[14:28] jamespage: ddstreet: sarnold: pre-ping for MIR meeting in a few minutes [14:28] o/ [14:30] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [14:30] Meeting started Tue Aug 11 14:30:50 2020 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [14:30] Available commands: action commands idea info link nick === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: [14:30] hi jamespage: ddstreet: sarnold: [14:31] we are a reduced team again with doko and didrocks being out this week [14:31] gladly I could convince seb128 to attend in case we need AA actions (and my precheck indicates we will) [14:31] welcome him [14:32] #topic Review of previous action items === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items [14:32] we had one action to check if probert-network still doesn't show up in component mismatches [14:33] it does still seem wrong (is in universe, but is depended from main, not showing) [14:33] I have asked Odd_Bloke to file a bug and get in touch wit hthe archive admins about that oddity [14:33] :-) [14:33] seems nothing we could do a lot about [14:33] good morning [14:33] #topic current component mismatches === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: current component mismatches [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [14:33] we have a bunch ready to promote today [14:33] and a puzzle :-) [14:34] let us go one by one [14:34] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-requests-toolbelt/+bug/1751093 [14:34] Launchpad bug 1751093 in python-requests-toolbelt (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-requests-toolbelt" [Undecided,Fix released] [14:34] that is ready (from past review) [14:34] and now depended on again [14:34] openstack is still subscribed [14:34] so I gues we'd just want that to be re-promoted in groovy [14:34] jamespage: any objections to do that? [14:35] arr [14:35] just found out jamespage is out this week as well [14:36] but the case is rather clear [14:36] anyone else to object re-promoting that= [14:36] ? [14:36] wfm [14:36] seb128: would you take this to promote it to groovy-main? [14:36] sure [14:36] thanks [14:37] next case is actually a double [14:37] hwloc depends on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-dasd/+bug/1522003 [14:37] Launchpad bug 1522003 in s390-dasd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] s390-dasd" [Undecided,Fix released] [14:37] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-sysconfig-writer/+bug/1522002 [14:37] Launchpad bug 1522002 in s390-sysconfig-writer (Ubuntu) "[MIR] s390-sysconfig-writer" [Undecided,Fix released] [14:37] both were in main before [14:37] they are ready to be promoted [14:37] TBH I don't see why they even demoted in the first place [14:37] IMHO those should also be (re-)promoted [14:37] any objection to that? [14:38] I take that as a now and the case is rather clear again [14:39] wfm [14:39] seb128: those would be the next to for you - ok with that ? [14:39] k [14:39] last item out of this category is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khronos-opencl-clhpp/+bug/1636728 [14:39] Launchpad bug 1636728 in khronos-opencl-clhpp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] khronos-opencl-clhpp" [Undecided,Fix released] [14:39] here we need the desktop Team anyway - the package was in main , the MIR is ready - but the subscriber was unclear [14:39] "ubuntu-x" is subscribed [14:40] we were wondering if that is still an active team from canonicals POV (to provide support in main) [14:40] seb128: do you happen to know since "ubuntu-x" sounds so Desktop'ish? [14:40] this one https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat [14:41] I don't think it's in the official list no [14:41] seb128: thanks [14:41] seb128: cuold you carry https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khronos-opencl-clhpp/+bug/1636728 to the Desktop Team meeting then to sort out who should subsceribe now? [14:41] Launchpad bug 1636728 in khronos-opencl-clhpp (Ubuntu) "[MIR] khronos-opencl-clhpp" [Undecided,Fix released] [14:41] "subscribe" [14:42] ack [14:42] the next in component mismatches is a massive tree of golang things [14:42] but not listing the root of the dependency [14:43] further to the right there is "gcc-compute-image-packages" which sounds suspicious to be related [14:43] does anyone know or has worked on that? [14:43] the khronos package seems to be pulled in by ocl-icd which is owned by kernel so I would suggest kernel should look at that one [14:43] since doko isn't here let me ping xnox - as maybe is is around and knows about it ^^ [14:44] seb128: agreed (we said and have seen the same last week) - but since the old owner was ubuntu-x it would be Dekstop to punt it over to kernel [14:44] maybe just get your and their manager connected [14:44] or do you prefer me to do the mailing [14:44] I can do it if you like [14:44] k [14:45] I can handle it [14:45] ok, thanks [14:45] np! [14:45] cpaelzer: sorry, what are you asking me? [14:45] xnox: hi [14:45] xnox do you know about all the google/golang things in https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg ? [14:45] we were wondering if that is any foundation driven effort? [14:46] cpaelzer: i think it's on rbalint to file all the MIRs and subscribe either foundations or cpc/cloudware. [14:46] I beg your pardon - since doko isn't here to speak for foundations I asked you [14:46] thank you - that makes sense then [14:46] all other things in there are known cases and actively handled one or the other way [14:47] I'll take an action to sort with vorlon how to handle the subscription problem that doko brought up for the fonts package [14:47] #action - cpaelzer to ask Steve how to fastpath font packages without subscriptions [14:47] ACTION: - cpaelzer to ask Steve how to fastpath font packages without subscriptions [14:47] #topic New MIRs === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: New MIRs [14:47] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:47] up until a few minutes ago there was https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-jwcrypto/+bug/1869215 [14:47] Launchpad bug 1869215 in python-jwcrypto (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-jwcrypto" [High,In progress] [14:48] but that will work out once jamespage is back [14:48] really new is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipp-usb/+bug/1891157 [14:48] Launchpad bug 1891157 in ipp-usb (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ipp-usb" [High,New] [14:48] and that looks for a reviewer [14:48] I have to admit I didn't even get to process my assignments of last week :-/ [14:48] does anyone have the breathing room to look at this (two packages actually) [14:48] sarnold: ddstreet: ^^ ? [14:49] i haven't got to the one i took last week either [14:49] I've still not finished the previous pcakage I've accepted :( I should say no on this one [14:49] ok so we are all in the sma eboat [14:49] same boat [14:49] we will let it open for this week [14:50] butnext week we need to asign someone as the target is 20.10 [14:50] maybe I can take a few hours off my +1 duty without being slapped too hard [14:50] we will see [14:50] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Incomplete bugs / questions [14:50] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:50] nothing new here [14:51] #topic Any other business? === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Any other business? [14:51] ok, that is it then [14:51] thanks everyone that isn't on PTO :-) [14:51] we see the expected end-of-cycle ramp up of activity here [14:51] see you all next week [14:52] #endmeeting === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice [14:52] Meeting ended Tue Aug 11 14:52:07 2020 UTC. [14:52] Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-08-11-14.30.moin.txt [14:52] thanks! bye o/ [14:52] thanks cpaelzer, all :) [14:52] and thanks seb128 for standing in for our missing AA members [14:52] yw! [16:50] o/ [17:07] Is kernel meeting still planning to happen?