| RAOF | rbasak: The current state of GNOME MRU clarification is I've talked with Seb and he's gone “yeah, I don't know; we should clarify that”, and I've written https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/scope-of-gnome-mru/18041 | 00:34 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2.1 => 20.04.2.2] (ubuntustudio) | 01:17 | |
| Eickmeyer | ^ bug 1892949 | 01:17 |
| ubot5 | bug 1892949 in ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu Groovy) "[SRU] grub can no longer detect kernels after ubuntustudio-lowlatency-settings is uninstalled" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892949 | 01:17 |
| RAOF | Eickmeyer: Could I trouble you for a better changelog entry for that SRU? The changelog entry is the only user-visible notification of *why* we're SRUing something, and “add ubuntustudio-lowlatency-settings.postrm” is entirely uninteresting to users. | 05:35 |
| RAOF | Yes, there's a link to the actual bug there. We'd still prefer that you summarise the fix (and what it fixes). | 05:36 |
| RAOF | Something like “Ensure removing ubuntustudio-lowlatency-settings package doesn't remove all kernels from GRUB boot menu” or, similar. | 05:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.2.2] | 07:15 | |
| ginggs | ubuntu-archve would someone please remove pyhst2's amd64 binaries from -release? this would help me by allowing nvidia-cuda-toolkit to migrate. libhst2 can migrate later along with nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 and linux-restricted-modules-* | 07:37 |
| ginggs | ubuntu-archive even ^ | 07:48 |
| apw | ginggs, would -450 migrating take libhst2 with it as things stand and solve your issue too? | 07:48 |
| ginggs | apw: yes it would | 07:49 |
| ginggs | apw: i'd like nvidia-cuda-toolkit to migrate so i can sync in the next version from experimental, before feature freeze though | 07:50 |
| apw | ginggs, sorry i left the context out; i am hoping that what i just did to the archive will let that pile migrate in the next run, maybe | 07:51 |
| ginggs | apw: ok, that sounds great, thanks! | 07:51 |
| apw | ginggs, if it doesn't (and all things are possible, i won't be supprised if there is something else hiding in here) then we can revisit the removal | 07:52 |
| ginggs | apw: ack | 07:52 |
| sil2100 | RikMills, vorlon: ok, bileto login should now work once again | 08:42 |
| sil2100 | Took a bit of digging in though, phew | 08:43 |
| RikMills | sil2100: excellent. thank you :) | 08:50 |
| ginggs | apw: it worked \o/ thanks! | 09:04 |
| apw | ginggs, miraculously | 09:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu6 => 2.14.0-1ubuntu1] (core) | 10:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [11.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 12:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 12:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: secureboot-db (bionic-proposed/main) [1.4~ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1.4.1] (core) | 12:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: secureboot-db (xenial-proposed/main) [1.4~ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1.4.1~ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core) | 12:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: secureboot-db (trusty-proposed/main) [1.4~ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1.4.1~ubuntu0.14.04.1] (core) | 12:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: secureboot-db (focal-proposed/main) [1.5 => 1.6~20.04.1] (core) | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (bionic-proposed/primary) [450.66-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (focal-proposed/primary) [450.66-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 12:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (bionic-proposed/primary) [450.51.06-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 12:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/primary) [450.51.06-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 12:30 | |
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: Thanks, reuploaded. | 13:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.2.1 => 20.04.2.2] (ubuntustudio) | 13:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1023.23] (no packageset) | 13:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1022.22~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [11.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 14:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1023.23] | 14:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1022.22~18.04.1] | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted command-not-found [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.4] | 15:07 | |
| * apw is looking at nvidia-*450* | 15:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (bionic-proposed) [450.66-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 15:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (focal-proposed) [450.66-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 15:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [i386] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [450.66-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [i386] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [450.66-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist) | 15:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [450.66-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [amd64] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [450.66-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist) | 15:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [arm64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [11.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [84.0.4147.105-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:37 | |
| slashd | o/ sru vanguard, could you please reject my sosreport upload ? I'll re-upload later, I need to talk to sil2100 about some specifics first. | 16:49 |
| slashd | in focal ^ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=sosreport | 16:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.24 => 1:20.04.25] (core) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 17:37 | |
| sergiodj | hi there, libapache2-mod-wsgi has been dropped on Debian and we've just sync'ed mod-wsgi, so I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mod-wsgi/+bug/1893100 to make sure we RM libapache2-mod-wsgi from groovy | 18:07 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1893100 in mod-wsgi (Ubuntu) "[RM] libapache2-mod-wsgi from groovy" [Undecided,New] | 18:07 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: hi, so I'm continuing the review of dragonfly-reverb, and I've just run into the same issue with the font as .cpp that RAOF previously noted to you. The Open Font License is not GPL-compatible; we can't have binaries that contain both GPL code and compiled-in fonts that are under the SIL Open Font License, that's not distributable | 19:25 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: I also found some smaller issues with debian/copyright declaring wrong licenses for a few files; they're all GPL-compatible licenses so it's not a major issue but should still be fixed: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/JHXQ3PDZnn/ | 19:28 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: however, the embedded font makes the whole binary package nondistributable, so this is a reject, unless we could prove that the embedded font is not actually used | 19:30 |
| vorlon | (i.e. not compiled in) | 19:30 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: well I just checked, and it is definitely compiled into the binary. So that needs to be addressed before this can be accepted. | 19:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartmontools (xenial-proposed/main) [6.4+svn4214-1 => 6.4+svn4214-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server) | 20:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartmontools (bionic-proposed/main) [7.0-0ubuntu1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 6.5+svn4324-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server) | 20:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dragonfly-reverb [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.0-0ubuntu1] | 20:53 | |
| teward | vorlon: i'll copy/paste this to them in Telegram, I seem to remember they're suffering from system-not-available problems. Ten bucks says this won't get in on the groovy cycle this close to freezes | 20:57 |
| teward | (re: dragonfly-reverb) | 20:57 |
| vorlon | given that it will require an upstream fix, I'm not surprised, unfortunate that it is | 20:59 |
| teward | yup | 21:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.5 => 2.664.6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 21:09 | |
| teward | vorlon: this will sound a liiiiiitle bit janky, but... assuming that single font isn't crucial to the application could it be yanked out during build-time before ti actually builds so the font isn't compiled in? | 21:10 |
| teward | just wondering :p | 21:10 |
| teward | (it's a janky approach but still) | 21:10 |
| teward | ... oh ffs, 18.04 -> 20.04 upgrade broke my sbuild envs locally >.> | 21:10 |
| teward | *spends the next hour redoing his sbuild* | 21:12 |
| sarnold | any application that has compiled in a specific font is unlikely to handle that font going missing | 21:13 |
| sarnold | if you're lucky you wind up with big blank areas where text should be | 21:14 |
| sarnold | if you're unlucky it'll fall over and won't let you do anything | 21:14 |
| sarnold | if you're very unlucky they've never read danluu's page about file IO, and it'll corrupt stuff while falling over | 21:14 |
| teward | hah lol sarnold | 21:45 |
| RikMills | vorlon: quick query on your copyright comments. I note you imply that some incompatible copyright files may be ok if not compiled in/used? reason I ask as I want to get a source uploaded that opensuse had to repack the tar to remove unittests with non-free licenses, if we are not running or shipping the tests, can I avoid doing that repack? | 21:58 |
| vorlon | teward: well there is an api call, that's scattered throughout the source code, that returns this font; so I don't know what the consequences are for making this internal api call fail | 21:59 |
| RikMills | I should also note that the issues are fixed in upstream git, so this problem will go away when they do a new release | 21:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-noto [source] (focal-proposed) [20200323-1build1~ubuntu20.04.1] | 22:00 | |
| RikMills | or maybe I should play safe and do a git snapshot? | 22:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu9.1] | 22:09 | |
| vorlon | RikMills: if they're not embedded, it's at least not a combined work; but even a hard-coded requirement for a specific font that is loaded externally is a license issue under the GPL | 22:12 |
| vorlon | RikMills: unit tests in source code under a different license are not a GPL problem | 22:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kazam [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.5-3ubuntu0.1] | 22:15 | |
| RikMills | vorlon: understood. in that case I think I will upload as it is, and let the review decide. should there in the end be as issue, I can always the re-do the source | 22:18 |
| RikMills | vorlon: thanks :) | 22:18 |
| RikMills | ps. it is the example files for the unittests that were the issue. upstream grabbed some form somewhere on the internet without thinking about licences | 22:20 |
| RikMills | *from somewhere | 22:20 |
| RikMills | vorlon: damn. you are talking about combining incompatible free licenses are you not? penny just dropped. I think I am going to have to repack/snapshot after all | 22:29 |
| * RikMills blames the lateness of the hour in the UK | 22:29 | |
| RikMills | it is a weird thing, but I often find the copyright stuff MORE mind-bending than the quantum physics exams I had to do at Uni! | 22:34 |
| teward | RikMills: you mean RE: dragonfly-reverb? | 23:14 |
| teward | yeah that one's incompatible free licenses | 23:15 |
| teward | SIL Open Font License isn't compatible with GPL | 23:15 |
| teward | :P | 23:15 |
| vorlon | RikMills: if the test suite is not being shipped in a binary package, it still doesn't matter. You're allowed to combine GPL and non-GPL code into a single binary /which you don't distribute/. | 23:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!