[00:07] <sigv> what does incoming to focal mean exactly in `rls-ff-incoming` tag? trying to figure out status of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debmirror/+bug/1821251 considering the bug has been fixed in upstream (debian) repository.
[00:07] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1821251 in debmirror (Ubuntu) "please add cnf support to debmirror" [Medium,Triaged]
=== slingamn_ is now known as shivaram
=== shivaram is now known as slingamn
[03:55] <eoli3n_> Hi
[03:56] <eoli3n_> since python2 is not supported anymore, how to deal with tools using as shebang /usr/bin/env python ?
[04:18] <Unit193> Either port to python3, or change that 'python' to 'python2' and ensure it's installed for the time being?
[04:24] <eoli3n_> Unit193 that's a set fo scripts for science, i didn't write them
[04:24] <eoli3n_> https://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/cms/mctdh.html
[04:24] <eoli3n_> i sent a mail
[04:24] <eoli3n_> Thanks Unit193
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
[10:54] <cjwatson> seb128: Re langpack-o-matic (from #launchpad), I don't *object* to removing eoan here but I'd rather that be a separate step taken by people who more normally maintain langpack stuff than me - I don't know what cleanup it requires
[10:55] <cjwatson> seb128: Are you able to merge this or should I poke sil2100?  I don't think there's an automatic mergebot here
[11:10] <mdeslaur> mwhudson: oh, sorry about that, I didn't notice the merge proposal
[11:11] <mwhudson> mdeslaur: it was hardly complicated :)
[11:11] <mdeslaur> hehe
[11:46] <seb128> cjwatson, hey, ack for 19.10, and I've merged the change now
[11:52] <cjwatson> seb128: Thanks
[11:53] <seb128> cjwatson, np, thank you for helping with the groovy translations opening!
[11:53] <cjwatson> seb128: So we haven't had a langpack yet of course, but I don't think that needs to block unhiding translations for groovy at this point - do you agree?
[11:53] <seb128> yes, agreed
[11:53] <cjwatson> seb128: Oh, maybe you already did so?  Somebody did
[11:54] <seb128> though the unhiding might be done already, I think Gunnar mentioned changing a setting yesterday
[11:54] <seb128> the contributor who was pinging around did talk to him as well it seems
[11:55] <cjwatson> Yeah, it all seems to be open now
[11:55] <cjwatson> So I think we're done here
[11:55] <seb128> \o/
[11:55] <seb128> thanks again!
[12:42] <rbasak> RAOF: vala is another GNOME MRE request. And it's special, so I have greater concern on this one that we make the right call. Details in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vala/+bug/1891318/comments/2
[12:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1891318 in vala (Ubuntu) " [SRU] Update to vala 0.48.9 in focal " [Undecided,New]
[13:33] <kenvandine> I've was working on the libhinawa transtion, which i thought would be done this morning however libhinawa ended up on the dep list this morning with an unknown status
[13:33] <kenvandine> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-libhinawa.html
[13:33] <kenvandine> can anyone help me understand what's up with it?
[13:35] <kenvandine> libhinawa has migrated to release, so just why it's still showing up.  Maybe just a tooling issue
[15:39] <mitya57> Hi! If a source is in main but one of its binaries is in universe, will it be automatically moved to main if I start depending on it from a main package? Or I should file a MIR for binary?
[15:40] <mitya57> (Dependency in question is python3-sphinx → python3-snowballstemmer, from src:snowball)
[15:46] <Laney> mitya57: no to both, but it will block in proposed until someone fixes it
[15:46] <Laney> but can be done without an MIR
[15:47] <mitya57> Laney: ack, so I should ping an archive admin?
[15:47] <Laney> is it already blocking?
[16:05] <mitya57> Laney: no, not uploaded yet
[16:05] <Laney> mitya57: ah, ok, ping me or someone when it is showing as blocking in update_excuses and it can be fixed then
[16:09] <mitya57> Ok, thanks
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
[17:04] <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: just saw libopeniscsiusr being rejected for groovy. you want me to fix it to match sonames in Ubuntu and re-propose it do Debian or you prefer to give up on this merge for this cycle ?
[17:04] <rafaeldtinoco> i've done many tests to it, it looks good (apart from this new binary package and soname mismatch)
[17:10] <rafaeldtinoco> Ill give it a try with correct lib name
[17:56] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1170138/accepted-recommonmark-060ds-1-source-into-unstable/
[18:06] <LocutusOfBorg> mitya57, please upload also in Ubuntu, or sync whenever possible
[18:06] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg: it will be auto-synced I guess
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> so, tomorrow I'll retry llvm_* stuff
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson
[18:23] <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: yeah, with a proper name for the runtime lib package, that should be fine to resubmit