[06:10] <cpaelzer> hi ubuntu-archive, can I get someone to look at bug 1891340 and either action on it or tell me how this kind of cases would have to be solved?
[06:13] <RAOF> cpaelzer: Hm. If we just remove the !amd64 binaries, won't subsequent updates FTBFS on all other architectures anyway?
[06:13] <RAOF> Hm, no. The builds won't be dispatched, because LP will notice the missing build-depends first.
[06:14] <cpaelzer> yeah it does detect the missing b-dep as you see here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gubbins/2.4.1-2
[06:14] <cpaelzer> yet it can't migrate as it thinks it needs to wait on non-x86
[06:14] <cpaelzer> because Ubuntu had non-x86 builds before
[06:14] <RAOF> Yeah.
[06:14] <cpaelzer> Debian didn't and I'd have hoped that removing the !x86 bins makes this check pass
[06:14] <RAOF> How did Debian not build it on all architectures?
[06:15] <cpaelzer> really I'm only 75% sure on this, so if there is a different/better way let me know
[06:15] <RAOF> (That's somewhat of a tangent, as I think removing the binaries is indeed the correct path)
[06:16] <cpaelzer> RAOF: yeah the "how did Debian do it" is confusing on this one
[06:17] <cpaelzer> RAOF: e.g. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gubbins&suite=buster
[06:17] <cpaelzer> https://trello.com/c/9d4tprP6/919-ciphersuite-recommendation-package-proposal
[06:17] <cpaelzer> that looks like it would be there, but it isn't
[06:17] <cpaelzer> maybe they removed them as well for some reason, but I haven't found a Debian bug that discusses that
[06:22] <RAOF> Why is jqtree amd64 only, anyway?
[06:23] <cpaelzer> ask me something I know please :-)
[06:24] <cpaelzer> "iqtree"
[06:24] <cpaelzer> not "jqtree"
[06:24] <cpaelzer> RAOF: ^^
[06:24] <cpaelzer> I mix them, my bad
[06:24] <RAOF> Ah, no. iqtree. Looks like it's a bit of core computational-biology software, so my guess would be contains x86 asm.
[06:37] <cpaelzer> Thank you RAOF, I'll in a few hours re-cehck what happened to the package
[06:37] <cpaelzer> just to be sure
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Xenial 16.04.7] has been marked as ready
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.7] has been marked as ready
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Xenial 16.04.7] has been marked as ready
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Xenial 16.04.7] has been marked as ready
[07:53] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, libomp5 was part of another package... sad story
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[07:54] <LocutusOfBorg> now it is provided by llvm-defaults
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:15] <seb128> could someone get gst-plugins-base1.0 gtk+3.0 ignore the libreoffice/armhf autopkgtest regression? those updates are ftbfs fixes and not what is make libreoffice red
[08:16] <seb128> also the icu transition depending on libreoffice arm issues to be resolved is no fun :-(
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, please kick out marionnet? blocking ocaml transition https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952310
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, can you please upgrade the faketime hint to 0.9.7-3.1 ?
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, I did some analysis, and this is a multiarch issue, the code injects this in LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg>         ftpl_path = PREFIX "/$LIB/faketime/libfaketimeMT.so.1";
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:27] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, can you please try to change the "Breaks: libomp5 (<< 44)" in libomp5-10 to see if changes something?
[08:28] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe Breaks: libiomp5 (<< 3.7-1) might help
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.7] has been marked as ready
[08:31] <Laney> seb128: can you make a merge proposal adding force-skiptest for those two?
[08:33] <seb128> Laney, yes, I'm still unsure to grasp the spirit behind those though, isn't it easy to issue a command to skip (you guys can do that right?) for a one time thing rather than commit (and then having to revert or keep noise about old versions)?
[08:33] <Laney> what?
[08:33] <Laney> oh I see
[08:33] <Laney> there is no command, no
[08:34] <seb128> ah ok
[08:34] <Laney> it is all hints
[08:34] <seb128> I though you guys had a command line interface to do a one time hint
[08:34] <seb128> k
[08:47] <seb128> should we consider skiptest the libreoffice/armhf result for libreoffice itself to have a chance to see icu getting ready this week? it sucks to let it through if there is a problem on that arch, which might be the case, but if we chase a fix and go through another upload, build, autopkgtests round it's going to take another week of delay...
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[08:54] <Laney> that would become a force-badtest then
[08:54] <Laney> but maybe, if icu becomes otherwise ready ...
[08:55] <seb128> vorlon, ^ opinion?
[08:56] <seb128> Laney, so, I'm probably just not properly awake, but what do I need to skiptest to have e.g gtk+3.0 migrating?
[08:56] <Laney> gtk
[08:56] <seb128> Laney, I can't skiptest libreoffice/armhf
[08:56] <seb128> ah
[08:57] <seb128> but that would skip any problem and not only the one specific? (which is fine in that case sine that's only libreoffice blocking)
[08:57] <seb128> so the hammer is 'we skip results now because we determined that the remaining problems are the ones we decided to ignore'?
[08:57] <seb128> no granularity in what we ignore?
[08:58] <Laney> that's what we have
[08:58] <seb128> k, thanks!
[08:58] <seb128> learning every day :)
[09:02] <Laney> it's going to be a while before the new nodejs finishes running everything, I think we still have a bit of time
[09:03] <Laney> e.g. for hellswort_h to figure out some clues as to which direction to look in
[09:03] <Laney> also, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#firebird3.0 "firebird3.0 unsatisfiable Build-Depends(-Arch) on i386: recode"
[09:03] <Laney> that seems true, and " Deleted 9 hours ago by Steve Langasek
[09:03] <Laney> i386 deprecated as host arch
[09:03] <Laney> "
[09:04] <Laney> also will block icu ;-)
[09:07] <Laney> vorlon: can you check the recode/firebird3.0 situation please? some of the tooling is not agreeing with some other part of the tooling and I'm not sure in which direction that is
[09:08] <seb128> Laney, had, I hadn't noticed recode was deleted, I asked about that earlier, thanks
[09:09] <Laney> nod
[09:12] <seb128> Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/britney/ignore-libreoffice-armhf/+merge/389227
[09:13] <Laney> cheers!
[09:23] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, we have to roll-back node-gulp-util please?
[09:24] <LocutusOfBorg> 3.0.8-1 is fine, 3.0.8-2 has a specific dependency on new nodejs, leading to uninstallability in autopkgtests
[09:30] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: not me, or at least not now sorry
[09:30] <Laney> I don't want to context switch atm
[09:30] <Laney> maybe seb128 can help you :>
[09:31] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, Laney , k
[09:39] <seb128> small improvement to the team report
[09:39] <seb128> https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubuntu-archive-scripts/include-build-depends/+merge/389229
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: build-essential (focal-proposed/main) [12.8ubuntu1 => 12.8ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:39] <seb128> (include the 'missing build-depends' info)
[09:41] <seb128> Laney, ^ for later, I'm not asking you to context switch, but is it normal that there is no 'reason' in that case?
[09:43] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, how did it ever migrate if it's missing a depends?
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcdio [i386] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.0-2]
[09:45] <Laney> seb128: I don't think the reasons are super consistently used, but I guess it would be ok
[09:48] <seb128> Laney, k
[09:53] <ginggs> ubuntu-archive: would someone please RM pyhst2's binaries on ppc64el in release?
[09:54] <ginggs> it no longer builds there since the nvidia ppc64el drivers were dropped https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server/418.152.00-0ubuntu1
[09:58] <seb128> ginggs, done!
[09:58] <ginggs> seb128: thanks!
[10:02] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, unsure how it migrated and if it's right to copy over it in the release pocket ... what about doing a new upload with the lowered requirement? and then if it's blocked in proposed then retry with the right triggers
[10:24] <cpaelzer> RAOF: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gubbins/2.4.1-2 worked and migrated
[10:24] <cpaelzer> just FYI and thanks again
[10:41] <RAOF> Always nice to have your understanding of how things work confirmed by them working 😀
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sane-airscan [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sane-airscan [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sane-airscan [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sane-airscan [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sane-airscan [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:03] <xnox> ubuntu-archive can wasi-libc please be rolled back to a previous version, such that rustc 43 can migrate?
[11:05] <juliank> I just rebased the autopkgtest on our infra, let me know if any new issues popped up
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sane-airscan [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:11] <juliank> Starting with the next images, haveged is replaced by rng-tools, which feeds entropy to /dev/random from the host (via virtio-hwrng)
[11:13] <Laney> 👍
[11:33] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, will have a look
[11:34] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, btw the build-dependency was bumped to >=12 to make sure it was picking up nodejs
[11:34] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure if the patch is retro-compatible, but at runtime there is no enforcing of version
[11:34]  * LocutusOfBorg meh nodejs
[11:34] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please unblock the patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1872118 ?
[11:34] <LocutusOfBorg> groovy is fixed, focal is in unapproved
[11:34] <LocutusOfBorg> this is a serious bug...
[11:36] <seb128> Laney, gtk and gstreamer migrated, we can revert that commit ... could you do that or do you prefer a mp?
[11:37] <Laney> can do later
[11:37] <seb128> (the mp would make sense if we had a merge button but if you need to pull/commit/push to land it that might be less for you and for me if you just do directly the revert?)
[11:37] <seb128> thanks
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1067.70] (no packageset)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1081.92] (no packageset)
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21] (no packageset)
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chromium-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [84.0.4147.105-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1022.22] (core, kernel)
[11:49] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, can we please have haskell-cborg{,-json} removed on armhf? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968084
[11:54] <rbalint> sil2100, please proceed phasing u-u in focal, i've opened a bug for the non-regression
[12:12] <sil2100> rbalint: ok
[12:27] <rbalint> Laney/ubuntu-archive i need with systemd in groovy-proposed in update_output i see migrating systemd makes kworkflow uninstallable, but locally chdist seem to be happy to install both kworkflow and all systemd binary packages
[12:27] <rbalint> i need help :-)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-babel (focal-proposed/main) [2.6.0+dfsg.1-1ubuntu2 => 2.6.0+dfsg.1-1ubuntu2.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[12:30] <rbalint> hm, it pulls in other stuff from -proposed, like gmp, so i figured this out it seems
[12:31] <seb128> rbalint, k, good :)
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (bionic-proposed/main) [12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:35] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please merge this for lintian and other packges? https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/389166
[12:40] <sil2100> rbalint: will do all of that soonish! Just need to finish some point-release preps
[12:56] <xnox> cpaelzer:  sigh, https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/groovy/arm64 your trigger build after mine, and fails isc-dhcp migration.
[12:57] <xnox> cpaelzer:  it must be retried against new systemd, let me do that please.
[13:01] <seb128> xnox, are you sure it's not going to pick the successful one and is just timing that the current iteration didn't get the result yet?
[13:02] <xnox> seb128:  hm =/ not sure, in the past it did pick the latest one.
[13:02] <xnox> i guess i'll need to wait
[13:02] <seb128> k, I'm not sure either but I think I had case where it picked the good one even if a more recent retry failed
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.45 => 2.525.47] (desktop-core)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-melt [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.0-3]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-melt [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.0-3]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-melt [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.0-3]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sane-airscan [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sane-airscan [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sane-airscan [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-melt [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.0-3]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sane-airscan [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sane-airscan [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-melt [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.0-3]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: base-files [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu11] (core, i386-whitelist)
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sane-airscan [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.99.12-1ubuntu2]
[13:11] <RikMills> seb128: a later fail does not invalidate a pass
[13:11] <seb128> RikMills, what I though, thanks
[13:18] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, can you please do the hlint removals on arm64 armhf riscv64 s390x? debian bug: #967899
[13:42] <Laney> I don't think we have ever picked the 'latest' one, or if we did at least not for many years
[13:46] <cpaelzer> xnox: ok will leave it to you
[13:46] <cpaelzer> I was sorting out plenty of those tests yesterday and they worked fine, glad to learn that these new ones need a combined trigger again
[13:46] <cpaelzer> all yours
[13:47] <cpaelzer> xnox: in the past (for me) it didn't insist on "the last result" btw, just one good one was ok
[13:48] <seb128> cpaelzer, from the backlog is looks like that was a wrong assumption from him so it's fine to ignore imho
[13:49] <cpaelzer> ok
[13:49] <cpaelzer> thanks seb128
[13:50] <seb128> np!
[13:50] <cpaelzer> xnox: BTW on s390x I did the combined one already and it is good https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/groovy/s390x
[13:51] <cpaelzer> and also the one you missed was already in the queue when you asked - so we have two good ones now https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/groovy/arm64
[13:51] <cpaelzer> never the less I'm happy to leave these tests to you
[13:51] <cpaelzer> I have yesterday needed a table for the 2D matrix of arch/result of the many outstanding sytsmed tests
[13:51] <cpaelzer> so I'm glad if you watch&kick those as part of the new version
[13:57] <ahasenack> vorlon: base-files uploaded to groovy, awaiting in the new queue because of the new binary motd-news-config
[13:58] <ahasenack> I need that accepted before I can upload ubuntu-meta with the seed change for ubuntu-server (already committed and pushed)
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi3 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi3 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] has been marked as ready
[14:05] <xnox> cpaelzer:  seb128: looks like it did pick up whatever success tests. and at least some things are up for migration now.
[14:06] <Laney> wonder how many times we need to confirm this is the behaviour :p
[14:12] <sil2100> rbalint: could you give me a link to the bug for the non-regression of u-u ?
[14:12] <sil2100> (for focal)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haveged [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haveged [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haveged [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haveged [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haveged [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:41] <sil2100> Publishing .5!
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1081.92]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1022.22]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1067.70]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21]
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haveged [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[14:59] <Laney> \o\
[15:56] <rbalint> sil2100, bdmurray please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/389256 to make glibc not block other packages
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pycurl (focal-proposed/main) [7.43.0.2-1ubuntu5 => 7.43.0.2-1ubuntu6] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted base-files [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [11ubuntu11]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haveged [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haveged [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haveged [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haveged [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haveged [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1]
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haveged [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.9.8-4ubuntu1]
[17:00] <sil2100> 18.04.5 and 16.04.7 are out!
[17:12] <ahasenack> vorlon: the update script inside src:ubuntu-meta doesn't seem to know about groovy-proposed, so it doesn't find motd-news-config:
[17:12] <ahasenack> ? Unknown server package: motd-news-config
[17:13] <ahasenack> that package also won't migrate, because it makes ubuntu-server uninstallable
[17:13] <ahasenack> should I just hack the depends manually in d/control in an upload, and once both migrated, upload another ubuntu-meta with the update script run?
[17:13] <ahasenack> or is my reading of the above incorrect
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cppy [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sphinxcontrib-log-cabinet [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-cryptography to i386-whitelist in groovy
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added simplejson to i386-whitelist in groovy
[17:45] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: That worked but I had to change it for libomp5-10 and libomp5-9.
[17:56] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: and actually just removing the Breaks field from those packages allows the upgrade to calculate. Why is << 44 in there anyway?
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, meh, a while ago llvm-defaults had the real package, let me double check
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't remember...
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> git log might help
[18:08] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: How do you want to proceed with fixing this?
[18:09] <LocutusOfBorg> do you have a patch?
[18:11] <bdmurray> No
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-66.60] (kernel)
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1051.55] (kernel)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppy [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sphinxcontrib-log-cabinet [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-cffi to i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added recode to i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libclass-load-xs-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libdata-messagepack-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libmoose-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libmouse-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libpackage-stash-xs-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libpadwalker-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libtext-levenshteinxs-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libtext-xslate-perl from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed lzop from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed msgpack-c from i386-whitelist in groovy
[19:31] <vorlon> rolling back postgresql-12, which synced and reset the icu transition
[19:36] <ginggs> vorlon: hi!  what needs to happen for #1889111 ?
[19:36] <ginggs> LP: #1889111
[19:37] <ginggs> thanks ubot5
[19:37] <vorlon> ginggs: the linux-restricted-modules in groovy-proposed needs to be otherwise ready to migrate, at which point the block-proposed bug can be closed
[19:38] <ginggs> vorlon: ack, thanks
[19:55] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, can you please process hlint above? also haskell-cborg{,-json} and maybe bump faketime hint? faketime I did some analysis on i386, it fails because the code tries to inject $LIB into LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and maybe $LIB is not set on multiarch?
[19:55] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm progressing with haskell, leaving behind everything that is icu entangled
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-66.60]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1051.55]
[20:47] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: I found this commit but it still doesn't really clarify why 44 was chosen https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/-/commit/d9b6d3fd40bc1079d47db90021e01d8bcd9a97b8
[20:49] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: marionnet: removed.  faketime: this should be faketime/all/i386 instead now that I've looked at the tests.
[20:51] <vorlon> Laney: I'm not enthusiastic about skiptesting (or rather, should be badtesting) libreoffice/armhf.  I suppose downgrading to the release version and doing a no-change rebuild is not wanted?  libreoffice is pretty much the only real blocker now afaics
[20:52] <vorlon> Laney: the firebird3.0+recode issue was because "someone" did a binary-copy of recode to groovy-proposed to resurrect the i386 binaries, but without talking to archive admins to make sure it got into the packageset, so my cleanup scripts removed it again :P
[20:55] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: so if node-gulp-util had a nodejs12-specific change, how did https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/n/node-gulp-util/20200625_183437_f2a04@/log.gz pass with nodejs 10 and the package migrated?
[21:06] <vorlon> ahasenack: motd-news-config vs ubuntu-server: yes, manually hacking the dependencies is in order here
[21:06] <ahasenack> vorlon: ah, thanks
[21:07] <ahasenack> I think in the next migration page refresh it will be clean wrt tests
[21:07] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: and haskell-cborg binaries also now removed
[21:15] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, node-gulp-utils had an ubuntu1 that removed the patch
[21:15] <LocutusOfBorg> and it migrated
[21:15] <LocutusOfBorg> and retried the tests
[21:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll upload an ubuntu2 that goes in sync again once nodejs/icu migrates and nodejs12 is restored
[21:15] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for doing everything!
[21:17] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: but the 3.0.8-2 itself migrated to the release pocket, so why did that happen
[21:17] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, because it had a *build* dependency on nodejs >= 12, but not a runtime one?
[21:18] <LocutusOfBorg> and autopkgtests was probably retried against proposed nodejs
[21:18] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: it was not, that's what I'm saying
[21:18] <vorlon> it passed against nodejs 10 at the time it migrated to the release pocket
[21:19] <LocutusOfBorg> oh because that change was not probably related to nodejs/12 but a combo of nodejs+something else?
[21:20] <LocutusOfBorg> mocha, or something similar, they now embed lots of stuff
[21:20] <vorlon> bdmurray: node-redis/arm64... this is still failing with nodejs 10, and none of these runs are running for a particularly long time, so long-tests doesn't seem to help?
[21:20] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ugh, ok
[21:20] <LocutusOfBorg> or maybe node-autopkgtests added some more test stuff...
[21:20] <vorlon> now, what the heck happened with contextfree + x264? this wasn't blocking before
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, looking at the other breaks, that "44" looks more a copy-paste error?
[21:22] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: given that libomp isn't managed by llvm-defaults I'd agree
[21:23] <vorlon> wasn't blocking before, but none of the issues with contextfree + x264 are new afaict, so... a britney bug that it didn't report on this? :/
[21:24] <vorlon> Laney: since we're trying to get this transition moved sooner rather than later, unless you plan to hint the libreoffice/armhf failures, I'd like to roll it back asap to get the build started sooner rather than later
[21:27] <bdmurray> vorlon: I see - I looked at the 3 hour test not the whole history of tests
[21:27] <LocutusOfBorg> reverse-depends -r groovy src:contextfree
[21:27] <LocutusOfBorg> No reverse dependencies found
[21:27] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ what about kicking it out from release to disentangle x264? :)
[21:28] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: possibly. In the meantime I've triggered rebuilds for the other x264 revdeps that hadn't been handled... there's a good chance that'll be done before libreoffice
[21:28] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case kicking it out won't hurt too much :D
[21:29] <LocutusOfBorg> there is also a possibility that haskell will finish before libreoffice :p
[21:29] <seb128> vorlon, did you come to a conclusion on what to do with libreoffice?
[21:30] <LocutusOfBorg> but without free builders (all stuch in cleaning)... we can't progress too much
[21:30]  * LocutusOfBorg goes to bed, g'night
[21:31] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, did you do hlint removal? on arm64 armhf riscv64 s390x? debian bug: #967899
[22:00] <sergiodj> friendly ping to archive-admin re. the telegraf package that's sitting on the NEW queue.  thanks
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hg-git [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytest-twisted [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.12-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: hlint> done now
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added asn1crypto to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pycparser to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-cryptography-vectors to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-filelock to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-hypothesis to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-iso8601 to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-pretend to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-virtualenv to i386-whitelist in groovy
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added sortedcontainers to i386-whitelist in groovy