[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed modernizr from i386-whitelist in groovy
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pangox-compat to i386-whitelist in focal
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pangox-compat to i386-whitelist in groovy
[05:59] <vorlon> xnox: our groovy daily ISOs are pulling in a grub signed with the old archive signing key.  Why is this?
[06:04] <vorlon> xnox: hmm because gcdx64.efi.signed is copied into cd-boot-images-amd64 at build time instead of letting it be pulled directly from the archive mirror, and has not been updated since the CVE
[06:12] <vorlon> xnox: LP: #1892754 - so who is responsible for tracking that Built-Using points to an out-of-date version?
[06:30] <guiverc> thanks vorlon :)
[06:57] <RAOF> Hm. Is `pkg-config --static --libs wayland-client` failing with missing dependencies a bug we care about?
[06:58]  * RAOF is not sure why the build system is adding the `--static` flag 🤷‍♀️
[06:59] <RAOF> Ooops, wrong channel.
[07:33] <vorlon> guiverc: sure - sorry we missed this
[07:33] <guiverc> caught before release, that's what matters :)
[07:36] <RikMills> santa_: ack. plasma 5.19.5 should be out later today, so I will incorporate those changes
[08:12] <Laney> wee no ghc/armhf build yet?
[08:16] <santa_> RikMills: thanks, wrong chan by the way, sorry everyone else for the noise
[08:59] <xnox> vorlon:  i heard rumours that launchpad would have started doing this soon together with new britney. i guess that was not the case. Should I add strict Depends on == of built-using packages?
[09:10] <cjwatson> xnox: I'm still working on LP Built-Using support but it got pushed back somewhat due to discovering problems that required a rethink
[09:31] <mwhudson> xnox: i guess strict depends would solve the problem for now
[09:32] <Laney> The support is there in proposed-migration, but it doesn't make too much sense to enforce it there without the LP side
[09:32] <Laney> We will enable it once that's good to go
[09:33] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: Yeah, I saw!
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1]
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset)
[11:21] <xnox> Laney:  what would proposed-migration thing do? prevent migrations?
[11:22] <Laney> yep, enforce the built-using thing is present in the target
[11:24] <xnox> Laney:  i kind of think it is useful to start enforcing that already, if there is code to do that. It would have blocked grub2-signed from migrating without cd-boot-images-amd64 rebuild.
[11:26] <xnox> or does it only prevent i.e. cd-boot-images-amd64 from migrating, ahead of grub2-signed/shim-signed/etc?
[11:26] <Laney> what has the Built-Using here?
[11:29] <Laney> problem is that without archive support it can be falsified at any time
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1001.1] (core)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1001.1] (core, kernel)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mozjs78 (groovy-proposed/primary) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [source] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[12:13] <handsome_feng> Hi, Any idea about same code build successfully on Debian but fails on Ubuntu due to symbols file? see:  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=peony&arch=ppc64el&ver=3.0.2-2&stamp=1597758554&raw=0 and https://launchpadlibrarian.net/495492230/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-ppc64el.peony_3.0.2-2_BUILDING.txt.gz (Ignore the .qm warnings which I fixed in recent commits),  I tested 'export
[12:13] <handsome_feng> DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL = 1', but still failed in my PPA.
[12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset)
[12:24] <LocutusOfBorg> handsome_feng, just mark some symbols as optional and add the new ones as optional?
[12:24] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu uses -O3 optimization, this makes some symbols change
[12:24] <LocutusOfBorg> (and I would say that symbols for c++ projects are a waste of time)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1001.1]
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1001.1]
[12:32] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, is nodejs patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1858971 still useful?
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117] (core, kernel)
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't understand why this last piece of delta can't go in debian or go away
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset)
[12:37] <handsome_feng> LocutusOfBorg: Got it, Thanks!
[12:45] <LocutusOfBorg> handsome_feng, if you need help, just ask :)
[12:48] <handsome_feng> LocutusOfBorg: Thanks, :) ,  I'm thinking of  just delete the symbols file and then specify the exact dependent library, is it acceptable?
[12:53] <handsome_feng> It's hard to deal with the symbols file even with the kde tools.
[12:56] <coreycb> RAOF: hello, if you happen to have cycles in your SRU rota today we have a few openstack stable releases in the focal unapproved queue. the neutron one in particular has a number of needed OVN fixes. this is for bug 1892139.
[13:11] <LocutusOfBorg> handsome_feng, I don't know the answer... :D
[13:11] <LocutusOfBorg> it really depends on the project and context, and how fast it does change symbols
[13:13] <handsome_feng> LocutusOfBorg: Okay, I'll do some research and find some examples. Thanks a lot! :)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset)
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117] (core, kernel)
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.6]
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset)
[17:12] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'd like to get gnome-control-center for focal fully phased. The new issues are all false positives as 1:3.36.3-... didn't exist for very long.
[17:15] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok, sure
[17:15] <sil2100> I can override it, hopefully once it's phased 100 it will not get zeroed out on new false positives
[17:15] <bdmurray> sil2100: It won't we've done this before.
[17:18] <sil2100> Done!
[17:19] <bdmurray> Thanks
[17:46] <coreycb> bdmurray: if you happen to have some cycles in your SRU rota, we have a neutron upload in the focal unapproved queue with some important OVN fixes
[17:48] <bdmurray> coreycb: ack
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (focal-proposed) [2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu1]
[18:18] <vorlon> "started 6 hours ago" <table flip> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.36-1/+build/19872368
[18:18] <vorlon> did someone here restart those haskell-gi-gtk builds, and can explain why?
[18:18] <vorlon> xnox, Laney: I am not in favor of britney enforcing Built-Using, it will make proposed-migration even more brittle than it already is.  (And I think for that matter we'd be better off without britney enforcing build-depends, in favor of the previous handling of doing an end-of-cycle cleanup of ftbfs)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.15.0-1ubuntu9.1]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.3]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbsigntool [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2-2ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2]
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s3cmd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.2-1ubuntu1]
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-taskflow [source] (focal-proposed) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1.1]
[19:40] <teward> bdmurray: thanks for accepting the s3cmd into proposed.  If nobody replies with it being tested by EOD Tomorrow I'll weigh in - 'cause this issue bites me too.  (I know it's preferred that the 'uploader' doesn't test the SRU alone but... :P)
[19:41] <teward> (I also know it's still accepted if nobody else does the testing)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117]
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117]
[19:49] <vorlon> cpaelzer: hi, you said on https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-vagrant-libvirt/+merge/389888 that the change is "now correct", but I see no changes on your branch, and the version listed in your hint update is only in -proposed, NOT in the release pocket
[19:58] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please merge this (hopefully) last round for glibc? https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390116
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnsl (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rpcsvc-proto (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[20:20] <rbalint> vorlon, also those are for the new glibc, please check them, too ^
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected freecad [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.16.6712+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1]
[20:53] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, missing build on i386: libdune-ocaml-dev, ocaml-dune (from 2.1.3-2)
[20:53] <LocutusOfBorg> can you please do something?
[20:55] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: removed; and if someone could get lintian to migrate, we'd be clean wrt packageset overrides and I could do a batch cleanup
[20:57] <LocutusOfBorg> do we need 3 MIRs?
[20:57] <vorlon> I think that's what's currently missing
[20:57] <vorlon> there was some discussion of perl fast-track MIRs, but that's waiting on doko
[20:58] <vorlon> (not sure if anyone actually talked to doko about it)
[20:58] <LocutusOfBorg> there is also an armhf regression...
[20:59] <LocutusOfBorg> but we might want to try to move armhf to big-packages, and test here
[21:04] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/udisks2/groovy/amd64 looks like regressed in release? can we do something?
[21:06] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: covered by rbalint's MP above
[21:06] <LocutusOfBorg> oh rbalint ^^ yep sorry I just discovered bug 1893827
[21:11] <vorlon> rbalint: merged; and I appreciate the due diligence wrt baseline retesting
[21:14] <vorlon> rbalint: if glibc is dropping libnsl, doesn't it need a pre-dependency on the new package to ensure its availability for all existing packages that use it?  Because lbnsl1 is certainly listed in libc6.symbols/.shlibs as pointing to libc6
[21:16] <vorlon> (rpcsvc seems less critical since it's only about headers + rpcgen, but do we know what the buildability impact will be there too?)
[21:18] <vorlon> oh, I see, this is libnsl2, not libnsl1
[21:21] <vorlon> rbalint: I: libnsl source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/nisplus/nis_hash.c (paragraph at line 38)
[21:21] <vorlon> I: libnsl source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright test-driver (paragraph at line 119)
[21:25] <vorlon> rbalint: similarly, some debian/copyright mismatches on rpcsvc-proto
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:30] <mwhudson> well ghc/armhf hasn't failed yet
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:31] <mwhudson> argh wtf what happened to the haskell-gi-gtk builds :(
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [armhf] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:38] <vorlon> rbalint: and this should probably be a Breaks:? I: libnsl-dev: conflicts-with-version libc6-dev (<< 2.32)
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:48] <vorlon> rbalint: I think rpcsvc-proto is missing a Breaks/Replaces on libc6-dev-bin (<< 2.32), for /usr/bin/rpcgen
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu29 => 2.04-1ubuntu29] (core)
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.5 => 2.664.6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu29 => 2.04-1ubuntu29] (core)
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.4]