[08:39] <cjwatson> tedg: Yep, it's currently confusing, sorry.  There's a branch in flight to make the UI there much clearer.
[13:18] <ricotz> tomwardill, hello, could you take a look at this build to check whether it is (nearly) stuck? https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-prereleases/+build/19777511
[13:19] <tomwardill> ricotz: hmm, build time of over a day, I'd say that looks reasonably stuck
[13:20] <tomwardill> let me see if I can see anything in the logs for you
[13:20] <ricotz> tomwardill, this build can take some while, but usually not that long
[13:21] <ricotz> (meaning 10 hours would not be surprising)
[13:26] <tomwardill> hmm, can't find any mention of it at all in the logs, going to see if anyone else can help :)
[13:28] <ricotz> tomwardill, thank you, retrying it would be waste if it can be resumed somehow
[13:52] <cjwatson> It's likely to be stuck at the builder end.  Probably the best we'll be able to do is to extract some information
[13:52] <cjwatson> (Unlikely to be buildd-manager having forgotten about it, since it was only restarted a couple of hours ago as part of a deployment)
[13:53] <ricotz> cjwatson, tomwardill, please restart it when you finished your investigation
[13:54] <cjwatson> Please restart what?
[13:54] <cjwatson> buildd-manager?  That wouldn't make sense here
[13:55] <ricotz> cjwatson, the libreoffice build
[13:55] <tomwardill> I assume the build
[13:55] <cjwatson> Oh, right
[14:09] <tomwardill> ricotz: this is the ps tree from the builder: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/vs7C7t5Cdr/ it looks like the build has died to me, but do you have any suggestions beyond just restarting the build?
[14:13] <ricotz> tomwardill, sorry, no, just restart it
[14:15] <cjwatson> OK, applying fire
[14:19] <tomwardill> ricotz: restarted, thanks for your patience while we looked at that
[14:21] <ricotz> tomwardill, no problem, although cancelling != restarting
[14:22] <ricotz> should I start it myself?
[14:23] <tomwardill> oh, errr. Unsure... cjwatson did you just cancel or did you queue a rebuild too?
[14:26] <cjwatson> I cancelled and then I finished writing an email while it got around to processing the cancel.
[14:26] <cjwatson> I've retried it now.
[14:26] <tomwardill> ah, ta :)
[14:40] <ricotz> :)
[15:50] <marcustomlinson> tomwardill: any idea why this package is stuck in the queue: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libreoffice
[15:52] <tomwardill> hmm, not immediately, 6 hours seems a reasonable time gap
[15:53] <Laney> there's a duplicate versioned upload stuck in Accepted; that one failed due to .orig mismatch
[15:53] <Laney> this was a re-upload to fix that but both appear wedged
[15:54] <marcustomlinson> thanks Laney
[15:54] <Laney> np
[15:56] <Laney> I could try to reject the queue item in Accepted, see if that does anything ...
[15:56] <marcustomlinson> do eeet
[15:56] <Laney> actually I probably can't, no checkboxes on the UI
[15:56] <cjwatson> That surely won't do anything to the one in Unapproved though?  An upload is generally in Unapproved because it hasn't been approved yet
[15:57] <Laney> Timo tried to approve it earlier; you can see that if you expand the item
[15:57] <cjwatson> Ah, interesting
[15:57] <cjwatson> Looking in logs
[15:58] <cjwatson> Curious that it got logged as accepted even though it wasn't
[15:59] <cjwatson> Laney: Try the command line: `queue -s focal-proposed -Q accepted reject -m 'fill in some reason here' libreoffice`
[16:00] <cjwatson> Then I guess the other one will probably need to be accepted again
[16:02] <Laney> cjwatson: Yep, that did manage to get rid of it
[16:03] <ricotz> \o/
[16:03] <Laney> I'll take Timo's previous attempt as permission enough and accept it myself
[16:07] <Laney> Oh good, I got a 503
[16:08] <Laney> https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=3cb368e6557579d3aa354c7437da3d4a but ISTR accepting LO to be a bit timeouty so maybe this is known
[16:10] <Laney> yes ok, it worked a second time
[16:10] <marcustomlinson> oh woot thanks Laney!
[16:11] <marcustomlinson> and cjwatson :)
[16:11] <Laney> np
[16:11] <Laney> marcustomlinson: fwiw I can't usually accept SRUs, so don't ask me about them in future :p
[16:12] <marcustomlinson> haha
[16:13] <cjwatson> Laney: mm, that's an unfortunate slightly-quadratic thing due to not having an in-process way to do the equivalent of DEB_HOST_ARCH=foo dpkg-architecture -ibar
[16:13] <cjwatson> (Accepting an upload needs to work out which builds to dispatch)
[16:13] <Laney> Ah, and it's done synchronously?
[16:14] <cjwatson> Yeah