-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed modernizr from i386-whitelist in groovy | 01:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pangox-compat to i386-whitelist in focal | 01:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pangox-compat to i386-whitelist in groovy | 01:15 | |
vorlon | xnox: our groovy daily ISOs are pulling in a grub signed with the old archive signing key. Why is this? | 05:59 |
---|---|---|
vorlon | xnox: hmm because gcdx64.efi.signed is copied into cd-boot-images-amd64 at build time instead of letting it be pulled directly from the archive mirror, and has not been updated since the CVE | 06:04 |
vorlon | xnox: LP: #1892754 - so who is responsible for tracking that Built-Using points to an out-of-date version? | 06:12 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1892754 in cd-boot-images-amd64 (Ubuntu) "Unable to boot in UEFI+secure boot mode" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892754 | 06:12 |
guiverc | thanks vorlon :) | 06:30 |
RAOF | Hm. Is `pkg-config --static --libs wayland-client` failing with missing dependencies a bug we care about? | 06:57 |
* RAOF is not sure why the build system is adding the `--static` flag 🤷♀️ | 06:58 | |
RAOF | Ooops, wrong channel. | 06:59 |
vorlon | guiverc: sure - sorry we missed this | 07:33 |
guiverc | caught before release, that's what matters :) | 07:33 |
RikMills | santa_: ack. plasma 5.19.5 should be out later today, so I will incorporate those changes | 07:36 |
Laney | wee no ghc/armhf build yet? | 08:12 |
santa_ | RikMills: thanks, wrong chan by the way, sorry everyone else for the noise | 08:16 |
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
xnox | vorlon: i heard rumours that launchpad would have started doing this soon together with new britney. i guess that was not the case. Should I add strict Depends on == of built-using packages? | 08:59 |
cjwatson | xnox: I'm still working on LP Built-Using support but it got pushed back somewhat due to discovering problems that required a rethink | 09:10 |
mwhudson | xnox: i guess strict depends would solve the problem for now | 09:31 |
Laney | The support is there in proposed-migration, but it doesn't make too much sense to enforce it there without the LP side | 09:32 |
Laney | We will enable it once that's good to go | 09:32 |
Laney | LocutusOfBorg: Yeah, I saw! | 09:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] | 09:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) | 10:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) | 10:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) | 10:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) | 10:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) | 10:01 | |
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
xnox | Laney: what would proposed-migration thing do? prevent migrations? | 11:21 |
Laney | yep, enforce the built-using thing is present in the target | 11:22 |
xnox | Laney: i kind of think it is useful to start enforcing that already, if there is code to do that. It would have blocked grub2-signed from migrating without cd-boot-images-amd64 rebuild. | 11:24 |
xnox | or does it only prevent i.e. cd-boot-images-amd64 from migrating, ahead of grub2-signed/shim-signed/etc? | 11:26 |
Laney | what has the Built-Using here? | 11:26 |
Laney | problem is that without archive support it can be falsified at any time | 11:29 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1001.1] (core) | 11:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1001.1] (core, kernel) | 11:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] | 11:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] | 11:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] | 11:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] | 11:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mozjs78 (groovy-proposed/primary) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] | 11:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] | 11:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [source] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] | 11:58 | |
handsome_feng | Hi, Any idea about same code build successfully on Debian but fails on Ubuntu due to symbols file? see: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=peony&arch=ppc64el&ver=3.0.2-2&stamp=1597758554&raw=0 and https://launchpadlibrarian.net/495492230/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-ppc64el.peony_3.0.2-2_BUILDING.txt.gz (Ignore the .qm warnings which I fixed in recent commits), I tested 'export | 12:13 |
handsome_feng | DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL = 1', but still failed in my PPA. | 12:13 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) | 12:19 | |
LocutusOfBorg | handsome_feng, just mark some symbols as optional and add the new ones as optional? | 12:24 |
LocutusOfBorg | ubuntu uses -O3 optimization, this makes some symbols change | 12:24 |
LocutusOfBorg | (and I would say that symbols for c++ projects are a waste of time) | 12:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) | 12:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1001.1] | 12:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1001.1] | 12:30 | |
LocutusOfBorg | xnox, is nodejs patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1858971 still useful? | 12:32 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1858971 in ruby2.5 (Ubuntu) "SECLEVEL=2 & tls1.2-min by default are causing ftbfs / autopkgtest failures" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 12:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117] (core, kernel) | 12:32 | |
LocutusOfBorg | I don't understand why this last piece of delta can't go in debian or go away | 12:33 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) | 12:34 | |
handsome_feng | LocutusOfBorg: Got it, Thanks! | 12:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | handsome_feng, if you need help, just ask :) | 12:45 |
handsome_feng | LocutusOfBorg: Thanks, :) , I'm thinking of just delete the symbols file and then specify the exact dependent library, is it acceptable? | 12:48 |
handsome_feng | It's hard to deal with the symbols file even with the kde tools. | 12:53 |
coreycb | RAOF: hello, if you happen to have cycles in your SRU rota today we have a few openstack stable releases in the focal unapproved queue. the neutron one in particular has a number of needed OVN fixes. this is for bug 1892139. | 12:56 |
ubot5 | bug 1892139 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ussuri "[SRU] ussuri stable releases" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892139 | 12:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | handsome_feng, I don't know the answer... :D | 13:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | it really depends on the project and context, and how fast it does change symbols | 13:11 |
handsome_feng | LocutusOfBorg: Okay, I'll do some research and find some examples. Thanks a lot! :) | 13:13 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) | 13:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) | 14:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117] (core, kernel) | 14:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.6] | 14:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) | 17:05 | |
bdmurray | sil2100: I'd like to get gnome-control-center for focal fully phased. The new issues are all false positives as 1:3.36.3-... didn't exist for very long. | 17:12 |
sil2100 | bdmurray: ok, sure | 17:15 |
sil2100 | I can override it, hopefully once it's phased 100 it will not get zeroed out on new false positives | 17:15 |
bdmurray | sil2100: It won't we've done this before. | 17:15 |
sil2100 | Done! | 17:18 |
bdmurray | Thanks | 17:19 |
coreycb | bdmurray: if you happen to have some cycles in your SRU rota, we have a neutron upload in the focal unapproved queue with some important OVN fixes | 17:46 |
bdmurray | coreycb: ack | 17:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 17:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (focal-proposed) [2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1] | 17:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu1] | 18:13 | |
vorlon | "started 6 hours ago" <table flip> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.36-1/+build/19872368 | 18:18 |
vorlon | did someone here restart those haskell-gi-gtk builds, and can explain why? | 18:18 |
vorlon | xnox, Laney: I am not in favor of britney enforcing Built-Using, it will make proposed-migration even more brittle than it already is. (And I think for that matter we'd be better off without britney enforcing build-depends, in favor of the previous handling of doing an end-of-cycle cleanup of ftbfs) | 18:18 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.15.0-1ubuntu9.1] | 18:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.3] | 18:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbsigntool [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2-2ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 18:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2] | 19:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2] | 19:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s3cmd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.2-1ubuntu1] | 19:16 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-taskflow [source] (focal-proposed) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1.1] | 19:33 | |
teward | bdmurray: thanks for accepting the s3cmd into proposed. If nobody replies with it being tested by EOD Tomorrow I'll weigh in - 'cause this issue bites me too. (I know it's preferred that the 'uploader' doesn't test the SRU alone but... :P) | 19:40 |
teward | (I also know it's still accepted if nobody else does the testing) | 19:41 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117] | 19:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117] | 19:43 | |
vorlon | cpaelzer: hi, you said on https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-vagrant-libvirt/+merge/389888 that the change is "now correct", but I see no changes on your branch, and the version listed in your hint update is only in -proposed, NOT in the release pocket | 19:49 |
rbalint | vorlon, could you please merge this (hopefully) last round for glibc? https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390116 | 19:58 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnsl (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 20:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rpcsvc-proto (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 20:18 | |
rbalint | vorlon, also those are for the new glibc, please check them, too ^ | 20:20 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected freecad [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.16.6712+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1] | 20:29 | |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, missing build on i386: libdune-ocaml-dev, ocaml-dune (from 2.1.3-2) | 20:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | can you please do something? | 20:53 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: removed; and if someone could get lintian to migrate, we'd be clean wrt packageset overrides and I could do a batch cleanup | 20:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | do we need 3 MIRs? | 20:57 |
vorlon | I think that's what's currently missing | 20:57 |
vorlon | there was some discussion of perl fast-track MIRs, but that's waiting on doko | 20:57 |
vorlon | (not sure if anyone actually talked to doko about it) | 20:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | there is also an armhf regression... | 20:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | but we might want to try to move armhf to big-packages, and test here | 20:59 |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/udisks2/groovy/amd64 looks like regressed in release? can we do something? | 21:04 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: covered by rbalint's MP above | 21:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh rbalint ^^ yep sorry I just discovered bug 1893827 | 21:06 |
ubot5 | bug 1893827 in udisks2 (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest fails in groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1893827 | 21:06 |
vorlon | rbalint: merged; and I appreciate the due diligence wrt baseline retesting | 21:11 |
vorlon | rbalint: if glibc is dropping libnsl, doesn't it need a pre-dependency on the new package to ensure its availability for all existing packages that use it? Because lbnsl1 is certainly listed in libc6.symbols/.shlibs as pointing to libc6 | 21:14 |
vorlon | (rpcsvc seems less critical since it's only about headers + rpcgen, but do we know what the buildability impact will be there too?) | 21:16 |
vorlon | oh, I see, this is libnsl2, not libnsl1 | 21:18 |
vorlon | rbalint: I: libnsl source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/nisplus/nis_hash.c (paragraph at line 38) | 21:21 |
vorlon | I: libnsl source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright test-driver (paragraph at line 119) | 21:21 |
vorlon | rbalint: similarly, some debian/copyright mismatches on rpcsvc-proto | 21:25 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:30 | |
mwhudson | well ghc/armhf hasn't failed yet | 21:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:31 | |
mwhudson | argh wtf what happened to the haskell-gi-gtk builds :( | 21:31 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [armhf] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:35 | |
vorlon | rbalint: and this should probably be a Breaks:? I: libnsl-dev: conflicts-with-version libc6-dev (<< 2.32) | 21:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 21:43 | |
vorlon | rbalint: I think rpcsvc-proto is missing a Breaks/Replaces on libc6-dev-bin (<< 2.32), for /usr/bin/rpcgen | 21:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] | 21:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu29 => 2.04-1ubuntu29] (core) | 21:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.5 => 2.664.6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 22:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu29 => 2.04-1ubuntu29] (core) | 22:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.4] | 22:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!