[00:16] ok who keeps trying to rebuild llvm-toolchain-8 on riscv64, ain't nobody need that [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu30] [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu30] === s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 [05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt) [07:07] rbalint, your upload of glibc missed the fix for Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964141 [07:07] Debian bug 964141 in libc6 "libc6: "cannot allocate memory in static TLS block" with some library combinations on arm64" [Normal,Fixed] [07:07] why did 2ubuntu1 get removed? [07:08] in any case, we should upload a ubuntu12 with the patch soon... its preventing lots of opencv reverse dependencies from having autopkgtests work on arm64 [07:08] e.g. autopkgtest for facedetect/0.1-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass [07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-esqueleto [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3.2-1] (no packageset) [07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.5 => 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu4.6] (desktop-core, xorg) [08:21] haskell-esqueleto has a new "-doc" package, leaf package nothing to care about ^^ [08:23] sagemath (Debian bug: #963338) is a blocker for flint, as well as e-antic (Debian bug: #963290) vorlon can you please have a look? they entangle my transition... [08:23] Debian bug 963338 in src:sagemath "sagemath: FTBFS: RuntimeError: Aborted" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/963338 [08:23] Debian bug 963290 in src:e-antic "e-antic: FTBFS: ../e-antic/e-antic.h:24:2: error: #error FLINT 2.5.2 or 2.5.3 required" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/963290 [08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.29] [08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1023.23] (core, kernel) [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23] [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23] [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1025.25] [10:39] why do we still have wrongly versioned mate components on the focal queue? [10:39] -0ubuntu0 can't be right [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caja-extensions [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected eom [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-applets [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-menus [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-panel [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-sensors-applet [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-settings-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected engrampa [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-calc [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-notification-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-session-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected marco [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-power-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.2-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-media [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-terminal [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmatekbd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmateweather [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-desktop [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmatemixer [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu0] [10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-common [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.2-0ubuntu0] [10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted im-config [source] (focal-proposed) [0.44-1ubuntu1.2] [11:30] Laney: hello! We have a netplan FFe for someone to review and act on - I think I probably shouldn't be the one ACKing it as I have worked on some of those changes and obviously want it to go in [11:30] Laney: would you have a moment to take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1894197 ? [11:30] Ubuntu bug 1894197 in netplan.io (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Update to netplan.io 0.100" [Undecided,New] [11:30] It's got quite the number of changes, which is why we want it landed as soon as possible - we were unable to make it in time for FF [11:31] With my release team hat it's a +1, since netplan - even though risky - has an extensive unit test and integration test story, with every new feature fully covered by both (mostly thanks to slyon!) [11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [11:42] sil2100: sure, let me look after lunch (+ probably after rpi meeting) [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.6] [12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.136ubuntu6.3] [12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9] [12:52] LocutusOfBorg, yes, i know that, i'm preparing to land glibc 2.32 next week in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4017 [12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (focal-proposed/main) [9.3.0-10ubuntu2 => 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-10 (focal-proposed/main) [10-20200411-0ubuntu1 => 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [sync] (focal-proposed) [9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04] [13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-10 [sync] (focal-proposed) [10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04] [13:32] thanks rbalint please let me know as soon as you have something, it is blocking quite lots of things [13:32] otherwise I can upload a glibc just with that patch... [13:33] or well, copy back in proposed the 2ubuntu1 version! [13:35] seb128, do you plan a poppler merge= [13:35] ? [13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.10] [13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.10] [13:48] mwhudson: hi, could you please add the sru information as requested on bug 1887638 [13:48] bug 1887638 in launchpad-buildd "Failure to build snap that runs pull-lp-source" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1887638 [14:28] LocutusOfBorg, by have something you mean landing in groovy-proposed, or in bileto? [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nova [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0~b2~git2020073014.2f3a380c3c-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [14:41] rbalint, groovy proposed [14:41] I can copy the binary that has been dropped [14:41] and your bileto publish will in any case superseed it [14:45] what's the point of that if it's not going to migrate? [14:45] tricking proposed-migration into releasing things by hacking the triggers is not good [14:55] LocutusOfBorg, the binary copy will clog the test infra, the package in bileto looks good, let me pre-test 2.32 in bileto and land it early next week [14:56] LocutusOfBorg, thank you for working hard, i know this is not ideal but triggering all the tests with a copied back glibc slows down the next planned glibc upload [14:57] to be fair, if there were test results from a previous run those should be found [14:57] like if it was copied and then deleted [14:58] Laney, ah, this sounds better [14:58] still I don't like the motivations behind the request ;-) [14:59] Laney, i'm ok with it, it won't migrate because cross-toolchain-base needs an update, but let me abstain then [15:00] rbalint: I think the idea is to hack the triggers of those failing things to make them migrate, but then they go in without the corresponding glibc [15:01] but I'm guessing a bit, so maybe LOB can put me at ease :-) [15:01] Laney, well, if they pass, they are not buggy [15:01] it doesn't say anything about the state of what will be the release pocket [15:02] Laney, this is true :-( [15:04] Laney, i'm kind of getting satisfied enough with glibc 2.32 in the ppa so i could just test it in groovy-proposed instead of with bileto [15:04] Laney, I agree on your point [15:05] to be honest, in my its quicker to copy back the glibc fixes rather than asking to force-hint-reset some tests :p [15:06] your point is valid, and I fully agree. I was just proposing something quick to have at least the fix in proposed pocket, because the bug that makes test fail is not in the packages, but in glibc itself [15:06] so, now lots of testsuites changed from fail to pass on arm64, and are shown as regression [15:07] e.g. if you could hint facedetect on arm64, it would be so helpful [15:07] LocutusOfBorg, they will be green again in a few days, don't worry [15:08] sure, just I would like to make ilmbase migrate [15:09] LocutusOfBorg, @poppler, yes, why? [15:10] seb128, just asking, as usual, I propose my help in fixing rdeps :) [15:11] we are back to two packages to have ilmbase, flint, opencv, flint-arb, cfitsio migration [15:11] LocutusOfBorg, thx, probably next week, I don't want to risk delaying libffi with some more changes [15:12] ^^ sagemath, and probably copy vips from 8.9.2-1 to proposed pocket, the version 8.10.0 is regressing on arm64 and ppc64el also in Debain [15:12] vorlon, if you can have a look, it would be awesome [15:14] I opened a bug in Debian against vips/8.10.0 [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnss-nis (groovy-proposed/primary) [3.1-0ubuntu1] [15:17] Laney, sil2100: autopkg tests don't seem to be triggered for https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html (yes, focal) [15:21] doko: example? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#queue-huge-groovy-amd64 shows that there's a backlog on focal, for amd64/armhf/arm64 [15:22] doko: and I do see tests in progress triggered by gcc-9, e.g., the most recent focal upload recorded by britney [15:22] vorlon: well, the URL doesn't show anything triggered, like it's done for gcc-9 [15:22] ah, gcc-10 is newer but shows no autopkgtests [15:22] so is that the concern? [15:22] yep [15:22] should gcc-10 get autopkgtests triggered in focal, given that it has no reverse-dependencies? [15:23] it has, all the runtime libs [15:23] if re.match(r'gcc-\d$', src) or src == 'gcc-defaults': [15:23] but I don't care that much, the test rebuild itself didn't show any regressions [15:23] that regexp doesn't match -10 [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libnss-nisplus (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.3-0ubuntu1] [15:24] doko: were you noticing this problem also for gcc-10 in groovy? [15:25] because it looks to me it should've been the same [15:25] vorlon: I'll tell you once the arm64 is done ;p [15:25] right [15:26] vorlon, Laney could you please check the libnss-* packages in NEW? (for next glibc) [15:27] rbalint: is this new source, or splitted out from glibc? [15:29] doko, i'd say forked [15:29] doko, some time ago [15:30] doko, they will also need MIR next week [15:30] ok, looking ... [15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-esqueleto [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3.2-1] [15:34] LocutusOfBorg: when 2 out of 6 reverse-dependencies of a library aren't ready to go, I question whether it's in the best interest of the users to take that transition yet (flint) [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dropwatch [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [1.5.3-1build1] [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nova [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2:22.0.0~b2~git2020073014.2f3a380c3c-0ubuntu2] [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted microcode-initrd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1] [15:35] vorlon, only sagemath [15:35] e-antic is fixed [15:35] LocutusOfBorg: e-antics? and sagemath has sagetex as a revdep [15:35] I fixed e-antic some minutes ago [15:36] sagemath FWIW I can upload with no testsuite waiting for debian fixes :p [15:36] that package fails testsuite each months or so [15:36] - $(call run_tests_with_retry,arch,$(SAGE_TEST_FLAGS_ARCH) src/sage,350) [15:36] + $(call run_tests_with_retry,arch,$(SAGE_TEST_FLAGS_ARCH) src/sage,200) [15:37] ehi, less that 350 failures is good :D [15:37] this is how sagemath works, meh! [15:38] rbalint: why MIR, does glibc has runtime deps on those? [15:39] rolling back vips to unblock cfitsio transition [15:39] doko, yes, will have [15:39] thanks vorlon if you want please reference debian bug #969538 [15:39] Debian bug 969538 in src:vips "vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/969538 [15:40] LocutusOfBorg: it's a temporary rollback so I didn't bother :) [15:41] LocutusOfBorg: ok, if it's just sagemath+sagetex now, I'll have a look [15:41] no problem thanks for rolling it back [15:41] please hint facedetect on arm64, it fails because of glibc discussed above [15:42] TLS block, something that was fixed in glibc 2ubuntu1, but it has been deleted because of something buggy [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnss-nis [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.1-0ubuntu1] [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libnss-nisplus [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3-0ubuntu1] [15:42] sagemath removed [15:42] thanks! [15:43] I triggered ruby-image-science autopkgtest against itself, lets see [15:43] seems the *last* blocker [15:43] facedetect hinted [15:43] but please let opencv migrate, it is needed for the transition, even if not directly spot by britney! [15:43] thanks! [15:43] (without opencv rebuild, some syum [15:44] *symbos mismatches between c++11 and c++14 were making half of ilmbase rebuilds fail to link) [15:44] so, opencv has to migrate [15:46] rbalint: both ftbfs with uninstallability issues [15:48] and I'll add those plus libnsl to the i386 bootstrap [15:51] doko, yes, they will build when glibc 2.32 lands [15:52] doko, i'm tidying up glibc in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4017/+packages, they build there [15:56] rbalint: please re-upload libnsl, and libnss-nis* to pick up the i386 build records [16:06] doko, do i need to reupload libnss* which did not build? [16:07] doko, libc6-dev will also depend on rpcsvc-proto in case you would like to add that, too [16:12] rbalint: yes, to create the build record [16:13] rbalint: I can't add it yet, because it's not yet in the archive [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnsl to i386-whitelist in groovy [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnss-nis to i386-whitelist in groovy [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnss-nisplus to i386-whitelist in groovy [16:38] doko: rbalint: for future reference, it doesn't need a re-upload, you can use copy-package to copy it back over itself to make the build record be created [16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1024.24] (core, kernel) [16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1002.4] (no packageset) [16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1052.56] (kernel) [16:45] Laney, thanks, will keep that in mind [16:45] np! [16:58] Laney: I don't like that, because then you probably have very different b-d's on one architecture depending on the age of the package [16:59] doko, could you please review the glibc changes at https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+git/glibc/+ref/ubuntu/devel or in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4017 ? [17:00] doko, systemd and a few other autopkgtests passed so i'm comfortable uploading it to groovy-proposed rather than doing the first round of testing in the ppa [17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24] [17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1002.4] [17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1052.56] [17:10] vorlon, migrated :D [17:11] (flint) [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libtirpc to i386-whitelist in groovy [17:27] rbalint: it looks ok'ish, but I can't install the -dev package because of the missing rpcscv-proto package. plus I don't see why you dropped the math-vector-fortran.h change. I can't see how this is picked up by gfortran. some paste in private message [18:54] Is there a way to help stunnel4 migrate? For i386 it grew a Build-Depends on ncat which doesn't exist for i386. [19:25] I need a FFe for LP: #1894325 (fence-agents), its not a long-to-review one and I'll be the one maintaining it. It adds fence agents to IBM z LPARs and aws, and fixes issues in fence_aws and fence_azure_arm agents (we need them all, and even backport some of them as SRUs later). [19:25] Launchpad bug 1894325 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Fence Agents should be upgraded to v4.6.0 in Groovy" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894325 [19:25] if someone can address it ^. Thanks a lot [20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1094.104] (no packageset) [20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1082.93] (no packageset) [20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1094.104] [20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1082.93] === falcojr3 is now known as falcojr [20:45] bdmurray: well we could bring nmap/ncat back on i386, but the justification for the maintainer switching stunnel4 to ncat is lame; it's a build-dependency, who cares about special features, packages should just use the default netcat implementation unless they have special requirements [20:46] bdmurray: (our default netcat implementation is netcat-openbsd) [20:49] vorlon: why do we care if stunnel4 is availalbe for i386 though? [20:50] bdmurray: because unfortunately it's a build-dependency of curl [20:50] and the stunnel4 change looks per se wrong to me, so I want to just revert i [20:50] ah, that explains things [20:50] t [20:51] yeah, if stunnel4 isn't using the features who cares [20:51] fwiw https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.groovy/i386+build-depends contains the answers to such questions [21:02] that's helpful too, thanks [21:24] vorlon: lomiri-download-manager has a build-dep on libnih-dbus-dev, so I guess the package should be blacklisted? [21:46] vorlon, copy-vips-back? [21:49] * LocutusOfBorg tries it [22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haveged (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-6 => 1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) [22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haveged (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1 => 1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kubuntu)