[03:38] <piercedwater> hi :)
[03:39] <piercedwater> installed lubuntu on my dell latitude d630 and it runs great. thanks for the free os (that works well)
[03:39] <piercedwater> maybe i'll stick around and try to help some people :D
[03:39] <guiverc> :)  glad it's working for you.   All help is greatly appreciated :)
[03:40] <piercedwater> trying to think of ideas for what i can use it for
[03:40] <piercedwater> run freebsd on my desktop, so i guess rdp/vnc would be a good start
 so my mouse shuts down wile muving it 10 s afte i turn it on
[06:30] <guiverc> @Arydev, if it's run by batteries, the batteries maybe need a charge, or are near EOL (ie. can no longer hold a charge..)  If that's the case they'll perform the same on another OS (you could test using a *live* environment if you don't have another box handy)
 @guiverc [<guiverc> @Arydev, if it's run by batteries, the batteries maybe need a charge, …], no the batery i new and fully charged
 @guiverc [<guiverc> @Arydev, if it's run by batteries, the batteries maybe need a charge, …], i teste with mint same resuls
[06:32] <guiverc> if another OS responds the same... I'd blame the batteries are near EOL ie. no longer holding the charge, so reporting fully-charged when they're not (full charge maybe as little as 3% of whatever ~10secs of use is)
 @guiverc [<guiverc> if another OS responds the same... I'd blame the batteries are near EO …], hwe i both the baterys yesterday are new
 @guiverc [<guiverc> if another OS responds the same... I'd blame the batteries are near EO …], that i thinked was thw problem but isnt i trye changing the ports nothing
[06:36] <guiverc> if the batteries are removable, i'd test with a multimeter & try and assess the health of the batteries, and/or charger.  the only other cause I can think of is RF interference from other device(s), where it'll no longer do it at another location (if easily tested)... I can't think of any Lubuntu cause; and you've ruled out Lubuntu anyway as Mint does it too
 @guiverc [<guiverc> if the batteries are removable, i'd test with a multimeter & try and a …], i tested that is 1.5
 @guiverc [<guiverc> if the batteries are removable, i'd test with a multimeter & try and a …], no i think is some config or drivers idk but the bateries are good
[06:40] <guiverc> you haven't said what release of Lubuntu, but i'd take note of it's software stack, the Mint software stack you used (which I'll assume you tried something different.. I would have used something non-Ubuntu based to test it myself).. which provides some clue..
[06:41] <guiverc> software stack meaning what release, if LTS release you have two stacks you can choose from (GA or HWE - in simple terms it's kernel choice.. but that's missing some detail)
 @guiverc [<guiverc> software stack meaning what release, if LTS release you have two stack …], so i am new to terminal idk how i know what is is lts 20 somting like thet
[06:46] <guiverc> Lubuntu 20.04 (lubuntu is a desktop so releases are yy.mm in format, yy is used only by specialist releases & not server or desktop) has only a single stack; 5.4 kernel (GA & HWE are currently identical for 20.04/focal).
[06:48] <guiverc> fyi: 20.04 means the 2020-April release (yy.mm being year.month of release)
[08:11] <lexichan> hey, anyone here?
[08:12] <lexichan> pretty archaic this place eh
[08:15] <tomreyn> !ask | lexichan
[08:15] <tomreyn> also "welcome!" ;)
[08:16] <lexichan> Ah, sorry, didn't expect to get a reply, hello to you
[08:17] <tomreyn> hi, so you don't actually have a question then?
[08:17] <lexichan> No, sorry, I didn't see the offtopic channel eheh
[08:17] <tomreyn> ok ;)
[09:42] <guiverc> @Michael Van Bogaert, because that ISO hasn't changed.. a new 20.04.1 iso is what was related (different ISO)
[09:44] <guiverc> sorry s/related/released/
[09:45] <guiverc> if you want to install the original 20.04 release; use the 20.04 ISO, if you want the updated packages use (rather than download after install) use the 20.04.1 ISO - http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/20.04.1/release/
[09:48] <guiverc> there are certain very rare circumstances where people want the original ISO  (before an upgrade occurred that their box doesn't like for example; allowing them to apt-mark the older package for some reason maybe)