[01:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1] [02:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-system-monitor [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1] [02:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [03:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 45 entries have been added or removed [05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt) [06:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (focal-proposed/main) [1.6.4-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.4-3ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [08:04] teward: If you can upload there it'll end up in new or unapproved, try it [08:49] don't you have to be a member of ubuntu-backporters? [08:51] apw: only to approve, not sure about to upload [08:52] think that might be motu or just regular archive permissions, can't remember exactly [08:53] that is a thing i ought to know how to find out ... hmmmm [08:54] the wiki seems to suggest that members of the 'backports team' should upload [08:55] but..... last edited 2013-12-05 [08:56] actually last edited 2013-12-05 [08:56] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/m6nZq8vGXQ/ [08:56] *2012-05-23 [08:56] I think because that doesn't specify a pocket, it means all pockets including backports [08:57] RikMills: yeah, that's the main thing that means the backports project is a bit comatose [08:57] we wanted to move it to more like SRUs [08:57] but nobody's had the time to rewrite the policy yet [08:57] logical [08:58] so it's an open task if somebody wants to help :-) [08:59] anything I might want to realistically backport is probably better sourced via snap/flatpak etc [09:01] Laney, oddly you for instance also have: Archive Upload Rights for ubuntu-backporters: archive 'primary', pocket 'Backports' [09:02] (but i assume that is belt and braces) [09:03] apw: Yeah, an additional row in the ACLs [09:03] I guess so if there is a backporter who is not in core-dev for example, they can actually upload anything to backports via that one [09:04] I wonder if ubuntu-sru should have this for updates - afaik upload rights are needed for copying (releasing SRUs) [09:04] giving them queue rights and not upload rights would be unusual for sure [09:06] Laney, i don't think that could be true, else you would not be able to have released sru's as ubuntu-sru, and one can [09:06] oh i see no because we assume you are an ubuntu-core-dev before becoming ubuntu-sru [09:07] and you get to upload to any pocket via that, just only accept them in Updates [09:08] though ubuntu-security does have the upload component. we are inconsistent that is for sure [09:18] Yeah I think all SRU members are also core-devs [09:18] perhaps that's a policy the team has [10:03] bdmurray, fixed the tags in LP: #1874362. [10:03] Launchpad bug 1874362 in smartmontools (Ubuntu Bionic) "update-smart-drivedb is missing in Xenial and Bionic" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1874362 [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel) [10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel) [10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119] [11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119] [12:17] hi release team, I filed an FFe bug and subscribed ~ubuntu-release. I also set it to "in progress" because I have an MP attached to it already, but was wondering if that bug state would hide it from your filter? [12:17] should I set it to "new" instead? [12:17] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838 fwiw [12:18] Ubuntu bug 1894838 in openldap (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs" [High,In progress] [12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core) [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core) [12:52] Laney: ^^^ please review =) [13:25] yus [13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1] [13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1] [13:45] omg [13:45] ghc finished [13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.456] [13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.456] [14:03] rbalint: hi SRU vanguard. Do you mind if I action https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1894096 ? [14:03] Ubuntu bug 1894096 in OEM Priority Project "RM oem-stella.cmit-abra-meta from focal" [Medium,Confirmed] [14:09] sorry rbalint! [14:09] rbasak: ^ [14:11] *waves at Laney* [14:11] hi teward [14:11] rbasak: when you get a few minutes, got a question for you - Server team related. [14:12] but no rush [14:38] o/ [14:41] Laney: no objection from me, but I don't think I can give a +1 on behalf of the SRU team here. It's a pretty odd case. [14:42] I don't mind carrying the can, just didn't want to step on any SRU toes [14:42] I don't think any SRU toes are involved here - thanks :) [14:43] teward: pong, but please just ask questions without pinging first. You know how it works :) [14:44] 💣 [14:58] LocutusOfBorg: tuxguitar is arch:any and has a dependency on swt4-gtk; and there are other packages in the rev-build-dep list that build arch: any binaries (openjfx, libjogl2-java) [14:59] wooo ghc built/published [15:11] vorlon, if you have a full list I can open Debian rc bugs... [15:19] btw, haskell-hoogle/armhf, can we do a test with big-packages? [15:20] this seems the last blocker for libffi/ghc/ocaml [15:20] LocutusOfBorg: that's the full list [15:20] tuxguitar, openjfx, libjogl2-java [15:20] thanks [15:21] there is no such thing as big packages for armhf [15:21] because the containers don't actually have hard memory limits, correct [15:22] sad, so what can we do? [15:24] do you know that it's a memory issue? [15:24] not anymore, after the last few runs its not timeouting [15:25] seems a regression in last haskell-hoogle... [15:25] :( [15:25] it's a bit suspiciously like 5.0.18 is broken to me [15:25] yep, agreed [15:25] looks broken on 32bit maybe, lets try on debian porterbox [15:27] * Laney runs it on this here raspberry pi [15:27] very convenient for armhf/64 autopkgtests, much recommended [15:29] Laney: How does that compare in terms of speed to using canonistack? [15:30] Laney, I have a raspberrypi here, but runs my custom yocto-based os... :/ [15:30] bdmurray: seems better, maybe mainly because I have good IO on it [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [15:34] whoops, it passed, because I forgot to take hoogle from proposed [15:34] * Laney le fail [15:36] Laney, works on debian porterbox... [15:36] but ghc is 8.8.4 here [15:37] bdmurray: I'll have a new upload of that one soon. Just going to redo it and apply the delta from 0.9.23a1. [15:40] Eickmeyer[m]: okay, feel free to ping me [15:48] Laney: Hey fellow release team member could you take a look at bug 1894919 and the set of packages that will get removed if I make this change? [15:48] bug 1894919 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "gnome-software-plugin-snap consider an unwanted removal for 20.04 ubuntu-desktop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894919 [15:49] bdmurray: what, that list is supposed to be the packages considered for removal just by adding gnome-software-plugin-snap? [15:51] Laney: yes, they were previously held back because of gnome-software-plugin-snap [15:51] kernels and bits of xorg [15:51] how can this be? [15:53] I believe a full set of changes is gotten and if any package in that set is not itself a removal candidate then nothing gets removed. [15:55] I see, so it can be accumulated cruft [15:55] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/tree/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeCache.py#n947 [15:55] well I don't see anything particularly problematic there [15:55] Right, I'll could run another upgrade w/o the gnome-software-plugin-snap change and I believe most of those will show up as autoremovable after the upgrade. [16:00] Laney, could you please drop haskell-hoogle from groovy-proposed? it holds back the libffi transition [16:00] vorlon, ^? [16:00] We're just discussing it now. [16:01] It can't just be dropped as it is a part of the transition [16:01] Maybe the previous version can be rebuilt though [16:01] I've got a call, feel free to upload a rebuild of .17 to a silo [16:02] vorlon, Opened #969975 in ftp.debian.org by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS». https://bugs.debian.org/969975 [16:02] Debian bug 969975 in ftp.debian.org "RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS" [Normal,Open] [16:24] xnox, FYI I diffed ghc build logs and the major difference I found on armhf is gcc-9 -> gcc-10 [16:24] so I'm doing a test build with gcc-9 everywhere, lets see how "fast" it goes [16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xca (focal-backports/universe) [2.2.1-1 => 2.3.0-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset) [16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio) [16:29] bdmurray: ^ should have a much cleaner diff [16:36] bdmurray: In fact, the diff LGTM. [16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync-qdevice [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-4ubuntu1.1] [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] [16:54] * Laney tries hoogle 17.15 [16:55] if not I guess we can punt hoogle and lambdabot-plugins out of groovy [16:56] Laney, how about dropping them out first, then trying other things later? [16:56] i'd love to get glibc rolling [16:56] can an archive admin reject xca for focal-backports? [16:56] accidentally sent to ubuntu instead of a ppa [16:57] (my bad!0 [16:57] (was working on a test-build and uploaded the wrong file - which was to focal-backports as well, my fault for having too many similar versions and trying to work from a phone keyboard) [16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid3 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.12-1ubuntu7.14] [17:03] bdmurray: Thanks! :) [17:04] Laney, rbalint: I agree, we should droop haskell-hoogle + lambdabot-plugins from release pocket immediately to unblock the transition, then if we get a solution for haskell-hoogle to let it back in naturally later [17:07] yes, I've done it [17:09] also a rebuild of 17.15 actually does work, so let me roll that back and rebuild too, at least then we can still have the thing [17:09] LocutusOfBorg: FYI in case you want to bisect or something [17:17] please someone binNMU the hoogle binaries as they come through [17:17] binNEW* [17:17] should have done the removals in a different order [17:19] rbasak: Don't bother reviewing the ubuntu-release-upgrader upload, I'll have another one shortly. [17:20] Laney, I can't reproduce on debian armhf porterbox, or pbuilder-dist groovy armhf local chroot... [17:21] can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ? [17:21] Debian bug 969715 in src:petsc4py "petsc4py: autopkgtest regression on ppc64el" [Serious,Open] [17:21] LocutusOfBorg: happened for me with great ease on the lxd/armhf pi I mentioned [17:21] guess you could take this as a chance to set up a nice armhf env for yourself [17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] (no packageset) [17:27] bdmurray, i've updated https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal/+merge/390395 to change ubuntu-sru, please take a look [17:29] rbalint: did you notice that systemd got broken in focal in august btw? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/focal/amd64 [17:29] sad for that to happen in a stable release :( [17:30] bdmurray: np. I skipped that already because it's waiting on SRU information - someone already asked IIRC [17:32] Laney yeah that's because systemd-fsckd is failing, i believe it's a kernel upgrade that broke it, but discussed in lp: #1892358 [17:32] Launchpad bug 1892358 in util-linux (Ubuntu Focal) "autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1892358 [17:33] i'm gonna try to kick the systemd-fsckd test to get it passing...i wish systemd-fsckd got upstreamed, we've been carrying it for years [17:33] ddstreet: ah ok, thanks [17:34] Laney is there a good way to get access to an armhf system? i got haveged updated but it is failing on armhf because it segfaults... [17:34] but only armhf [17:34] i guess i could get on a arm64 and create armhf container? [17:37] ddstreet: that's what I've done in canonistack [17:38] sigh, well i just tried to deploy an arm64 instance and got a deploy error in canonistack :( [17:39] although I recently realized it doesn't work for machine isolation tests [17:39] ddstreet: what error? [17:39] | 5514ce89-1c9a-4ffb-88ab-b759c9c05597 | test-arm | ERROR | | ubuntu/ubuntu-groovy-daily-arm64-server-20200909-disk1.img | m1.large | [17:39] i'll try deploying again and dig farther if it fails again... [17:40] there aren't groovy images [17:40] So I use focal as my base [17:40] yeah, that, use sbuild or lxd [17:41] you need to do something like that anyway as you'd have an arm64 host [17:41] ugh, well the error is: | fault | {'code': 500, 'created': '2020-09-09T17:40:26Z', 'message': 'No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.'} | [17:41] sigh [17:41] well, I'm not giving my hosts up! [17:42] lol [17:42] i was trying to create m1.large, i'll try with m1.small [17:42] you could do ssh-import-id lp:ddstreet and share! [17:42] m1.large might be ambitious though, fair [17:44] Laney: oh, that's an idea [17:44] :) [17:44] on that note, see you tomorrow [17:46] ddstreet: let me know if you want access to a arm64 system [17:47] bdmurray i might be able to use one of the pi systems i have, i'll try that [18:14] rbalint: I find the description of bug 1894828 - why is there ldirectord stuff in there? [18:14] bug 1894828 in badger (Ubuntu Focal) "badger autopkgtest fails in focal " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894828 [18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] (no packageset) [19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.25 => 1:20.04.27] (core) [19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] [19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] [19:34] Laney, also there is a hint, please accept it until the test is fixed https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/390005 [19:51] bdmurray, my bad, fixed. [19:52] got a patch for groovy here (since past deiban import freeze) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1895020 [19:52] Ubuntu bug 1895020 in cinnamon (Ubuntu) "[Groovy Patch] Network applet - List of Wireless Networks doesn't refresh properly when clicking the applet logo" [Undecided,New] [19:52] took 8 days, 16 hours, 12 minutes, 41.9 seconds [19:52] oh boy [19:54] er does lambdabot need to be removed from release or something? [19:54] Laney, vorlon: around-p? [19:55] nil :P [19:55] mwhudson: I just force'd lambdabot [19:56] cool, then i think libffi should go [19:56] reverse-depends didn't report lambdabot as a rev-build-dep of haskell-lambdabot-haskell-plugins, so it looks like this may be a new build-dep only in -proposed [19:56] yeah i think so [19:57] anyway I'm -1 on build-deps being a blocker for p-m so will route around when convenient [19:58] I thought libffi was already in and I syncd haskell-gi-harfbuzz [19:59] the copyright fixes you requested... [20:00] interestingly, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-harfbuzz/+publishinghistory shows haskell-gi-harfbuzz as 'pending' for release, so maybe it is done in the currently-running britney? [20:01] vorlon, Laney can i have a green light for LP: #1894434 to publish from the bileto ppa after libffi migrated? [20:01] Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894434 [20:02] vorlon, Laney i'd then stay up a bit more to see if i can press the publish button tonight [20:03] yes vorlon it migrated [20:03] \o/ [20:04] and also libffi yay [20:16] rbalint: ^^ [20:17] vorlon, yes, great! [20:17] vorlon, can i please go ahead with glibc? [20:18] rbalint: looks like it to me [20:19] vorlon, could you please comment on the ffe bug to make that even more official?;) [20:19] rbalint: was the ffe not already approved? [20:20] kanashiro, I syncd your ruby autopkgtest fixes but they looks like fixed only on amd64... [20:21] vorlon, Laney's comments where not clearly an approval as i read them [20:21] rbalint: bug #? [20:21] LP: #1894434 [20:21] Launchpad bug 1894434 in glibc (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept glibc 2.32-0ubuntu1 to Groovy" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894434 [20:22] LocutusOfBorg: I noticed those failures, some issue with webpack in non-amd64 arches [20:22] yep :) [20:23] now for rails, we need to find an archive-admin willing to do ~10 removal of stuff already out from debian testing... [20:24] LocutusOfBorg: I was thinking about to let Rails 6 to the next cycle, some rails apps were removed from Debian testing to let it migrate there [20:24] we'd need to do the same in Ubuntu [20:24] yes, we need an archive admin willing to do it [20:24] vorlon, ^^ opinion? :) [20:24] and the only reason to have rails in the archive is to support the packages rails apps [20:25] and some upstream projects do not support it yet [20:25] s/packages/packaged [20:29] yay libffi migrated [20:30] oh and ghc too [20:30] rbalint: approved [20:30] mwhudson: a package deal [20:31] LocutusOfBorg, kanashiro: I have no problem doing the removals; for source removals I do want a bug reference of some kind, either the related RC Debian bug or a new bug filed in LP [20:33] vorlon: what do you think if we finish the rails 6 transition in the next cycle and give more time for upstream projects to support it? [20:35] vorlon, thanks, publishing... === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand === ahayzen_ is now known as ahayzen [20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4] [20:42] xnox: grub2-signed/focal upload references a bug with no grub-related tasks open [20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core) [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4] [21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core) [21:08] mwhudson: fyi kicking off a bunch of no-change rebuilds now for packages built-using golang-1.[89] (so far); only one of these was FTBFS according to the last report, and I removed it (flannel) [21:08] vorlon: ah cool [21:09] aw geez there are even some for golang-1.7 [21:09] but i think none for 1.6 [21:09] i wonder if that's just because the tooling was too old to update built-using correctly then :) [21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4] [21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 => 6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset) [21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (bionic-proposed/main) [2.27-3ubuntu1.2 => 2.27-3ubuntu1.3] (core) [21:58] bdmurray, do you step in for sil2100 for tomorrow's sru shift? in that case it would be nice if glibc could be reviewed ^ [22:02] vorlon: correct, it is meant to reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1894824 [22:02] Ubuntu bug 1894824 in grub2-signed (Ubuntu Focal) "compare grub efi during build" [Undecided,New] [22:08] vorlon: better grub2-signed uploaded [22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.5 => 1.142.6] (core) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-arista (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.1.5~git2020041316.382e8a9-0ubuntu1 => 2019.2.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6] [22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6] [22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1084.95] (no packageset) [22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58] (kernel) [22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1070.73] (no packageset) [22:27] horay libffi migrated [22:27] rbalint: libffi migrated =) horay [23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95] [23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58] [23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1070.73]