| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1] | 01:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-system-monitor [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1] | 02:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 02:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 45 entries have been added or removed | 03:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 05:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (focal-proposed/main) [1.6.4-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.4-3ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 06:06 | |
| Laney | teward: If you can upload there it'll end up in new or unapproved, try it | 08:04 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | don't you have to be a member of ubuntu-backporters? | 08:49 |
| Laney | apw: only to approve, not sure about to upload | 08:51 |
| Laney | think that might be motu or just regular archive permissions, can't remember exactly | 08:52 |
| apw | that is a thing i ought to know how to find out ... hmmmm | 08:53 |
| RikMills | the wiki seems to suggest that members of the 'backports team' should upload | 08:54 |
| RikMills | but..... last edited 2013-12-05 | 08:55 |
| RikMills | actually last edited 2013-12-05 | 08:56 |
| Laney | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/m6nZq8vGXQ/ | 08:56 |
| RikMills | *2012-05-23 | 08:56 |
| Laney | I think because that doesn't specify a pocket, it means all pockets including backports | 08:56 |
| Laney | RikMills: yeah, that's the main thing that means the backports project is a bit comatose | 08:57 |
| Laney | we wanted to move it to more like SRUs | 08:57 |
| Laney | but nobody's had the time to rewrite the policy yet | 08:57 |
| RikMills | logical | 08:57 |
| Laney | so it's an open task if somebody wants to help :-) | 08:58 |
| RikMills | anything I might want to realistically backport is probably better sourced via snap/flatpak etc | 08:59 |
| apw | Laney, oddly you for instance also have: Archive Upload Rights for ubuntu-backporters: archive 'primary', pocket 'Backports' | 09:01 |
| apw | (but i assume that is belt and braces) | 09:02 |
| Laney | apw: Yeah, an additional row in the ACLs | 09:03 |
| Laney | I guess so if there is a backporter who is not in core-dev for example, they can actually upload anything to backports via that one | 09:03 |
| Laney | I wonder if ubuntu-sru should have this for updates - afaik upload rights are needed for copying (releasing SRUs) | 09:04 |
| apw | giving them queue rights and not upload rights would be unusual for sure | 09:04 |
| apw | Laney, i don't think that could be true, else you would not be able to have released sru's as ubuntu-sru, and one can | 09:06 |
| apw | oh i see no because we assume you are an ubuntu-core-dev before becoming ubuntu-sru | 09:06 |
| apw | and you get to upload to any pocket via that, just only accept them in Updates | 09:07 |
| apw | though ubuntu-security does have the upload component. we are inconsistent that is for sure | 09:08 |
| Laney | Yeah I think all SRU members are also core-devs | 09:18 |
| Laney | perhaps that's a policy the team has | 09:18 |
| paride | bdmurray, fixed the tags in LP: #1874362. | 10:03 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1874362 in smartmontools (Ubuntu Bionic) "update-smart-drivedb is missing in Xenial and Bionic" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1874362 | 10:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel) | 10:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel) | 10:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 11:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119] | 11:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119] | 11:31 | |
| ahasenack | hi release team, I filed an FFe bug and subscribed ~ubuntu-release. I also set it to "in progress" because I have an MP attached to it already, but was wondering if that bug state would hide it from your filter? | 12:17 |
| ahasenack | should I set it to "new" instead? | 12:17 |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838 fwiw | 12:17 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1894838 in openldap (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs" [High,In progress] | 12:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core) | 12:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core) | 12:24 | |
| xnox | Laney: ^^^ please review =) | 12:52 |
| Laney | yus | 13:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 13:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1] | 13:44 | |
| Laney | omg | 13:45 |
| Laney | ghc finished | 13:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.456] | 13:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.456] | 13:45 | |
| Laney | rbalint: hi SRU vanguard. Do you mind if I action https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1894096 ? | 14:03 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1894096 in OEM Priority Project "RM oem-stella.cmit-abra-meta from focal" [Medium,Confirmed] | 14:03 |
| Laney | sorry rbalint! | 14:09 |
| Laney | rbasak: ^ | 14:09 |
| teward | *waves at Laney* | 14:11 |
| Laney | hi teward | 14:11 |
| teward | rbasak: when you get a few minutes, got a question for you - Server team related. | 14:11 |
| teward | but no rush | 14:12 |
| rbasak | o/ | 14:38 |
| rbasak | Laney: no objection from me, but I don't think I can give a +1 on behalf of the SRU team here. It's a pretty odd case. | 14:41 |
| Laney | I don't mind carrying the can, just didn't want to step on any SRU toes | 14:42 |
| rbasak | I don't think any SRU toes are involved here - thanks :) | 14:42 |
| rbasak | teward: pong, but please just ask questions without pinging first. You know how it works :) | 14:43 |
| Laney | 💣 | 14:44 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: tuxguitar is arch:any and has a dependency on swt4-gtk; and there are other packages in the rev-build-dep list that build arch: any binaries (openjfx, libjogl2-java) | 14:58 |
| vorlon | wooo ghc built/published | 14:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, if you have a full list I can open Debian rc bugs... | 15:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw, haskell-hoogle/armhf, can we do a test with big-packages? | 15:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this seems the last blocker for libffi/ghc/ocaml | 15:20 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: that's the full list | 15:20 |
| vorlon | tuxguitar, openjfx, libjogl2-java | 15:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 15:20 |
| Laney | there is no such thing as big packages for armhf | 15:21 |
| vorlon | because the containers don't actually have hard memory limits, correct | 15:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sad, so what can we do? | 15:22 |
| vorlon | do you know that it's a memory issue? | 15:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not anymore, after the last few runs its not timeouting | 15:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seems a regression in last haskell-hoogle... | 15:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :( | 15:25 |
| Laney | it's a bit suspiciously like 5.0.18 is broken to me | 15:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep, agreed | 15:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | looks broken on 32bit maybe, lets try on debian porterbox | 15:25 |
| * Laney runs it on this here raspberry pi | 15:27 | |
| Laney | very convenient for armhf/64 autopkgtests, much recommended | 15:27 |
| bdmurray | Laney: How does that compare in terms of speed to using canonistack? | 15:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I have a raspberrypi here, but runs my custom yocto-based os... :/ | 15:30 |
| Laney | bdmurray: seems better, maybe mainly because I have good IO on it | 15:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 15:31 | |
| Laney | whoops, it passed, because I forgot to take hoogle from proposed | 15:34 |
| * Laney le fail | 15:34 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, works on debian porterbox... | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but ghc is 8.8.4 here | 15:36 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | bdmurray: I'll have a new upload of that one soon. Just going to redo it and apply the delta from 0.9.23a1. | 15:37 |
| bdmurray | Eickmeyer[m]: okay, feel free to ping me | 15:40 |
| bdmurray | Laney: Hey fellow release team member could you take a look at bug 1894919 and the set of packages that will get removed if I make this change? | 15:48 |
| ubot5 | bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894919 | 15:48 |
| Laney | bdmurray: what, that list is supposed to be the packages considered for removal just by adding gnome-software-plugin-snap? | 15:49 |
| bdmurray | Laney: yes, they were previously held back because of gnome-software-plugin-snap | 15:51 |
| Laney | kernels and bits of xorg | 15:51 |
| Laney | how can this be? | 15:51 |
| bdmurray | I believe a full set of changes is gotten and if any package in that set is not itself a removal candidate then nothing gets removed. | 15:53 |
| Laney | I see, so it can be accumulated cruft | 15:55 |
| bdmurray | https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/tree/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeCache.py#n947 | 15:55 |
| Laney | well I don't see anything particularly problematic there | 15:55 |
| bdmurray | Right, I'll could run another upgrade w/o the gnome-software-plugin-snap change and I believe most of those will show up as autoremovable after the upgrade. | 15:55 |
| rbalint | Laney, could you please drop haskell-hoogle from groovy-proposed? it holds back the libffi transition | 16:00 |
| rbalint | vorlon, ^? | 16:00 |
| Laney | We're just discussing it now. | 16:00 |
| Laney | It can't just be dropped as it is a part of the transition | 16:01 |
| Laney | Maybe the previous version can be rebuilt though | 16:01 |
| Laney | I've got a call, feel free to upload a rebuild of .17 to a silo | 16:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, <BTS> Opened #969975 in ftp.debian.org by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS». https://bugs.debian.org/969975 | 16:02 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 969975 in ftp.debian.org "RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS" [Normal,Open] | 16:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, FYI I diffed ghc build logs and the major difference I found on armhf is gcc-9 -> gcc-10 | 16:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so I'm doing a test build with gcc-9 everywhere, lets see how "fast" it goes | 16:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xca (focal-backports/universe) [2.2.1-1 => 2.3.0-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio) | 16:29 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | bdmurray: ^ should have a much cleaner diff | 16:29 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | bdmurray: In fact, the diff LGTM. | 16:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync-qdevice [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-4ubuntu1.1] | 16:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 16:48 | |
| * Laney tries hoogle 17.15 | 16:54 | |
| Laney | if not I guess we can punt hoogle and lambdabot-plugins out of groovy | 16:55 |
| rbalint | Laney, how about dropping them out first, then trying other things later? | 16:56 |
| rbalint | i'd love to get glibc rolling | 16:56 |
| teward | can an archive admin reject xca for focal-backports? | 16:56 |
| teward | accidentally sent to ubuntu instead of a ppa | 16:56 |
| teward | (my bad!0 | 16:57 |
| teward | (was working on a test-build and uploaded the wrong file - which was to focal-backports as well, my fault for having too many similar versions and trying to work from a phone keyboard) | 16:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid3 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.12-1ubuntu7.14] | 16:58 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | bdmurray: Thanks! :) | 17:03 |
| vorlon | Laney, rbalint: I agree, we should droop haskell-hoogle + lambdabot-plugins from release pocket immediately to unblock the transition, then if we get a solution for haskell-hoogle to let it back in naturally later | 17:04 |
| Laney | yes, I've done it | 17:07 |
| Laney | also a rebuild of 17.15 actually does work, so let me roll that back and rebuild too, at least then we can still have the thing | 17:09 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: FYI in case you want to bisect or something | 17:09 |
| Laney | please someone binNMU the hoogle binaries as they come through | 17:17 |
| Laney | binNEW* | 17:17 |
| Laney | should have done the removals in a different order | 17:17 |
| bdmurray | rbasak: Don't bother reviewing the ubuntu-release-upgrader upload, I'll have another one shortly. | 17:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I can't reproduce on debian armhf porterbox, or pbuilder-dist groovy armhf local chroot... | 17:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ? | 17:21 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] | 17:21 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: happened for me with great ease on the lxd/armhf pi I mentioned | 17:21 |
| Laney | guess you could take this as a chance to set up a nice armhf env for yourself | 17:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] (no packageset) | 17:22 | |
| rbalint | bdmurray, i've updated https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal/+merge/390395 to change ubuntu-sru, please take a look | 17:27 |
| Laney | rbalint: did you notice that systemd got broken in focal in august btw? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/focal/amd64 | 17:29 |
| Laney | sad for that to happen in a stable release :( | 17:29 |
| rbasak | bdmurray: np. I skipped that already because it's waiting on SRU information - someone already asked IIRC | 17:30 |
| ddstreet | Laney yeah that's because systemd-fsckd is failing, i believe it's a kernel upgrade that broke it, but discussed in lp: #1892358 | 17:32 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1892358 in util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) "autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892358 | 17:32 |
| ddstreet | i'm gonna try to kick the systemd-fsckd test to get it passing...i wish systemd-fsckd got upstreamed, we've been carrying it for years | 17:33 |
| Laney | ddstreet: ah ok, thanks | 17:33 |
| ddstreet | Laney is there a good way to get access to an armhf system? i got haveged updated but it is failing on armhf because it segfaults... | 17:34 |
| ddstreet | but only armhf | 17:34 |
| ddstreet | i guess i could get on a arm64 and create armhf container? | 17:34 |
| bdmurray | ddstreet: that's what I've done in canonistack | 17:37 |
| ddstreet | sigh, well i just tried to deploy an arm64 instance and got a deploy error in canonistack :( | 17:38 |
| bdmurray | although I recently realized it doesn't work for machine isolation tests | 17:39 |
| bdmurray | ddstreet: what error? | 17:39 |
| ddstreet | | 5514ce89-1c9a-4ffb-88ab-b759c9c05597 | test-arm | ERROR | | ubuntu/ubuntu-groovy-daily-arm64-server-20200909-disk1.img | m1.large | | 17:39 |
| ddstreet | i'll try deploying again and dig farther if it fails again... | 17:39 |
| bdmurray | there aren't groovy images | 17:40 |
| bdmurray | So I use focal as my base | 17:40 |
| Laney | yeah, that, use sbuild or lxd | 17:40 |
| Laney | you need to do something like that anyway as you'd have an arm64 host | 17:41 |
| ddstreet | ugh, well the error is: | fault | {'code': 500, 'created': '2020-09-09T17:40:26Z', 'message': 'No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.'} | | 17:41 |
| ddstreet | sigh | 17:41 |
| bdmurray | well, I'm not giving my hosts up! | 17:41 |
| ddstreet | lol | 17:42 |
| ddstreet | i was trying to create m1.large, i'll try with m1.small | 17:42 |
| Laney | you could do ssh-import-id lp:ddstreet and share! | 17:42 |
| Laney | m1.large might be ambitious though, fair | 17:42 |
| bdmurray | Laney: oh, that's an idea | 17:44 |
| Laney | :) | 17:44 |
| Laney | on that note, see you tomorrow | 17:44 |
| bdmurray | ddstreet: let me know if you want access to a arm64 system | 17:46 |
| ddstreet | bdmurray i might be able to use one of the pi systems i have, i'll try that | 17:47 |
| bdmurray | rbalint: I find the description of bug 1894828 - why is there ldirectord stuff in there? | 18:14 |
| ubot5 | bug 1894828 in badger (Ubuntu Focal) "badger autopkgtest fails in focal " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894828 | 18:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] (no packageset) | 18:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.25 => 1:20.04.27] (core) | 19:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] | 19:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] | 19:08 | |
| rbalint | Laney, also there is a hint, please accept it until the test is fixed https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/390005 | 19:34 |
| rbalint | bdmurray, my bad, fixed. | 19:51 |
| ItzSwirlz | got a patch for groovy here (since past deiban import freeze) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1895020 | 19:52 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1895020 in cinnamon (Ubuntu) "[Groovy Patch] Network applet - List of Wireless Networks doesn't refresh properly when clicking the applet logo" [Undecided,New] | 19:52 |
| mwhudson | took 8 days, 16 hours, 12 minutes, 41.9 seconds | 19:52 |
| mwhudson | oh boy | 19:52 |
| mwhudson | er does lambdabot need to be removed from release or something? | 19:54 |
| mwhudson | Laney, vorlon: around-p? | 19:54 |
| vorlon | nil :P | 19:55 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: I just force'd lambdabot | 19:55 |
| mwhudson | cool, then i think libffi should go | 19:56 |
| vorlon | reverse-depends didn't report lambdabot as a rev-build-dep of haskell-lambdabot-haskell-plugins, so it looks like this may be a new build-dep only in -proposed | 19:56 |
| mwhudson | yeah i think so | 19:56 |
| vorlon | anyway I'm -1 on build-deps being a blocker for p-m so will route around when convenient | 19:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I thought libffi was already in and I syncd haskell-gi-harfbuzz | 19:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the copyright fixes you requested... | 19:59 |
| vorlon | interestingly, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-harfbuzz/+publishinghistory shows haskell-gi-harfbuzz as 'pending' for release, so maybe it is done in the currently-running britney? | 20:00 |
| rbalint | vorlon, Laney can i have a green light for LP: #1894434 to publish from the bileto ppa after libffi migrated? | 20:01 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894434 | 20:01 |
| rbalint | vorlon, Laney i'd then stay up a bit more to see if i can press the publish button tonight | 20:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes vorlon it migrated | 20:03 |
| vorlon | \o/ | 20:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and also libffi yay | 20:04 |
| vorlon | rbalint: ^^ | 20:16 |
| rbalint | vorlon, yes, great! | 20:17 |
| rbalint | vorlon, can i please go ahead with glibc? | 20:17 |
| vorlon | rbalint: looks like it to me | 20:18 |
| rbalint | vorlon, could you please comment on the ffe bug to make that even more official?;) | 20:19 |
| vorlon | rbalint: was the ffe not already approved? | 20:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | kanashiro, I syncd your ruby autopkgtest fixes but they looks like fixed only on amd64... | 20:20 |
| rbalint | vorlon, Laney's comments where not clearly an approval as i read them | 20:21 |
| vorlon | rbalint: bug #? | 20:21 |
| rbalint | LP: #1894434 | 20:21 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894434 | 20:21 |
| kanashiro | LocutusOfBorg: I noticed those failures, some issue with webpack in non-amd64 arches | 20:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep :) | 20:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | now for rails, we need to find an archive-admin willing to do ~10 removal of stuff already out from debian testing... | 20:23 |
| kanashiro | LocutusOfBorg: I was thinking about to let Rails 6 to the next cycle, some rails apps were removed from Debian testing to let it migrate there | 20:24 |
| kanashiro | we'd need to do the same in Ubuntu | 20:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, we need an archive admin willing to do it | 20:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, ^^ opinion? :) | 20:24 |
| kanashiro | and the only reason to have rails in the archive is to support the packages rails apps | 20:24 |
| kanashiro | and some upstream projects do not support it yet | 20:25 |
| kanashiro | s/packages/packaged | 20:25 |
| mwhudson | yay libffi migrated | 20:29 |
| mwhudson | oh and ghc too | 20:30 |
| vorlon | rbalint: approved | 20:30 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: a package deal | 20:30 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg, kanashiro: I have no problem doing the removals; for source removals I do want a bug reference of some kind, either the related RC Debian bug or a new bug filed in LP | 20:31 |
| kanashiro | vorlon: what do you think if we finish the rails 6 transition in the next cycle and give more time for upstream projects to support it? | 20:33 |
| rbalint | vorlon, thanks, publishing... | 20:35 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| === ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4] | 20:39 | |
| vorlon | xnox: grub2-signed/focal upload references a bug with no grub-related tasks open | 20:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core) | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4] | 20:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core) | 21:06 | |
| vorlon | mwhudson: fyi kicking off a bunch of no-change rebuilds now for packages built-using golang-1.[89] (so far); only one of these was FTBFS according to the last report, and I removed it (flannel) | 21:08 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: ah cool | 21:08 |
| vorlon | aw geez there are even some for golang-1.7 | 21:09 |
| mwhudson | but i think none for 1.6 | 21:09 |
| mwhudson | i wonder if that's just because the tooling was too old to update built-using correctly then :) | 21:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4] | 21:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 => 6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset) | 21:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (bionic-proposed/main) [2.27-3ubuntu1.2 => 2.27-3ubuntu1.3] (core) | 21:56 | |
| rbalint | bdmurray, do you step in for sil2100 for tomorrow's sru shift? in that case it would be nice if glibc could be reviewed ^ | 21:58 |
| xnox | vorlon: correct, it is meant to reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1894824 | 22:02 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1894824 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "compare grub efi during build" [Undecided,New] | 22:02 |
| xnox | vorlon: better grub2-signed uploaded | 22:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.5 => 1.142.6] (core) | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-arista (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.1.5~git2020041316.382e8a9-0ubuntu1 => 2019.2.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 22:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6] | 22:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6] | 22:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1084.95] (no packageset) | 22:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58] (kernel) | 22:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1070.73] (no packageset) | 22:18 | |
| xnox | horay libffi migrated | 22:27 |
| xnox | rbalint: libffi migrated =) horay | 22:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95] | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58] | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1070.73] | 23:29 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!