[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:7.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-prosemirror-markdown [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.4-1] (no packageset)
[01:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-aws-sdk-s3 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.48.0-3] (no packageset)
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libdata-section-simple-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libdevel-checkcompiler-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added liblocale-us-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libmodule-build-xsutil-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libpath-class-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libregexp-common-perl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linuxaudio-new-session-manager [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linuxaudio-new-session-manager [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linuxaudio-new-session-manager [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linuxaudio-new-session-manager [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linuxaudio-new-session-manager [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linuxaudio-new-session-manager [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-contravariant-extras [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.3.5.1-1]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-prosemirror-markdown [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.4-1]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-aws-sdk-s3 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.48.0-3]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.4]
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu16.10]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [1.187.3]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-meta [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.361.5]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.5]
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu5.2]
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: base-files [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu2.10]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (xenial-proposed) [9.4ubuntu4.13]
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: base-files [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [10.1ubuntu2.10] (core)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: base-files [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [9.4ubuntu4.13] (core)
[11:52]  * Laney gently helps the haskell transition along with a -validity fix
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: termtosvg [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1023.23~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:50] <mdeslaur> So the libreswan autopkgtest is now failing because it looks like launchpad now knows about "needs-internet", but internet access isn't complete...does launchpad support "open-internet-access" or do I drop the test completely?
[13:51] <mdeslaur> s/launchpad/the autopkgtest infrastructure/
[13:52] <mdeslaur> Laney: ^ perhaps you know?
[14:01] <Laney> mdeslaur: open-internet-access is still just a proposal, I don't think we have a way to say the equivalent yet
[14:02] <Laney> It looks from a quick reading like that test might want to be skippable and exit 77 if the ping fails, or something like that?
[14:08] <mdeslaur> Laney: is 77 a special exit codes? where can I see where those are documented?
[14:09] <Laney> mdeslaur: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst "skippable"
[14:09] <mdeslaur> Laney: ah, perfect, just what I needed. Thanks!
[14:09] <Laney> np
[14:09] <mdeslaur> ebarretto: ^
[14:09] <Laney> that feels upstreamable too, ideally
[14:10] <mdeslaur> yeah
[14:11] <ebarretto> mdeslaur, ack, thanks! thanks Laney too!
[14:13] <Laney> np!
[14:13] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: thx for uploading that patch
[14:13] <Laney> I forgot how debian-haskell works, should probably leave that group
[14:13] <Laney> or maybe somneone did already
[14:13] <Laney> removed me*
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netgen [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [6.2.2006+dfsg-1]
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted termtosvg [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-2]
[14:32] <ricotz> hi, please retry ppc64el and s390x for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu1
[14:45] <Laney> ricotz: I will, I just asked Launchpad people (on an internal channel) about these ones to see if there's something for them to look at first
[15:06] <didrocks> cjwatson: hey, once you get some time, I’m puzzled to see why germinate against groovy-proposed output lines like golang-google-api-dev                               | golang-google-api                     | Rescued from golang-google-api                   | Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>                |         3587748 |           93367
[15:07] <didrocks> golang-google-api is in universe, I don’t find anything in any seed and it’s only against proposed
[15:07] <didrocks> (rationale is: this one and some others are showing up as root nodes on component-mismatches)
[15:13] <ricotz> Laney, ty
[15:13] <Laney> ricotz: It looks like there's a problem with the buildds though so it might struggle to finish until that's sorted out
[15:14] <Laney> but we'll see
[15:18] <Eickmeyer> Not sure if it's related, but I'm having a similar problem with germinate at the moment.
[15:19] <Eickmeyer> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/r45dTCXJNZ/
[15:30] <Eickmeyer> Nevermind, seems to be working now.
[15:37] <cjwatson> didrocks: This is legitimately extremely confusing, but I think it *might* be because golang-goprotobuf in -proposed has gained a dependency on golang-google-protobuf-dev, or similar?  Basically a bunch of golang stuff ends up in the build-sources closure of the supported-cloud seed and that then activates the "Extra-Include: ... *-dev" seed in supported
[15:38] <cjwatson> didrocks: I think it might be worth adding "Extra-Exclude: golang-*-dev" to override that for golang, since the "include all *-dev packages from otherwise-supported things" rule doesn't make as much sense for lang
[15:38] <cjwatson> *golang
[15:41] <cjwatson> Eickmeyer: Certainly unrelated.  But where did you see that?
[15:44] <Eickmeyer> cjwatson: Output from updating the ubuntustudio-meta source, but it went away. I think it was just a burp in the git server.
[15:46] <didrocks> cjwatson: that makes sense, I’ll look at the Extra-Exclude indeed as golang package are special in that regards. Thanks for looking!
[16:45] <ahasenack> vorlon: hi, tjaalton accepted my base-files sru, but a) the NEW package needs to be accepted; b) it needs to go into main; c) I missed the bug number in d/changelog of ubuntu-meta's x and b upload (focal has it, but wasn't accepted). And I think he is EOD now
[17:00] <tjaalton> right, i'm off already for today, can handle them on monday if needed
[17:08] <ahasenack> thanks
[18:05] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, thenks you to for providing the patch, otherwise all the work would have been useless :)
[18:05] <LocutusOfBorg> but next time please just commit on git and upload
[18:15] <LocutusOfBorg> (I added you to the team)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:7.0.1~rc1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected secureboot-db [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.1]
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected secureboot-db [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.4.1~ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected secureboot-db [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6~20.04.1]
[21:34] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: It confuses me with the package plan and stuff, I'm scared of breaking it because I forgot how all that works and I don't fancy re-learning
[21:34] <Laney> but thanks
[21:42] <bdmurray> vorlon: Could you update the autopkgtest-cloud worker configurations?
[21:51] <vorlon> bdmurray: done
[21:52] <bdmurray> vorlon: thanks!
[21:59] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: hmm so I understood we were redoing dragonfly-reverb in order to fix the debian/copyright warnings from lintian... and lintian -I still shows a bunch of them
[22:02] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I just do and commit on git, and git tag version...
[22:02] <LocutusOfBorg> nothing more :) I know they have stuff but meh, I don't care
[22:05] <cjwatson> Eickmeyer: There were some performance problems earlier today, indeed, worked around by repacking a particularly heavy repository
[23:41] <vorlon> juliank: grub2 has a grubzfs-testsuite autopkgtest regression focal that I believe had a matching one in groovy fixed by an update to grubzfs-testsuite.  Should we be SRUing this in focal?