[01:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pluma [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1]
[02:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-system-monitor [source] (focal-proposed) [1.24.1-0ubuntu1]
[02:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[03:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 45 entries have been added or removed
[05:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.3 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.4] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[06:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (focal-proposed/main) [1.6.4-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.4-3ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:04] <Laney> teward: If you can upload there it'll end up in new or unapproved, try it
[08:49] <apw> don't you have to be a member of ubuntu-backporters?
[08:51] <Laney> apw: only to approve, not sure about to upload
[08:52] <Laney> think that might be motu or just regular archive permissions, can't remember exactly
[08:53] <apw> that is a thing i ought to know how to find out ... hmmmm
[08:54] <RikMills> the wiki seems to suggest that members of the 'backports team' should upload
[08:55] <RikMills> but..... last edited 2013-12-05
[08:56] <RikMills> actually last edited 2013-12-05
[08:56] <Laney> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/m6nZq8vGXQ/
[08:56] <RikMills> *2012-05-23
[08:56] <Laney> I think because that doesn't specify a pocket, it means all pockets including backports
[08:57] <Laney> RikMills: yeah, that's the main thing that means the backports project is a bit comatose
[08:57] <Laney> we wanted to move it to more like SRUs
[08:57] <Laney> but nobody's had the time to rewrite the policy yet
[08:57] <RikMills> logical
[08:58] <Laney> so it's an open task if somebody wants to help :-)
[08:59] <RikMills> anything I might want to realistically backport is probably better sourced via snap/flatpak etc
[09:01] <apw> Laney, oddly you for instance also have: Archive Upload Rights for ubuntu-backporters: archive 'primary', pocket 'Backports'
[09:02] <apw> (but i assume that is belt and braces)
[09:03] <Laney> apw: Yeah, an additional row in the ACLs
[09:03] <Laney> I guess so if there is a backporter who is not in core-dev for example, they can actually upload anything to backports via that one
[09:04] <Laney> I wonder if ubuntu-sru should have this for updates - afaik upload rights are needed for copying (releasing SRUs)
[09:04] <apw> giving them queue rights and not upload rights would be unusual for sure
[09:06] <apw> Laney, i don't think that could be true, else you would not be able to have released sru's as ubuntu-sru, and one can
[09:06] <apw> oh i see no because we assume you are an ubuntu-core-dev before becoming ubuntu-sru
[09:07] <apw> and you get to upload to any pocket via that, just only accept them in Updates
[09:08] <apw> though ubuntu-security does have the upload component.  we are inconsistent that is for sure
[09:18] <Laney> Yeah I think all SRU members are also core-devs
[09:18] <Laney> perhaps that's a policy the team has
[10:03] <paride> bdmurray, fixed the tags in LP: #1874362.
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel)
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-118.119] (core, kernel)
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-staryu-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-pinsir-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-meowth-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-stella.cmit-eevee-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-caterpie-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119]
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-118.119]
[12:17] <ahasenack> hi release team, I filed an FFe bug and subscribed ~ubuntu-release. I also set it to "in progress" because I have an MP attached to it already, but was wondering if that bug state would hide it from your filter?
[12:17] <ahasenack> should I set it to "new" instead?
[12:17] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1894838 fwiw
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1.456] (core)
[12:52] <xnox> Laney:  ^^^ please review =)
[13:25] <Laney> yus
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[13:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected haveged [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-6ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[13:45] <Laney> omg
[13:45] <Laney> ghc finished
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.456]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-meta [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.456]
[14:03] <Laney> rbalint: hi SRU vanguard. Do you mind if I action https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1894096 ?
[14:09] <Laney> sorry rbalint!
[14:09] <Laney> rbasak: ^
[14:11] <teward> *waves at Laney*
[14:11] <Laney> hi teward
[14:11] <teward> rbasak: when you get a few minutes, got a question for you - Server team related.
[14:12] <teward> but no rush
[14:38] <rbasak> o/
[14:41] <rbasak> Laney: no objection from me, but I don't think I can give a +1 on behalf of the SRU team here. It's a pretty odd case.
[14:42] <Laney> I don't mind carrying the can, just didn't want to step on any SRU toes
[14:42] <rbasak> I don't think any SRU toes are involved here - thanks :)
[14:43] <rbasak> teward: pong, but please just ask questions without pinging first. You know how it works :)
[14:44] <Laney> 💣
[14:58] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: tuxguitar is arch:any and has a dependency on swt4-gtk; and there are other packages in the rev-build-dep list that build arch: any binaries (openjfx, libjogl2-java)
[14:59] <vorlon> wooo ghc built/published
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, if you have a full list I can open Debian rc bugs...
[15:19] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, haskell-hoogle/armhf, can we do a test with big-packages?
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> this seems the last blocker for libffi/ghc/ocaml
[15:20] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: that's the full list
[15:20] <vorlon> tuxguitar, openjfx, libjogl2-java
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[15:21] <Laney> there is no such thing as big packages for armhf
[15:21] <vorlon> because the containers don't actually have hard memory limits, correct
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> sad, so what can we do?
[15:24] <vorlon> do you know that it's a memory issue?
[15:24] <LocutusOfBorg> not anymore, after the last few runs its not timeouting
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> seems a regression in last haskell-hoogle...
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> :(
[15:25] <Laney> it's a bit suspiciously like 5.0.18 is broken to me
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> yep, agreed
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> looks broken on 32bit maybe, lets try on debian porterbox
[15:27]  * Laney runs it on this here raspberry pi
[15:27] <Laney> very convenient for armhf/64 autopkgtests, much recommended
[15:29] <bdmurray> Laney: How does that compare in terms of speed to using canonistack?
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I have a raspberrypi here, but runs my custom yocto-based os... :/
[15:30] <Laney> bdmurray: seems better, maybe mainly because I have good IO on it
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[15:34] <Laney> whoops, it passed, because I forgot to take hoogle from proposed
[15:34]  * Laney le fail
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, works on debian porterbox...
[15:36] <LocutusOfBorg> but ghc is 8.8.4 here
[15:37] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: I'll have a new upload of that one soon. Just going to redo it and apply the delta from 0.9.23a1.
[15:40] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: okay, feel free to ping me
[15:48] <bdmurray> Laney: Hey fellow release team member could you take a look at bug 1894919 and the set of packages that will get removed if I make this change?
[15:49] <Laney> bdmurray: what, that list is supposed to be the packages considered for removal just by adding gnome-software-plugin-snap?
[15:51] <bdmurray> Laney: yes, they were previously held back because of gnome-software-plugin-snap
[15:51] <Laney> kernels and bits of xorg
[15:51] <Laney> how can this be?
[15:53] <bdmurray> I believe a full set of changes is gotten and if any package in that set is not itself a removal candidate then nothing gets removed.
[15:55] <Laney> I see, so it can be accumulated cruft
[15:55] <bdmurray> https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/tree/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeCache.py#n947
[15:55] <Laney> well I don't see anything particularly problematic there
[15:55] <bdmurray> Right, I'll could run another upgrade w/o the gnome-software-plugin-snap change and I believe most of those will show up as autoremovable after the upgrade.
[16:00] <rbalint> Laney, could you please drop haskell-hoogle from groovy-proposed? it holds back the libffi transition
[16:00] <rbalint> vorlon, ^?
[16:00] <Laney> We're just discussing it now.
[16:01] <Laney> It can't just be dropped as it is a part of the transition
[16:01] <Laney> Maybe the previous version can be rebuilt though
[16:01] <Laney> I've got a call, feel free to upload a rebuild of .17 to a silo
[16:02] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, <BTS> Opened #969975 in ftp.debian.org by Gianfranco Costamagna (locutusofborg) «RM: openjfx tuxguitar libjogl2-java [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- RoQA; NBS». https://bugs.debian.org/969975
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, FYI I diffed ghc build logs and the major difference I found on armhf is gcc-9 -> gcc-10
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg> so I'm doing a test build with gcc-9 everywhere, lets see how "fast" it goes
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xca (focal-backports/universe) [2.2.1-1 => 2.3.0-1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rapid-photo-downloader (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntustudio)
[16:29] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: ^ should have a much cleaner diff
[16:36] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: In fact, the diff LGTM.
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync-qdevice [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-4ubuntu1.1]
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rapid-photo-downloader [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.23a1-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[16:54]  * Laney tries hoogle 17.15
[16:55] <Laney> if not I guess we can punt hoogle and lambdabot-plugins out of groovy
[16:56] <rbalint> Laney, how about dropping them out first, then trying other things later?
[16:56] <rbalint> i'd love to get glibc rolling
[16:56] <teward> can an archive admin reject xca for focal-backports?
[16:56] <teward> accidentally sent to ubuntu instead of a ppa
[16:57] <teward> (my bad!0
[16:57] <teward> (was working on a test-build and uploaded the wrong file - which was to focal-backports as well, my fault for having too many similar versions and trying to work from a phone keyboard)
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid3 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.12-1ubuntu7.14]
[17:03] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: Thanks! :)
[17:04] <vorlon> Laney, rbalint: I agree, we should droop haskell-hoogle + lambdabot-plugins from release pocket immediately to unblock the transition, then if we get a solution for haskell-hoogle to let it back in naturally later
[17:07] <Laney> yes, I've done it
[17:09] <Laney> also a rebuild of 17.15 actually does work, so let me roll that back and rebuild too, at least then we can still have the thing
[17:09] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: FYI in case you want to bisect or something
[17:17] <Laney> please someone binNMU the hoogle binaries as they come through
[17:17] <Laney> binNEW*
[17:17] <Laney> should have done the removals in a different order
[17:19] <bdmurray> rbasak: Don't bother reviewing the ubuntu-release-upgrader upload, I'll have another one shortly.
[17:20] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I can't reproduce on debian armhf porterbox, or pbuilder-dist groovy armhf local chroot...
[17:21] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please hint petsc4py/ppc64el regressed in relase and Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969715 ?
[17:21] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: happened for me with great ease on the lxd/armhf pi I mentioned
[17:21] <Laney> guess you could take this as a chance to set up a nice armhf env for yourself
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] (no packageset)
[17:27] <rbalint> bdmurray, i've updated https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal/+merge/390395 to change ubuntu-sru, please take a look
[17:29] <Laney> rbalint: did you notice that systemd got broken in focal in august btw? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/focal/amd64
[17:29] <Laney> sad for that to happen in a stable release :(
[17:30] <rbasak> bdmurray: np. I skipped that already because it's waiting on SRU information - someone already asked IIRC
[17:32] <ddstreet> Laney yeah that's because systemd-fsckd is failing, i believe it's a kernel upgrade that broke it, but discussed in lp: #1892358
[17:33] <ddstreet> i'm gonna try to kick the systemd-fsckd test to get it passing...i wish systemd-fsckd got upstreamed, we've been carrying it for years
[17:33] <Laney> ddstreet: ah ok, thanks
[17:34] <ddstreet> Laney is there a good way to get access to an armhf system? i got haveged updated but it is failing on armhf because it segfaults...
[17:34] <ddstreet> but only armhf
[17:34] <ddstreet> i guess i could get on a arm64 and create armhf container?
[17:37] <bdmurray> ddstreet: that's what I've done in canonistack
[17:38] <ddstreet> sigh, well i just tried to deploy an arm64 instance and got a deploy error in canonistack :(
[17:39] <bdmurray> although I recently realized it doesn't work for machine isolation tests
[17:39] <bdmurray> ddstreet: what error?
[17:39] <ddstreet> | 5514ce89-1c9a-4ffb-88ab-b759c9c05597 | test-arm                                | ERROR   |                                            | ubuntu/ubuntu-groovy-daily-arm64-server-20200909-disk1.img | m1.large         |
[17:39] <ddstreet> i'll try deploying again and dig farther if it fails again...
[17:40] <bdmurray> there aren't groovy images
[17:40] <bdmurray> So I use focal as my base
[17:40] <Laney> yeah, that, use sbuild or lxd
[17:41] <Laney> you need to do something like that anyway as you'd have an arm64 host
[17:41] <ddstreet> ugh, well the error is: | fault                       | {'code': 500, 'created': '2020-09-09T17:40:26Z', 'message': 'No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.'} |
[17:41] <ddstreet> sigh
[17:41] <bdmurray> well, I'm not giving my hosts up!
[17:42] <ddstreet> lol
[17:42] <ddstreet> i was trying to create m1.large, i'll try with m1.small
[17:42] <Laney> you could do ssh-import-id lp:ddstreet and share!
[17:42] <Laney> m1.large might be ambitious though, fair
[17:44] <bdmurray> Laney: oh, that's an idea
[17:44] <Laney> :)
[17:44] <Laney> on that note, see you tomorrow
[17:46] <bdmurray> ddstreet: let me know if you want access to a arm64 system
[17:47] <ddstreet> bdmurray i might be able to use one of the pi systems i have, i'll try that
[18:14] <bdmurray> rbalint: I find the description of bug 1894828 - why is there ldirectord stuff in there?
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2] (no packageset)
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.25 => 1:20.04.27] (core)
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2]
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hoogle [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.0.17.15+dfsg1-2build2]
[19:34] <rbalint> Laney, also there is a hint, please accept it until the test is fixed https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-disable-systemd/+merge/390005
[19:51] <rbalint> bdmurray, my bad, fixed.
[19:52] <ItzSwirlz> got a patch for groovy here (since past deiban import freeze) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1895020
[19:52] <mwhudson> took 8 days, 16 hours, 12 minutes, 41.9 seconds
[19:52] <mwhudson> oh boy
[19:54] <mwhudson> er does lambdabot need to be removed from release or something?
[19:54] <mwhudson> Laney, vorlon: around-p?
[19:55] <vorlon> nil :P
[19:55] <vorlon> mwhudson: I just force'd lambdabot
[19:56] <mwhudson> cool, then i think libffi should go
[19:56] <vorlon> reverse-depends didn't report lambdabot as a rev-build-dep of haskell-lambdabot-haskell-plugins, so it looks like this may be a new build-dep only in -proposed
[19:56] <mwhudson> yeah i think so
[19:57] <vorlon> anyway I'm -1 on build-deps being a blocker for p-m so will route around when convenient
[19:58] <LocutusOfBorg> I thought libffi was already in and I syncd haskell-gi-harfbuzz
[19:59] <LocutusOfBorg> the copyright fixes you requested...
[20:00] <vorlon> interestingly, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-gi-harfbuzz/+publishinghistory shows haskell-gi-harfbuzz as 'pending' for release, so maybe it is done in the currently-running britney?
[20:01] <rbalint> vorlon, Laney can i have a green light for LP: #1894434 to publish from the bileto ppa after libffi migrated?
[20:02] <rbalint> vorlon, Laney i'd then stay up a bit more to see if i can press the publish button tonight
[20:03] <LocutusOfBorg> yes vorlon it migrated
[20:03] <vorlon> \o/
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> and also libffi yay
[20:16] <vorlon> rbalint: ^^
[20:17] <rbalint> vorlon, yes, great!
[20:17] <rbalint> vorlon, can i please go ahead with glibc?
[20:18] <vorlon> rbalint: looks like it to me
[20:19] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please comment on the ffe bug to make that even more official?;)
[20:19] <vorlon> rbalint: was the ffe not already approved?
[20:20] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, I syncd your ruby autopkgtest fixes but they looks like fixed only on amd64...
[20:21] <rbalint> vorlon, Laney's comments where not clearly an approval as i read them
[20:21] <vorlon> rbalint: bug #?
[20:21] <rbalint> LP: #1894434
[20:22] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg: I noticed those failures, some issue with webpack in non-amd64 arches
[20:22] <LocutusOfBorg> yep :)
[20:23] <LocutusOfBorg> now for rails, we need to find an archive-admin willing to do ~10 removal of stuff already out from debian testing...
[20:24] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg: I was thinking about to let Rails 6 to the next cycle, some rails apps were removed from Debian testing to let it migrate there
[20:24] <kanashiro> we'd need to do the same in Ubuntu
[20:24] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, we need an archive admin willing to do it
[20:24] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ opinion? :)
[20:24] <kanashiro> and the only reason to have rails in the archive is to support the packages rails apps
[20:25] <kanashiro> and some upstream projects do not support it yet
[20:25] <kanashiro> s/packages/packaged
[20:29] <mwhudson> yay libffi migrated
[20:30] <mwhudson> oh and ghc too
[20:30] <vorlon> rbalint: approved
[20:30] <vorlon> mwhudson: a package deal
[20:31] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg, kanashiro: I have no problem doing the removals; for source removals I do want a bug reference of some kind, either the related RC Debian bug or a new bug filed in LP
[20:33] <kanashiro> vorlon: what do you think if we finish the rails 6 transition in the next cycle and give more time for upstream projects to support it?
[20:35] <rbalint> vorlon, thanks, publishing...
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4]
[20:42] <vorlon> xnox: grub2-signed/focal upload references a bug with no grub-related tasks open
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core)
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4]
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.4] (core)
[21:08] <vorlon> mwhudson: fyi kicking off a bunch of no-change rebuilds now for packages built-using golang-1.[89] (so far); only one of these was FTBFS according to the last report, and I removed it (flannel)
[21:08] <mwhudson> vorlon: ah cool
[21:09] <vorlon> aw geez there are even some for golang-1.7
[21:09] <mwhudson> but i think none for 1.6
[21:09] <mwhudson> i wonder if that's just because the tooling was too old to update built-using correctly then :)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.4]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scilab (focal-proposed/universe) [6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu3 => 6.1.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glibc (bionic-proposed/main) [2.27-3ubuntu1.2 => 2.27-3ubuntu1.3] (core)
[21:58] <rbalint> bdmurray, do you step in for sil2100 for tomorrow's sru shift? in that case it would be nice if glibc could be reviewed ^
[22:02] <xnox> vorlon:  correct, it is meant to reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1894824
[22:08] <xnox> vorlon:  better grub2-signed uploaded
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.142.5 => 1.142.6] (core)
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: networking-arista (focal-proposed/universe) [2019.1.5~git2020041316.382e8a9-0ubuntu1 => 2019.2.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6]
[22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.142.6]
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1084.95] (no packageset)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58] (kernel)
[22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1070.73] (no packageset)
[22:27] <xnox> horay libffi migrated
[22:27] <xnox> rbalint:  libffi migrated =) horay
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1084.95]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1070.73]