[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed modernizr from i386-whitelist in groovy [01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pangox-compat to i386-whitelist in focal [01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pangox-compat to i386-whitelist in groovy [05:59] xnox: our groovy daily ISOs are pulling in a grub signed with the old archive signing key. Why is this? [06:04] xnox: hmm because gcdx64.efi.signed is copied into cd-boot-images-amd64 at build time instead of letting it be pulled directly from the archive mirror, and has not been updated since the CVE [06:12] xnox: LP: #1892754 - so who is responsible for tracking that Built-Using points to an out-of-date version? [06:12] Launchpad bug 1892754 in cd-boot-images-amd64 (Ubuntu) "Unable to boot in UEFI+secure boot mode" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892754 [06:30] thanks vorlon :) [06:57] Hm. Is `pkg-config --static --libs wayland-client` failing with missing dependencies a bug we care about? [06:58] * RAOF is not sure why the build system is adding the `--static` flag 🤷‍♀️ [06:59] Ooops, wrong channel. [07:33] guiverc: sure - sorry we missed this [07:33] caught before release, that's what matters :) [07:36] santa_: ack. plasma 5.19.5 should be out later today, so I will incorporate those changes [08:12] wee no ghc/armhf build yet? [08:16] RikMills: thanks, wrong chan by the way, sorry everyone else for the noise === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [08:59] vorlon: i heard rumours that launchpad would have started doing this soon together with new britney. i guess that was not the case. Should I add strict Depends on == of built-using packages? [09:10] xnox: I'm still working on LP Built-Using support but it got pushed back somewhat due to discovering problems that required a rethink [09:31] xnox: i guess strict depends would solve the problem for now [09:32] The support is there in proposed-migration, but it doesn't make too much sense to enforce it there without the LP side [09:32] We will enable it once that's good to go [09:33] LocutusOfBorg: Yeah, I saw! [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mutter [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.37.91-1ubuntu1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-srs [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset) === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks [11:21] Laney: what would proposed-migration thing do? prevent migrations? [11:22] yep, enforce the built-using thing is present in the target [11:24] Laney: i kind of think it is useful to start enforcing that already, if there is code to do that. It would have blocked grub2-signed from migrating without cd-boot-images-amd64 rebuild. [11:26] or does it only prevent i.e. cd-boot-images-amd64 from migrating, ahead of grub2-signed/shim-signed/etc? [11:26] what has the Built-Using here? [11:29] problem is that without archive support it can be falsified at any time [11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1001.1] (core) [11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1001.1] (core, kernel) [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mozjs78 (groovy-proposed/primary) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-srs [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.9-1] [11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [source] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] [12:13] Hi, Any idea about same code build successfully on Debian but fails on Ubuntu due to symbols file? see: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=peony&arch=ppc64el&ver=3.0.2-2&stamp=1597758554&raw=0 and https://launchpadlibrarian.net/495492230/buildlog_ubuntu-groovy-ppc64el.peony_3.0.2-2_BUILDING.txt.gz (Ignore the .qm warnings which I fixed in recent commits), I tested 'export [12:13] DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL = 1', but still failed in my PPA. [12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) [12:24] handsome_feng, just mark some symbols as optional and add the new ones as optional? [12:24] ubuntu uses -O3 optimization, this makes some symbols change [12:24] (and I would say that symbols for c++ projects are a waste of time) [12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) [12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1001.1] [12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1001.1] [12:32] xnox, is nodejs patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1858971 still useful? [12:32] Ubuntu bug 1858971 in ruby2.5 (Ubuntu) "SECLEVEL=2 & tls1.2-min by default are causing ftbfs / autopkgtest failures" [Undecided,Fix committed] [12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117] (core, kernel) [12:33] I don't understand why this last piece of delta can't go in debian or go away [12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) [12:37] LocutusOfBorg: Got it, Thanks! [12:45] handsome_feng, if you need help, just ask :) [12:48] LocutusOfBorg: Thanks, :) , I'm thinking of just delete the symbols file and then specify the exact dependent library, is it acceptable? [12:53] It's hard to deal with the symbols file even with the kde tools. [12:56] RAOF: hello, if you happen to have cycles in your SRU rota today we have a few openstack stable releases in the focal unapproved queue. the neutron one in particular has a number of needed OVN fixes. this is for bug 1892139. [12:56] bug 1892139 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ussuri "[SRU] ussuri stable releases" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892139 [13:11] handsome_feng, I don't know the answer... :D [13:11] it really depends on the project and context, and how fast it does change symbols [13:13] LocutusOfBorg: Okay, I'll do some research and find some examples. Thanks a lot! :) [13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) [14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117] (core, kernel) [14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.6] [17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs78 [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1] (no packageset) [17:12] sil2100: I'd like to get gnome-control-center for focal fully phased. The new issues are all false positives as 1:3.36.3-... didn't exist for very long. [17:15] bdmurray: ok, sure [17:15] I can override it, hopefully once it's phased 100 it will not get zeroed out on new false positives [17:15] sil2100: It won't we've done this before. [17:18] Done! [17:19] Thanks [17:46] bdmurray: if you happen to have some cycles in your SRU rota, we have a neutron upload in the focal unapproved queue with some important OVN fixes [17:48] coreycb: ack [17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.1.0-0ubuntu1] [17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (focal-proposed) [2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1] [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.4-0ubuntu1] [18:18] "started 6 hours ago" https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.36-1/+build/19872368 [18:18] did someone here restart those haskell-gi-gtk builds, and can explain why? [18:18] xnox, Laney: I am not in favor of britney enforcing Built-Using, it will make proposed-migration even more brittle than it already is. (And I think for that matter we'd be better off without britney enforcing build-depends, in favor of the previous handling of doing an end-of-cycle cleanup of ftbfs) [18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.15.0-1ubuntu9.1] [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.3] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sbsigntool [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.2-2ubuntu1.20.04.1] [19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-canonical [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2] [19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shim-canonical [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2] [19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s3cmd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.2-1ubuntu1] [19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-taskflow [source] (focal-proposed) [4.1.0-0ubuntu1.1] [19:40] bdmurray: thanks for accepting the s3cmd into proposed. If nobody replies with it being tested by EOD Tomorrow I'll weigh in - 'cause this issue bites me too. (I know it's preferred that the 'uploader' doesn't test the SRU alone but... :P) [19:41] (I also know it's still accepted if nobody else does the testing) [19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117] [19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117] [19:49] cpaelzer: hi, you said on https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-groovy-vagrant-libvirt/+merge/389888 that the change is "now correct", but I see no changes on your branch, and the version listed in your hint update is only in -proposed, NOT in the release pocket [19:58] vorlon, could you please merge this (hopefully) last round for glibc? https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390116 [20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnsl (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rpcsvc-proto (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [20:20] vorlon, also those are for the new glibc, please check them, too ^ [20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected freecad [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.16.6712+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.1] [20:53] vorlon, missing build on i386: libdune-ocaml-dev, ocaml-dune (from 2.1.3-2) [20:53] can you please do something? [20:55] LocutusOfBorg: removed; and if someone could get lintian to migrate, we'd be clean wrt packageset overrides and I could do a batch cleanup [20:57] do we need 3 MIRs? [20:57] I think that's what's currently missing [20:57] there was some discussion of perl fast-track MIRs, but that's waiting on doko [20:58] (not sure if anyone actually talked to doko about it) [20:58] there is also an armhf regression... [20:59] but we might want to try to move armhf to big-packages, and test here [21:04] vorlon, https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/udisks2/groovy/amd64 looks like regressed in release? can we do something? [21:06] LocutusOfBorg: covered by rbalint's MP above [21:06] oh rbalint ^^ yep sorry I just discovered bug 1893827 [21:06] bug 1893827 in udisks2 (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest fails in groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1893827 [21:11] rbalint: merged; and I appreciate the due diligence wrt baseline retesting [21:14] rbalint: if glibc is dropping libnsl, doesn't it need a pre-dependency on the new package to ensure its availability for all existing packages that use it? Because lbnsl1 is certainly listed in libc6.symbols/.shlibs as pointing to libc6 [21:16] (rpcsvc seems less critical since it's only about headers + rpcgen, but do we know what the buildability impact will be there too?) [21:18] oh, I see, this is libnsl2, not libnsl1 [21:21] rbalint: I: libnsl source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/nisplus/nis_hash.c (paragraph at line 38) [21:21] I: libnsl source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright test-driver (paragraph at line 119) [21:25] rbalint: similarly, some debian/copyright mismatches on rpcsvc-proto [21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:30] well ghc/armhf hasn't failed yet [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [arm64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:31] argh wtf what happened to the haskell-gi-gtk builds :( [21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [armhf] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:38] rbalint: and this should probably be a Breaks:? I: libnsl-dev: conflicts-with-version libc6-dev (<< 2.32) [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libnsl [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnsl [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1] [21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpcsvc-proto [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:48] rbalint: I think rpcsvc-proto is missing a Breaks/Replaces on libc6-dev-bin (<< 2.32), for /usr/bin/rpcgen [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpcsvc-proto [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.2-0ubuntu1] [21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu29 => 2.04-1ubuntu29] (core) [22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.5 => 2.664.6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) [22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (groovy-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu29 => 2.04-1ubuntu29] (core) [22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.4]