[07:11] <LocutusOfBorg> harf
[07:11] <LocutusOfBorg> oops
[07:17] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, some minion failed... removing ocaml dune didn't help too much
[07:17] <LocutusOfBorg> ocaml-integers unsatisfiable Build-Depends(-Arch) on i386: ocaml-dune
[07:27] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks, yes, relaxing conflicts is on my todo list
[07:31] <rbalint> rbasak, could you please check the focal glibc sru in unapproved again? the fixes will land in groovy in a few hours and maybe the sru could be accepted even in advance or at least be checked
[09:13] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: what was the problem with dune? looks like this is required by llvm ...
[09:13]  * Laney is going through libffi blockers
[09:24] <rbasak> rbalint: for a package as crucial as glibc, surely we want to actually test a fix in Groovy for a while first rather than accepting in advance?
[09:25] <rbasak> Is there a reason this needs priority?
[09:28] <rbalint> rbasak, focal is broken on wsl1, but it can wait a few hours, sure
[09:29] <rbasak> rbalint: I'm thinking weeks, not hours.
[09:30] <rbasak> Focal has been out for five months. Is this a post-release regression?
[09:33] <rbalint> rbasak, no, a release one, but if we enable upgrades to focal users start hitting it, because release upgrade breaks in the middle
[09:33] <rbalint> rbasak, i'd rather have glibc tested in focal-proposed for weeks, too, rather than just in groovy
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, which llvm?
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> not the one in proposed (I guess only llvm-10 builds i386 stuff, and I disabled ocaml there)
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> we agreeded with vorlon to stop doing ocaml on i386 just for llvm
[09:39] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: ok, good, then ocaml-integers needs to go too I guess
[09:43] <rbalint> Laney, could you please merge this for glibc? https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390141
[09:48] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: (vorlon): ocaml-integers/i386 removed
[09:48] <Laney> rbalint: ok
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs78 [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [78.2.0-1~fakesync1]
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks Laney lets see how we go now
[10:24] <Laney> libffi's still got a way to go
[10:25] <mwhudson> ghc/armhf at 36 hours now, fingers crossed
[10:36] <xnox> mwhudson:  it has done that a few times now. not sure if it is getting auto-retried, or people are manually retrying it. cause i have seen it reset a few times before.
[10:37] <Laney> There were some problems in bos02, believed now fixed, so this one is hopefully going to be the one
[10:38] <cjwatson> Having builders networked via a router that isn't having hardware trouble will hopefully help
[10:39] <Laney> You want me to do WHAT with this packet? Eat it? OK!
[10:40] <cjwatson> Certainly a non-zero number of the ghc/armhf retries were entirely automatic
[10:40] <cjwatson> Some will probably have been me bulk-retrying all the failures of a certain kind after attempted fixes
[10:41] <cjwatson> It wasn't manually cancelled at any point though, AFAICS
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, I retroed
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I retried everytime I saw it failed with no logs, same for llvm-toolchain-10
[10:42] <Laney> vor_lon said they did 3 retries; I know I did a couple
[10:42] <Laney> much mashing
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> probably I did around 3-4 too
[10:42] <LocutusOfBorg> but not sure because I have another ghc in bileto, so I don't remember exactly
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> I also tried to lower parallel building on armhf, before discovering that the issue was coming from bos02
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> btw thanks IS for discovering the subtle hardware bug
[10:45] <cjwatson> That particular build has been auto-retried 6 times and has failed (and thus presumably been manually retried) 5 times
[10:45] <LocutusOfBorg> I never cancelled it, this is sure :p
[10:48] <mwhudson> i don't think it ever got this far in before falling over somehow
[10:48] <mwhudson> but i've not exactly been keeping track
[10:48]  * mwhudson saves some glares for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-gtk/3.0.36-1/+build/19872366
[10:51] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, the riscv64 builds are mostly good
[10:52] <LocutusOfBorg> armhf will be done by me later when that one is over
[10:52] <mwhudson> LocutusOfBorg: yeah that chain is mostly dug out now i think?
[10:52] <LocutusOfBorg> I fixed this one this morning https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-src-exts/1.23.1-2~build1
[10:52] <LocutusOfBorg> mwhudson, we still have some sadness here and there
[10:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I see: haskell-gtk-sni-tray taffybar haskell-gi-gtk-hs haskell-src-exts haskell-src-exts-simple haskell-gi-vte haskell-gtk-strut haskell-termonad
[10:56] <mwhudson> those are mostly just waiting on builds though?
[10:56] <mwhudson> or are some failing for other reasons?
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> probably only exts needed some care
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> but without ghc finishing build, the tracker won't be helpful on armhf
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> manually searching for missing build on armhf ghc tracker is painful today
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> I admit I cheated and searched for "missing build on armhf: libghc" on excuses page :p
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: haskell-th-constraint-compat (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: haskell-th-bang-compat (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[11:09] <LocutusOfBorg> oh dear haskell-persistable-record, I forgot you needed some love
[11:09] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept the stuff I uploaded in groovy queue
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> (same tarball as the one in Debian new queue)
[11:17] <rbasak> rbalint: why isn't the nanosleep bug being fixed in the WSL kernel? Looks like the fix will be present on other platforms too? Are we sure that clock_nanosleep_time64 never legitimately fails but valid_nanosleep_ts still returns true - for all platforms?
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:43] <Laney> p-m looks like it's got a crash in the sourceppa policy
[11:44] <Laney> I think I can fix that though, sec
[12:18] <rbalint> rbasak, according to clock_nanosleep(2) EINVAL is returned only in the cases which are checked by valid_nanosleep_ts or due to clock_id being invalid which is checked before
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1]
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-46.50~18.04.1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added mozjs78 to i386-whitelist in groovy
[13:03] <LocutusOfBorg> libgcc(.text): unknown symbol __aarch64_have_lse_atomics
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-116.117~16.04.1] (kernel)
[13:04] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, ^^ golang-1.14 needs some glibc/related care?
[13:26] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, gcc-related, https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39466
[13:31] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, would you like to fix it? i have glibc and systemd before that on my todo list
[13:40] <rbalint> Laney, i've missed that in my previous merge, this should really unblock glibc, please merge it : https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390171
[13:50] <Laney> rbalint: later maybe, busy with gnome stuff atm
[13:50] <Laney> or try someone else
[13:50] <rbasak>  rbalint: OK thanks. I was just about to accept but I'm puzzled by the addition of debian/patches/any/local-revert-glibc_has_include.diff though I don't see a change to the corresponding series file. Is this a mistake?
[13:52] <LocutusOfBorg> rbasak, I'm testing the fix on my ppa
[13:57] <rbalint> rbasak, hm, let me check it after meeting just starting
[14:11] <rbalint> rbasak, is slipped in when importing 2.31-0ubuntu9, please reject the upload, i'm uploading the clean one
[14:13] <rbasak> OK thanks
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected glibc [source] (focal-proposed) [2.31-0ubuntu9.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smartmontools [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.5+svn4324-1ubuntu0.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smartmontools [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.4+svn4214-1ubuntu0.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (focal-proposed/main) [2.31-0ubuntu9 => 2.31-0ubuntu9.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:27] <rbalint> rbasak, thanks, uploaded the good one ^
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glibc [source] (focal-proposed) [2.31-0ubuntu9.1]
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (focal-proposed/main) [0.136ubuntu6.2 => 0.136ubuntu6.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [0.130ubuntu3.9 => 0.130ubuntu3.10] (core)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [0.130ubuntu3.9 => 0.130ubuntu3.10] (core)
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu29]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu29]
[15:49] <vorlon> Laney, LocutusOfBorg: ocaml-integers> cheers
[15:51] <Laney> libffi's inched a bit closer
[15:52] <vorlon> exciting progress on the haskell gi stack, I see
[15:53] <vorlon> only 3 packages in progress on armhf that directly affect libffi, plus haskell-gi-vte; one in progress on riscv64 (taffybar); and ghc/armhf (fingers crossed)
[15:56] <rbalint> vorlon,, i've missed that in my previous merge, this should really unblock glibc, could you please merge it? : https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/390171
[15:57] <vorlon> rbalint: done!
[15:57] <vorlon> congrats, glibc migrating before libffi ;)
[15:58] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks! :-) (btw i think it can't due to having some tested packages also being blocked by libffi)
[15:59] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I retried lots of riscv64 stuff and it *all* succeeded
[16:00] <Laney> it'll go, see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/groovy/update_output_notest.txt
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure who/what did the riscv64 fix, but meh!
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. brz, vips, libvirt-dbus, rust-onig-sys and lots more
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> also biobambam2 is now building fine
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> meh
[16:00] <LocutusOfBorg> did anybody upgrade riscv64 hw? :)
[16:01] <LocutusOfBorg> haskell and ocaml are mostly finished
[16:01] <vorlon> rbalint: I don't believe the interactions between tested package versions are blocking
[16:01] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: rust-onig-sys> oh wow
[16:04] <LocutusOfBorg> somebody should do a mass retry of the failures...
[16:05] <LocutusOfBorg> and ocamlbricks is now fixed on riscv64 too yay
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, haskell-persistable-record needs two packages that are already in Debian and Ubuntu new queue...
[16:09] <LocutusOfBorg> pleease^
[16:11] <vorlon> any chance we can wait for the Debian ftpmasters to review it? :) or is this tied into the haskell mini-transition?
[16:11] <cjwatson> The riscv64 hardware is unchanged, but maybe William did a bit of sysadmin there
[16:11] <cjwatson> (Neither host has rebooted in the last couple of weeks or so though)
[16:12] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, needed by haskell-persistable-record...
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, maybe something that has been uploaded into groovy fixed it then, maybe new gcc, new libc, new kernel...
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I already pinged ftpmasters...
[16:13] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: which itself doesn't look like it's tied to the current haskell mini-transitions, but rather triggers one of its own
[16:14] <vorlon> (but fortunately doesn't interact with any of the others in progress, so it's /safe/ to accept these without impacting libffi)
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> I think libffi and haskell can migrate together
[16:19] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Sure, could be
[16:20] <cjwatson> (Well, the kernel isn't from groovy AFAIK)
[16:20] <cjwatson> (Or at least not auto-upgraded)
[16:42] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, easy one, rawtran/i386 hint please?
[16:42] <LocutusOfBorg> (I'm trying to get cfitsio transition in)
[16:44] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done
[16:44] <LocutusOfBorg> please kick munipack out from groovy release, debian bug: #957572
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-constraint-compat [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-constraint-compat [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-constraint-compat [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-constraint-compat [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-bang-compat [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-constraint-compat [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-constraint-compat [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-constraint-compat [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-bang-compat [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-bang-compat [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-bang-compat [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-bang-compat [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-bang-compat [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0.1.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-bang-compat [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-bang-compat [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-bang-compat [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-bang-compat [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-bang-compat [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.0.1.0-1~build1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-settings-daemon (groovy-release/primary) [3.36.1-1ubuntu2]
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gnome-settings-daemon (groovy-release/primary) [3.36.1-1ubuntu2]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-settings-daemon [sync] (groovy-release) [3.36.1-1ubuntu2]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [sync] (groovy-release) [3.36.1-1ubuntu2]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.8 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dropwatch [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.5.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[18:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: munipack removed
[18:41] <vorlon> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-libffi.html taunts me
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-simplelog [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-2] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-width [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-3] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-width [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-3] (no packageset)
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-width [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-3] (no packageset)
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-width [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-3] (no packageset)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-simplelog [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.7.4-2]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-width [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-3]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-width [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-3]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-width [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-3]
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-width [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-3] (no packageset)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-width [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-3]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-width [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-3]
[19:07] <vorlon> node-xterm, that's just offensive
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-unicode-width [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-3] (no packageset)
[19:07] <vorlon> should be node-vt220
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-unicode-width [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.7-3]
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ledger-autosync [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ledger-autosync [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-116.117~16.04.1]
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar (focal-proposed/main) [0.19.3-1 => 0.19.3-1.1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:18] <mwhudson> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4153-deletedppa/+build/19595126 -> "took 3 days, 13 hours, 55 minutes, 29.6 seconds"
[20:18] <mwhudson> just another day and a half to go then
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dragonfly-reverb [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:22] <vorlon> Eickmeyer, teward: ^^ \o/
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dragonfly-reverb [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dragonfly-reverb [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dragonfly-reverb [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/none) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dragonfly-reverb [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dragonfly-reverb [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dragonfly-reverb [armhf] (groovy-proposed/none) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dragonfly-reverb [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dragonfly-reverb [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.25 => 1:20.04.26] (core)
[22:59] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: \o/