/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/08/26/#snappy.txt

mupPR snapcraft#3263 closed: colcon v2 plugin: honour http(s) proxy for all build commands <bug> <Created by cjp256> <Closed by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3263>02:32
zyga-x240o/06:23
zyga-x240mvo: I saw your message yesterday06:23
zyga-x240oh boy I open my laptop and Lucy wakes up06:23
mvozyga-x240: good morning06:24
zyga-x240:)06:24
mvozyga-x240: no worries, either way is fine06:24
zyga-x240until she's fully awake, changed and fed I will not be fully available06:25
zyga-x240just a few more days till next week06:25
mvozyga-x240: no worries06:26
mvocan someone please approve 9214? it's just changelog updaes06:32
mupPR snapd#9215 closed: mkversion.sh: do not use git describe --dirty <Created by mvo5> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9215>06:40
mupPR snapd#9215 opened: mkversion.sh: do not use git describe --dirty <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9215>06:45
pstolowskimorniing07:04
mvogood morning pstolowski07:05
zygare07:18
zygamvo looking07:18
zygamvo merged07:19
mupPR snapd#9214 closed: release: 2.46 <Skip spread> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9214>07:20
mvozyga: \o/07:23
zygamvo in a way it's good we'll need 2.4707:24
zygawe should release it in a few weeks at most07:24
zygaand get back to small releases07:24
zygathat are fast07:24
mupPR snapd#9219 opened: run-checks: only check files in git for misspelling <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9219>07:25
zygamvo reviewed with a question07:27
mvozyga: \o/07:28
zygamvo I'm available now, shall I pick up snapshot export PR?07:28
mvozyga: if you want, I did not manage to and have meetings soon :/07:28
zygaok07:28
* mvo hugs zyga07:28
zygagladly07:28
zygaon it07:28
zygait's a new topic07:28
zygathat feels good sometimes07:28
zygabtw, offtopic, my lxd install stopped working07:28
zygait says it needs manual network configuration07:28
zygaas it cannot find a free subnet or something07:29
zygaI have a 10.x.y.z/8 netmask07:29
zygaso I'm quite surprised07:29
zygamvo shellcheck complained about the spell changing07:31
mvozyga: yeah, I am a muppet07:34
mvozyga: I force pushed a fix, I don't have $GOPATH/bin in my $PATH07:34
zygak07:34
mvozyga: so for local testing I did that (I don't like the idea of something like $GOPATH/bin in my PATH, feels too dangerous)07:34
mvoanyway07:34
mvosilly me07:34
zygait's okay07:34
mvozyga: I replied, I can add comments about where the ignore comes from, maybe a good idea07:35
zygamvo replied too07:36
mupPR snapd#9205 closed: boot/initramfs_test.go: reset boot vars on the bootloader for each iteration <Simple 😃> <Test Robustness> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9205>07:50
zygamvo I've updated https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8982 and left two unresolved comments:09:08
mupPR #8982: snapshots: export of snapshots <Created by slimjim777> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8982>09:08
zygamvo one is about the help message of export-snapshot, I need to ask Graham for help here09:08
zygait can also happen in a follow up I guess but it might be easy enough to do todat09:08
zyga*today09:08
zygathe second one is about error handling in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8982#discussion_r47637269309:09
zygaand I think I need pstolowski help on that09:09
zygacan you look and express your opinion please pawel?09:09
zygaother code seems to handle errors from requests in a different way09:09
zygaand can use the body to unpack error details09:09
zygawe should either be consistent about it or leave a comment why we are not doing this09:09
zygamvo I left the tar improvements out for a new PR09:10
zygaand adjusted everything else09:10
zygaso it means someone other than me should do a review09:10
mvozyga: in a meeting, but *thanks*09:10
pstolowskizyga: sure09:11
pedronisI can look about the error handling as well but in a bit, I suspect the difference might relate that the happy response is not json here09:15
pedronisbut I suspect the error ones should be09:15
zygayeah, I think so too09:19
zygathanks!09:19
zygaI'll return to my other tasks and try to finish the tar optimize after PT in the evening09:20
pstolowskizyga: it looks like e.g. maintenance status on error may be interesting to have09:26
mvozyga: just looked over your changes, looks fine10:03
mvozyga: thank you!10:03
zygamvo cheers :)10:05
mvopstolowski: I wonder if the client error handling should be done in a followup, I'm not sure we need more here tbh but even if it seems the exiting code is not wrong, just that it could be improved(?)10:05
mvopstolowski: I'm in favor of merging (if green :)10:05
pstolowskimvo: yes, absolutely, a followup is gine10:05
pstolowski*fine10:05
zygamvo I'm okay with that as well10:05
pstolowskihmm services PR failed and the failure looks real on 14.0410:26
mupPR snapd#9220 opened: o/snapstate: disk space check with single snap install <Disk space awareness> <â›” Blocked> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9220>10:41
zygapstolowski how did it fail?10:55
pstolowskizyga: state of services not as expected10:56
zygammm10:56
pstolowskioddly only on 14.04. i'm going to investigate in a bit10:56
zygawhat was the unexpected status?10:57
pstolowskizyga: enabled/inactive instead of disabled/inactive11:06
mupPR snapd#9221 opened: tests: disk space awareness spread test <Disk space awareness> <â›” Blocked> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9221>11:06
mupPR snapd#8982 closed: snapshots: export of snapshots <Created by slimjim777> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/8982>11:16
mupPR snapd#9199 closed: snapstate: installSize helper that calculates total size of snaps and their prerequisites <Disk space awareness> <Needs Samuele review> <Created by stolowski> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9199>11:21
pedronispstolowski: should I re-review the service PR or wait?11:31
mupPR snapd#9222 opened: osutil: add a package doc comment (via doc.go) <Simple 😃> <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9222>11:51
pstolowskipedronis: please wait, i'll let you know12:04
pedronispstolowski: ok, thx12:04
pedronispstolowski: when you have a moment, can you merge master into #9211 ?12:05
mupPR #9211: o/snapstate: disk space check with InstallMany <Disk space awareness> <â›” Blocked> <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9211>12:05
pstolowskiyes12:07
pedronismvo: #9222 is small/simple and touches something you did12:11
mupPR #9222: osutil: add a package doc comment (via doc.go) <Simple 😃> <Created by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9222>12:11
=== benfrancis7 is now known as benfrancis
mvopedronis: thank you12:58
mupPR snapd#9206 closed: boot: complain about reused asset name during initial install <UC20> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9206>13:01
mupPR snapd#9222 closed: osutil: add a package doc comment (via doc.go) <Simple 😃> <Created by pedronis> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9222>13:01
Chipacahey-o13:09
Chipacai've recently found that i need to restart snapd.socket manually every so often13:09
=== benfrancis6 is now known as benfrancis
mvopstolowski: 9211 has some unhappy unit test but looks great otherwise14:06
pstolowskimvo: ah, i forgot to rename after mergin master, thanks14:08
cachiozyga, hey14:08
cachioabout the error related to the failober tests14:08
zygare14:09
cachioof rexternal backend14:09
zygaChipaca, oh what's the state of the socket when you do?14:09
zygacachio, yeah?14:09
cachiodo you have in mind anython to fix that?14:09
Chipacazyga: a fair question. i'll look next time it happens.14:09
zygacachio sorry, the failure we talked about before or some new one?14:09
zygaChipaca I did observe something weird related to pulse socket like that14:09
zygaoh, sorry14:09
zyganot to the pulse socket14:09
cachiozyga, the one we talked before14:09
zygato the snapd socket in fact14:09
zygait was related to snapd-userd socket14:10
zygawhen we changed the socket definition14:10
zyga(just rewrite it)14:10
zygaand not reload systemd-userd14:10
cachiozyga, which failed because external backend does "sudo su to run the spread script"14:10
zygacachio right14:10
zygacachio that's fundamentally broken sadly :/14:10
zygacachio we have to change that14:11
zygait should, at minimum, do sudo -l14:11
cachiozyga, so change spread14:11
zygaer, wait14:11
zyganot -l14:11
zygasu -l, for sudo that's ....14:11
mupPR snapd#9217 closed: run-checks: add typos from auto-tools when using `make hack` <Simple 😃> <Test Robustness> <Created by anonymouse64> <Closed by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9217>14:12
zygacachio sudo -i (or sudo --login for clarity)14:12
zyganot tested14:12
zygabut that should be much better if it works as I expect14:12
zygaif that's convenient, change spread and see if this fixes it14:12
cachiozyga, ok, I'll make the change14:12
zygaok14:12
cachiozyga, thanks for the suggestion14:12
zygaChipaca in any case, thanks for the heads up14:13
zygaI'm running snapd without rebooting on metal to observe weird things as well but I have been unable to spend the time to dig into the things I saw14:13
zyga(insert commas for best sense)14:13
ijohnsonzyga: mvo: so for #9216, what should I do? the changelog typo fix is not on release/2.46 so I'm not sure what to force push ?14:16
mupPR #9216: vendor.json: update mysterious secboot SHA again <âš  Critical> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9216>14:16
mupPR snapd#9215 closed: mkversion.sh: do not use git describe --dirty <âš  Critical> <Created by mvo5> <Closed by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9215>14:17
zygaijohnson I was unclear, sorry, I expected to find only the hash change, not the typo fixes14:17
ijohnsonzyga: sure but then no tests run against the PR if I don't fix the typos here14:17
zygaare they necessary in this branch?14:17
zygaoh14:17
zygameh14:17
zygathat sucks, can we just merge the fixes separately?14:17
ijohnsoni.e. open any PR against release/2.46 and tests don't run14:17
zygait's not a biggie14:17
ijohnsonI'll leave to mvo to decide what to do, I'll leave the PR as-is for now14:18
zygaijohnson due to the typos?14:18
zygaok14:18
ijohnsonzyga: yes14:18
zygaI trust mvo's merge button14:18
ijohnsonthe unit / static tests fail on the typos and don't do spread runs14:18
mupPR snapcraft#3264 closed: colcon v2 plugin: don't strip environment for stage-runtime-dependencies <bug> <Created by cjp256> <Closed by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3264>14:18
ijohnsonnormally I'd say it's fine but this sha thing is mysterious enough to make me want to see spread results of building with this vendor.json change14:18
zygaijohnson I would just merge the typos separately14:20
zygaand then rebase this branch14:20
zygaso we can see a single thing to track, not that with other bits14:20
ijohnsonzyga: sure but I would rather wait til mvo says what he prefers14:22
zygaok14:22
mupPR snapcraft#3265 opened: colcon v2 plugin: honour http(s) proxy for stage-runtime-dependencies <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3265>14:23
pedronismvo: pstolowski: there is no daemon support yet for ErrInsuffiecientSpace ? also that name is not following style conventions14:29
pstolowskipedronis: correct, no daemon yet14:30
cachiozyga, so currently it is doing "sudo -i /bin/bash /tmp/tmp.zwRt33mi04"14:35
cachioto execute the script14:35
pedronispstolowski: I left some comments14:36
zygacachio currently as in with some changes or vanilla?14:36
mvoijohnson, zyga sorry, meetings will look at the backlog14:37
cachiozyga, vanilla14:37
zygacachio ok, perhaps it needs some more oomph14:37
pstolowskipedronis: ty14:37
zygacan you try changing that to su -l14:38
cachiozyga, sure14:38
ijohnsonmvo: I opened https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9223 to fix the --dirty handling in mkversion.sh14:40
mupPR #9223: mkversion.sh: simple hack to include dirty in version if the tree is dirty <Bug> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9223>14:40
ijohnsonhopefully that is the best of all possible worlds (but all possible worlds are still terrible)14:41
ijohnsonmvo: also please advice on next steps for #921614:41
mupPR #9216: vendor.json: update mysterious secboot SHA again <âš  Critical> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9216>14:41
mupPR snapd#9223 opened: mkversion.sh: simple hack to include dirty in version if the tree is dirty <Bug> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9223>14:42
mupPR snapd#9216 closed: vendor.json: update mysterious secboot SHA again <âš  Critical> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9216>15:07
pedronispstolowski: mvo: do we plan to have checks also for refresh ?15:07
mupPR snapcraft#3266 opened: cli: add --enable-experimental-extensions option for expand-extensions <enhancement> <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3266>15:08
mvopstolowski, pedronis: I think that would be good15:09
pstolowskipedronis: yes i think so15:09
pedronispstolowski: mvo: given that we remove old revisions only after installing the new ones, it's probably not too different form install15:15
pedronis*from15:15
mvopedronis: yeah15:15
mvopedronis: one interessting point for really low disk space system is that we may need to provide a mode in the future to change this behavior to "remove-before-install"15:16
pedronisok, sounds something to think about when we get there15:19
pedronisit means no rollback unless you keep two old revisions15:21
pedroniswhich would take more space15:22
pedronismvo: if you really want just one revision there's no undo15:23
* cachio lunch15:28
* mvo nods15:29
mupPR snapd#9224 opened: Added MIRKey to U2F devices list in interfaces/builtin <Created by kobusgrobler> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9224>15:42
pstolowskihmm there is something wonky with 'systemctl enable --root=/ on 14.04 ...'15:47
pstolowskimvo: interesting idea15:48
mvopstolowski: all later15:49
pstolowskisure, ack15:49
mvopstolowski: just an idea because we were talking about really low disspace systems15:49
pstolowskisystemctl enable --root=/ on 14.04 creates symlinks sunch as "snap.disabled-svcs-kept.svc.service -> ///etc/systemd/system/snap.disabled-svcs-kept.svc.service" and things seem to go wrong from there15:51
pedronispstolowski: what is using enable --root ? a test?15:52
pstolowskipedronis: Enable(..) in our systemd package, and it's now used in my services PR. no problems except for 14.0415:53
pstolowskiso it's used for real, not in test15:54
pedronispstolowski: is that related to preseeding ?15:55
pstolowskipedronis: no15:55
pedronisor it was always like that?15:55
pstolowskipedronis: as far as systemd package is concerned , --root is 1 year old15:56
pedronisit's related to user services it seems15:56
pstolowskipedronis: but it's now used for snap start.. in my PR. i need to compare with master15:56
pstolowskipedronis: likely, the change was from James15:57
pedronisnot sure15:57
pedronisJames didn't change that15:57
pedronisat least not in the obvious PR15:58
* mvo hockey, available via tg for ugent cases15:59
pstolowskipedronis: right, he just touched the line but didn't change semantics. anyway, something in my PR to fix, i need to check what did we do in master, most likely --root wasn't and shouldn't be passed in this case16:01
pedronisafaict even on master we pass it everywhere16:02
pedronisah, no16:02
pedronissorry, I'm confused is the problem enable or start?16:02
pstolowskipedronis: start --enable our our side, which translates to separate enable followed by start16:04
pedronispstolowski: I see, anyway --root was there since that code started using systemctl in 201616:06
pedronispstolowski: 5106ed3bcb193bf16:07
mupPR snapd#9225 opened: many: cloud-init cleanups from previous PR's <Cleanup :broom:> <Simple 😃> <Test Robustness> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9225>16:07
pstolowskipedronis: yes, but afaict it wasn't used with this exec-command tasks where systemctl was called directly, that's the thing16:11
pstolowskianyway i need to eod, appointment16:11
mupPR snapd#9226 opened: cmd/snap-bootstrap/initramfs-mounts: compute string outside of loop <Cleanup :broom:> <Simple 😃> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9226>16:12
pedronisijohnson: does #9225 need to run with nested tests enabled?16:17
mupPR #9225: many: cloud-init cleanups from previous PR's <Cleanup :broom:> <Simple 😃> <Test Robustness> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9225>16:17
cachiozyga, no luck with sudo -l16:18
ijohnsonpedronis: ah yes good point, let me re-open with that label16:18
pedronisijohnson: I reviewed the cleanup PRs16:21
ijohnsonthanks16:21
mupPR snapd#9219 closed: run-checks: only check files in git for misspelling <Skip spread> <Created by mvo5> <Merged by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9219>16:27
ijohnsoncachio: can you add to your nested test TODO to fix the regexp here for the ubuntu-16.04-64:tests/nested/core/extra-snaps-assertions test? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8y5pYY5PQw/16:29
ijohnsonpedronis: the last change you requested re cloud-init was in nested.sh from the private reviews, but I pushed it to https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9208/commits/9d1a8d64f0eb1242ce912875fc9e9f977fe72fe3 since that branch needed a restart anyways and is already nested.sh related16:30
mupPR #9208: tests/nested/core20/kernel-failover: add test for failed refresh of uc20 kernel <Run nested> <Test Robustness> <UC20> <Created by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9208>16:30
ijohnsonpedronis: you originally requested it here: https://github.com/anonymouse64/snapd-private/pull/8/files/bbfe9f9fc266d9cc43fe2c45c44620f4ad6ff2d0#r45135770016:30
cachioijohnson, to fix?16:30
cachiolet me check16:30
ijohnsoncachio: see the pastebin, the regexp for the core snap is wrong, it doesn't expect to see a pre version there16:31
mupPR snapd#9227 opened: snap: add stat to the random access file return interface <Simple 😃> <UC20> <Created by cmatsuoka> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9227>16:32
cachioijohnson, ahhh, the pre + git16:33
ijohnsonyes16:33
cachioin my pr16:33
cachioI am not checkin hte version when the rev ix x116:33
cachiobecause we test that as part of the listing test in main suite16:34
cachioso what I did is to simplify what we test in case we build core16:34
cachioijohnson, does it make sense for you?16:34
ijohnsoncachio: sure if it doesn't make sense to check that you can just remove that check that's fine16:35
ijohnsonjust wanted to make sure you knew about the failure16:35
cachioijohnson, nice, so that problem is covered in #909816:38
mupPR #9098: tests: new organization for nested tests <Run nested> <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9098>16:38
ijohnsongreat16:39
zygacachio, can you check if if su -l creates a logind session?16:51
cachiozyga, sure16:51
* zyga feels so so16:51
zygaI think I may be getting the same thing my wife has16:52
cachiozyga, go to rest16:52
ijohnsonzyga: oh no16:52
zygacachio alternatively try this16:53
zygacachio run without sudo16:53
zygacachio use sudo to create a systemd unit, maybe via systemd-run or manually16:53
zygahave the unit run the shell script16:53
cachiozyga, run the script without sudo?16:54
zygaand start the unit similarly to how session-tool does it, with runuser -l16:54
zygacachio start the script with runuser -l, as the desired user (root) but inside a systemd system unit16:55
zygacachio it's all a bit convoluted but that's one scenario that I know should behave correctly16:55
zygacachio you can then try to reduce this16:55
cachiozyga, ok, I'll try that16:56
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: what's the keyboard shortcut to open a debug shell for a uc20 vm again? I seem to remember it was ctrl+f8 or something but that doesn't do anything :-/17:06
zygaijohnson, cmatsuoka: please review simple bug fix https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/922818:04
mupPR #9228: interfaces/systemd: compare dereferenced Service <Bug> <Simple 😃> <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9228>18:04
zygacustomer bug18:04
zygaand my shame18:04
zygaas I wrote this18:04
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: hey on your spread runner do you have python installed?18:04
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: see https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/runs/1032308198?check_suite_focus=true18:04
zygaijohnson: python-launchpadlib probably18:04
zygaor python3-launchpadlib18:05
ijohnsonthe CLA checker failed because it couldn't find python18:05
zygaanyway18:05
ijohnsonzyga: sure I'll have a look18:05
cachiozyga, back to this18:05
cachiozyga, you said start the script with runuser -l18:05
cachiowhich script are you talking about?18:05
zygacachio runuser -l is like sudo18:05
cachiozyga, yes18:05
zygabut it has the right pam config so it gives you a logind session18:06
zygathe logind session is only created if the invoking process does not belong to a cgroup which is considered part of a session18:06
cachioyou mean spread has do to that?18:06
cachioinstead of doing sudo -i18:06
zygahence the workaround with running a systemd unit to run runuser -l18:06
zygayes18:06
cachiozyga, ah, ok18:06
zygaor offer a way for us to do this via spread18:06
cmatsuokaijohnson: installing python-is-python318:07
zygaotherwise, the external user has a session18:07
zygaand root does not18:07
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: thanks18:07
zygaand our tests are not compatible wiith  that18:07
cmatsuokazyga: will check asap18:07
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: also did you see my ping before you logged off about the debug shell on a VM?18:07
mupPR snapd#9228 opened: interfaces/systemd: compare dereferenced Service <Bug> <Simple 😃> <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9228>18:07
cmatsuokaijohnson: yes, I answered it (alt+f9) but maybe it was lost in a reconnection?18:08
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: yeah I didn't see the response18:08
zygaThank you for the quick review Ian18:08
zygabtw, if my wife is okay and she goes back to work next week18:08
zygaI will shift my hours to start at 11 AM or perhaps even at noon18:08
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: hmm so I added rd.systemd.debug-shell=1 to the kernel command line via grub.cfg but alt-f9 still doesn't work18:08
zygato be with lucy in the morning18:08
ijohnsonzyga: that's great that your wife is okay18:08
ijohnsonhappy to hear that18:08
zygaand then hand off to her (my wife will work part time)18:08
zygaijohnson: she's not yet, I meant "iff she's okay"18:09
ijohnsonzyga: ah I missed the most critical word there18:09
zygaijohnson: so if that all works out I will be working more with you guys :)18:09
ijohnson:-)18:09
zygamore overlap during the day18:09
cmatsuokazyga: reviewed18:09
zygathank you guys!18:10
zygacomplex day18:10
zygaolder kids fighting18:10
zygalucy not seeing mom all day, being very grumpy about that18:11
zygawife coming home sick18:11
zygaeh18:11
zygaeh18:11
zygaand now bugs18:11
mupPR snapcraft#3267 opened: ci: re-enable appveyor artifact collection <tooling> <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3267>18:34
cachiozyga, tried that but the session was not created18:43
cachioallways have the external and test sessions but can make it for the root session18:44
cachioI need to go to the kinesiologist now18:44
cachioI tried manuall18:44
cachioy18:44
cachioonce I am back I'll continue reading documentation18:45
cachiozyga, if you have any idea please leave a note18:45
cachiozyga, thanks18:45
* cachio -> kinesiologist18:45
cmatsuokaijohnson: did you add dangerous too?19:07
ijohnsoncmatsuoka: yes I did still didn't work, but I was able to work around it anyways19:07
cmatsuokaijohnson: it works for me with regular systemd.debug-shell, it's been a long time since I used rd.systemd but it should work using the same mechanism19:09
cmatsuokaafk, /me forgot to pay some bills19:11
ijohnsoncachio: I reviewed #9098, I think it is getting close just a few more comments21:22
mupPR #9098: tests: new organization for nested tests <Run nested> <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9098>21:22
cachioijohnson, thanks21:22
ijohnsonnp21:23
cachioijohnson, any idea how to create a user session for root when I an using external user?21:23
cachioI tried what zyga suggested21:23
cachiobut no luck21:23
ijohnsonahh no unfortunately I don't I would need to spend a bit of time looking at the problem first, I haven't looked at the user session stuff in a while21:24
ijohnsonif you still can't get it worked out tomorrow maybe I can have a look tomorrow afternoon21:24
cachioijohnson, np, tomorrow I'll continue with zyga21:24
ijohnsonsounds good21:25
cachionot it is too late for him21:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!