[00:50] <waltman> Hi! I was just poking around on your website and I think you might want to fix this: https://docs.lubuntu.net/lubuntu_installation_on_old_computers.html
[00:52] <krytarik> waltman: Well, except the Lubuntu team have no control over that site, and the official site is lubuntu.me instead.
[00:53] <waltman> I had a question I was looking for on your website, but I might as well ask while I'm here. I've got a friend with an old eee pc laptop. He's looking for a distro that still has 32-bit support. I was hoping lubuntu might, but it looks not.
[00:53] <waltman> krytarik: ah. Let me see how I got there...
[00:53] <waltman> It's linked off of https://lubuntu.net/downloads/
[00:54] <waltman> and I got there from https://duckduckgo.com/?t=canonical&q=lubuntu+x86&ia=web
 @waltman [<waltman> I had a question I was looking for on your website, but I might as wel …], 18.04 has a 32 bits iso
 @waltman [<waltman> It's linked off of https://lubuntu.net/downloads/], No oficial website there...
[00:55] <waltman> Thanks. That's the conclusion I came to as well.
[00:55] <waltman> Waht's the difference between lubuntu.net and lubuntu.me?
[00:55] <kc2bez> lubuntu.net isn't controlled by the Lubuntu team
[00:56] <kc2bez> lubuntu.me is official
[00:56] <kc2bez> It is in the topic here too.
[00:57] <waltman> you might to work on your SEO to get your links about the .net links on the search engines :)
[01:25] <guiverc> waltman, Canonical control ubuntu.com; if you want an official web site for any Ubuntu flavor you should use ubuntu.com, ie. https://ubuntu.com/download/flavours which will send you correct websites for each flavor
[01:30] <waltman> I just thought I was being nice and reporting what appears to be a serious bug on your website. I didn't mean to get involved in a turf war between you and canonical. :)
 watman, thanks, we are aware of the problem butt we can't do much about it.
 *waltman
[01:49] <guiverc> Our website is lubuntu.me, what bug on our website?
[01:49] <guiverc> waltman, ^
[01:51] <guiverc> (We can change much of ubuntu.com web pages, either directly or via request, but lubuntu.net is neither a Canonical, Ubuntu or Lubuntu website so beyond our control, what we've all tried to say)
 @kc2bez
 Thanks @N0um3n0
 :)
 ^ @guiverc you saw anything like this on any install? I haven't.
[17:43] <wxl> apparently power losses can cause the crc errors
[17:44] <wxl> the invalid extent is also a dis error of some kind
[17:44] <wxl> might need some fsck'ing… or a new drive
[17:53] <wxl> perhaps
 @A ¥ [Should i reinstall os], I doubt that helps much
[17:59] <wxl> run fsck from xubuntu
[18:03] <wxl> oh boy
[18:05] <wxl> no, it means you don't know how to use the command
[18:05] <wxl> i'm trying to find something less dangerous for you given that
[18:06] <wxl> i would not in general encourage you to blindly type in commands people give you
[18:07] <wxl> for example if i had you do `sudo rm -rf /` your whole installation would be deleted, but i might tell you it could help you
[18:09] <wxl> does `apt-cache policy gnome-disk-utility` show that you have it installed? if not, `sudo apt install gnome-disk-utility`. it should show up in your menu as "disks."
[18:10] <wxl> https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/disk-check.html.en
[19:32] <wxl> to be fair, so do all operating systems. it's just that with the major ones, most folks have been exposed to them so much it's hard not to know how to use them.
[19:56] <redji12> This is the place to ask about screengrab, right? I set the Print shortcut to run "screengrab -r" and screengrab to remain open in the systray, not allow multiple instances. But when I press Print for the second time, I get no printscreen and this errors in the .xsession-errors https://pastebin.com/raw/nx2rhB9f