[00:16] <vorlon> ok who keeps trying to rebuild llvm-toolchain-8 on riscv64, ain't nobody need that
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu30]
[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu30]
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:07] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, your upload of glibc missed the fix for Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964141
[07:07] <LocutusOfBorg> why did 2ubuntu1 get removed?
[07:08] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case, we should upload a ubuntu12 with the patch soon... its preventing lots of opencv reverse dependencies from having autopkgtests work on arm64
[07:08] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. autopkgtest for facedetect/0.1-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-esqueleto [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3.2-1] (no packageset)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.5 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.6] (desktop-core, xorg)
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> haskell-esqueleto has a new "-doc" package, leaf package nothing to care about ^^
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg> sagemath (Debian bug: #963338) is a blocker for flint, as well as e-antic (Debian bug: #963290) vorlon can you please have a look? they entangle my transition...
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.29]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1023.23] (core, kernel)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23]
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1025.25]
[10:39] <tjaalton> why do we still have wrongly versioned mate components on the focal queue?
[10:39] <tjaalton> -0ubuntu0 can't be right
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caja-extensions [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected eom [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-applets [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-menus [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-sensors-applet [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-settings-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected engrampa [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-calc [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-notification-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-session-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected marco [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-power-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.2-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-media [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-terminal [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmatekbd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmateweather [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmatemixer [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.2-0ubuntu0]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted im-config [source] (focal-proposed) [0.44-1ubuntu1.2]
[11:30] <sil2100> Laney: hello! We have a netplan FFe for someone to review and act on - I think I probably shouldn't be the one ACKing it as I have worked on some of those changes and obviously want it to go in
[11:30] <sil2100> Laney: would you have a moment to take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1894197 ?
[11:30] <sil2100> It's got quite the number of changes, which is why we want it landed as soon as possible - we were unable to make it in time for FF
[11:31] <sil2100> With my release team hat it's a +1, since netplan - even though risky - has an extensive unit test and integration test story, with every new feature fully covered by both (mostly thanks to slyon!)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[11:42] <Laney> sil2100: sure, let me look after lunch (+ probably after rpi meeting)
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.6]
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.3]
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9]
[12:52] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, yes, i know that, i'm preparing to land glibc 2.32 next week in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4017
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (focal-proposed/main) [9.3.0-10ubuntu2 => 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (focal-proposed/main) [10-20200411-0ubuntu1 => 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (focal-proposed) [9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [sync] (focal-proposed) [10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04]
[13:32] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks rbalint please let me know as soon as you have something, it is blocking quite lots of things
[13:32] <LocutusOfBorg> otherwise I can upload a glibc just with that patch...
[13:33] <LocutusOfBorg> or well, copy back in proposed the 2ubuntu1 version!
[13:35] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, do you plan a poppler merge=
[13:35] <LocutusOfBorg> ?
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.10]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.10]
[13:48] <tjaalton> mwhudson: hi, could you please add the sru information as requested on bug 1887638
[14:28] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, by have something you mean landing in groovy-proposed, or in bileto?
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nova [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0~b2~git2020073014.2f3a380c3c-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg> rbalint, groovy proposed
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg> I can copy the binary that has been dropped
[14:41] <LocutusOfBorg> and your bileto publish will in any case superseed it
[14:45] <Laney> what's the point of that if it's not going to migrate?
[14:45] <Laney> tricking proposed-migration into releasing things by hacking the triggers is not good
[14:55] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, the binary copy will clog the test infra, the package in bileto looks good, let me pre-test 2.32 in bileto and land it early next week
[14:56] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, thank you for working hard, i know this is not ideal but triggering all the tests with a copied back glibc slows down the next planned glibc upload
[14:57] <Laney> to be fair, if there were test results from a previous run those should be found
[14:57] <Laney> like if it was copied and then deleted
[14:58] <rbalint> Laney, ah, this sounds better
[14:58] <Laney> still I don't like the motivations behind the request ;-)
[14:59] <rbalint> Laney, i'm ok with it, it won't migrate because cross-toolchain-base needs an update, but let me abstain then
[15:00] <Laney> rbalint: I think the idea is to hack the triggers of those failing things to make them migrate, but then they go in without the corresponding glibc
[15:01] <Laney> but I'm guessing a bit, so maybe LOB can put me at ease :-)
[15:01] <rbalint> Laney, well, if they pass, they are not buggy
[15:01] <Laney> it doesn't say anything about the state of what will be the release pocket
[15:02] <rbalint> Laney, this is true :-(
[15:04] <rbalint> Laney, i'm kind of getting satisfied enough with glibc 2.32 in the ppa so i could just test it in groovy-proposed instead of with bileto
[15:04] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I agree on your point
[15:05] <LocutusOfBorg> to be honest, in my its quicker to copy back the glibc fixes rather than asking to force-hint-reset some tests :p
[15:06] <LocutusOfBorg> your point is valid, and I fully agree. I was just proposing something quick to have at least the fix in proposed pocket, because the bug that makes test fail is not in the packages, but in glibc itself
[15:06] <LocutusOfBorg> so, now lots of testsuites changed from fail to pass on arm64, and are shown as regression
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. if you could hint facedetect on arm64, it would be so helpful
[15:07] <rbalint> LocutusOfBorg, they will be green again in a few days, don't worry
[15:08] <LocutusOfBorg> sure, just I would like to make ilmbase migrate
[15:09] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, @poppler, yes, why?
[15:10] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, just asking, as usual, I propose my help in fixing rdeps :)
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> we are back to two packages to have ilmbase, flint, opencv, flint-arb, cfitsio migration
[15:11] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, thx, probably next week, I don't want to risk delaying libffi with some more changes
[15:12] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ sagemath, and probably copy vips from 8.9.2-1 to proposed pocket, the version 8.10.0 is regressing on arm64 and ppc64el also in Debain
[15:12] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, if you can have a look, it would be awesome
[15:14] <LocutusOfBorg> I opened a bug in Debian against vips/8.10.0
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnss-nis (groovy-proposed/primary) [3.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:17] <doko> Laney, sil2100: autopkg tests don't seem to be triggered for https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html (yes, focal)
[15:21] <vorlon> doko: example? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#queue-huge-groovy-amd64 shows that there's a backlog on focal, for amd64/armhf/arm64
[15:22] <vorlon> doko: and I do see tests in progress triggered by gcc-9, e.g., the most recent focal upload recorded by britney
[15:22] <doko> vorlon: well, the URL doesn't show anything triggered, like it's done for gcc-9
[15:22] <vorlon> ah, gcc-10 is newer but shows no autopkgtests
[15:22] <vorlon> so is that the concern?
[15:22] <doko> yep
[15:22] <vorlon> should gcc-10 get autopkgtests triggered in focal, given that it has no reverse-dependencies?
[15:23] <doko> it has, all the runtime libs
[15:23] <vorlon>             if re.match(r'gcc-\d$', src) or src == 'gcc-defaults':
[15:23] <doko> but I don't care that much, the test rebuild itself didn't show any regressions
[15:23] <vorlon> that regexp doesn't match -10
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnss-nisplus (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3-0ubuntu1]
[15:24] <vorlon> doko: were you noticing this problem also for gcc-10 in groovy?
[15:25] <vorlon> because it looks to me it should've been the same
[15:25] <doko> vorlon: I'll tell you once the arm64 is done ;p
[15:25] <vorlon> right
[15:26] <rbalint> vorlon, Laney could you please check the libnss-* packages in NEW? (for next glibc)
[15:27] <doko> rbalint: is this new source, or splitted out from glibc?
[15:29] <rbalint> doko, i'd say forked
[15:29] <rbalint> doko, some time ago
[15:30] <rbalint> doko, they will also need MIR next week
[15:30] <doko> ok, looking ...
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-esqueleto [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3.2-1]
[15:34] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: when 2 out of 6 reverse-dependencies of a library aren't ready to go, I question whether it's in the best interest of the users to take that transition yet (flint)
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dropwatch [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.5.3-1build1]
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nova [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:22.0.0~b2~git2020073014.2f3a380c3c-0ubuntu2]
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted microcode-initrd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1]
[15:35] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, only sagemath
[15:35] <LocutusOfBorg> e-antic is fixed
[15:35] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: e-antics? and sagemath has sagetex as a revdep
[15:35] <LocutusOfBorg> I fixed e-antic some minutes ago
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> sagemath FWIW I can upload with no testsuite waiting for debian fixes :p
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> that package fails testsuite each months or so
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> -	$(call run_tests_with_retry,arch,$(SAGE_TEST_FLAGS_ARCH) src/sage,350)
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> +	$(call run_tests_with_retry,arch,$(SAGE_TEST_FLAGS_ARCH) src/sage,200)
[15:37] <LocutusOfBorg> ehi, less that 350 failures is good :D
[15:37] <LocutusOfBorg> this is how sagemath works, meh!
[15:38] <doko> rbalint: why MIR, does glibc has runtime deps on those?
[15:39] <vorlon> rolling back vips to unblock cfitsio transition
[15:39] <rbalint> doko, yes, will have
[15:39] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon if you want please reference debian bug #969538
[15:40] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: it's a temporary rollback so I didn't bother :)
[15:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok, if it's just sagemath+sagetex now, I'll have a look
[15:41] <LocutusOfBorg> no problem thanks for rolling it back
[15:41] <LocutusOfBorg> please hint facedetect on arm64, it fails because of glibc discussed above
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> TLS block, something that was fixed in glibc 2ubuntu1, but it has been deleted because of something buggy
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnss-nis [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.1-0ubuntu1]
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnss-nisplus [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3-0ubuntu1]
[15:42] <vorlon> sagemath removed
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[15:43] <LocutusOfBorg> I triggered ruby-image-science autopkgtest against itself, lets see
[15:43] <LocutusOfBorg> seems the *last* blocker
[15:43] <vorlon> facedetect hinted
[15:43] <LocutusOfBorg> but please let opencv migrate, it is needed for the transition, even if not directly spot by britney!
[15:43] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[15:43] <LocutusOfBorg> (without opencv rebuild, some syum
[15:44] <LocutusOfBorg> *symbos mismatches between c++11 and c++14 were making half of ilmbase rebuilds fail to link)
[15:44] <LocutusOfBorg> so, opencv has to migrate
[15:46] <doko> rbalint: both ftbfs with uninstallability issues
[15:48] <doko> and I'll add those plus libnsl to the i386 bootstrap
[15:51] <rbalint> doko, yes, they will build when glibc 2.32 lands
[15:52] <rbalint> doko, i'm tidying up glibc in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4017/+packages, they build there
[15:56] <doko> rbalint: please re-upload libnsl, and libnss-nis* to pick up the i386 build records
[16:06] <rbalint> doko, do i need to reupload libnss* which did not build?
[16:07] <rbalint> doko, libc6-dev will also depend on rpcsvc-proto in case you would like to add that, too
[16:12] <doko> rbalint: yes, to create the build record
[16:13] <doko> rbalint: I can't add it yet, because it's not yet in the archive
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnsl to i386-whitelist in groovy
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnss-nis to i386-whitelist in groovy
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnss-nisplus to i386-whitelist in groovy
[16:38] <Laney> doko: rbalint: for future reference, it doesn't need a re-upload, you can use copy-package to copy it back over itself to make the build record be created
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1024.24] (core, kernel)
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.4] (no packageset)
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1052.56] (kernel)
[16:45] <rbalint> Laney, thanks, will keep that in mind
[16:45] <Laney> np!
[16:58] <doko> Laney: I don't like that, because then you probably have very different b-d's on one architecture depending on the age of the package
[16:59] <rbalint> doko, could you please review the glibc changes at https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+git/glibc/+ref/ubuntu/devel or in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4017 ?
[17:00] <rbalint> doko, systemd and a few other autopkgtests passed so i'm comfortable uploading it to groovy-proposed rather than doing the first round of testing in the ppa
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.4]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1052.56]
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, migrated :D
[17:11] <LocutusOfBorg> (flint)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libtirpc to i386-whitelist in groovy
[17:27] <doko> rbalint: it looks ok'ish, but I can't install the -dev package because of the missing rpcscv-proto package. plus I don't see why you dropped the math-vector-fortran.h change. I can't see how this is picked up by gfortran. some paste in private message
[18:54] <bdmurray> Is there a way to help stunnel4 migrate? For i386 it grew a Build-Depends on ncat which doesn't exist for i386.
[19:25] <rafaeldtinoco> I need a FFe for LP: #1894325 (fence-agents), its not a long-to-review one and I'll be the one maintaining it. It adds fence agents to IBM z LPARs and aws, and fixes issues in fence_aws and fence_azure_arm agents (we need them all, and even backport some of them as SRUs later).
[19:25] <rafaeldtinoco> if someone can address it ^. Thanks a lot
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1094.104] (no packageset)
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1082.93] (no packageset)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1094.104]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1082.93]
[20:45] <vorlon> bdmurray: well we could bring nmap/ncat back on i386, but the justification for the maintainer switching stunnel4 to ncat is lame; it's a build-dependency, who cares about special features, packages should just use the default netcat implementation unless they have special requirements
[20:46] <vorlon> bdmurray: (our default netcat implementation is netcat-openbsd)
[20:49] <bdmurray> vorlon: why do we care if stunnel4 is availalbe for i386 though?
[20:50] <vorlon> bdmurray: because unfortunately it's a build-dependency of curl
[20:50] <vorlon> and the stunnel4 change looks per se wrong to me, so I want to just revert i
[20:50] <bdmurray> ah, that explains things
[20:50] <vorlon> t
[20:51] <bdmurray> yeah, if stunnel4 isn't using the features who cares
[20:51] <vorlon> fwiw https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.groovy/i386+build-depends contains the answers to such questions
[21:02] <bdmurray> that's helpful too, thanks
[21:24] <bdmurray> vorlon: lomiri-download-manager has a build-dep on libnih-dbus-dev, so I guess the package should be blacklisted?
[21:46] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, copy-vips-back?
[21:49]  * LocutusOfBorg tries it
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haveged (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-6 => 1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haveged (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1 => 1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kubuntu)