 12:19 |
| cpaelzer | no, seems to be the same - so yes we already started | 12:19 |
| cpaelzer | doko: what is the source for your team mapping? | 12:20 |
| cpaelzer | doko: some openstack bits ended up in ur bucket - e.g. nfs-ganesha | 12:21 |
| cpaelzer | this mapping looks correct | 12:21 |
| cpaelzer | hence I'm asking what your script is based on | 12:21 |
| cpaelzer | doko: I have recently seen "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" on armhf a few times (groovy) | 12:27 |
| cpaelzer | doko: is there a known bug around that in progress already? | 12:27 |
| cpaelzer | could be 1887557 | 12:30 |
| doko | apw: see u-d-a, -release | 12:31 |
| doko | cpaelzer: I saw only one which succeeded on a retry. package? | 12:33 |
| cpaelzer | doko: qemu 2/5 armhf builds failed - no build log that shows it currently | 12:35 |
| cpaelzer | doko: I filed 1890435 to ahve something to dump further insights to | 12:35 |
| cpaelzer | one ongoing build which might or might not fail at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:5.0-5ubuntu4/+build/19773244 | 12:36 |
| cpaelzer | and this issue seems (from 10.000 feet) similar https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/+bug/1887557 | 12:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1887557 in gcc-10 (Ubuntu) "GCC 10 is crashing with an internal compiler error when compiling Mesa" [Undecided,New] | 12:36 |
| cpaelzer | I attached a failing build log that I still had on disk | 12:38 |
| apw | doko, most of the kernel ones look to be genuinly detected double definitions; which i assume is a new fatal warning | 12:39 |
| cjwatson | Sounds like the -fno-common change | 12:41 |
| doko | cpaelzer: that is focal only, fixed in groovy | 12:46 |
| cpaelzer | thanks doko | 12:48 |
| cpaelzer | doko: in that case I'll keep an eye open and report on that bug I filed if I see it happen more often | 12:48 |
| cpaelzer | or if I get to a reproducible state | 12:49 |
| doko | the one I saw for llvm-11 goes away with a rebuild too | 12:53 |
| tafb2 | When is Ubuntu going to have Intel Optane support? Trying to install it on my new laptop, no go. Acer A515-55-56HH, no bios options to disable Optane, UEFI mode only, etc. Secure boot is disabled. | 14:41 |
| tjaalton | ask intel | 15:03 |
| xnox | tafb2: hi, we currently do not support RST and we also give instructions to users on how to disable it, if we detect it is on. | 15:22 |
| xnox | tafb2: the url for instructions is at https://help.ubuntu.com/rst | 15:23 |
| xnox | tafb2: which effectively asks to diable Optate. | 15:24 |
| xnox | tafb2: you say you have no option to disable it however =( i'm not sure that's possible to support then. Because Intel Optane support is not available on linux at all. | 15:24 |
| xnox | tafb2: if not possible from Bios, you should be able to disable it after booting into windows too | 15:25 |
| xnox | i.e. https://support.cyberpowerpc.com/hc/en-us/articles/360014775073-How-do-I-disable-Intel-Optane- seems to be relevant too | 15:25 |
| tafb2 | xnox: neat, never figured you could disable from Windows, I'll give that a try, thanks so much. | 15:32 |
| tafb2 | xnox: In installed Intel RST but when I open it and go into settings it says "your system is not Intel Optane ready" lol :( I go into the bios, under SATA Mode: Optane (no raid), but you can't change it. Hmmm. Maybe i'll put a call into Acer, see if they know how to disable it. | 15:38 |
| === lucas_ is now known as lucascastro | ||
| xnox | tafb2: that sounds very odd, or new, or very restrictive. | 15:53 |
| xnox | tafb2: if you do figure out how to do it, please comment on https://help.ubuntu.com/rst such that we can improve instructions there. | 15:54 |
| xnox | tafb2: and hopefully next person (or you with next laptop ;-) ) will have that readily available to lookup | 15:54 |
| tafb2 | xnox: just got off the phone with acer, level 2 support, no way to disable Optane on that laptop. He put a suggestion into the firmware department to put a setting in the bios to disable Optane in the next bios update (if ever). | 17:42 |
| tafb2 | xnox: the instructions for rufus are pretty messy, just use the "reply" button at the bottom to suggest changes? | 17:47 |
| xnox | tafb2: Yeap, just reply. | 17:49 |
| === cnewcome- is now known as cnewcomer | ||
| tafb2 | "new users are temporarily limited to 3 replies in the same topic" so much for that, lol. I'll try again in a few days. | 18:04 |
| mwhudson | wait how does optane relate to rst | 19:49 |
| arnatious | ahasenack looking at the logs I'm a little confused | 21:32 |
| ahasenack | link? and bug number | 21:33 |
| arnatious | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175 | 21:33 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1883175 in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal) "missing support for python3.8 language features" [Low,Fix committed] | 21:33 |
| arnatious | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/update-manager/focal/amd64 | 21:33 |
| ahasenack | arnatious: ok, so it's elpy that failed | 21:34 |
| arnatious | The bug was fixed by a version bump to 3 related packages, it looks like the tests were triggered multiple times, is it safe to assume in each of those triggered tests all 3 packages were at their latest version? | 21:35 |
| ahasenack | arnatious: by clicking on amd64 (the test with a red), you get to https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/e/elpy/focal/amd64 | 21:35 |
| ahasenack | that shows which packages were used in the test | 21:35 |
| ahasenack | it also shows that it was passing before | 21:36 |
| ahasenack | same version | 21:36 |
| ahasenack | I have no idea what elpy is, but this is the test that failed: | 21:37 |
| ahasenack | 1 unexpected results: | 21:37 |
| ahasenack | FAILED elpy-profile-buffer-or-region-test-indir-failed | 21:37 |
| arnatious | Looks like the failed test case was elpy-profile-buffer-or-region-test-indir-failed | 21:37 |
| ahasenack | and that needs investigation | 21:37 |
| ahasenack | right | 21:37 |
| arnatious | Yeah this looks like python language support for emacs | 21:37 |
| arnatious | Judging by the lisp code | 21:38 |
| arnatious | It might need a version bump as well to support python 3.8 | 21:38 |
| ahasenack | ok, good luck, that's how troubleshooting goes | 21:39 |
| arnatious | I'll work on testing that theory, in the meanwhile, the other failure cases are interesting | 21:39 |
| arnatious | Update-manager and release-manager both failed, then passed | 21:39 |
| arnatious | They had two separate triggered tests for the containing packages | 21:40 |
| ahasenack | it can be a maze tracking these down | 21:41 |
| ahasenack | I have to go, it's end of day for me, good luck | 21:41 |
| arnatious | As a ROS dev, all I can say is better than no testing | 21:41 |
| arnatious | Thanks ahasenack | 21:41 |
| ahasenack | indeed | 21:42 |
| xnox | tafb2: mwhudson: i think one implied the other, and optane is now end of life?! unless got resurrected? https://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/support/articles/000055419/technologies.html | 23:53 |
| xnox | tafb2: mwhudson: unless i am very confused, one uses optane tech, to effectively bcache the drive, which requires the drive to be in the raid / RSTe mode. | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!