| vorlon | ok who keeps trying to rebuild llvm-toolchain-8 on riscv64, ain't nobody need that | 00:16 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu30] | 00:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu30] | 00:16 | |
| === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 05:32 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | rbalint, your upload of glibc missed the fix for Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964141 | 07:07 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 964141 in libc6 "libc6: "cannot allocate memory in static TLS block" with some library combinations on arm64" [Normal,Fixed] | 07:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | why did 2ubuntu1 get removed? | 07:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in any case, we should upload a ubuntu12 with the patch soon... its preventing lots of opencv reverse dependencies from having autopkgtests work on arm64 | 07:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | e.g. autopkgtest for facedetect/0.1-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass | 07:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-esqueleto [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3.2-1] (no packageset) | 07:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.5 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.6] (desktop-core, xorg) | 07:39 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | haskell-esqueleto has a new "-doc" package, leaf package nothing to care about ^^ | 08:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sagemath (Debian bug: #963338) is a blocker for flint, as well as e-antic (Debian bug: #963290) vorlon can you please have a look? they entangle my transition... | 08:23 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 963338 in src:sagemath "sagemath: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Aborted" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/963338 | 08:23 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 963290 in src:e-antic "e-antic: FTBFS: ../e-antic/e-antic.h:24:2: error: #error FLINT 2.5.2 or 2.5.3 required" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/963290 | 08:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.29] | 08:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1023.23] (core, kernel) | 08:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23] | 09:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23] | 09:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1025.25] | 09:01 | |
| tjaalton | why do we still have wrongly versioned mate components on the focal queue? | 10:39 |
| tjaalton | -0ubuntu0 can't be right | 10:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caja-extensions [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected eom [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-applets [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-menus [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-sensors-applet [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-settings-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected engrampa [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-calc [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-notification-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-session-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected marco [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-power-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.2-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-media [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-terminal [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmatekbd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmateweather [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmatemixer [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.2-0ubuntu0] | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted im-config [source] (focal-proposed) [0.44-1ubuntu1.2] | 10:51 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: hello! We have a netplan FFe for someone to review and act on - I think I probably shouldn't be the one ACKing it as I have worked on some of those changes and obviously want it to go in | 11:30 |
| sil2100 | Laney: would you have a moment to take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1894197 ? | 11:30 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1894197 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Update to netplan.io 0.100" [Undecided,New] | 11:30 |
| sil2100 | It's got quite the number of changes, which is why we want it landed as soon as possible - we were unable to make it in time for FF | 11:30 |
| sil2100 | With my release team hat it's a +1, since netplan - even though risky - has an extensive unit test and integration test story, with every new feature fully covered by both (mostly thanks to slyon!) | 11:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 11:41 | |
| Laney | sil2100: sure, let me look after lunch (+ probably after rpi meeting) | 11:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.6] | 11:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.3] | 12:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9] | 12:17 | |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, yes, i know that, i'm preparing to land glibc 2.32 next week in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4017 | 12:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (focal-proposed/main) [9.3.0-10ubuntu2 => 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (focal-proposed/main) [10-20200411-0ubuntu1 => 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (focal-proposed) [9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04] | 13:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [sync] (focal-proposed) [10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04] | 13:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks rbalint please let me know as soon as you have something, it is blocking quite lots of things | 13:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | otherwise I can upload a glibc just with that patch... | 13:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or well, copy back in proposed the 2ubuntu1 version! | 13:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, do you plan a poppler merge= | 13:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ? | 13:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.10] | 13:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.10] | 13:48 | |
| tjaalton | mwhudson: hi, could you please add the sru information as requested on bug 1887638 | 13:48 |
| ubot5 | bug 1887638 in launchpad-buildd "Failure to build snap that runs pull-lp-source" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1887638 | 13:48 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, by have something you mean landing in groovy-proposed, or in bileto? | 14:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nova [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0~b2~git2020073014.2f3a380c3c-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:30 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | rbalint, groovy proposed | 14:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I can copy the binary that has been dropped | 14:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and your bileto publish will in any case superseed it | 14:41 |
| Laney | what's the point of that if it's not going to migrate? | 14:45 |
| Laney | tricking proposed-migration into releasing things by hacking the triggers is not good | 14:45 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, the binary copy will clog the test infra, the package in bileto looks good, let me pre-test 2.32 in bileto and land it early next week | 14:55 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, thank you for working hard, i know this is not ideal but triggering all the tests with a copied back glibc slows down the next planned glibc upload | 14:56 |
| Laney | to be fair, if there were test results from a previous run those should be found | 14:57 |
| Laney | like if it was copied and then deleted | 14:57 |
| rbalint | Laney, ah, this sounds better | 14:58 |
| Laney | still I don't like the motivations behind the request ;-) | 14:58 |
| rbalint | Laney, i'm ok with it, it won't migrate because cross-toolchain-base needs an update, but let me abstain then | 14:59 |
| Laney | rbalint: I think the idea is to hack the triggers of those failing things to make them migrate, but then they go in without the corresponding glibc | 15:00 |
| Laney | but I'm guessing a bit, so maybe LOB can put me at ease :-) | 15:01 |
| rbalint | Laney, well, if they pass, they are not buggy | 15:01 |
| Laney | it doesn't say anything about the state of what will be the release pocket | 15:01 |
| rbalint | Laney, this is true :-( | 15:02 |
| rbalint | Laney, i'm kind of getting satisfied enough with glibc 2.32 in the ppa so i could just test it in groovy-proposed instead of with bileto | 15:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I agree on your point | 15:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | to be honest, in my its quicker to copy back the glibc fixes rather than asking to force-hint-reset some tests :p | 15:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | your point is valid, and I fully agree. I was just proposing something quick to have at least the fix in proposed pocket, because the bug that makes test fail is not in the packages, but in glibc itself | 15:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, now lots of testsuites changed from fail to pass on arm64, and are shown as regression | 15:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | e.g. if you could hint facedetect on arm64, it would be so helpful | 15:07 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, they will be green again in a few days, don't worry | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sure, just I would like to make ilmbase migrate | 15:08 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, @poppler, yes, why? | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, just asking, as usual, I propose my help in fixing rdeps :) | 15:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we are back to two packages to have ilmbase, flint, opencv, flint-arb, cfitsio migration | 15:11 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, thx, probably next week, I don't want to risk delaying libffi with some more changes | 15:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ^^ sagemath, and probably copy vips from 8.9.2-1 to proposed pocket, the version 8.10.0 is regressing on arm64 and ppc64el also in Debain | 15:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, if you can have a look, it would be awesome | 15:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I opened a bug in Debian against vips/8.10.0 | 15:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnss-nis (groovy-proposed/primary) [3.1-0ubuntu1] | 15:15 | |
| doko | Laney, sil2100: autopkg tests don't seem to be triggered for https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html (yes, focal) | 15:17 |
| vorlon | doko: example? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#queue-huge-groovy-amd64 shows that there's a backlog on focal, for amd64/armhf/arm64 | 15:21 |
| vorlon | doko: and I do see tests in progress triggered by gcc-9, e.g., the most recent focal upload recorded by britney | 15:22 |
| doko | vorlon: well, the URL doesn't show anything triggered, like it's done for gcc-9 | 15:22 |
| vorlon | ah, gcc-10 is newer but shows no autopkgtests | 15:22 |
| vorlon | so is that the concern? | 15:22 |
| doko | yep | 15:22 |
| vorlon | should gcc-10 get autopkgtests triggered in focal, given that it has no reverse-dependencies? | 15:22 |
| doko | it has, all the runtime libs | 15:23 |
| vorlon | if re.match(r'gcc-\d$', src) or src == 'gcc-defaults': | 15:23 |
| doko | but I don't care that much, the test rebuild itself didn't show any regressions | 15:23 |
| vorlon | that regexp doesn't match -10 | 15:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnss-nisplus (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3-0ubuntu1] | 15:23 | |
| vorlon | doko: were you noticing this problem also for gcc-10 in groovy? | 15:24 |
| vorlon | because it looks to me it should've been the same | 15:25 |
| doko | vorlon: I'll tell you once the arm64 is done ;p | 15:25 |
| vorlon | right | 15:25 |
| rbalint | vorlon, Laney could you please check the libnss-* packages in NEW? (for next glibc) | 15:26 |
| doko | rbalint: is this new source, or splitted out from glibc? | 15:27 |
| rbalint | doko, i'd say forked | 15:29 |
| rbalint | doko, some time ago | 15:29 |
| rbalint | doko, they will also need MIR next week | 15:30 |
| doko | ok, looking ... | 15:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-esqueleto [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3.2-1] | 15:34 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: when 2 out of 6 reverse-dependencies of a library aren't ready to go, I question whether it's in the best interest of the users to take that transition yet (flint) | 15:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dropwatch [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.5.3-1build1] | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nova [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:22.0.0~b2~git2020073014.2f3a380c3c-0ubuntu2] | 15:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted microcode-initrd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1] | 15:35 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, only sagemath | 15:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | e-antic is fixed | 15:35 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: e-antics? and sagemath has sagetex as a revdep | 15:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I fixed e-antic some minutes ago | 15:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sagemath FWIW I can upload with no testsuite waiting for debian fixes :p | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that package fails testsuite each months or so | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | -$(call run_tests_with_retry,arch,$(SAGE_TEST_FLAGS_ARCH) src/sage,350) | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | +$(call run_tests_with_retry,arch,$(SAGE_TEST_FLAGS_ARCH) src/sage,200) | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ehi, less that 350 failures is good :D | 15:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is how sagemath works, meh! | 15:37 |
| doko | rbalint: why MIR, does glibc has runtime deps on those? | 15:38 |
| vorlon | rolling back vips to unblock cfitsio transition | 15:39 |
| rbalint | doko, yes, will have | 15:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks vorlon if you want please reference debian bug #969538 | 15:39 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 969538 in src:vips "vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/969538 | 15:39 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: it's a temporary rollback so I didn't bother :) | 15:40 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: ok, if it's just sagemath+sagetex now, I'll have a look | 15:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | no problem thanks for rolling it back | 15:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | please hint facedetect on arm64, it fails because of glibc discussed above | 15:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | TLS block, something that was fixed in glibc 2ubuntu1, but it has been deleted because of something buggy | 15:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnss-nis [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.1-0ubuntu1] | 15:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnss-nisplus [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3-0ubuntu1] | 15:42 | |
| vorlon | sagemath removed | 15:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 15:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I triggered ruby-image-science autopkgtest against itself, lets see | 15:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seems the *last* blocker | 15:43 |
| vorlon | facedetect hinted | 15:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but please let opencv migrate, it is needed for the transition, even if not directly spot by britney! | 15:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 15:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (without opencv rebuild, some syum | 15:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | *symbos mismatches between c++11 and c++14 were making half of ilmbase rebuilds fail to link) | 15:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, opencv has to migrate | 15:44 |
| doko | rbalint: both ftbfs with uninstallability issues | 15:46 |
| doko | and I'll add those plus libnsl to the i386 bootstrap | 15:48 |
| rbalint | doko, yes, they will build when glibc 2.32 lands | 15:51 |
| rbalint | doko, i'm tidying up glibc in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4017/+packages, they build there | 15:52 |
| doko | rbalint: please re-upload libnsl, and libnss-nis* to pick up the i386 build records | 15:56 |
| rbalint | doko, do i need to reupload libnss* which did not build? | 16:06 |
| rbalint | doko, libc6-dev will also depend on rpcsvc-proto in case you would like to add that, too | 16:07 |
| doko | rbalint: yes, to create the build record | 16:12 |
| doko | rbalint: I can't add it yet, because it's not yet in the archive | 16:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnsl to i386-whitelist in groovy | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnss-nis to i386-whitelist in groovy | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnss-nisplus to i386-whitelist in groovy | 16:16 | |
| Laney | doko: rbalint: for future reference, it doesn't need a re-upload, you can use copy-package to copy it back over itself to make the build record be created | 16:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1024.24] (core, kernel) | 16:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.4] (no packageset) | 16:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1052.56] (kernel) | 16:40 | |
| rbalint | Laney, thanks, will keep that in mind | 16:45 |
| Laney | np! | 16:45 |
| doko | Laney: I don't like that, because then you probably have very different b-d's on one architecture depending on the age of the package | 16:58 |
| rbalint | doko, could you please review the glibc changes at https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+git/glibc/+ref/ubuntu/devel or in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4017 ? | 16:59 |
| rbalint | doko, systemd and a few other autopkgtests passed so i'm comfortable uploading it to groovy-proposed rather than doing the first round of testing in the ppa | 17:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24] | 17:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.4] | 17:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1052.56] | 17:06 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, migrated :D | 17:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (flint) | 17:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libtirpc to i386-whitelist in groovy | 17:16 | |
| doko | rbalint: it looks ok'ish, but I can't install the -dev package because of the missing rpcscv-proto package. plus I don't see why you dropped the math-vector-fortran.h change. I can't see how this is picked up by gfortran. some paste in private message | 17:27 |
| bdmurray | Is there a way to help stunnel4 migrate? For i386 it grew a Build-Depends on ncat which doesn't exist for i386. | 18:54 |
| rafaeldtinoco | I need a FFe for LP: #1894325 (fence-agents), its not a long-to-review one and I'll be the one maintaining it. It adds fence agents to IBM z LPARs and aws, and fixes issues in fence_aws and fence_azure_arm agents (we need them all, and even backport some of them as SRUs later). | 19:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1894325 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Fence Agents should be upgraded to v4.6.0 in Groovy" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894325 | 19:25 |
| rafaeldtinoco | if someone can address it ^. Thanks a lot | 19:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1094.104] (no packageset) | 20:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1082.93] (no packageset) | 20:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1094.104] | 20:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1082.93] | 20:22 | |
| === falcojr3 is now known as falcojr | ||
| vorlon | bdmurray: well we could bring nmap/ncat back on i386, but the justification for the maintainer switching stunnel4 to ncat is lame; it's a build-dependency, who cares about special features, packages should just use the default netcat implementation unless they have special requirements | 20:45 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: (our default netcat implementation is netcat-openbsd) | 20:46 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: why do we care if stunnel4 is availalbe for i386 though? | 20:49 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: because unfortunately it's a build-dependency of curl | 20:50 |
| vorlon | and the stunnel4 change looks per se wrong to me, so I want to just revert i | 20:50 |
| bdmurray | ah, that explains things | 20:50 |
| vorlon | t | 20:50 |
| bdmurray | yeah, if stunnel4 isn't using the features who cares | 20:51 |
| vorlon | fwiw https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.groovy/i386+build-depends contains the answers to such questions | 20:51 |
| bdmurray | that's helpful too, thanks | 21:02 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: lomiri-download-manager has a build-dep on libnih-dbus-dev, so I guess the package should be blacklisted? | 21:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, copy-vips-back? | 21:46 |
| * LocutusOfBorg tries it | 21:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haveged (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-6 => 1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 22:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haveged (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1 => 1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kubuntu) | 22:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!