-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1]01:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-system-monitor [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1]02:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]02:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 45 entries have been added or removed03:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt)05:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (focal-proposed/main) [1.6.4-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.4-3ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)06:06
Laneyteward: If you can upload there it'll end up in new or unapproved, try it08:04
apwdon't you have to be a member of ubuntu-backporters?08:49
Laneyapw: only to approve, not sure about to upload08:51
Laneythink that might be motu or just regular archive permissions, can't remember exactly08:52
apwthat is a thing i ought to know how to find out ... hmmmm08:53
RikMillsthe wiki seems to suggest that members of the 'backports team' should upload08:54
RikMillsbut..... last edited 2013-12-0508:55
RikMillsactually last edited 2013-12-0508:56
LaneyI think because that doesn't specify a pocket, it means all pockets including backports08:56
LaneyRikMills: yeah, that's the main thing that means the backports project is a bit comatose08:57
Laneywe wanted to move it to more like SRUs08:57
Laneybut nobody's had the time to rewrite the policy yet08:57
Laneyso it's an open task if somebody wants to help :-)08:58
RikMillsanything I might want to realistically backport is probably better sourced via snap/flatpak etc08:59
apwLaney, oddly you for instance also have: Archive Upload Rights for ubuntu-backporters: archive 'primary', pocket 'Backports'09:01
apw(but i assume that is belt and braces)09:02
Laneyapw: Yeah, an additional row in the ACLs09:03
LaneyI guess so if there is a backporter who is not in core-dev for example, they can actually upload anything to backports via that one09:03
LaneyI wonder if ubuntu-sru should have this for updates - afaik upload rights are needed for copying (releasing SRUs)09:04
apwgiving them queue rights and not upload rights would be unusual for sure09:04
apwLaney, i don't think that could be true, else you would not be able to have released sru's as ubuntu-sru, and one can09:06
apwoh i see no because we assume you are an ubuntu-core-dev before becoming ubuntu-sru09:06
apwand you get to upload to any pocket via that, just only accept them in Updates09:07
apwthough ubuntu-security does have the upload component.  we are inconsistent that is for sure09:08
LaneyYeah I think all SRU members are also core-devs09:18
Laneyperhaps that's a policy the team has09:18
paridebdmurray, fixed the tags in LP: #1874362.10:03
ubot5Launchpad bug 1874362 in smartmontools (Ubuntu Bionic) "update-smart-drivedb is missing in Xenial and Bionic" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/187436210:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel)10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel)10:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]11:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119]11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119]11:31
ahasenackhi release team, I filed an FFe bug and subscribed ~ubuntu-release. I also set it to "in progress" because I have an MP attached to it already, but was wondering if that bug state would hide it from your filter?12:17
ahasenackshould I set it to "new" instead?12:17
ahasenackhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838 fwiw12:17
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1894838 in openldap (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs" [High,In progress]12:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core)12:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core)12:24
xnoxLaney:  ^^^ please review =)12:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1]13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1]13:44
Laneyghc finished13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.456]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.456]13:45
Laneyrbalint: hi SRU vanguard. Do you mind if I action https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1894096 ?14:03
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1894096 in OEM Priority Project "RM oem-stella.cmit-abra-meta from focal" [Medium,Confirmed]14:03
Laneysorry rbalint!14:09
Laneyrbasak: ^14:09
teward*waves at Laney*14:11
Laneyhi teward14:11
tewardrbasak: when you get a few minutes, got a question for you - Server team related.14:11
tewardbut no rush14:12
rbasakLaney: no objection from me, but I don't think I can give a +1 on behalf of the SRU team here. It's a pretty odd case.14:41
LaneyI don't mind carrying the can, just didn't want to step on any SRU toes14:42
rbasakI don't think any SRU toes are involved here - thanks :)14:42
rbasakteward: pong, but please just ask questions without pinging first. You know how it works :)14:43
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: tuxguitar is arch:any and has a dependency on swt4-gtk; and there are other packages in the rev-build-dep list that build arch: any binaries (openjfx, libjogl2-java)14:58
vorlonwooo ghc built/published14:59
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, if you have a full list I can open Debian rc bugs...15:11
LocutusOfBorgbtw, haskell-hoogle/armhf, can we do a test with big-packages?15:19
LocutusOfBorgthis seems the last blocker for libffi/ghc/ocaml15:20
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: that's the full list15:20
vorlontuxguitar, openjfx, libjogl2-java15:20
Laneythere is no such thing as big packages for armhf15:21
vorlonbecause the containers don't actually have hard memory limits, correct15:21
LocutusOfBorgsad, so what can we do?15:22
vorlondo you know that it's a memory issue?15:24
LocutusOfBorgnot anymore, after the last few runs its not timeouting15:24
LocutusOfBorgseems a regression in last haskell-hoogle...15:25
Laneyit's a bit suspiciously like 5.0.18 is broken to me15:25
LocutusOfBorgyep, agreed15:25
LocutusOfBorglooks broken on 32bit maybe, lets try on debian porterbox15:25
* Laney runs it on this here raspberry pi15:27
Laneyvery convenient for armhf/64 autopkgtests, much recommended15:27
bdmurrayLaney: How does that compare in terms of speed to using canonistack?15:29
LocutusOfBorgLaney, I have a raspberrypi here, but runs my custom yocto-based os... :/15:30
Laneybdmurray: seems better, maybe mainly because I have good IO on it15:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]15:31
Laneywhoops, it passed, because I forgot to take hoogle from proposed15:34
* Laney le fail15:34
LocutusOfBorgLaney, works on debian porterbox...15:36
LocutusOfBorgbut ghc is 8.8.4 here15:36
Eickmeyer[m]bdmurray: I'll have a new upload of that one soon. Just going to redo it and apply the delta from 0.9.23a1.15:37
bdmurrayEickmeyer[m]: okay, feel free to ping me15:40
bdmurrayLaney: Hey fellow release team member could you take a look at bug 1894919 and the set of packages that will get removed if I make this change?15:48
ubot5bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189491915:48
Laneybdmurray: what, that list is supposed to be the packages considered for removal just by adding gnome-software-plugin-snap?15:49
bdmurrayLaney: yes, they were previously held back because of gnome-software-plugin-snap15:51
Laneykernels and bits of xorg15:51
Laneyhow can this be?15:51
bdmurrayI believe a full set of changes is gotten and if any package in that set is not itself a removal candidate then nothing gets removed.15:53
LaneyI see, so it can be accumulated cruft15:55
Laneywell I don't see anything particularly problematic there15:55
bdmurrayRight, I'll could run another upgrade w/o the gnome-software-plugin-snap change and I believe most of those will show up as autoremovable after the upgrade.15:55
rbalintLaney, could you please drop haskell-hoogle from groovy-proposed? it holds back the libffi transition16:00
rbalintvorlon, ^?16:00
LaneyWe're just discussing it now.16:00
LaneyIt can't just be dropped as it is a part of the transition16:01
LaneyMaybe the previous version can be rebuilt though16:01
LaneyI've got a call, feel free to upload a rebuild of .17 to a silo16:01
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, <BTS> Opened #969975 in ftp.debian.org by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS». https://bugs.debian.org/96997516:02
ubot5Debian bug 969975 in ftp.debian.org "RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS" [Normal,Open]16:02
LocutusOfBorgxnox, FYI I diffed ghc build logs and the major difference I found on armhf is gcc-9 -> gcc-1016:24
LocutusOfBorgso I'm doing a test build with gcc-9 everywhere, lets see how "fast" it goes16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xca (focal-backports/universe) [2.2.1-1 => 2.3.0-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)16:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio)16:29
Eickmeyer[m]bdmurray: ^ should have a much cleaner diff16:29
Eickmeyer[m]bdmurray: In fact, the diff LGTM.16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync-qdevice [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-4ubuntu1.1]16:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]16:48
* Laney tries hoogle 17.1516:54
Laneyif not I guess we can punt hoogle and lambdabot-plugins out of groovy16:55
rbalintLaney, how about dropping them out first, then trying other things later?16:56
rbalinti'd love to get glibc rolling16:56
tewardcan an archive admin reject xca for focal-backports?16:56
tewardaccidentally sent to ubuntu instead of a ppa16:56
teward(my bad!016:57
teward(was working on a test-build and uploaded the wrong file - which was to focal-backports as well, my fault for having too many similar versions and trying to work from a phone keyboard)16:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid3 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.12-1ubuntu7.14]16:58
Eickmeyer[m]bdmurray: Thanks! :)17:03
vorlonLaney, rbalint: I agree, we should droop haskell-hoogle + lambdabot-plugins from release pocket immediately to unblock the transition, then if we get a solution for haskell-hoogle to let it back in naturally later17:04
Laneyyes, I've done it17:07
Laneyalso a rebuild of 17.15 actually does work, so let me roll that back and rebuild too, at least then we can still have the thing17:09
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: FYI in case you want to bisect or something17:09
Laneyplease someone binNMU the hoogle binaries as they come through17:17
Laneyshould have done the removals in a different order17:17
bdmurrayrbasak: Don't bother reviewing the ubuntu-release-upgrader upload, I'll have another one shortly.17:19
LocutusOfBorgLaney, I can't reproduce on debian armhf porterbox, or pbuilder-dist groovy armhf local chroot...17:20
LocutusOfBorgcan anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ?17:21
ubot5Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open]17:21
LaneyLocutusOfBorg: happened for me with great ease on the lxd/armhf pi I mentioned17:21
Laneyguess you could take this as a chance to set up a nice armhf env for yourself17:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [] (no packageset)17:22
rbalintbdmurray, i've updated https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal/+merge/390395 to change ubuntu-sru, please take a look17:27
Laneyrbalint: did you notice that systemd got broken in focal in august btw? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/focal/amd6417:29
Laneysad for that to happen in a stable release :(17:29
rbasakbdmurray: np. I skipped that already because it's waiting on SRU information - someone already asked IIRC17:30
ddstreetLaney yeah that's because systemd-fsckd is failing, i believe it's a kernel upgrade that broke it, but discussed in lp: #189235817:32
ubot5Launchpad bug 1892358 in util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) "autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189235817:32
ddstreeti'm gonna try to kick the systemd-fsckd test to get it passing...i wish systemd-fsckd got upstreamed, we've been carrying it for years17:33
Laneyddstreet: ah ok, thanks17:33
ddstreetLaney is there a good way to get access to an armhf system? i got haveged updated but it is failing on armhf because it segfaults...17:34
ddstreetbut only armhf17:34
ddstreeti guess i could get on a arm64 and create armhf container?17:34
bdmurrayddstreet: that's what I've done in canonistack17:37
ddstreetsigh, well i just tried to deploy an arm64 instance and got a deploy error in canonistack :(17:38
bdmurrayalthough I recently realized it doesn't work for machine isolation tests17:39
bdmurrayddstreet: what error?17:39
ddstreet| 5514ce89-1c9a-4ffb-88ab-b759c9c05597 | test-arm                                | ERROR   |                                            | ubuntu/ubuntu-groovy-daily-arm64-server-20200909-disk1.img | m1.large         |17:39
ddstreeti'll try deploying again and dig farther if it fails again...17:39
bdmurraythere aren't groovy images17:40
bdmurraySo I use focal as my base17:40
Laneyyeah, that, use sbuild or lxd17:40
Laneyyou need to do something like that anyway as you'd have an arm64 host17:41
ddstreetugh, well the error is: | fault                       | {'code': 500, 'created': '2020-09-09T17:40:26Z', 'message': 'No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.'} |17:41
bdmurraywell, I'm not giving my hosts up!17:41
ddstreeti was trying to create m1.large, i'll try with m1.small17:42
Laneyyou could do ssh-import-id lp:ddstreet and share!17:42
Laneym1.large might be ambitious though, fair17:42
bdmurrayLaney: oh, that's an idea17:44
Laneyon that note, see you tomorrow17:44
bdmurrayddstreet: let me know if you want access to a arm64 system17:46
ddstreetbdmurray i might be able to use one of the pi systems i have, i'll try that17:47
bdmurrayrbalint: I find the description of bug 1894828 - why is there ldirectord stuff in there?18:14
ubot5bug 1894828 in badger (Ubuntu Focal) "badger autopkgtest fails in focal " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189482818:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [] (no packageset)18:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.25 => 1:20.04.27] (core)19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) []19:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed) []19:08
rbalintLaney, also there is a hint, please accept it until the test is fixed https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/39000519:34
rbalintbdmurray, my bad, fixed.19:51
ItzSwirlzgot a patch for groovy here (since past deiban import freeze) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/189502019:52
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1895020 in cinnamon (Ubuntu) "[Groovy Patch] Network applet - List of Wireless Networks doesn't refresh properly when clicking the applet logo" [Undecided,New]19:52
mwhudsontook 8 days, 16 hours, 12 minutes, 41.9 seconds19:52
mwhudsonoh boy19:52
mwhudsoner does lambdabot need to be removed from release or something?19:54
mwhudsonLaney, vorlon: around-p?19:54
vorlonnil :P19:55
vorlonmwhudson: I just force'd lambdabot19:55
mwhudsoncool, then i think libffi should go19:56
vorlonreverse-depends didn't report lambdabot as a rev-build-dep of haskell-lambdabot-haskell-plugins, so it looks like this may be a new build-dep only in -proposed19:56
mwhudsonyeah i think so19:56
vorlonanyway I'm -1 on build-deps being a blocker for p-m so will route around when convenient19:57
LocutusOfBorgI thought libffi was already in and I syncd haskell-gi-harfbuzz19:58
LocutusOfBorgthe copyright fixes you requested...19:59
vorloninterestingly, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-harfbuzz/+publishinghistory shows haskell-gi-harfbuzz as 'pending' for release, so maybe it is done in the currently-running britney?20:00
rbalintvorlon, Laney can i have a green light for LP: #1894434 to publish from the bileto ppa after libffi migrated?20:01
ubot5Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189443420:01
rbalintvorlon, Laney i'd then stay up a bit more to see if i can press the publish button tonight20:02
LocutusOfBorgyes vorlon it migrated20:03
LocutusOfBorgand also libffi yay20:04
vorlonrbalint: ^^20:16
rbalintvorlon, yes, great!20:17
rbalintvorlon, can i please go ahead with glibc?20:17
vorlonrbalint: looks like it to me20:18
rbalintvorlon, could you please comment on the ffe bug to make that even more official?;)20:19
vorlonrbalint: was the ffe not already approved?20:19
LocutusOfBorgkanashiro, I syncd your ruby autopkgtest fixes but they looks like fixed only on amd64...20:20
rbalintvorlon, Laney's comments where not clearly an approval as i read them20:21
vorlonrbalint: bug #?20:21
rbalintLP: #189443420:21
ubot5Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189443420:21
kanashiroLocutusOfBorg: I noticed those failures, some issue with webpack in non-amd64 arches20:22
LocutusOfBorgyep :)20:22
LocutusOfBorgnow for rails, we need to find an archive-admin willing to do ~10 removal of stuff already out from debian testing...20:23
kanashiroLocutusOfBorg: I was thinking about to let Rails 6 to the next cycle, some rails apps were removed from Debian testing to let it migrate there20:24
kanashirowe'd need to do the same in Ubuntu20:24
LocutusOfBorgyes, we need an archive admin willing to do it20:24
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, ^^ opinion? :)20:24
kanashiroand the only reason to have rails in the archive is to support the packages rails apps20:24
kanashiroand some upstream projects do not support it yet20:25
mwhudsonyay libffi migrated20:29
mwhudsonoh and ghc too20:30
vorlonrbalint: approved20:30
vorlonmwhudson: a package deal20:30
vorlonLocutusOfBorg, kanashiro: I have no problem doing the removals; for source removals I do want a bug reference of some kind, either the related RC Debian bug or a new bug filed in LP20:31
kanashirovorlon: what do you think if we finish the rails 6 transition in the next cycle and give more time for upstream projects to support it?20:33
rbalintvorlon, thanks, publishing...20:35
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
=== ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4]20:39
vorlonxnox: grub2-signed/focal upload references a bug with no grub-related tasks open20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core)20:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4]20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core)21:06
vorlonmwhudson: fyi kicking off a bunch of no-change rebuilds now for packages built-using golang-1.[89] (so far); only one of these was FTBFS according to the last report, and I removed it (flannel)21:08
mwhudsonvorlon: ah cool21:08
vorlonaw geez there are even some for golang-1.721:09
mwhudsonbut i think none for 1.621:09
mwhudsoni wonder if that's just because the tooling was too old to update built-using correctly then :)21:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4]21:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 => 6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)21:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (bionic-proposed/main) [2.27-3ubuntu1.2 => 2.27-3ubuntu1.3] (core)21:56
rbalintbdmurray, do you step in for sil2100 for tomorrow's sru shift? in that case it would be nice if glibc could be reviewed ^21:58
xnoxvorlon:  correct, it is meant to reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/189482422:02
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1894824 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "compare grub efi during build" [Undecided,New]22:02
xnoxvorlon:  better grub2-signed uploaded22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.5 => 1.142.6] (core)22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-arista (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.1.5~git2020041316.382e8a9-0ubuntu1 => 2019.2.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6]22:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6]22:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1084.95] (no packageset)22:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58] (kernel)22:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1070.73] (no packageset)22:18
xnoxhoray libffi migrated22:27
xnoxrbalint:  libffi migrated =) horay22:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95]23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58]23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1070.73]23:29

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!