/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/08/24/#launchpad.txt

LocutusOfBorgis it normal that *lots* of builds are stopping without even a log?08:15
LocutusOfBorgI'm trying hard to build haskell stuff on arm* but they constantly fail without logs08:16
LocutusOfBorgeven ghc itself08:16
SpecialK|CanonLocutusOfBorg: We've had a bit of networking unhappiness in that cluster with unhappy failure modes; we're working on the underlying issues but I'll kick off some restarts in the interim that should help the immediate issues08:28
=== SpecialK|Canon changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: SpecialK|Canon (08:00-17:00 UTC Mon-Fri) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
LocutusOfBorgthanks!08:40
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq
crorafHi, anyone here? I have a bug to report about launchpad platform09:42
crorafCan you open following link:09:42
crorafhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.searchtext=microphone&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=&orderby=-09:42
crorafhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.searchtext=microphone&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=&orderby=-datecreated&start=009:43
crorafthe second one09:43
SpecialK|Canoncroraf: Yes09:47
crorafSpecialK|Canon, do you see the excessive 286 days in the list?09:48
SpecialK|Canoncroraf: No09:48
crorafhttps://pasteboard.co/JnPxqXH.png09:53
crorafSpecialK|Canon, is this what you see?09:53
SpecialK|Canoncroraf: Looks like part of it, yes09:57
crorafIf you observe the Age column, you will see that all are in order except the 286 days one09:58
crorafSpecialK|Canon,09:58
SpecialK|Canoncroraf: Ah except I don't have the Age column09:58
crorafOh. Please add it.09:58
SpecialK|Canoncroraf: Right, that's not the default09:59
SpecialK|Canoncroraf: Am I right in thinking you're talking about the difference between "Age" and sorting by "datecreated"?10:00
crorafSpecialK|Canon, yes it is not visible by default. I thought if the serach query has it that it would be added :)10:01
crorafSpecialK|Canon, yes, it is sorted by dateCreated (that is Age). All bugs are sorted correctly except this excessive 286 days10:02
crorafI noticed this couple of days ago.10:02
cjwatsonThe bug was created 286 days ago, but the bug task on /ubuntu/+source/linux (the search context) was created 10 days ago10:04
cjwatsonThe Age column uses the former, while the search order uses the latter10:04
crorafcjwatson, this should be corrected10:04
crorafcjwatson, this "search contenxt" I dont see anywhere10:05
cjwatsonIt's in your URL10:05
cjwatsonI'm not necessarily defending this, but both have their uses (for instance, the search order means you can see which tasks have recently appeared in a package's bug list)10:05
cjwatsonSo it's not obvious to me that either one is more correct as such, though I can see that this particular presentation is jarring10:06
cjwatsonAnyway, to report bugs on Launchpad, please use https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug - we don't generally track bug reports on IRC10:06
crorafcjwatson, if both dates are relevant then there should be 2 columns for them10:07
cjwatsonThat would be one possible resolution for a bug report I suppose10:07
crorafWould you comment on the bug with your note after I open it?10:10
crorafcjwatson, or I should mentioned this context.10:10
crorafthis search context10:11
cjwatsonSure10:14
crorafhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/189269710:16
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1892697 in Launchpad itself "Wrong sort by Age" [Undecided,New]10:16
crorafI put your comment, cjwatson . If you wish to add something, add10:17
cjwatsonDone10:20
crorafcjwatson, what is the bug task creation date?10:30
crorafWhen is the bug task created if not at the time when the user creates a bug?10:30
cjwatsoncroraf: Bugs can have multiple tasks, for example when they affect more than one piece of software.  If you look at the "Affects" table at the top of the bug in question (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1852071) you'll see that it affects both "OEM Priority Project" and "linux (Ubuntu)".  It's possible to mark a bug as affecting an additional target using things like "Also ...10:41
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1852071 in OEM Priority Project "[HP ZBook Studio G5, Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS] Brightness function keys works as microphone mute function keys" [Undecided,Triaged]10:41
cjwatson... affects project" or "Also affects distribution/package".10:42
mdeslaurhi, could someone please kill this build? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/1985678710:59
cjwatsonmdeslaur: Do you not have a "Cancel build" link there?11:02
mdeslauryeah...I thought you told me not to use that last time I had a hung build?11:02
mdeslaurdid I misunderstand?11:03
cjwatsonmdeslaur: I don't remember what that was nor why I would have said that.  It's the only way I have to kill builds ...11:03
mdeslaurcjwatson: ok, thanks, sorry about that, I'll go click it11:04
cjwatsonnp11:04
crorafcjwatson, ok, so that the bug affects multiple piece of software and which is something that someone other than reporter sets?11:08
crorafAnd this search is per package. So when someone opens a bug at later time someone might set a task on another package regarding this bug.11:11
cjwatsonBasically yes11:11
croraf__cjwatson, what if you want to search the bugs that dont have any package attached. The age column, as is now, would bug11:29
cjwatsoncroraf__: Every bug has at least one task11:30
croraf__cjwatson, when i want to report a bug i can put "i dont know" as package11:31
cjwatsonYes.  It still gets a task in that case, which would have the distribution as its target11:31
cjwatsonRendered as just "Ubuntu" rather than as "linux (Ubuntu)" or whatever11:32
croraf__cjwatson, Yes i reported a bug right now, and it shows Ubuntu target11:48
croraf__After i report a bug on linux package after 10 min the message to do the apport-collect showed up. Is this automatical, or someone did the the request to gather specific files manually?12:17
cjwatsoncroraf__: It's automatic12:37
cjwatsoncroraf__: It says so in the message ...12:37
cjwatson"This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team"12:38
croraf__cjwatson, yes, I thought someone had to trigger this depending on the type of the request13:00
croraf__what confused me is that the first file reported is the alsa information, which is related to my specific issue13:01
croraf__but it is alphabetically first13:01
=== tintou_ is now known as tintou
ricotzSpecialK|Canon, hi :), there are several builders marked "Cleaning" for some hours - https://launchpad.net/builders20:00
gpiccoliHi folks, I started to observe a failure in building one package after the upgrade of PPA builders to bionic20:00
gpiccoliit seems related to the base kernel, worked on 4.4 and it's failing on 4.1520:01
gpiccoliIs there a way to set a PPA to use Xenial (or even Bionic with 4.4) to confirm that was the issue?20:01
cjwatsonricotz: Poking20:01
cjwatsongpiccoli: There is no way20:01
gpiccolithe package is cryptsetup20:01
cjwatsongpiccoli: (Should be possible to try it in a VM locally, though?)20:02
gpiccolicjwatson, so maybe trying to reproduce locally in a chroot environment is the way to go right?20:02
cjwatsonWell you'd need a pair of VMs with 4.4 and 4.15 but otherwise matching chroots to have an apples-to-apples comparison20:02
cjwatsonBut yes20:02
gpiccolimaybe...I'll try and see what I get. Another idea would be to try powerpc and amd64 ..to see what happens, I expect powerpc to succeed and amd64 to fail hehe20:02
gpiccoliThat'd be an indication20:03
cjwatsonThat's a possibility, yes20:03
gpiccolicool, let's cjwatson - thanks for confirming =)20:03
cjwatsongpiccoli: If absolutely necessary I can switch one of our staging builders back to 4.4.  But decentralised investigation is usually better :)20:04
gpiccolisure, I agree with you, and thanks a lot for the offer cjwatson =))20:04
ricotzcjwatson, thank you20:05
cjwatson(BTW the reason we can't do this sort of per-PPA stuff is that, to minimise latency, the VM is reset before LP knows what build it might want to dispatch to it.)20:05
gpiccolioh, cool! makes sense!20:05
cjwatsonIn principle it might be possible to maintain multiple pools with different properties, but that would decrease overall throughput so we try to avoid that.20:06
gpiccoliand increase complexity, something definitely bad too heh20:09
cjwatsonExactly20:11
cjwatsonbuildd-manager is already one of our two or three most complex services20:12
gpiccolihehe nice!20:12
=== Euph0ria is now known as TabMasher
=== TabMasher is now known as FutureShock
=== TabMasher is now known as CyberBurn
=== CyberBurn is now known as q[_]
=== q[_] is now known as q[_]Coffee
=== q[_]Coffee is now known as LOGOS

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!