[00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added rpcsvc-proto to i386-whitelist in groovy
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (focal-backports) [227-1~ubuntu20.04.1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1023.23]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24]
[07:18] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon :D
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-js-dgtable (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.5.2-1]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-shake (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.19.1-1]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: hasktags (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.71.2-2]
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1047.48] (kernel)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1024.24~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1047.48]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24~18.04.1]
[13:01] <RikMills> vorlon: could you please remove kio-extras from proposed? LocutusOfB0rg will need to rebuild the current release pocket version for openexr transition
[13:06] <LocutusOfBorg> the transition is in bileto only tbh :) I still would like to see how far it goes before asking an ffe
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1024.24~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1068.73] (no packageset)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1053.57~16.04.1] (kernel)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1036.38] (no packageset)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1083.94~16.04.1] (kernel)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1095.105~16.04.1] (kernel)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:32] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, question for you sorry but I don't remember where to find it by myself... you remember the day when all the riscv64 stuff suddenly become "building fine"... I discovered that riscv64 might be building with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck... is it true?
[16:42] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: if that's so, it was changed in dpkg rather than in LP, so you should be able to look that up
[16:42] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/1.20.5ubuntu2 - I don't remember how that correlates with the date in question
[16:43] <tjaalton> yes, see the thread on ubuntu-devel@
[16:43] <tjaalton> "bileto and riscv64"
[16:55] <LocutusOfBorg> oh thanks!
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1024.24~18.04.1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1068.73]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1036.38]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-47.51~18.04.1]
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1095.105~16.04.1]
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1053.57~16.04.1]
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1083.94~16.04.1]
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio)
[18:13] <Eickmeyer> ^ SRU bug 1873944
[18:13] <ubot5> bug 1873944 in rapid-photo-downloader (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Upgrade rapid-photo-downloader to version 0.9.23a1" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1873944
[18:14] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: ^ I believe that was your reject and suggestion to fix.
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-117.118~16.04.1] (kernel)
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1026.26] (no packageset)
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-117.118~16.04.1] (kernel)
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1026.26]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-117.118~16.04.1]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-117.118~16.04.1]
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, diamond-aligner is NBS on armhf... can you please do the magic? also Debian removed it
[22:02] <mwhudson> tjaalton: aargh i keep forgetting that
[22:03] <mwhudson> about time for another network outage to take out the ghc build i guess